After decades in the U.S., Iranians arrested in Trump's deportation drive
Mandonna 'Donna' Kashanian lived in the United States for 47 years, married a U.S. citizen and raised their daughter. She was gardening in the yard of her New Orleans home when U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers handcuffed and took her away, her family said.
Kashanian arrived in 1978 on a student visa and applied for asylum, fearing retaliation for her father's support of the U.S.-backed shah. She lost her bid, but she was allowed to remain with her husband and child if she checked in regularly with immigration officials, her husband and daughter said. She complied, once checking in from South Carolina during Hurricane Katrina. She is now being held at an immigration detention center in Basile, La., while her family tries to get information.
Other Iranians are also getting arrested by immigration authorities after decades in the United States. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security won't say how many people they've arrested, but U.S. military strikes on Iran have fueled fears that there is more to come.
'Some level of vigilance, of course, makes sense, but what it seems like ICE has done is basically give out an order to round up as many Iranians as you can, whether or not they're linked to any threat and then arrest them and deport them, which is very concerning,' said Ryan Costello, policy director of the National Iranian American Council, an advocacy group.
Homeland Security did not immediately reply to an email seeking comment on Kashanian's case but have been touting arrests of Iranians. The department announced the arrests of at least 11 Iranians on immigration violations a week ago, during the weekend of the U.S. missile strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. U.S. Customs and Border Protection said, without elaborating, that it arrested seven Iranians at a Los Angeles-area address that 'has been repeatedly used to harbor illegal entrants linked to terrorism.'
The department 'has been full throttle on identifying and arresting known or suspected terrorists and violent extremists that illegally entered this country, came in through Biden's fraudulent parole programs or otherwise,' spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said of the 11 arrests. She didn't offer any evidence of terrorist or extremist ties. Her comment on parole programs referred to former President Biden's expanded legal pathways to entry, which President Trump shut down.
Russell Milne, Kashanian's husband, said his wife is not a threat. Her appeal for asylum was complicated because of 'events in her early life,' he explained. A court found an earlier marriage of hers to be fraudulent.
But over four decades, Kashanian, 64, built a life in Louisiana. The couple met when she was bartending as a student in the late 1980s. They married and had a daughter. She volunteered with Habitat for Humanity, filmed Persian cooking tutorials on YouTube and was a grandmother figure to the children next door.
The fear of deportation always hung over the family, Milne said, but he said his wife did everything that was being asked of her.
'She's meeting her obligations,' Milne said. 'She's retirement age. She's not a threat. Who picks up a grandmother?'
While Iranians have been crossing the border illegally for years, especially since 2021, they have faced little risk of being deported to their home countries due to severed diplomatic relations with the U.S. That seems to no longer be the case.
The Trump administration has deported hundreds of people, including Iranians, to countries other than their own in an attempt to circumvent diplomatic hurdles with governments that won't take their people back. During Trump's second term, countries including El Salvador, Costa Rica and Panama have taken back noncitizens from the U.S.
The administration has asked the Supreme Court to clear the way for several deportations to South Sudan, a war-ravaged country with which it has no ties, after the justices allowed deportations to countries other than those noncitizens came from.
The U.S. Border Patrol arrested Iranians 1,700 times at the Mexican border from October 2021 through November 2024, according to the most recent public data available. The Homeland Security Department reported that about 600 Iranians overstayed visas as business or exchange visitors, tourists and students in the 12-month period through September 2023, the most recent report shows.
Iran was one of 12 countries subject to a U.S. travel ban imposed by Trump that took effect this month. Some fear ICE's growing deportation arrests will be another blow.
In Oregon, an Iranian man was detained by immigration agents this past week while driving to the gym. He was picked up roughly two weeks before he was scheduled for a check-in at ICE offices in Portland, according to court documents filed by his attorney, Michael Purcell.
The man, identified in court filings as S.F., has lived in the U.S. for more than 20 years, and his wife and two children are U.S. citizens.
S.F. applied for asylum in the U.S. in the early 2000s, but his application was denied in 2002. His appeal failed, but the government did not deport him and he continued to live in the country for decades, according to court documents.
Due to 'changed conditions' in Iran, S.F. would face 'a vastly increased danger of persecution' if he were to be deported, Purcell wrote in his petition. 'These circumstances relate to the recent bombing by the United States of Iranian nuclear facilities, thus creating a de facto state of war between the United States and Iran.'
S.F.'s long residency in the U.S., his conversion to Christianity and the fact that his wife and children are U.S. citizens 'sharply increase the possibility of his imprisonment in Iran, or torture or execution,' he said.
Similarly, Kashanian's daughter said she is worried what will happen to her mother.
'She tried to do everything right,' Kaitlynn Milne said.
