logo
Plans to keep Peterhead gas plant open could ‘blow hole' in targets

Plans to keep Peterhead gas plant open could ‘blow hole' in targets

The National2 days ago
ENERGY giant SSE may keep Scotland's dirtiest power station open until 2040 – 10 years longer than planned – which critics fear could 'blow an enormous hole' in the Scottish Government's climate strategy.
The company owns the Peterhead gas-fired power station in the North East which has been producing ­electricity since 1982.
It is the largest remaining fossil fuel power station in Scotland and one of the biggest polluters in the ­country, releasing more than one million tonnes of climate-warming carbon dioxide (CO2) in an average year – about the same as 250,000 cars.
SSE, along with Norwegian ­company Equinor, is planning to build a new replacement gas power station next to the current one. They claim this new plant will help Scotland meet climate targets because it will use technology to capture most of its emissions and store them under the North Sea.
READ MORE: Norwegian firm planning for first UK deep-sea salmon farm
However, new plans show that the old Peterhead plant could stay ­operational until 2040 – and could run at the same time as the new one. That is despite SSE previously saying it 'could not foresee' the old plant staying open past 2030.
Meanwhile, a document published on climate change by the Scottish Government last month suggests ministers were unaware of the changed timeline – which one campaigner claimed was 'stunning' given 'all their cosy meetings with SSE'.
Campaigners and local ­politicians argued extending the life of the 'mega-polluter' old plant could see Scotland 'bust through' its climate targets.
But SSE said it is needed to play an 'important back-up role' ensuring Scotland can keep the lights on when energy from other sources like wind turbines is not available.
Extended lifespan
THE finding about the old plant's extended life comes from a new assessment of the environmental impact of the new plant published by SSE in May.
The document says that if the new plant (Peterhead 2) is approved by Scottish ministers, the old one (Peterhead 1) is 'expected' to stay in operation with its 'existing total capacity available up to 2040'.
In a response to The Ferret, SSE said it expects the current station to run until the mid-2030s, and that the 2040 date is a worst case scenario.
Unlike the current station, the new one would use carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology to ­reduce emissions. SSE says building the new plant is essential to Scotland meeting its climate targets because it will ­provide a reliable source of ­'dispatchable' low-carbon power at times when renewable sources ­cannot meet demand, such as when the wind is not blowing.
But Peterhead 2 will still be linked to considerable emissions. The new environmental assessment looked at 'well-to-tank' emissions – including the climate pollution created when drilling for the gas that will be burned at the new site. These emissions will not be captured by CCS.
READ MORE: Experts warn far- right are 'weaponising Christianity'
Taking these into account, the new plant could cause the equivalent of 17 million tonnes of CO2 to enter the ­atmosphere over its 25-year life – three times more than SSE originally estimated in 2022.
Climate activists believe this could still be an understatement because they are skeptical about the amount of CO2 that will be captured by Peterhead 2.
'Unreliable technology'?
SSE has 'conservatively' assumed that 90% of the emissions from the new site will be captured and stored. Campaigners argue this level of ­capture has never been achieved in practice.
The think tank Carbon Tracker ­published an analysis on ­Peterhead 2 last year which argued most ­carbon capture plants operating today ­'struggle to achieve high capture rates above 80%, let alone 90-95%'.
'Carbon capture has repeatedly failed to deliver so trying to make future calculations based on such an unreliable technology is foolish at best and downright reckless at worst,' Friends of the Earth Scotland's ­senior climate campaigner Alex Lee told The Ferret.
They warned that continuing to ­allow gas burning at Peterhead could 'blow an enormous hole in Scotland's limited carbon budget'.
