Adler Weighs Sale of Prized €3.5 Billion Berlin Rental Portfolio
Adler Group SA is weighing the sale of its prized portfolio of Berlin apartments, a deal that would mark a landmark step in the slow unraveling of the scandal-hit German landlord.
The company has heard pitches from investment banks seeking to win a role advising on the sale of the €3.5 billion ($4.1 billion) property portfolio, people with knowledge of the process said. The role includes advising on how to best structure the portfolio in order to maximize proceeds, the people said, asking not to be identified as the information is private.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
IEFA Is a Great Choice for Most, but I Like VEA ETF Better
IEFA is an exchange-traded fund that follows large-, mid- and small-cap stocks from developed markets outside the U.S. and Canada. VEA does much of the same work, but includes stocks from Canada and South Korea. If you're looking for international exposure to stocks from developed companies, VEA is a slightly better pick. 10 stocks we like better than Vanguard Tax-Managed Funds - Vanguard Ftse Developed Markets ETF › For investors in the United States, it's pretty easy to get overexposed to domestic stocks. These are the brands that you're most used to and the companies that you see every day. It's easy to load up on what you know. Heck, even Warren Buffett makes that a central theme of his investing. But you shouldn't forget about international exposure, and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are some of the best ways to get there. ETFs give you exposure to hundreds or thousands of stocks with the click of a button. And that's why funds like the iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (NYSEMKT: IEFA) are so popular. I actually think IEFA is a perfectly fine fund. But it's not my favorite for international exposure. There's a better option out there in the Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (NYSEMKT: VEA) Let's take a look at these two funds. IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE Investable Market Index, which is a market-cap weighted index that includes large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks from developed markets outside the U.S. and Canada. (EAFE stands for Europe, Australia and Asia, and the Far East.) Because it also excludes emerging markets, you won't find any stocks from nations like China, Brazil, or India. In total, IEFA includes 2,605 companies, with the top holdings including ASML, Nestle, Novo Nordisk, and AstraZeneca. The heaviest weighting in the fund is 1.4%, so you know you're getting some serious diversification. So far this year, IEFA is up 15.2%, which is better than the S&P 500's performance of 3.1%. Its five-year performance is nearly 39%. With an expense ratio of 0.07%, investors can expect to pay just $7 annually for each $10,000 they invest. Clearly, IFEA is an excellent fund, and it's widely held for good reason. I'm not sure you could call IEFA vs. VEA an apples-to-oranges comparison. It's more like comparing a good apple to one that's a little shinier. VEA tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. So it gives you access to small-, mid-, and large-cap stocks, in developed companies outside the U.S. But unlike IEFA, it also includes Canada and South Korea. That's why it tracks a whopping 3,839 companies, giving you even more diversification than IEFA. Top holdings also include ASML, Nestle, Novo Nordisk, and AstraZeneca. But you also find Toyota Motor in the top 10 of the VEA. No stock has a weighting of more than 1.3%. VEA also gives you slightly better returns. It's up nearly 16% so far this year and 40% in the last five years. And you get an even lower expense ratio of 0.03%, which means you're only paying $3 annually for each $10,000 you're investing. Metric IEFA VEA Expense ratio 0.07% 0.03% Year-to-date return 15.2% 15.9% Five-year return 38.7% 40.3% Equity holdings 2,605 3,839 Index tracked MSCI EAFE Investable Market Index FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index Data source: Morningstar, author research. There may be times when you want to invest in IEFA rather than VEA. For example, VEA might not be suitable if your portfolio already includes significant Canadian holdings, or is overweight in energy and natural resources, a sector where Canadian companies are prominent. But in general, if you're looking for the efficient, affordable way to get international exposure from developed countries, VEA is the better choice. It's slightly cheaper, it offers more diversification, and it outperforms the IEFA. If you're building a set-it-and-forget-it portfolio, those little differences can add up in the long run. Before you buy stock in Vanguard Tax-Managed Funds - Vanguard Ftse Developed Markets ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Vanguard Tax-Managed Funds - Vanguard Ftse Developed Markets ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Patrick Sanders has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends ASML and Vanguard Tax-Managed Funds - Vanguard Ftse Developed Markets ETF. The Motley Fool recommends AstraZeneca Plc, Nestlé, and Novo Nordisk. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. IEFA Is a Great Choice for Most, but I Like VEA ETF Better was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Refresco CEO Hans Roelofs to step down after 18-year tenure