Chandler, Rush and Spagat write for the Associated Press.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump's bombs won't solve the nuclear proliferation problem
By bombing Iran's nuclear facilities, did President Trump just demonstrate a promising new approach to international arms control? Some conservatives seem to think so. They are wrong. National security strategist Matthew Kroenig suggested in The Washington Post last week that bombing other countries' nuclear facilities is a good way to keep them from joining the world's exclusive Armageddon Club. 'Leaders around the world must now consider that an attempt to start an illegal nuclear weapons program could very well result in a devastating confrontation with the Pentagon,' he argued. 'In fact, the United States could capitalize on this moment and declare a new foreign policy doctrine of counter-proliferation through military force. … This brutal reality will not only make any future leader think twice about going nuclear, but will strengthen global nonproliferation efforts and perhaps, paradoxically, make the world a safer place.' Dream on. In the first place, early damage reports indicate that dropping 14 of the world's biggest non-nuclear bombs with pinpoint accuracy did not destroy Iran's underground uranium enrichment facility. The Pentagon acknowledges the challenges of destroying military assets located deep underground. One of its most sensitive installations is located inside a Colorado mountain, where officials say it can be destroyed only by a nuclear missile. So, as impressive as it was, the mission may not turn out to be a 'devastating confrontation' with American power. Second, violence begets violence. The U.S. cannot expect to violate foreign airspace and bomb sovereign nations without retaliation. The Iran mission immediately led to an attack on a U.S. military base and speculation that it might activate sleeper cells for terrorist acts in America. Kroenig's 'bomb 'em' strategy would invite more violence, not less. As Hebert Lin, a national security scholar at Stanford University, put it: 'Going forward, no one knows what Iran will do next or when they will do it, but it's hard to imagine that U.S. citizens around the world are safer today than they were a week ago.' Third, the Iran mission depended on the element of surprise. But if bunker-busting bombs become America's preferred response to nuclear arms proliferation, countries with nuclear programs will prepare defenses. It's possible that the Iranians anticipated the June 21 attack and simply moved their equipment elsewhere. Lin cautions that 'any long-term solution will not lie in a military-only approach.' The next step should not be bigger and better bunker-busters. Rather, we should reopen global negotiations on complete worldwide nuclear disarmament with open inspections and severe sanctions against any nation that attempts to build or hide a nuclear arsenal. So long as some nations have nuclear weapons, it's unrealistic to expect that more won't try to acquire them. According to the Institute for Science and International Security, 30 countries have tried to acquire nuclear weapons, including Iraq and Libya. South Africa succeeded but dismantled them. Experts speculate that South Korea, Taiwan and Algeria may attempt to develop them due to security concerns. Ukraine was equipped with nuclear weapons under the Soviet Union. It returned them to Russia in 1994 after gaining independence and obtaining a security agreement from the U.S., United Kingdom, and Russia. It may regret giving the weapons back, now that Vladimir Putin has violated that agreement. Next month, we will mark the 80th anniversary of the Trinity test, the first nuclear-weapon detonation. We have lived under the shadow of Armageddon ever since. Now, the danger of proliferation is growing. The New START agreement is the only remaining arms control treaty between the two nuclear superpowers, Russia and the U.S. It is due to expire next February. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 'There are no signs of negotiations to renew or replace it.' Instead, the world is moving in the opposite direction. Last year, nearly all nine countries with nuclear arms upgraded and modernized their arsenals. The institute expects the U.S., Russia and China to deploy more nukes in the years ahead. Expert Hans Kristensen warns, 'We see a clear trend of growing nuclear arsenals, sharpened nuclear rhetoric and the abandonment of arms control agreements.' The institute also warns that artificial intelligence, cyber capabilities, space assets and new missile defenses are 'radically redefining nuclear capabilities, deterrence, and defense' and creating new instability. Trump is also a source of instability. Former President Obama reached an agreement with Russia on New START in 2010; seven years later, Trump called it 'one of several bad deals negotiated by the Obama administration.' In Trump's view, another bad deal was the agreement the Obama administration and the European Union reached with Iran in 2015 to curtail its nuclear arms program. Trump withdrew the U.S. from the deal in 2018, then tried to negotiate something similar with Iran this year — before bombing Iran. The world's failure to abolish nuclear weapons, like its failure to stop climate change, is symptomatic of an unacceptable human extinction paradigm. Mutual assured destruction is not a defense strategy; it's a suicide pact. The psychological damage of these swords of Damocles has been profound, especially among children and adolescents. It is in every nation's interest, and every person's, to achieve verifiable and enforceable nuclear disarmament. From time to time, Trump laments that he hasn't received the Nobel Peace Prize like Barack Obama did. He won't get one by bombing other countries to maintain America's nuclear superiority. William S. Becker is co-editor of and a contributor to 'Democracy Unchained: How to Rebuild Government for the People,' and contributor to 'Democracy in a Hotter Time,' named by the journal Nature as one of 2023's five best science books. He previously served as a senior official in the Wisconsin Department of Justice. He is currently executive director of the Presidential Climate Action Project, a nonpartisan climate policy think tank unaffiliated with the White House.


