logo
Chicago transit budget crisis deepens as funding stalls in Springfield

Chicago transit budget crisis deepens as funding stalls in Springfield

Axios01-06-2025
After months of grave warnings by Chicago-area transit leaders, unions and commuters, the Illinois General Assembly passed a $55 billion budget without the funding and reform agencies hoped for.
Why it matters: Leaders warned they need $1.5 billion to prevent service cuts and layoffs at CTA, Metra and Pace.
State of play: The Senate approved a proposal Saturday that would create a new governing body for Chicago-area transit as well as revenue from a fee on Uber Eats, Amazon, and other online food and retail deliveries.
Yes, but: The House failed to take it up.
Catch up quick: The Regional Transit Authority (RTA), which oversees CTA, Metra commuter rail and Pace suburban bus service, launched the "Save Transit Now" campaign in April, which encouraged riders to tell state legislators to include transit funding in the 2026 budget.
A $770 million budget shortfall resulted from the expiration of COVID-era federal funding and a decline in ridership to pre-pandemic levels.
Friction point: Lawmakers repeated throughout the session that state funding would not come without reform, saying a streamlined governing body was needed as well as better efforts to address safety on trains and buses.
Additionally, the perennial issue in budget negotiations was at play, as downstate lawmakers pushed back against any legislation that would tax their districts to fund services their constituents don't use.
Zoom out: The bill that passed the Senate included a new agency called Northern Illinois Transit Authority (NITA), which would replace RTA to oversee CTA, Metra, and Pace.
NITA would have the authority to set and coordinate fares, allowing riders to use one fare card for all services.
It also includes plans for a task force of officers from the Cook County Sheriff's Office, and Chicago, Metra and Illinois State Police dedicated to crime mitigation on transit.
What they're saying: RTA spokesperson Tina Fassett Smith said in a statement that, "Balancing regional interests is challenging, but we are ready to continue our work to achieve consensus and deliver a solution."
"In the coming weeks, the RTA will work with the Service Boards on a regional budget that by law must only include funding we are confident the system will receive in 2026," Smith said.
Saturday's inaction "jeopardizes Illinois transit systems with expected cuts, massive layoffs, and service disruptions," Illinois AFL-CIO President Tim Drea said in a statement, adding that riders and workers are now "left concerned about the future of our communities."
Between the lines: Pritzker said Sunday funding transit quickly is imperative, but took a shot at RTA's $750,000 "Save Transit Now" campaign.
"I also would say that they'd have more money in their coffers if they hadn't spent money advertising here in Springfield to try to convince people of something that they really should be leaving to the legislators to decide," the governor said at a press conference.
What's next: Pritzker said transit funding remains a priority and expects lawmakers to revisit the issue in the coming months.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Escalates Nuclear Brinksmanship with Russia Over Social Media Spat
Trump Escalates Nuclear Brinksmanship with Russia Over Social Media Spat

Time​ Magazine

time29 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Trump Escalates Nuclear Brinksmanship with Russia Over Social Media Spat

President Donald Trump on Friday told Russia he was ordering two U.S. nuclear submarines to change course in response to comments made on social media by Russia's former president. It was a rare public escalation between the two nuclear superpowers and an unusual moment of brinksmanship in the atomic age played out in public and online. It was not immediately clear if any U.S. submarines changed their course. The Pentagon referred a request for more information to the White House, which did not immediately respond. Trump wrote the comments in response to former Russian president Dmitri Medvedev's online posts invoking reports about a Cold War-era Soviet nuclear strategy known as 'The Dead Hand' designed to deploy nuclear weapons even if the humans assigned to operate the weapons had been killed in a first strike. The Russian government has not officially confirmed the capability, but in 2011, a retired commander of Russia's Strategic Missile Forces claimed it could be reactivated if needed. Writing on his social media website Truth Social, Trump called Medvedev's statements 'highly provocative' and said he said he took action as a precaution. 'I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that,' Trump wrote. 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.' Trump was responding to an online post Medvedev wrote on Thursday that President Trump should remember movies about zombies and hinted at how 'dangerous' a Russian nuclear retaliation could be. 'Let him remember his favorite movies about 'The Walking Dead,' as well as how dangerous the non-existent in nature 'Dead Hand' can be,' Medvedev wrote. The online spat between Trump and Medvedev, who often serves as the Kremlin's Twitter troll, had played out earlier in the day. After Medvedev had rejected Trump's shorter deadline for Russia to agree to a peace deal in Ukraine, Trump criticized him on Truth Social. Trump told Medvedev to 'watch his words,' called him a 'failed former President of Russia,' and said he was 'entering very dangerous territory.' It's not the first time Trump has used social media to send a signal about the U.S. nuclear arsenal. In December 2016, after he was elected President the first time, Trump wrote on Twitter that the U.S. 'must greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability.' The comments at the time raised concerns that Trump would spark a new arms race by increasing the U.S. stockpile of nuclear weapons, which had been reduced through arms control agreements with Russia after the end of the Cold War. Trump has proposed increasing spending on nuclear forces, but the total number of U.S. warheads has declined since hitting a peak in the late 1960s and has largely remained the same in recent years.

