
From coverage to crisis? How Trump's tax package could strip millions of Medicaid benefit
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Safety-Net Shake-Up: Medicaid in the Crosshairs
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Mandated Work Requirements and Eligibility Checks
Changes to Medicaid Financing: States to Feel the Pinch
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Republican Defense: Work for Welfare
Consumer Watchdogs Worry About Mounting Medical Debt
A Step Backward from Universal Healthcare?
FAQs
What does the new law say about Medicaid?
How many people could lose health coverage because of this bill?
Millions of Americans enrolled in Medicaid are set to face significant changes as the U.S. Congress approved President Donald Trump's expansive tax and spending package this week. While the bill extends key components of Trump's tax cuts, it also includes deep reductions in federal healthcare support—prompting growing anxiety among health policy experts and consumer advocates.The newly passed legislation, which cleared the U.S. Senate on July 1 and the House of Representatives on July 3, is expected to reduce federal healthcare expenditures by nearly $1 trillion over the next decade. A substantial portion of these cuts target Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) insurance exchanges.According to projections by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the law will result in 11.8 million Americans losing health coverage, with an additional 5 million affected by the discontinuation of pandemic-era tax credits that had subsidized ACA plans.Medicaid, which provided health insurance to 78.6 million low-income Americans as of March 2025, will now come under stricter eligibility surveillance, including job verification requirements and reduced financial leeway for states to fund their share of the programme.A defining element of the bill is its imposition of work requirements on certain Medicaid recipients. Beginning in 2027, states that expanded Medicaid under the ACA must verify twice a year that "able-bodied" beneficiaries are employed for at least 80 hours per month or meet exemption criteria—such as being a caregiver, student, or disabled.Parents of children above 13 years will also be subjected to these checks. States will be obligated to set up systems for regular job verification, though the Department of Health and Human Services can grant implementation delays through waivers for those acting in "good faith."During Trump's first term, 13 states sought similar waivers. Only Arkansas implemented them before a federal court halted the programme, which had disenrolled 18,000 people within seven months. Currently, Georgia operates the only state-approved Medicaid work requirement scheme, known as "Georgia Pathways," with fewer than 7,500 people enrolled.Beyond eligibility criteria, the bill also reforms how states can finance Medicaid. Many states have used 'provider taxes'—fees on hospitals and other healthcare providers—to boost their federal Medicaid match. The new law freezes the current tax limit and then, beginning in 2028, lowers the allowable rate from 6% to 3.5%, as per a report by USA Today.Health policy analysts believe this reduction could pressure states to reduce healthcare services or reconsider their expansion commitments under the ACA.'States are going to anticipate that loss of revenue and will be looking to make changes,' said Jennifer Tolbert, Deputy Director at KFF's Medicaid and Uninsured Program.While critics describe the bill as a rollback of Obama-era healthcare reforms, Republican lawmakers argue that the overhaul is a necessary realignment of federal assistance programmes.Speaker Mike Johnson, speaking before the House vote, defended the inclusion of work requirements, stating that they aim to 'restore dignity and purpose to those on taxpayer-funded benefits.'The bill also aligns with Trump's broader campaign promise to extend his 2017 tax cuts, eliminate taxes on tips and overtime, and ramp up border security—creating a sweeping fiscal package that redefines government spending priorities.Consumer advocacy groups warn that the new law could lead to a rise in medical debt, particularly among vulnerable populations who lose insurance coverage.Medical debt already constitutes more than half of all debt in collections, as per a 2022 report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). A Biden-era rule intended to ban medical debt from credit reports is now at risk, as the GOP-led bill includes funding cuts to the CFPB, potentially weakening its ability to implement consumer protections.'The combination of reduced healthcare access and a weakened consumer watchdog agency is a double blow,' said Sally Greenberg, CEO of the National Consumers League. 'Consumers are going to pay—and patients are going to pay big time.'Health policy researchers view the legislation as a significant departure from the universal coverage ambitions of the Obama-era ACA.'This is a giant step backwards from the vision of universal coverage that was President Obama's legacy,' said Joan Alker, Executive Director of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families.With Trump's tax cuts extended and Medicaid restrictions tightened, the bill is poised to redraw the contours of America's healthcare landscape. Its long-term impact will depend on how states choose to implement the new rules—and how millions of Americans adjust to a potentially leaner public health safety net.The newly passed legislation includes nearly $1 trillion in federal healthcare cuts over the next decade, with a significant portion targeting Medicaid. The law introduces work requirements, tighter eligibility checks, and limits on how states fund Medicaid.According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), 11.8 million Americans are projected to lose health insurance coverage due to the Medicaid reductions and the expiration of pandemic-era tax credits for ACA plans.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
32 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Every party had complained of inaccuracies in voters' list, revision necessary under law: CEC
The Congress and other I.N.D.I.A. bloc parties have questioned the intent and the timing of the revision of the voters' list, claiming that the exercise carries the risk of willful exclusion of voters using the state machinery.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
35 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump's tax cuts vs. healthcare fallout: Will the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' backfire in 2026 midterms?
