
Whatever happened to our sense of moderation?
The Government tried to cut benefits to save money wasted by its predecessors but went to the extreme length of immediately not fully supporting families with more than two children. A more moderate approach would have been to limit it by cutting benefits to the third or more children born after 12 months of the passing of the relevant legislation – in other words, after a pregnant pause.
Young couples, sometimes married, buy houses with three bedrooms and two toilets before they need them. Builders and mortgage suppliers oblige them, so the result is too little economic housing. Older folk cannot downsize for the same reason. Good building land is wasted under the present conditions.
The business world has the same failings, closing various units to centralise – often with government grants – and so putting large numbers of loyal staff out of work. At sea, bigger vessels have docking problems, run into important bridges and block canals. Just like the big cars, it's a lack of moderation but with profit in mind. Has your favourite holiday venue been spoiled by the masses off visiting cruise liners?
We can definitely not accuse Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump or the Gaza opponents of moderation. Our PM however is moderate when under pressure, to the point of oblivion of promised changes.
We should all take a step back and reconsider if we are going down a path which will be detrimental to our successors. What will they think of the world we are leaving them?
JB Drummond, Kilmarnock.
Read more letters
NHS must improve openness
Many may be puzzled about the significance of the Information Commissioner's criticism of NHS Forth Valley:('NHS board could face court for FoI delays', The Herald, July 15). Making a freedom of information request (FoI) is one of three methods of finding out how your local health service is performing and with what governance. Having spent many years on the inside – as much as GPs are on the inside – and now retired, the NHS performance can be difficult to scrutinise. The same applies for any member of the public, patients, carers and indeed MSPs.
Other methods of scrutiny include observing health board and integration joint board meetings (health and social care partnerships). Thirdly, some health board websites contain a lot of information including minutes and reports of previous meetings, annual reports and services and clinical guidance. Board communications teams will send out news at regular intervals to subscribers, but this is of course always the good news.
Generally speaking, when I attend to observe a health board meeting, I will be the only guest or perhaps with one or two others. We are not allowed to speak and are presented on arrival with around 350 pages of reports and the agenda of the meeting. For years, I have been campaigning to have this information made available to the public three working days before the meeting. The centre, the Health and Social Care Directorate, has advised boards that they should do this, but for some reason there is resistance, including from my own board, NHS Forth Valley. Frankly, this is ridiculous. There seems to be a fear that journalists will write about reports yet to be discussed and approved.
It is 20 years since the legal right to FoI commenced in Scotland and around 1.4 million requests have been made to public bodies in that time, 80% by members of the public. There is a cost to meet this freedom, but the Information Commissioner reckons FoI 'has helped to shift the balance of power between individuals and organisations, while also helping Scotland's public bodies become more open, transparent and accountable to the communities they serve'.
The NHS in Scotland has a Duty of Candour, a legal requirement to be open and honest with individuals when something goes wrong. I suggest that this extends to FoI efficiency and health boards' openness.
Philip Gaskell, Drymen.
Road system needs rebuilt
John Jamieson's drive from Folkestone to Ayr (Letters, July18) was a bold undertaking in today's traffic. I am sure we have all made similar nightmare journeys. A contributory reason is certainly traffic numbers, but also the increase in vehicle sizes – particularly length – since roads were built. Cars are half again as large and long as they were, and commercial vehicles are of a size and length never imagined. Some articulated trucks make it impossible to read motorway signage. The basic space requirement for today's vehicles must have at least doubled, while that provided by our roads has basically remained the same.
Another aspect is the closure of roads for police investigation after any accident, however minor. They make a measurement and photographic meal of it.
Most of continental Europe's roads and motorways were rebuilt after the war, and bridges over junctions are numerous, meaning fewer stop/start movements on any journey. Speed limits are also widely ignored.
The UK road system needs to be rebuilt, and we should adopt road rationing to reduce traffic while this is done.
Malcolm Parkin, Kinross.
Are our roads no longer fit for purpose? (Image: PA)
It's all went wrong
What has happened to grammar?
I agree with Peter Martin's letter (July 18). Using them, they, their when referring to a trans person is grammatically incorrect. I imagine we probably belong in the same age group when grammar was drummed into us at school.
My recent experiences of incorrect grammar include:
A call updating an order –' it has came in'.
In a reply from an MP's office – 'you will know that it has went through'.
From a television interview with a government minister – 'I'm sorry it has came to this'.