Shock jobs report stirs recession fears: 5 takeaways
Shock jobs report stirs recession fears: 5 takeaways

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Shock jobs report stirs recession fears: 5 takeaways

The disappointing July jobs report threw a bucket of cold water on an economic outlook that appeared to be holding up surprisingly well despite President Donald Trump's high import tariffs, immigration crackdown and widespread federal layoffs. Not only did employers add a disappointing 73,000 jobs – well below the 105,000 expected – but payroll gains for May and June were revised downward by a whopping 258,000. That left May's additions at 19,000 and June's at 14,000, the weakest performance since the nation was climbing out of the COVID-19 recession in December 2020. In early afternoon trading, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down about 607 points and the benchmark S&P 500 index was off 1.5% Over the past three months, the economy has averaged just 35,000 employment gains. Here are a few takeaways: This was no blip The poor showing likely wasn't an outlier that will be followed by a resumption of healthy job gains in the months ahead, economists said. Consumers have reined in their spending somewhat, amid worries about Trump's tariffs pushing up prices, and are pulling back on travel and recreational activities. As more of the import charges hit store shelves, Americans will likely restrain their outlays further, Pantheon Macroeconomics wrote in a note to clients. That should translate into weaker job gains, especially in sectors such as manufacturing, retail, trucking and warehousing, the research firm said. And on July 31, Trump escalated his global trade fight with a sweeping new round of import levies. Meanwhile, executives' confidence in the business outlook has been shaken in recent months by the tariffs – which are squeezing profit margins – and that's expected to spell a more pronounced decline in business investment, Pantheon said. 'Sadly, employment appears set for a further summer slowdown as firms, facing renewed cost volatility from escalating trade tensions, remain focused on managing labor costs through reduced hiring, performance-based layoffs, restrained wage growth, and lower entry-level wages,' Gregory Daco, chief economist of EY-Parthenon, wrote to clients. Also, after the Supreme Court recently lifted a stay on mass federal layoffs, 'the decline in federal employment likely will gather more momentum over the coming months,' Pantheon said. The Labor Department has tracked 84,000 federal job losses this year, but the number of buyouts and job cuts announced was much larger. Hiring across the economy hit a 12-month low in June, Labor Department figures show. Will there be a recession in 2025? The dreaded word has slipped back into the conversation after fading the past couple of months as Trump delayed many tariffs and reached deals with several countries. 'To me, today's jobs report is what entering a recession looks like,' Josh Bivens, chief economist of the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute, said in a statement. 'Could we pull up? Sure. But if we look back and end up dating an official recession that starts 3-6 months from now, this is what it would look like today – rapid softening/deterioration in the labor market.' A recession now appears 'very, very likely' unless Trump lowers the tariffs by Labor Day, said Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Analytics. Could a skidding economy and stock market lead Trump to reverse course? A darkening economic outlook and tumbling stock market could well prompt Trump to try to soften the import fees, Zandi said. 'He's going to try to pull it back,' he said. But if he doesn't act before Labor Day, 'It will be too late,' Zandi said, adding the duties will start to ripple too dramatically into retail prices and consumer and business sentiment for the effects to be undone. A September fed rate cut likely At a July 30 news conference following the Fed's decision to hold rates steady for a fifth straight meeting, Fed Chair Jerome Powell described the labor market as solid and balanced. He also said officials would focus primarily on the unemployment rate as they decide whether to lower rates in September. The jobless rate edged up to 4.2% in July. It's still historically low even as Trump's immigration constraints, particularly deportations, shrank the labor force – the pool of people working or looking for jobs. Still, employer demand for employees has waned. But Morgan Stanley suggested the feeble job gains of the past three months would spur the Fed to act in September despite stable unemployment. 'The slower payroll pace keeps downside risks elevated and a September cut on the table,' Morgan Stanley said in a research note. Fed fund futures markets are now putting the chances of a September rate decrease at 85%, up from 45% after Powell's July 30 remarks. AI is starting to crimp job gains Professional and business services shed 14,000 jobs in July and payroll gains in the sprawling white-collar sector have been stagnant for more than two years. July's showing included job losses in computer and technical roles. Staffing executives say companies are replacing many entry-level information technology workers with artificial intelligence. 'It is happening,' Goldman Sachs chief economist Jan Hatzius said on CNBC after the release of the July jobs report. 'This is not the main thing driving the labor market... But we're seeing early signs.'