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Iran Bans Elon Musk's Starlink and Threatens Users With Flogging or Jail
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Iran's parliament has voted to ban Elon Musk's Starlink satellite internet service, marking a sharp escalation in its crackdown on outside influence after U.S. and Israeli strikes. Users of the SpaceX-operated satellite service now face penalties of fines, flogging, or up to two years in prison if they are caught, according to state media. The law, which also toughens espionage rules, targets foreign-backed dissent. Though pending final approval, it reflects Tehran's growing alarm over Starlink's role as a digital lifeline during internet blackouts and a potent symbol in its information war with the West. Newsweek has reached out to Elon Musk via X for comment. Why It Matters The Starlink ban underscores how private tech firms such as Starlink have become entangled in global conflict. Coming after U.S. and Israeli strikes, the move highlights how satellite internet is now a tool of modern warfare—and a threat in the eyes of governments like Iran's. Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk speaks at the SATELLITE Conference and Exhibition, March 9, 2020, in Washington. Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk speaks at the SATELLITE Conference and Exhibition, March 9, 2020, in Washington. Susan Walsh/AP Photo What to Know Iran's new legislation expands state powers over digital and foreign-linked activities. In addition to criminalizing Starlink, the law introduces sweeping penalties for espionage and cooperation with foreign adversaries. It defines "operational cooperation" with countries like the U.S. and Israel as "corruption on earth"—a capital offense under Iranian law. This includes actions such as cyberattacks, use of drones or sabotage tools, and accepting funds from foreign intelligence, even without taking action. Starlink in Iran On June 14—just one day after Israeli airstrikes first targeted Iran—Elon Musk posted a four-word message on X: "The beams are on." The post confirmed the activation of Starlink's satellite internet service over Iran amid a sweeping government-imposed internet blackout. Tehran's shutdown came as part of its crackdown following escalating regional conflict, severing much of the country's digital communication with the outside world. Musk's move instantly provided a high-speed, uncensorable connection, offering Iranians a potential lifeline to bypass state censorship and maintain contact during a period of intense unrest. The beams are on — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 14, 2025 Though exact numbers remain unclear, images circulated online throughout 2024 showed Starlink dishes installed on rooftops across Iran, often in direct defiance of strict local laws. According to Iranian tech outlet Zoomit, equipment costs range from IRR400 million ($673) to IRR2 billion ($3,367), with monthly fees around $40—making the service unaffordable for most Iranians. Amid heavy government censorship and widespread internet blackouts, many Iranians rely on VPNs and other tools to bypass restrictions and access the outside world. Starlink has emerged as one of the few reliable options during these shutdowns, offering a critical lifeline for protesters and dissidents. Espionage Arrests In the past few weeks, Iran has detained over 700 people accused of spying for Israel and the U.S., with state media reporting at least six executions, including three Kurds accused of aiding Mossad, Israel's foreign intelligence agency. Security forces dismantled multiple drone-surveillance cells, arresting 53 people for filming sensitive sites and allegedly sharing footage with foreign outlets. Human rights groups have condemned the arrests and executions as politically motivated and a severe violation of due process. An Iranian VPN service appears on a cell phone screen, Feb.20, 2024, Tehran, Iran. An Iranian VPN service appears on a cell phone screen, Feb.20, 2024, Tehran, Iran. AP Photo What People Are Saying ISNA News Agency: "Under the law, violations could be punished with fines, flogging, or up to two years in prison." Elon Musk: "The beams are on" What Happens Next Iran's Guardian Council is expected to approve the Starlink ban within days. Authorities may begin enforcement shortly thereafter, targeting users, distributors, and any entities suspected of collaborating with perceived hostile states.


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Iran acknowledges death toll from Israel's strike on notorious Evin prison
Iran acknowledged on Sunday that an Israeli strike on Tehran's notorious Evin prison last week killed dozens of people. Iran's judiciary spokesperson Asghar Jahangir posted on the office's official Mizan news agency website that the strike killed at least 71 people, including staff, soldiers, prisoners and members of visiting families. Officials did not provide a breakdown of casualty figures. The Washington-based Human Rights Activists in Iran said at least 35 of those killed were staff members and two were inmates. Others killed included a person walking in the prison vicinity and a woman who went to meet a judge about her imprisoned husband's case, the organization said. Jahangir said some of the injured were treated on site, while others were taken to hospitals. Iran has not said how many were injured. Iran had also confirmed on Saturday that top prosecutor Ali Ghanaatkar had been killed in the attack. Ghanaatkar's prosecution of dissidents, including Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi, had led to widespread criticism by human rights groups. Israel carried out the strike on June 23 as its Defense Ministry said it was attacking "regime targets and government repression bodies in the heart of Tehran." The facility was known to hold many of Iran's political prisoners and dissidents. The prison attack came near the end of 12 days of Israeli strikes, which Israel claimed killed around 30 Iranian commanders and 11 nuclear scientists, while hitting eight nuclear-related facilities and more than 720 military infrastructure sites. The status of Iran's nuclear program remains unclear, even after President Donald Trump said American strikes on June 22 "obliterated" Iran's nuclear capabilities. Rafael Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told CBS' "Face the Nation" in an interview Sunday that Iran's capacities remain, but it is impossible to assess the full damage to the nuclear program unless inspectors are allowed in, which Iranian officials have not authorized. "It is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage, first of all. And secondly, Iran has the capacities there, industrial and technological capacities. So if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again," Grossi said. Grossi said Iran could have centrifuges spinning enriched uranium "in a matter of months." "Frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there," he said.