logo
We are unable to sell our Glasgow flats, this quay wall needs fixed

We are unable to sell our Glasgow flats, this quay wall needs fixed

Residents say they are unable to sell flats and are urging Glasgow City Council to reconsider its position and contribute the necessary funds to get the work done.
(Image: Perceptive)
The council said the costs are more than the quay wall budget and there are no plans to revisit it.
The residents association said the risks are increasing the longer the issue drags on.
Kenny McFarland, Chairman of The Waterfront Residents Owners Association, said: 'This is an urgent crisis.
"The lack of action is not only impacting our homes but also Glasgow's wider development goals for the riverside.
"We are calling on local and national government to step in and provide the necessary funding to resolve this crisis.
'The longer this issue remains unresolved, the greater the risk and the higher the cost."
There are 278 owners in the development.
Other owners told how it impacts them.
One woman, Erin, who owns a property at the development, said she only went ahead with buying her flat after she was advised that the wall was going to be fixed by the council.
She tried to sell last year but it fell though after the buyer was unable to secure a mortgage on the property, which in turn prevented her buying a new home with her partner.
Erin said: 'My life is on hold and my entire life savings are all wrapped up in my flat. This full episode has caused me a huge amount of stress and upset - I just want to move on with my life.'
Another resident, who wished to remain anonymous, is also unable to buy a new home.
They said: 'My money is tied up in this property and I have absolutely no desire to become a landlord given all of the costs and challenges associated.
'I just want to be able to sell my property at a fair price to someone looking to get on the property ladder in Glasgow. Given the housing crisis this should not be that hard. To be honest, I just feel like a prisoner in my own home.'
The residents showed local Labour politicians, Paul Sweeney MSP and Zubir Ahmed MSP the site and shared their concerns.
A spokesperson for Glasgow City Council said: 'After the completion of the procurement process for the contract to deliver the works at Windmillcroft Quay, on the south bank of the Clyde at Tradeston, a decision was last year made not to proceed with the project due to excessively high costs - and therefore no contract award was made.
'These costs greatly exceed the available Glasgow City Region City Deal budget for the project. Throughout the design process a range of solutions were developed, assessed and re-appraised.
'After full analysis of the site and its conditions, the current design solution was the only viable option for City Deal investment. Therefore, there is no further design work or procurement procedure to follow under the City Deal programme.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Diane Abbott: Labour ‘wants me out' after second suspension
Diane Abbott: Labour ‘wants me out' after second suspension

Rhyl Journal

timean hour ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Diane Abbott: Labour ‘wants me out' after second suspension

The Hackney North and Stoke Newington MP said the Labour leadership 'wants me out' and that her comments in a BBC interview released this week were 'factually correct'. It comes a day after Sir Keir Starmer stripped the whip from four Labour MPs for persistent breaches of discipline. Ms Abbott, the longest-serving female MP in the Commons, lost the whip and had a lengthy stint sitting as an independent after she suggested in 2023 that Jewish, Irish and Traveller people experience prejudice, but not racism. She apologised for those remarks at the time and was eventually readmitted to the party just in time to stand as a Labour candidate in the 2024 general election. But in a BBC interview released this week, she said she did not regret the incident. 'Diane Abbott has been administratively suspended from the Labour Party, pending an investigation. We cannot comment further while this investigation is ongoing,' a Labour spokesperson said. Ms Abbott posted a clip of her BBC interview after news of her suspension emerged. She did not respond to a request for comment, but gave a statement to BBC Newsnight. 'It is obvious this Labour leadership wants me out. 'My comments in the interview with James Naughtie were factually correct, as any fair-minded person would accept,' she said. The original comments in 2023 were in a letter to The Observer newspaper, and she withdrew the remarks the same day and apologised 'for any anguish caused'. In the interview with BBC Radio 4's Reflections programme, she was asked whether she looked back on the incident with regret. 'No, not at all,' she said. 'Clearly, there must be a difference between racism which is about colour and other types of racism, because you can see a Traveller or a Jewish person walking down the street, you don't know. 'You don't know unless you stop to speak to them or you're in a meeting with them. 'But if you see a black person walking down the street, you see straight away that they're black. There are different types of racism.' She added: 'I just think that it's silly to try and claim that racism which is about skin colour is the same as other types of racism.' Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner was asked if she was disappointed by the comments. 'I was. There's no place for antisemitism in the Labour Party, and obviously the Labour Party has processes for that,' she told The Guardian newspaper. 'Diane had reflected on how she'd put that article together, and said that 'was not supposed to be the version', and now to double down and say 'Well, actually I didn't mean that. I actually meant what I originally said', I think is a real challenge.' Ms Abbott entered Parliament in 1987 and holds the honorary title of Mother of the House. Her suspension comes in the same week that Sir Keir carried out a purge of troublesome backbenchers in a bid to assert authority over the party. Rachael Maskell, who spearheaded plans to halt the Government's welfare reforms, had the whip suspended alongside Neil Duncan-Jordan, Brian Leishman and Chris Hinchliff. Party sources said the decision to suspend the whip was taken as a result of persistent breaches of discipline rather than a single rebellion.