After a breakup, I left NYC for Miami and moved in with my mom. It was supposed to be temporary, but 3 years later, I have no plans to leave.
After a breakup, I left NYC for Miami and moved in with my mom. It was supposed to be temporary, but 3 years later, I have no plans to leave.

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

After a breakup, I left NYC for Miami and moved in with my mom. It was supposed to be temporary, but 3 years later, I have no plans to leave.

Samantha Stobo moved from New York to Miami to live with her mom in 2022. Stobo is also training to take over her mom's company, so the two work together. Stobo has no plans to move and says living with her mom has improved her mental health. This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Samantha Stobo, a 32-year-old who lives in Miami with her mom. It has been edited for length and clarity. When your life feels like it's falling apart, it might actually be coming together. I was in a bad place in 2022, but I wouldn't change anything because it led me to where I am now. I was working in private equity in New York and had been living there for five years. We had gone fully remote during COVID, but then my company wanted to return to in-office five days a week. I was 9-to-5, five days a week, for four or five years, but after getting a taste of the remote lifestyle, I did not want to go back. Then, I went through a pretty brutal breakup with the guy I was living with. I was turning 28 and didn't want to be in New York City anymore. I called my mom, and she said, "I don't know why we've never done this before, but why don't you come work for me?" The short-term plan was to move in with my mom in Miami, get my bearings, and start working with her. That was three years ago, and it's been perfect ever since. Moving back in with Mom My mom owns a wellness hotel in Costa Rica, and I work with her in business development and marketing. I am prepping to take over the company at some point. My mom moved to Miami from California in 2021 because it's closer to Costa Rica. I wasn't so worried about what it would be like to live with her because we have such a great relationship. I was more worried about what people would think about me living with my mom. I think there's a stigma out there that you lose your independence or you're backtracking if you move back in with your parents. When I first moved in with her, we were in a rental. It was a two-bedroom, two-bathroom, but quite a small rental. My mom's boyfriend lives with us and works for the company, too. We laugh now. We're like, "How did we ever live there?" But it was fun. Now, we're in a much larger home. It has four bedrooms and four baths. Adjusting to change My mom purchased her home in 2023, and now we have expenses like cleaners that come once a week and a pool cleaner. My mom also buys all the groceries. We decided I would pay a fixed amount to the household, which is $2,000 a month. When I moved in, I hadn't lived in a family home for 10 years. I was trying to adjust from living with roommates, where you buy your own groceries, keep them in separate areas of the fridge, and get mad when they leave their dishes in the sink. My mom loves to cook, so she cooks all my meals for me and does my laundry sometimes. It was an adjustment to be like, "OK, what are these things that she does for me? But also, I'm a fully functioning adult. What are the things that I do for myself that don't make me seem like I'm a 12-year-old living with her mom?" When I first moved in, I went out with friends and came home around 2 a.m. She was up and panicked. I didn't even think to tell her because I'd lived in New York for five years by myself and never had to tell someone when I'd be home. I taught her how to use Find My Friends, and we have open communication. Working together We work from home. While it's a lot to live and work with my mom, I think it would be ridiculous to have a separate apartment and then come to the house to work with her. Since she's the company owner and I'm learning to take it over, it's also helpful that I'm clued into every conversation, and it's not just 9-to-5 that we're talking about work. We're talking about it on Saturday, Sunday, after hours, whenever something comes up. It is sometimes hard to separate work from mother-daughter chores. If I am working and she says, "Take out the trash," then I'm like, "Well, I'm busy working." We get in stupid little arguments like that, but overall, it's worked really well for us. A built-in best friend Living together was only supposed to be temporary, but it's been three years. I don't have any plans to live alone, but sometimes, I get a little stressed. I don't want to be 36, still living with my mom, but it's working for where we are right now. I have a built-in best friend. Life is hard enough. It's nice to come home every day to a place where I feel safe and comfortable and know that I have someone who has my back. I think it's kind of crazy that we've normalized living with random people over living with your family. Living with my mom has been amazing for my mental health. Having a safe landing space is so important. Read the original article on Business Insider Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store