logo
Mayor Adams gives Bally's Bronx casino bid second chance, vetoes NYC Council vote

Mayor Adams gives Bally's Bronx casino bid second chance, vetoes NYC Council vote

Yahoo2 days ago
Bally's bid to build a casino in the Bronx has been given a second chance after Mayor Adams on Wednesday vetoed a City Council measure that would have killed the proposal.
The Council, which voted to shut down the proposal last month, could still override the mayor's veto with a two-thirds majority vote.
Adams said his decision will 're-level the playing field and allow the Bronx to have a seat at the table, rather than give an unfair advantage to the other bidders and boroughs.'
'The City Council's decision to treat the Bronx differently than other boroughs goes against the publicly stated, in-favor positions of the Bronx borough president and other Council members representing working-class neighborhoods across the Bronx,' the mayor said in a statement.
Frank Carone, the mayor's campaign chairperson, is a consultant on the Bally's project, and Vito Pitta, the campaign's lawyer, has also been a lobbyist for the casino bid.
'To make myself abundantly clear, this is not an endorsement or expression of support giving a leg up to any casino bid over the others as the City Council has tried to do, but an action I feel is necessary to best ensure a fair and competitive process,' Adams said.
Carone said Wednesday he has had 'zero' conversations with the mayor about the Bally's bid. Pitta didn't immediately return a request for comment.
The Trump Organization also stands to gain $115 million if the casino goes through.
The Council voted 29-to-9 against the proposal at a July 14 meeting, following an unofficial practice called 'member deference' by lining up behind local Council member Kristy Marmorato, who opposes the project, which would be in her district.
The mayor has indicated he wants to chip away at member deference, and his Charter Revision Commission has moved forward ballot proposals to limit the practice.
Mara Davis, a spokesperson for the City Council speaker, slammed the mayor in a statement, saying he should put his efforts toward building more housing instead of protecting the Bronx casino bid, which doesn't include any housing.
'This administration's hypocrisy and unethical conduct is well documented and has been witnessed by all New Yorkers, so the mayor's words have no credibility,' Davis said. 'The Council will consider its next steps on this land-use application.'
Marmorato and a spokesperson for Bally's did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Bally's would need city approval to change the potential casino site's zoning from parkland to mixed-use development.
With Chris Sommerfeldt
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court tees up Louisiana case on whether racial redistricting is unconstitutional
Supreme Court tees up Louisiana case on whether racial redistricting is unconstitutional

CBS News

time2 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Supreme Court tees up Louisiana case on whether racial redistricting is unconstitutional

The Supreme Court has teed up a major case for next term on whether racial redistricting is unconstitutional. In a Friday night scheduling order, the high court asked parties to file briefs on whether Louisiana's creation of a second majority-minority House seat violates the 14th or 15th Amendments. The question could significantly curtail efforts to force states to create majority-minority congressional districts. The order is part of a case from the 2024 term regarding Louisiana's congressional map that justices decided to hold over for re-argument. The justices set a deadline of Aug. 27 for briefs to be filed by appellants on the question. Reply briefs are due Oct. 3, the Friday before the beginning of the 2025 session. In June, the Supreme Court ordered further arguments over Louisiana's congressional map that was approved by the state's GOP-led legislature and created a second majority-Black district. An order from the court issued on the last day of the 2024 term restored the case to its calendar for reargument. Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the move to order more arguments and said the court should have decided the case. The move meant the state's map with two majority-Black districts would remain intact for now. The district lines at the center of the dispute were invalidated in 2022 by a three-judge lower court panel, which sided with a group of self-described "non-African-American voters" who had challenged the House map as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The map wasn't the first crafted by the state's Republican-led legislature in the wake of the 2020 Census. Instead, Louisiana's efforts to redraw district lines, as all states do after the census, have resulted in a yearslong legal battle that has been before the Supreme Court twice before. The case demonstrated the challenges state lawmakers face when trying to balance trying to comply with the Voting Rights Act without relying too much on race in the drawing the political lines, which can run afoul of the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause. The Supreme Court's decision is also likely to have implications for the balance of power in the House in the 2026 midterm elections, when Republicans will try to hold onto their tiny Crawford contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store