US Has Likely Moved Nuclear Weapons In UK For First Time Since 2008: Report
On July 16, a US military aircraft flew with its transponder on - making its identification and location publicly visible - from a US nuclear weapons depot at Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque, New Mexico, to an airbase in the UK city of Lakenheath, according to defense analysts and open-source data.
The C-17 flight involved the US Air Force's Prime Nuclear Airlift Force, which transports nuclear weapons, and didn't fly over any other nation's territory, according to William Alberque, a Europe-based senior fellow at the Pacific Forum.
The US and UK governments have longstanding policies of not commenting on the status or location of their nuclear weapons.
US Department of Defense budget documents show that millions of dollars of work on "surety" facilities - the term the Pentagon uses to describe nuclear weapon security - has been in progress at Lakenheath for several years.
The weapons the aircraft most likely delivered were the new B61-12 thermonuclear bombs, increasing the number of US tactical nuclear weapons in Europe for the first time since the Cold War.
"There are strong indications" that the US has returned nuclear weapons to the UK, said Hans Kristensen, director of the Federation of American Scientists' Nuclear Information Project.
Alberque said the decision to leave the flight transponders on indicates the US wants to show Russia that it is not reducing its nuclear capability in Europe. NATO officials declined to immediately comment.
"This is a down payment that there's more to come on shifting NATO's deterrence posture toward strengthening," Alberque said. "Returning US nuclear weapons to the UK is no small feat."
The move also signals that the US is committing more flexible nuclear capabilities to Europe, creating a wider range of options for its forces, said Sidharth Kaushal, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute.
"Capabilities such as the B61 can contribute to limiting the impact of Russia's large advantage in theater-level nonstrategic nuclear weapons," Kaushal said.
US President Donald Trump has hardened his approach to Putin in recent weeks, agreeing to send Ukraine more US-made Patriot missiles through European purchases and threatening to hit Russia with secondary tariffs if it doesn't agree to a cease fire within 50 days. On Monday, Trump said that he would reduce that deadline, adding that the was "disappointed" in Putin.
The UK announced last month that it would purchase at least a dozen new US-made F-35A fighter jets capable of carrying B61-12 nuclear bombs. This week, its Ministry of Defense stated in an updated policy document that "NATO's nuclear deterrence also relies on US nuclear weapons deployed in Europe and supporting capabilities and infrastructure provided by Allies."
The new jets will be available to fly NATO's nuclear mission, according to the document.
"This decision reintroduces a nuclear role for the RAF for the first time since the UK retired its sovereign air-launched nuclear weapons after the Cold War," the MoD said in the document.
B61-12 thermonuclear gravity bombs carry a warhead with a yield adjustable between 0.3 kilotons and 50 kilotons, according to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. They can be carried on F-35A fighter jets as well as other US and NATO aircraft.
Yield measures the explosive power of a nuclear weapon, measured in the equivalent in tons of conventional explosives.
Designed to be much more accurate than previous B61 models, its variable yield means it can be used against small military targets as well as population centers. The apparent shipment to the UK means the bomb is now fully deployed in Europe at seven bases across six NATO countries, Kristensen said.
US nuclear weapons, even those on other countries' territory, can only be used after the direct authorization of the US President.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Long-term investing: Volatility, even threats, have limited shelf life; 5 large-caps from different sectors with upside potential of up to 38%
Synopsis What will dominate headlines for some time? Tariff impacting X industry, goods stuck at ports, exporters under pressure, India-US talking to resolve the deadlock. Yes, the action by President Trump will create issues, but it is not the end of the world. There are a couple of reasons for our assumption that things will not be as bad as they might appear to be when you read the headlines that are bound to come in the coming weeks. You may not be aware, but the history of threats, trade, and diplomacy reveals that, finally, the last one has won.
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
What does US-Pakistan trade deal over 'massive oil reserves' mean for India?