Donald Trump's signature tax legislation, dubbed the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' faces political scrutiny ahead of the 2026 midterms. While Republicans tout its economic benefits, critics argue it favours the wealthy and endangers healthcare for the poor, raising questions about its long-term electoral consequences. read more Barack Obama had the Affordable Care Act. Joe Biden pushed through the Inflation Reduction Act. Now, Donald Trump is staking his legacy on sweeping tax cuts. Like his predecessors' landmark policies, Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' is both a signature legislative achievement and a potential electoral liability. While initially celebrated within Republican circles, the bill is under growing scrutiny for provisions that critics say could strip health coverage from low-income Americans and unravel years of climate and energy policy progress. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump secured passage of the multitrillion-dollar legislation by rallying Republican lawmakers through a blend of persuasion and pressure tactics. True to his brand-driven approach, he named the bill with characteristic flair and made it a partisan milestone, pushing it through Congress without a single Democratic vote. But its political durability faces a crucial test in the 2026 midterm elections. Democrats are preparing to center their campaign narrative around a stark accusation: that Trump has prioritised tax breaks for the wealthy at the cost of health care for the poor. While Trump and Republican allies insist that vulnerable groups will retain access to health coverage, independent analysts forecast a sharp rise in the uninsured population. At the same time, GOP promises that the bill will deliver an economic boost are being questioned amid economic instability and global trade tensions. To address criticism that the bill primarily benefits the rich, Trump has highlighted tax relief measures for tipped workers and those earning overtime pay—groups that, while politically symbolic, make up only a fraction of the workforce. Still, whether these offsets will be enough to change public perception remains to be seen as both parties brace for an intense electoral showdown. Extending the tax cuts from Trump's first term that were set to expire if Congress failed to act meant he could also argue that millions of people would avoid a tax increase. To enact that and other expensive priorities, Republicans made steep cuts to Medicaid that ultimately belied Trump's promise that those on government entitlement programs 'won't be affected.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The biggest thing is, he's answering the call of the forgotten people. That's why his No. 1 request was the no tax on tips, the no tax on overtime, tax relief for seniors,' said Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. 'I think that's going to be the big impact.' Presidents have seen their signature legislative accomplishments unraveled by their successors or become a significant political liability for their party in subsequent elections. A central case for Biden's reelection was that the public would reward the Democrat for his legislative accomplishments. That never bore fruit as he struggled to improve his poll numbers driven down by concerns about his age and stubborn inflation. Since taking office in January, Trump has acted to gut tax breaks meant to boost clean energy initiatives that were part of Biden's landmark health care-and-climate bill. Obama's health overhaul, which the Democrat signed into law in March 2010, led to a political bloodbath in the midterms that fall. Its popularity only became potent when Republicans tried to repeal it in 2017. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Whatever political boost Trump may have gotten from his first-term tax cuts in 2017 did not help him in the 2018 midterms, when Democrats regained control of the House, or in 2020 when he lost to Biden. 'I don't think there's much if any evidence from recent or even not-so-recent history of the president's party passing a big one-party bill and getting rewarded for it,' said Kyle Kondik, an elections analyst with the nonpartisan University of Virginia's Center for Politics. Democrats hope they can translate their policy losses into political gains. During an Oval Office appearance in January, Trump pledged he would 'love and cherish Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid.' 'We're not going to do anything with that, other than if we can find some abuse or waste, we'll do something,' Trump said. 'But the people won't be affected. It will only be more effective and better.' That promise is far removed from what Trump and the Republican Party ultimately chose to do, paring back not only Medicaid but also food assistance for the poor to make the math work on their sweeping bill. It would force 11.8 million more people to become uninsured by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office, whose estimates the GOP has dismissed. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'In Trump's first term, Democrats in Congress prevented bad outcomes. They didn't repeal the (Affordable Care Act), and we did COVID relief together. This time is different,' said Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii. 'Hospitals will close, people will die, the cost of electricity will go up, and people will go without food.' Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., repeatedly argued the legislation would lead to drastic coverage losses in his home state and others, leaving them vulnerable to political attacks similar to what Democrats faced after they enacted 'Obamacare.' With his warnings unheeded, Tillis announced he would not run for reelection, after he opposed advancing the bill and enduring Trump's criticism. 'If there is a political dimension to this, it is the extraordinary impact that you're going to have in states like California, blue states with red districts,' Tillis said. 'The narrative is going to be overwhelmingly negative in states like California, New York, Illinois, and New Jersey.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Even Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who eventually became the decisive vote in the Senate that ensured the bill's passage, said the legislation needed more work and she urged the House to revise it. Lawmakers there did not. Early polling suggests that Trump's bill is deeply unpopular, including among independents and a healthy share of Republicans. White House officials said their own research does not reflect that. So far, it's only Republicans celebrating the victory. That seems OK with the president. In a speech in Iowa after the bill passed, he said Democrats only opposed it because they 'hated Trump.' That didn't bother him, he said, 'because I hate them, too.' With inputs from agencies


The Hindu
36 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Maoists deny reports on Damodar's surrender, distance themselves from threat letter to Minister Seethakka
The CPI (Maoist) Telangana State Committee has distanced itself from a recent letter published in a section of the media, threatening Mulugu MLA and Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Minister Dansari Anasuya (Seethakka) in the name of their Telangana State Committee. The letter criticised Seethakka for allegedly neglecting tribal rights, but the party clarified that it had no connection with the letter, a statement issued on Saturday in the name of the party Telangana spokesperson Jagan said. The committee claimed that reports of Damodar's surrender or death have been repeatedly spread by the police. Such reports are a 'deliberate misinformation campaign' carried out by the police as part of a psychological warfare to confuse the revolutionary forces. The Maoists highlighted the contradiction between the Congress government's stance on Maoist issue. While the Congress government has declared the Maoist problem as a social and political issue that cannot be resolved through repression and is demanding that the Central government stop encounters, the police are harassing innocent tribals in Mulugu, Bhadradri-Kothagudem, and Asifabad districts by summoning them to police stations. The Maoist party urged the people to take note of this disparity.