Last month, the Scottish Government announced a new approach to measuring progress towards its target for Scotland to reach net zero emissions by 2045. This would bring in new 'carbon budgets' – limits on how much carbon Scotland can emit every five years – to replace annual targets that were dropped last year after being repeatedly missed.
A document accompanying these new budgets included the assumption that Peterhead 1 would be replaced by the new plant 'just after 2030'. Lee said it was 'stunning' that the Scottish Government did not appear to know that the life of the plant is likely to be extended 'despite all their cosy meetings with SSE'.
In the five years between 2019 and 2023 – the most recent for which there is data – Peterhead 1 produced nearly six million tonnes of climate-warming CO2.
SSE expects the old plant to run at reduced levels once the new ­station comes online and is predicting a '­reduction in overall emissions' from Peterhead.
But 'worse case scenario' ­projections by SSE suggest in total the site could be responsible for the ­equivalent of 1.6 million tonnes of CO2 entering the atmosphere each year of the 2030s. SSE stressed that this was 'unlikely'.
Politicians expressed concern that keeping the old plant running could see the Peterhead site consume a growing share of Scotland's carbon budgets. This would leave less room for emissions from sectors which are seen as hard to decarbonise, such as farming.
Maggie Chapman, the Scottish Greens MSP, said keeping 'mega-polluter' Peterhead running until 2040 would see Scotland 'bust through its climate targets'.
'Given the success of decarbonising Scotland's energy supply, there can be absolutely no justification to continue generation from gas past its use-by date,' Chapman continued.
She added that instead of expanding one of Scotland's most polluting sites, 'we need to see government-led projects to build a better future' for workers and communities which have relied on the fossil fuel industry.
Chapman's fellow north east MSP, Scottish Labour's Mercedes Villalba, said the Scottish Government appeared to be 'clueless' about the overlap in running Peterhead 1 and 2 because of its 'inadequate and ineffective oversight'.
READ MORE: UK events use Scottish land to clean up their carbon footprint
'Proposals for a new plant rely on CCS which remains years from ­realisation in Scotland,' Villalba said. 'Meanwhile, with no plan for transition, it is no surprise that the dirtier alternative is set to continue.
'Our energy transition will ­continue to be disorderly, with ­workers ­paying the price with our jobs, health, ­environment and ­climate, until the government gets a grip.'
An SSE spokesperson pointed out that the UK Government had 'outlined the need for up to 35GW of gas generation to remain on the system by 2030'. 'This type of capacity will continue to play an important backup role into the 2030s,' they said.
'As a result, our existing assets, including Peterhead 1, will remain operational for longer than previously expected, helping us to keep the lights on when required.
'Peterhead carbon capture (Peterhead 2) will ultimately replace the ­existing station, delivering ­low-carbon power and supporting the transition to a clean energy system.'
The Scottish Government said ­policies to meet the carbon budgets would be set in its draft climate change plan which is due 'later this year'. A spokesperson said ministers were ­opposed to continued use of fossil ­fuels to generate electricity if they are not 'abated' by CCS technology.
'However, as the UK Climate Change Committee and National Infrastructure Commission have ­emphasised, there will continue to be a role for small amounts of abated natural gas, due to renewables' intermittent nature and the flexibility which gas is able to provide during periods of low renewable generation,' the spokesperson said.
'The application for Peterhead low carbon power station is live – as such it would not be appropriate to ­comment on it or prejudice any ­considerations or final outcome.'
The Ferret is an editorially independent, not-for-profit co-operative run by its journalists and subscribers. You can find it at https://theferret.scot/ and can subscribe for £5 a month here: https://theferret.scot/subscribe/
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Long-running road and rail projects to go ahead after year-long pause
Long-running road and rail projects to go ahead after year-long pause