Don't try to contact me as I have went for a lie down to recover.
Marion Donnachie, Lennoxtown.
• Thank you to David Miller (Letters, July 19). Him and me think alike.
Peter McKerrell, Kilmacolm.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump goes on FEMA spending binge announcing several states will receive federal funding months after disasters
President Donald Trump announced that four states, which experienced disasters over the last six months, would receive funding from the Federal Emergency Management Agency – despite previously threatening to eliminate the federal agency. Taking to Truth Social Tuesday, the president announced he would unlock millions in federal funding for Indiana, which experienced deadly tornadoes in March; Michigan, which experienced ice storms in March; Kentucky, which experienced flooding and tornadoes in April and May; and West Virginia, which experienced flooding and tornadoes in June. The announcement arrives after the president has signaled his desire to phase out FEMA and the administration has been scrutinized for its response to the devastating floods in Texas that killed more than 130 people. Trump has reportedly indicated he wants to return disaster response to the states by removing FEMA as the lead in response. Instead, the president hopes to make local and state officials the primary leaders while using FEMA as financial support. In January, Trump claimed FEMA had not been productive for years and pushed responsibility onto the states for handling disaster response. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson previously said in a statement that 'federal assistance was always intended to supplement state actions, not replace those actions.' 'FEMA's outsized role created a bloated bureaucracy that disincentivized state investment in their own resilience,' Jackson said. However, since then, the president has softened his stance, reportedly backing away from language that indicated he was going to shut down the decades-old agency. While the funding is slightly delayed, state leaders expressed gratitude for it. 'I'm glad to have received word from President Trump committing federal funds to help Northern Michigan communities impacted by the historic ice storm damage earlier this year,' Governor Gretchen Whitmer said on X. 'We have more details to gather, but I'm grateful for this response to my requests of the White House.' Northern Michigan experienced deadly ice storms in March that left at least six people dead. Homes and infrastructure also experienced damage due to the heavy ice. Trump, who said it was his honor to approve federal funds for the state, and would give $50 million to assist in recovery. Indiana Governor Mike Braun thanked Trump for his approval of $15.1 million in funding, which will go toward assisting recovery after a string of tornadoes hit the state in March. In announcing the state's funding, Trump also reminded people that he won 'BIG' in the state in the 2016, 2020 and 2024 presidential elections. Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear wrote on X that he was 'grateful' to the president and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem for providing a total of $56 million in disaster response. At least seven people died in April after the state experienced devastating flooding. At least 31 people died in May after deadly tornadoes swept across the state as well. 'This support is essential to helping these communities rebuild, and I am grateful to the president and @SecNoem. I also told @POTUS that the @FEMA team members on the ground are doing great work supporting Kentuckians. We will provide more details soon,' Beshear wrote. Patrick Morrisey, the governor of West Virginia, praised Trump and the administration for 'providing us with another tool to help these communities make a full recovery.' Trump said he would provide $11.7 million in federal funding to support recovery after heavy rains brought flooding in June. At least nine people died as a result of the floods.


Scottish Sun
4 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
English seaside county votes to become UK's 5th nation on par with Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland
The council will now call for national government recognition NEW KINGDOM? English seaside county votes to become UK's 5th nation on par with Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland A SEASIDE county has voted to become the UK's 5th nation as it hopes to be put on a par with Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. A proposal passed with a majority of votes on July 22. Advertisement 4 Cornwall Council has voted to become the UK's 5th nation in a majority vote Credit: Getty 4 Council leader Leigh Frost believes it would improve funding in the area Credit: Cornwall Council 4 The council said it was facing a housing crisis, and issues with child poverty Credit: Getty 4 Since 2014, the Cornish have been recognised as a national minority Credit: Getty Cornwall Council passed the proposal with a vote of 53 to 22, with two abstentions. Council leader Leigh Frost believes that it would lead to fairer funding, stronger representation, and greater inclusion in national decision-making. It would also put the seaside town on a par with the other Celtic nations. Frost told the BBC: "We're making this case for better funding and representation, and for a stronger place in the union which we have contributed to for centuries. Advertisement "It's time to show what Cornwall is made of." Previously, the 2025 State of Cornwall report had laid out the challenges the county was facing. It included low wages, high house prices and a housing crisis that pushes young people out of their home towns. In addition, the county is facing a struggling social care system, with limited public transport and child poverty. Advertisement Meanwhile, the county has become popular among second-home owners looking to enjoy the beautiful beaches. The proposal was brought forward by Dick Cole, council member and leader of local political party Mebyon Kernow, in an attempt to address some of these issues. The seaside town of Newlyn in Cornwall has been dubbed as one of the 'coolest' places to relocate Despite the majority supporting the bill, local Reform councillors largely voted against the proposal. They cited concerns over the potential for tax increases and a loss of British identity. Advertisement Cornwall's Local Democracy Reporting service reported that Reform member Rowland O'Connor said: "I identify as Cornish but also British. "It feels like I'm being asked to choose one or the other and I refuse to do that." Since 2014, the Cornish have been recognised as a national minority. This is in spite of their long-standing history, which Frost says out-dates England's. Advertisement The vote came following an address by Frost on the "State of Cornwall in the National Context". As reported by the Falmouth Packet, Frost said: "A nation isn't just a border or a flag. It's a people. It's a voice. It's shared history and a shared purpose. Cornwall has all of that and more." Following the successful vote, the council plans to write to Sir Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner to work towards getting the proposal enacted on a national level. They will also continue to build support on a local level among Cornwall's MPs.


Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
MAGA turns its fury on a new Trump aide being blamed for 'helping' Obama
President Donald Trump 's MAGA supporters have a new target for their fury: his CIA director John Ratcliffe. And it's all because of Barack Obama. Ratcliffe, who served as the director of the Office of National Intelligence (ODNI) in Trump's first administration, is one of the president's most loyal supporters. But now MAGA supporters are asking why he didn't originally declassify the documents tied to the investigation of Russia's role in the 2016 election that were released last week. Criticism arose after Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's current intel chief, released a report that accused Obama of being behind a 'treasonous conspiracy' to allege Russia interfered in the 2020 election on Trump's behalf. Now MAGA supporters are furious that this did not come to light earlier. 'Wait! The current CIA director John Ratcliffe had the position of ODNI in the first Trump administration. Why didn't he declassify the documents proving the Russian collusion corruption by the Obama cabal that Tulsi Gabbard has now made public?,' Trump loyalist Roger Stone wrote on X. The CIA did not immediately respond to Daily Mail's request for comment. But in Trump's first term, Ratcliffe did release some documents tied to the Russia investigation, including a CIA memo that revealed Hillary Clinton had approved a plan to publicly tie Trump to the country's hack of the Democratic National Committee. At that time, Trump was running against Joe Biden for a second term in the White House - a contest he would ultimately lose. His campaign seized upon Ratcliffe's move as new evidence that Clinton was in a scheme to discredit Trump, who refers to the matter as the 'Russia hoax.' Additionally, in this Trump term, Ratcliffe and Gabbard have declassified information to allege Obama administration officials manipulated intelligence and conspired to undermine the legitimacy of Trump's win in 2016. And, earlier this month Ratcliffe released an internal CIA review of its Russia investigation, which found the agency failed in some cases to follow standard procedures. Ratcliffe, a longtime Trump loyalist, argued the review showed that Democratic appointees who led the agency at the time 'manipulated intelligence and silenced career professionals — all to get Trump.' Gabbard added fuel to the fire on Friday when she released a 114-page document that she says shows the Obama administration was aware that there was no threat of Russia 'directly' manipulating the vote in 2016. 'Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people,' Gabbard said in a statement. She called for an investigation into and potential criminal prosecution of anyone who took part – which may include Obama and James Comey, the former FBI director. Obama fired back at the 'bizarre allegations' coming from Trump. His office dismissed the claims as another example of the constant 'nonsense and misinformation' that emanates out of the White House. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes,' his post-presidency office said in a statement. The documents revealed insider discussions among top Obama officials about Russia 's much-debated role in the 2016 U.S. elections. Trump latched on to them and issued an extraordinary call to investigate the former president – accusing his predecessor of 'treason.' 'After what they did to me, whether it's right or wrong, it's time to go after people,' Trump said in the Oval Office on Tuesday. President Trump accused his Democratic rivals of organizing a failed 'coup' in 2016, when Trump defeated Hillary Clinton and captured the White House. 'They tried to rig the election and they got caught and there should be really severe consequences,' he said. Trump has long argued that the FBI counterintelligence probe that began during the 2016 election was the start of a 'coup' to prevent him from taking office. But a bipartisan Senate investigation in 2020 found that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. One of the leaders of that probe was Marco Rubio, who was a senator on the intelligence committee at the time and now serves as Trump's secretary of state.