In what appears to be a pressure tactic, US President Donald Trump has announced a trade deal with Pakistan while threatening 25% tariffs on Indian goods, saying that Washington would help Islamabad develop its 'massive oil reserves.' Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif (left) on Thursday thanked US President Donald Trump for the 'historic' trade agreement reached between Islamabad and Washington.(Reuters and AP file) In a social media post, the US President wondered if Pakistan could sell oil to India 'some day'. 'We have just concluded a deal with the country of Pakistan, whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive oil reserves," Donald Trump said in a post on Truth Social on Wednesday. Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Thursday thanked Donald Trump for the 'historic' trade agreement reached between Islamabad and Washington, and expressed hope that it would expand cooperation between the two nations. 'I wish to convey my profound thanks to President Trump @realDonaldTrump for his leadership role in finalization of the historic US-Pakistan trade agreement, successfully concluded by our two sides in Washington, last night,' he wrote on X. 'This landmark deal will enhance our growing cooperation so as to expand the frontiers of our enduring partnership in days to come,' he said. What is US-Pakistan oil agreement? It is not immediately clear what massive oil reserves in Pakistan Trump was referring to. Trump also made no mention of tariffs in his announcement. "We are in the process of choosing the oil company that will lead this partnership. Who knows, maybe they'll be selling oil to India some day!' Trump said. What does it mean for Pakistan? Pakistan has long claimed to have large oil deposits along its coast, but no progress has been made to tap those deposits. It has been trying to lure in investments to tap into these reserves. Pakistan currently imports oil from the Middle East to meet its energy demands. The deal was reached during a meeting between Pakistan's finance minister Muhammad Aurangzeb, US secretary of commerce Howard Lutnick, and US trade representative ambassador Jamieson Greer in Washington, DC, according to Radio Pakistan. The trade agreement aims at boosting bilateral trade, expanding market access, attracting investment and fostering cooperation in areas of mutual interest, the report said. 'The agreement will result in a reduction of reciprocal tariffs especially on Pakistani exports to the United States. This deal marks the beginning of a new era of economic collaboration especially in energy, mines and minerals, IT, cryptocurrency and other sectors,' it added. What does US-Pakistan trade deal mean for India? It's not clear immediately. The announcement is being seen as a pressure tactic to get New Delhi to agree to demands made by the US, which has, in recent days, got favourable trade deals with major partners like Japan, the UK and the European Union. The announcement came hours after Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on all goods coming from India, plus an additional unspecified penalty for purchases of Russian military equipment and energy. In a social media post, Trump called India's trade policies "most strenuous and obnoxious". "All things not good! India will therefore be paying a tariff of 25 per cent, plus a penalty for the above, starting on August first," Trump said. During the day, he spoke multiple times about the tariffs that India imposes and referred to India's membership in the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) grouping, which he described as "anti-US". Responding to a question on negotiations with India, Trump said Washington is talking to Delhi. "...We are going to see, we are negotiating with India right now,' he said, while calling India's tariff "one of the highest tariffs in the world". What India said India said it has 'taken note" of Trump's statement on bilateral trade and the Government is studying its implications. 'India and the US have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months. We remain committed to that objective,' the statement said. Trump has set the August 1 date for his tariffs to go into effect.
Mint
25 minutes ago
- Mint
Inside Ukraine's effort to fortify hundreds of miles of defensive lines
KRAMATORSK, Ukraine—A line of antitank ditches and barbed wire cuts through the sunflower fields all the way to the horizon here in Ukraine's battle-scarred east, fortifications the country bets it can lay fast and far enough to halt Russia's summer offensive. But the defensive gamble is facing increasingly long odds. Kyiv is in the midst of its most ambitious defensive construction effort to date, erecting obstacles and carving up the earth to thwart manned and unmanned assaults. While riflemen scan the sky for enemy robots, Ukraine's own drone operators sit below them in an extensive network of subterranean dugouts. 'The army that digs deeper is the army that survives," said Col. Oleh Rezunenko, a military engineer overseeing a nearly 200-mile section of the mammoth project. Well into its second year, the wider front-line program has been beset by delays, attacks and arrests for alleged corruption. It now faces being overrun by the enemy it is trying to repel. Rezunenko's entrenchments, including miles of waist-high concrete pyramids, start from the Kharkiv region in the north and reach as far south as Zaporizhzhia. 