Former senior church member sentenced for sexual assault of teen girl
The 50-year-old man, from Christies Beach, was sentenced in South Australia's District Court on Wednesday after previously pleading guilty to one count of unlawful sexual intercourse.
In sentencing, Judge Liesl Kudelka said she accepted the man was "genuinely remorseful and [had] taken steps in the past to apologise" but that he "should have known better".
"I do not consider there is any risk of you reoffending, however the harm is done."
Prosecutor Mitch Mott previously told the court the man was a "respected" member of the Impact Church at the time and had shown "continuing interest in the complainant".
Judge Kudelka outlined the events of that evening in her sentence and said the teenager had been staying with the then 29-year-old man to help look after his two children while his wife was away.
"The two of you drank alcohol together, I understand it was not usual for you to drink alcohol, you kissed her when you were both sitting on the couch, the two of you then moved to the bedroom [where the charged offending occurred]," she said.
"In the next day or so you drove [her] to a playground and kissed her when you were both at the top of the play equipment.
"You say you were trying to explain to her that the sexual contact that happened before should not have happened and could not continue.
"It seems, however, you didn't do a very good job of that on that day because you ended up kissing her."
The kiss in the days after the offending is not subject to any charges.
Judge Kudelka said the teenager was "vulnerable and struggling with challenges" at the time of the offending and "feels [the man] groomed her".
"As a 29-year-old man you took sexual advantage of a 14-year-old child," she said.
The man was sentenced to 16-months' imprisonment which was reduced to 12-months due to his early guilty plea.
He will be eligible for parole in four months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
26 minutes ago
- ABC News
Byron Bay night-precinct plan sparks fears of alcohol-fuelled violence
Byron Bay residents are worried a plan to boost the tourism hotspot's nightlife will lead to an increase in alcohol-fuelled violence. The NSW government announced in April that Byron Bay would be the first town outside of Sydney to trial a special entertainment precinct (SEP), as part of a strategy to boost its night-time economy. The move would allow the local council to designate an area in the CBD where trading hours and sound conditions could be relaxed for hospitality venues, live music, and special events. Enmore Road in Sydney became the first permanent SEP in December 2023, and other trials have started around the Chinatown Night Markets in Burwood and Fairfield. But the plan has drawn strong criticism from some residents, with about 150 people attending a community meeting on Tuesday night to raise their concerns. Among them was emergency medicine specialist Blake Eddington, who said extended nightlife trading could put lives at risk. "Seeing teenagers and young people mindlessly assaulted, some of them with life-threatening conditions, that are completely preventable by drinking less alcohol and not having venues stay open until 3, 4, 5 o'clock in the morning." Other medical professionals who spoke at the meeting said local health services, paramedics and police were at capacity, and not equipped to handle an increase in cases. Some speakers at the meeting raised two recent incidents which had shaken the Byron Bay community, including a fight outside a busy cafe last week, and an assault in which a 25-year-old suffered serious head injuries after he was reportedly attacked in a car park by six young men. Data from the Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (BOCSAR) showed there were 251 non-domestic-violence-related assaults in the Byron Shire in the 12 months to March — a ratio 1.6 times the statewide rate per 100,000 residents. The BOCSAR website warns crime rates could appear distorted in areas with high visitor populations because the resident population is smaller than the total number of people in the area. It also notes many assaults are not reported to police and are therefore not captured in BOCSAR data. Byron Bay Chamber of Commerce president Matt Williamson said businesses were not necessarily looking to extend their late-night trading, but were keen to try initiatives that could boost the town's "vibrancy". In April, Byron Shire Council received a grant of $162,800 to kickstart community consultation and begin planning the trial. Mr Williamson said consultation so far had been lacking. Concerns about alcohol-related violence prompted a community-led campaign in 2013 called Last Drinks at 12. Byron resident Chris Hanley was part of that initiative, and told ABC North Coast Breakfast the same fears had surfaced again. "Nothing will stop new operators and different people going into the future who do want to … open their venues to the wee small hours and disturb our community," he said. "To have more culture and vibrancy in a town … is easy to do — get council out of the way. "Get council to make it easy for businesses to have outside dining and street festivals." In a statement, NSW Police — which had officers at the community meeting — said Tweed/Byron Police were working alongside government, council, and community stakeholders in ongoing discussions about the SEP. The Byron Shire Council is set to hold information sessions for residents and businesses in August.