Refresco CEO Hans Roelofs will step down in August, concluding an 18-year tenure with the Netherlands-based drinks manufacturer. In a statement issued yesterday (26 June), Refresco, majority-owned by private-equity firm KKR, said it had started a search for a new chief executive. Refresco supervisory board chairman and KKR partner James Cunningham thanked Roelofs for "positioning Refresco for continued success in the years to come as we continue to expand the company's footprint'. Roelofs joined Refresco in 2007 after spells at meat group Dumeco and agri-food business Nutreco. Through M&A and organic growth, Refresco is now a company with operations in 13 countries. The business has 75 manufacturing sites and employs more than 14,000 staff. KKR invested in the group in 2022. Reflecting on his decision to retire, Roelofs said: 'This is the right time for me to step back, confident that the company will continue to grow and thrive on its unique entrepreneurial spirit and the agility of its people.' In 2024, Refresco generated revenue of €5.99bn ($x), up 1% on a year earlier. The volume of drinks sold stood at 13.83bn litres, down from 14.25bn litres in 2023. Some 26% of the company's volumes were carbonated soft drinks, with another 26% generated through water products. Sport and energy drinks accounted for 15%. Earlier this month, Refresco agreed to acquire Norway-based soft-drinks manufacturer Telemark Kildevann (TKV). TKV operates two production facilities in the Norwegian towns of Fyresdal and Aurskog and supplies products to retailers and branded customers in Norway and Sweden. Last year, Refresco snapped up Spanish plant-based beverage maker Frías Nutrición, purchased a production site from German beverage group Berentzen-Gruppe and bought US-based VBC Bottling Company, a fellow contract manufacturer. In May last year, Rotterdam-based Refresco opened its first European plant-based production line in Germany, marking an entry into the oat drinks' market. As part of the deal for the Berentzen-Gruppe facility, Refresco also bought the mineral-water brands Märkisch Kristall and Grüneberg Quelle. Commending Roelofs' leadership, Refresco supervisory board member and PAI managing partner Frédéric Stévenin said: 'Refresco went through a period of unprecedented growth and transformation." "Refresco CEO Hans Roelofs to step down after 18-year tenure" was originally created and published by Just Drinks, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Starmer: Foreign affairs delayed me dealing with welfare rebellion
Sir Keir Starmer has said he did not get to grips with the growing rebellion over welfare reforms earlier as he was focused on international affairs. He also said he took ownership for his decisions and believed as leader he should 'carry the can' when things do not go well. The Prime Minister said he was occupied with the G7 and Nato summits and the escalating tensions in the Middle East for much of the past two weeks. He said he was 'heavily focused' on what was happening with Nato and the Middle East all weekend and that his 'full attention really bore down' on the welfare bill on Thursday. He defended the eventual U-turn, which came after more than 100 MPs launched a bid to kill the legislation with an amendment. 'Getting it right is more important than ploughing on with a package which doesn't necessarily achieve the desired outcome,' Sir Keir told The Sunday Times. He said all the decisions were his and that 'I take ownership of them'. There have been reports that rebel MPs blamed Sir Keir's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney for the Government's approach. Sir Keir said: 'My rule of leadership is, when things go well you get the plaudits; when things don't go well you carry the can. 'I take responsibility for all the decisions made by this government. I do not talk about staff and I'd much prefer it if everybody else didn't.' Ministers had hoped the reforms would get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year, but the concessions made leave Chancellor Rachel Reeves needing to find money elsewhere and point to possible tax rises in the autumn. On Saturday, the Prime Minister told the Welsh Labour conference the 'broken' welfare system must be fixed 'in a Labour way'. He said: 'We cannot take away the safety net that vulnerable people rely on, and we won't, but we also can't let it become a snare for those who can and want to work.' Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch will hit out at Sir Keir as 'incapable of sticking to a decision' after he backed down on his plans. The reforms would only have made 'modest reductions to the ballooning welfare bill', but the Prime Minister was 'too weak to hold the line', the Conservative Party leader is expected to say in a speech next week. The Government's original welfare package had restricted eligibility for Pip, the main disability payment in England, as well as cutting the health-related element of universal credit. Existing recipients were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition. Now, the changes to Pip will be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only, while all existing recipients of the health element of universal credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. The concessions on Pip alone protect some 370,000 people currently receiving the allowance who were set to lose out following reassessment. As a year in office nears, more than half of voters think Labour has underperformed in that time, polling released on Saturday showed. The Opinium survey showed 54% think Labour has done a worse job than expected, while 18% think the party has exceeded expectations.