'Our main task is to dig as quickly and as deeply as we can." The challenge is to hold back a Russian army bolstered by thousands of fresh recruits whom Moscow is throwing into battle for only small or symbolic gains. Ukraine's understaffed units are struggling to defend against the onslaught as Russia shifts tactics daily and slowly chews through territory. Over the past 18 months, Moscow's troops have pierced several weak spots on the Ukrainian line, and taken advantage of slacker defenses in the north to begin a new push involving some 50,000 soldiers. Ukraine is now hoping that installing a triple row of fortifications will prevent similar breakthroughs in the east, where Russia is pushing to capture the key cities of Pokrovsk and Kostyantynivka. But gaps in the entrenchments have prompted some soldiers to warn that a patchy defensive belt could end up like the Maginot Line, the ambitious French fortifications that were bypassed by the Germans in World War II. Rezunenko's regiment has come under relentless Russian drone attacks, which also target their pickups and excavators. They have lost industrial equipment to strikes over the past three months and several dozen soldiers have been injured, Rezunenko says. The Wall Street Journal accompanied the regiment on a recent excursion to inspect fortifications being built in the Donetsk region, a part of the front along which Russia is actively pressing its offensive. The first line of defense is built by front-line troops, while teams like Rezunenko's dig the next line back. Regional civilian administrations are responsible for the third entrenchment, ringing key cities and reinforcing the borders of some regions. Each layer is designed to stop Russian troops in their tracks. The government says it allocated more than 46 billion hryvnia, equivalent to $1.1 billion, for defensive construction in 2024, close to 2% of Ukraine's military spending for the year. Officials say this year's amount is far greater but haven't disclosed the figure. 'We're using all the resources at our disposal," said Ivan Fedorov, the governor of the Zaporizhzhia region, where Russian artillery and glide bombs have slammed into defensive construction sites. 'We still have a lot of work to do." The speed of innovation on the battlefield means elements of the entrenchments could be obsolete by the time any Russians reach the second or third line of defense. At the start of the full-scale invasion in 2022, soldiers fought in long trench lines designed to protect company-size units from artillery. Today, small explosive drones are so ubiquitous and can penetrate such small gaps in defenses that protecting soldiers from them is the priority. That means Ukraine's trenches must now be built deeper underground, with dugouts for small groups of troops and command posts for drone pilots with antidrone nets and metal grids. Battlefield features in military textbooks—observation posts overlooking miles of spacious trenches—are becoming outdated. 'Fortifications remain important, but less so than over the past two years," said Franz-Stefan Gady, a Vienna-based military analyst who recently toured parts of Ukraine's front line. Rezunenko, a 55-year-old veteran of the Soviet and Ukrainian armed forces, says the 1,000 workers he oversees build smaller trench lines than in the past but more of them, and twice as fast. A dozen of them now take just three weeks to build a section of trench equipped with foxholes and sleeping quarters for a squad of soldiers. Because Russia's armored-vehicle stocks are running low, its troops are often dispatched in small groups on motorbikes and buggies. Rezunenko's teams counter this with a dense layer of hard-to-see thin metal coils, designed to entangle advancing troops and vehicles and turn them into drone targets. Col. Oleh Rezunenko, a military engineer overseeing a nearly 200-mile section of the project, climbs up a mound of known as dragon's teeth serve as protection against tanks. Still, Ukraine's military command continues to value more traditional defenses, such as antitank ditches, because Russia deploys combined-arms warfare that draws on old and new battle techniques. 'We study what the enemy is doing, and we adapt the defenses we build," said Serhiy Aborin, the chief of staff of Rezunenko's unit, the 23rd Engineering-Positional Regiment of Ukraine's Support Forces, on a tour of positions this month. For every worker constructing defenses, Rezunenko has two others with rifles on watch for drones. 'As soon as you relax," said one worker who was toiling in 100-degree heat. 'Expect instant comeuppance." Ukraine knows all about being bogged down by enemy defenses. Its troops and their Western-supplied arms got caught in Russia's own multilayered trench lines and antitank ditches during Kyiv's major counteroffensive in the summer of 2023. The setback spurred Ukraine's current fortification effort. At the time, President Volodymyr Zelensky called for accelerated construction, and urged private companies and donors to get involved. But it wasn't sufficient to hold back Russian forces whose tanks and troops poured across a badly defended stretch of Ukraine's northern border near Kharkiv the following spring. Ukraine's antitank obstacles—often called dragon's teeth—were overturned, littering the landscape, according to images posted online by local journalists. Soldiers criticized Ukraine's military command for a lack of adequate preparation. Local authorities in Kharkiv, Ukraine's second-largest city, were left to dig trenches while gas-station owners fortified refuel pumps with sandbags. The Russians never reached the city. Earlier this month, a court arrested Kharkiv's former deputy mayor on allegations of embezzling government funds allocated for fortifications. Now, the Russians are just 12 miles from Sumy, a regional capital in northern Ukraine, and soldiers there warn of a similar lack of proper defenses. One infantryman said that when Ukraine was in Russia's Kursk region, across the border from Sumy, it should have used the time to prepare strong entrenchments at home. 'We had an opportunity to strengthen the northern part of the front," but failed to do so, he said in a phone interview. On retreat from Kursk earlier this year, the soldier said his unit found outdated trenches with no overhead cover from Russian drones. Ukraine has since taken back three villages from the Russians and is establishing stronger defensive positions near Sumy. Back in the east, Rezunenko's regiment is around two-thirds of the way to completing its line, which will be mined should the Russians come close. The colonel, whose two sons have been wounded in the fighting, says Ukraine should live by the Roman adage: If you want peace, prepare for war. 'Our regiment will continue building," even after the conflict is over, he said. 'I failed to protect my children from war. At least I'll protect my grandkids." Write to Matthew Luxmoore at