ABC News
26 minutes ago
- ABC News
Federal government investigates Magnetic South's alleged illegal land clearing
The federal government is investigating alleged illegal land clearing at the proposed site of a new coal mine at Dingo in central Queensland. Drone footage taken by the Queensland Conservation Council shows about 200 hectares of land have been cleared since May at the site, 120 kilometres west of Rockhampton. The proposed Gemini Coal Mine would be operated by mining company Magnetic South and have a 25-year life span. Queensland Conservation Council's gas and coal campaigner Charlie Cox said the area was inhabited by endangered species, including greater gliders and koalas. "The proposed mine is kind of between two national parks; it has high biodiversity value," she said. "We were able to put the drone up and see fresh green trees lying on the ground at the site that is proposed at this coal mine." Ms Cox said the mining company had not received approval for the land clearing under the federal government's Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (EPBC). A Magnetic South spokesperson said all the work had been done in accordance with the law. "The metallurgical coal project near Dingo in central Queensland takes its environmental obligations seriously and is committed to ensuring that all of its activities are carried out in compliance with applicable state and federal laws, including the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) and Environmental Protection Act 1994 (Qld)," they said. The spokesperson said all activities were conducted in line with the conditions set by the "not a controlled action (NCA)" guidelines. The term NCA, outlined in the EPBC, reflects an action that is unlikely to have an impact on protected species. The spokesperon also said the company had negotiated a Cultural Heritage Investigation and Management Agreement with Gaangalu Nation People, undertaken Aboriginal cultural heritage surveys before the clearing and collected all the identified artefacts. "Magnetic South … has Gaangalu Nation People field officers onsite when clearing activities take place to confirm there are no additional artefacts that were previously not found being disturbed," they said. A Department of Environment spokesperson said it was investigating the allegations and could not comment further at this stage. "Federal government documents say that it needs to be approved and put through the process, and they said that hasn't happened yet," Ms Cox said. If the company is found to have breached environmental laws, it could result in a penalty of up to $13 million. Traditional owners say they were not informed about the work before it began. Ghungalu woman Zhanae Dodd said traditional owners had been holding ceremonies on country for the past two weeks, after learning about the clearing. "We only became aware a month or so ago, so very recently, and through yarns that my elders had with other people," she said. The Ghungalu community has been fighting for a native title claim for almost 30 years. "Even though we haven't gotten native title, it has still been recognised that we are the traditional custodians of that country," Ms Dodd said. Magnetic South said it valued the relationships with the local community and other stakeholders. The investigation is ongoing.
ABC News
26 minutes ago
- ABC News
AFL Tribunal hands Demons' Steven May three-match ban for controversial collision
Melbourne's Steven May has received a three-match suspension for the controversial collision that concussed Francis Evans and left the Carlton forward with a broken nose and a chipped tooth. May's case was sent directly to the AFL Tribunal on Wednesday night, with the rough conduct charge graded as careless, severe impact and high contact. AFL Tribunal counsel Andrew Woods pushed for a three-match ban to be imposed, declaring May should have slowed down or changed direction to either avoid or lessen the collision. It was a position with which the three-person tribunal ultimately agreed, delivering a guilty verdict after deliberating for more than 90 minutes. May had pleaded not guilty, with his lawyer Adrian Anderson arguing his client's actions were not unreasonable. The premiership defender clashed with Evans at speed while attacking a loose ball in the Blues' eight-point win at the MCG on Saturday night. Given the rolling ball popped up during its final bounce, Evans arrived a fraction of a second earlier than his opponent, with a charging May making contact after continuing his trajectory. May was also concussed in the same match, and he thanked the AFL tribunal for pushing the hearing out to Wednesday instead of the usual Tuesday slot. During his evidence, he reiterated the fact he thought he would arrive at the bouncing ball first. "I definitely thought it was my ball given how the previous bounces reacted," May said. "Then it took an unusual bounce given the conditions. It actually bounced up and towards Evans, which I didn't anticipate." May's hands were still in front of him in a collect-the-ball type pose when his shoulder made contact with Evans's head. "I thought it was going to be in my hands. I just can't believe I didn't take possession," May said. "I thought I did everything right. I was shocked." In his findings, tribunal chair Jeff Gleeson said the evidence from the biomechanics expert showed May had only 0.56 seconds from the ball's final bounce until the moment of the collision, and that he would have needed at least 0.2 to 0.25 seconds to react. "We find, however, that May could and should have reacted before the moment of the last bounce of the ball," Gleeson said. "Even if, contrary to our view, May could and should not have reacted until the final bounce of the ball, we find that he had sufficient time to position his body so that he was no longer attempting to gather the ball. "It's important to note in this regard that May had a relatively long period of time to sum up the key features of the contest. "May ran a sufficient distance and had sufficient time with an unimpeded view of what was before him to determine what he could and should do in the likely event he did not reach the ball first or at the same time." AAP