Rhyl Journal

timean hour ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Long-running road and rail projects to go ahead after year-long pause

The decision will see major road and rail projects outside London and the South East go ahead, backed by £92 billion from last month's spending review. Most have been in the works for several years, and many have already received planning permission. But their future was thrown into doubt last year when Labour announced a review of transport infrastructure projects, saying the previous Conservative government had promised to deliver some without putting enough money forward. In a statement to Parliament, then-transport secretary Louise Haigh accused the Tories of leaving a £2.9 billion gap between what it had announced and what it had funded. Almost a year after launching its internal review, the Government has now decided to press on with five major road schemes, five rail projects and 28 smaller road schemes, saying they will cut journey times, ease congestion, create jobs and support new housing. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'Transport is the backbone of our economy, which is why we are giving them the record funding boost they need, putting taxpayers' money where it matters most and making everyday journeys easier. 'With over £92 billion investment, including the biggest ever boost for city regions in the North and Midlands, we're delivering the schemes that fast-track economic growth and jobs, connect communities, and will help us build 1.5 million new homes, as we deliver our plan for change.' Preparatory work for some of the projects has continued despite the pause, but Tuesday's announcement means they can now proceed in full. For some projects, supporters will hope the backing marks the final stage of a long-running process. One, a widening of the A66 Trans-Pennine route, was first proposed in 2016, while the reopening of the railway between Portishead and Bristol has been the subject of a 25-year campaign. The A66 upgrade was given planning permission in March 2024, but was delayed by an ultimately unsuccessful legal challenge and put on hold by the new Government's review. Construction is now expected to start this winter. Former prime minister Rishi Sunak, whose constituency is served by the A66, welcomed the announcement, saying it would improve 'journey reliability' given the existing road's 'poor safety record'. The Portishead line, reopening a railway that was closed in the 1960s, was also thrown into question by the review, but then West of England mayor Dan Norris announced funding had been secured in February this year. On Tuesday, the Government announced it would invest another £27 million in the project, which it said would 'connect an additional 50,000 people' and support 'a significant new housing development'. Other major road schemes confirmed on Tuesday include the M54-M6 link, the M60 Simister Island junction near Manchester, the A38 Derby junctions and improvements to the A46 Newark bypass. Both the Simister Island and Newark bypass projects are yet to receive planning permission. The Government has also confirmed its commitment to build new stations at Wellington and Cullompton in the South West and Haxby in Yorkshire, which had all been part of the Conservatives' Restoring Your Railway project that was scrapped when Labour came to power. Funding for the stations, along with the Midlands Rail Hub plan to add 300 trains a day to the West Midlands network, was previously announced at last month's spending review. Other, smaller, schemes include improvements to the Middlewich Eastern Bypass, in Cheshire, and the A382 between Drumbridges and Newton Abbot, in Devon. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the investments were 'long overdue' and would 'transform local communities and improve living standards across the country'. But the Conservatives accused the Government of using the announcement as a 'distraction tactic'. Shadow transport secretary Gareth Bacon said: 'Labour are re-announcing projects that are already under way in order to distract from their failing economic strategy of high tax and high borrowing. They just don't have a plan. 'Rachel Reeves's catastrophic economic mismanagement and Keir Starmer's total inability to control his own party has led to a string of unfunded U-turns, meaning that more tax rises are coming.'

Near-Dickensian poverty levels for some children in England, warns commissioner
Near-Dickensian poverty levels for some children in England, warns commissioner

Rhyl Journal

timean hour ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Near-Dickensian poverty levels for some children in England, warns commissioner

Black mould in a bedroom and rats in a kitchen were among some of the examples given by young people for a new report said to reveal the 'real hardship' facing some families. While some feel a sense of shame over their situation, Dame Rachel de Souza said it is 'society at large and decision-makers that should be ashamed of the fact that children don't have enough money'. The latest official estimates, for the year to March 2024, suggest there were a record 4.45 million children living in poverty in the UK. The Government is expected to publish a child poverty strategy in autumn, and a multitude of campaign groups have said it must contain a commitment to do away with the two-child benefit limit. The limit, which came into effect under the Conservatives in April 2017, restricts child tax credit and universal credit (UC) to the first two children in most households. Organisations working in the sector argue that 109 children across the UK are pulled into poverty by the policy every day and that an estimated 350,000 children would be lifted out of poverty immediately if it was scrapped. But comments by Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson at the weekend have raised concerns the policy might not be done away with, amid financial pressures following the U-turn on welfare reforms. Ms Phillipson said spending decisions have been made 'harder' after the watering down of the welfare reforms. Pressed on whether the chances of the benefit cap going are now slimmer, Ms Phillipson told BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg: 'The decisions that have been taken in the last week do make decisions, future decisions harder. 'But all of that said, we will look at this collectively in terms of all of the ways that we can lift children out of poverty.' Estimates for the cost of scrapping the policy vary, from around £2.6 billion to £3.5 billion by the end of this Parliament (2029/30). Dame Rachel – whose office was commissioned to carry out its report to feed into the Government's work in the area – said while there is 'no quick fix to ending child poverty', she feels it is 'very clear that any child poverty strategy must be built on the foundation of scrapping the two-child limit'. She added that a new approach is needed which 'stops sidelining children's voices', saying that 'only by listening to children, and acting in response, will we get close to solving those problems'. The commissioner said in recent years she has seen a change in children's comments, noting that issues traditionally seen as 'adult' concerns 'are now keenly felt by children, who see their parents' worries and the struggles they face: the hours they work, the homes they live in and the ability to put food on the table'. She added: 'Children shared harrowing accounts of hardship, with some in almost-Dickensian levels of poverty. 'They don't talk about 'poverty' as an abstract concept but about not having the things that most people would consider basic: a safe home that isn't mouldy or full or rats, with a bed big enough to stretch out in, 'luxury' food like bacon, a place to do homework, heating, privacy in the bathroom and being able to wash, having their friends over, and not having to travel hours to school.' While commending 'some positive steps by the Government to get more money into families' pockets', she urged 'bold, practical measures that break the link between a child's background and their opportunities'. The commissioner's report, based on the experiences of 128 children across the country between January and March this year, noted a range of concerns including lack of access to quality, healthy food and living in cramped and poor conditions. As well as calling for the two-child benefit limit to be scrapped, Dame Rachel urged a commitment to a so-called 'triple-lock' for uprating all child-related benefits, reforms to ensure families are not being housed in temporary bed and breakfast accommodation for longer than the legal six-week limit, free bus travel for all school-aged children in England and better safety measures in areas with children in low-income families including increased street lighting, and more neighbourhood watch-style initiatives. A Government spokesperson said: 'We are determined to bring down child poverty. We've just announced a new £1 billion package to reform crisis support, including funding to ensure the poorest children do not go hungry outside of term time. 'This comes alongside the expansion to free breakfast clubs, investing £39 billion in social and affordable housing, increasing the national minimum wage and supporting 700,000 of the poorest families by introducing a Fair Repayment Rate on Universal Credit deductions. 'As part of our plan for change, the Child Poverty Taskforce will publish an ambitious strategy later this year to ensure we deliver fully-funded measures that tackle the structural and root causes of child poverty across the country.'

Ministers in talks with City over climate finance for disaster-hit nations
Ministers in talks with City over climate finance for disaster-hit nations

South Wales Guardian

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Ministers in talks with City over climate finance for disaster-hit nations

The Foreign Secretary has pledged £12 million from the Government's tightened aid budget in a bid to enable faster payouts for nations experiencing climate shocks like hurricanes and tornadoes. Mr Lammy will join the Chancellor, Energy Secretary Ed Miliband and Environment Secretary Steve Reed for the first meeting between multiple Cabinet ministers and finance leaders on Tuesday. The group is expected to discuss how the sector can play a part in channelling investment into climate initiatives in emerging markets. The Government hopes the £12 million for pre-arranged finance for disaster relief and risk insurance will cut the cost of responding to extreme weather events, and the time it takes for countries to recover from such shocks. This funding is triggered by certain warning signs — such as a forecast or weather event itself — to enable faster payouts, the Foreign Office said. It comes after the Government slashed the UK's overseas aid budget from 0.5% of gross national income to 0.3% in order to pay for increased defence spending. The UK's climate finance commitments come from its aid budget. The Foreign Secretary said: 'The climate and nature crisis is the greatest global challenge we face. Failure to act will cause unprecedented environmental damage, fuelling displacement, conflict and famine. 'Tackling this crisis is also a huge opportunity for people and businesses here in the UK, delivering on our Plan for Change. The green sector is worth trillions of pounds, and I'm determined that we seize on the economic growth, jobs and security it offers. 'The City of London, the world's leading sustainable development financing hub, has a crucial role to play in this.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store