Diane Abbott: Labour ‘wants me out' after second suspension
Diane Abbott: Labour ‘wants me out' after second suspension

Glasgow Times

timean hour ago

  • Glasgow Times

Diane Abbott: Labour ‘wants me out' after second suspension

The Hackney North and Stoke Newington MP said the Labour leadership 'wants me out' and that her comments in a BBC interview released this week were 'factually correct'. It comes a day after Sir Keir Starmer stripped the whip from four Labour MPs for persistent breaches of discipline. Ms Abbott, the longest-serving female MP in the Commons, lost the whip and had a lengthy stint sitting as an independent after she suggested in 2023 that Jewish, Irish and Traveller people experience prejudice, but not racism. She apologised for those remarks at the time and was eventually readmitted to the party just in time to stand as a Labour candidate in the 2024 general election. But in a BBC interview released this week, she said she did not regret the incident. 'Diane Abbott has been administratively suspended from the Labour Party, pending an investigation. We cannot comment further while this investigation is ongoing,' a Labour spokesperson said. Ms Abbott posted a clip of her BBC interview after news of her suspension emerged. She did not respond to a request for comment, but gave a statement to BBC Newsnight. 'It is obvious this Labour leadership wants me out. 'My comments in the interview with James Naughtie were factually correct, as any fair-minded person would accept,' she said. The original comments in 2023 were in a letter to The Observer newspaper, and she withdrew the remarks the same day and apologised 'for any anguish caused'. In the interview with BBC Radio 4's Reflections programme, she was asked whether she looked back on the incident with regret. 'No, not at all,' she said. 'Clearly, there must be a difference between racism which is about colour and other types of racism, because you can see a Traveller or a Jewish person walking down the street, you don't know. 'You don't know unless you stop to speak to them or you're in a meeting with them. 'But if you see a black person walking down the street, you see straight away that they're black. There are different types of racism.' She added: 'I just think that it's silly to try and claim that racism which is about skin colour is the same as other types of racism.' Diane Abbott lost the whip in April 2023 (Lucy North/PA) Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner was asked if she was disappointed by the comments. 'I was. There's no place for antisemitism in the Labour Party, and obviously the Labour Party has processes for that,' she told The Guardian newspaper. 'Diane had reflected on how she'd put that article together, and said that 'was not supposed to be the version', and now to double down and say 'Well, actually I didn't mean that. I actually meant what I originally said', I think is a real challenge.' Ms Abbott entered Parliament in 1987 and holds the honorary title of Mother of the House. Her suspension comes in the same week that Sir Keir carried out a purge of troublesome backbenchers in a bid to assert authority over the party. Rachael Maskell, who spearheaded plans to halt the Government's welfare reforms, had the whip suspended alongside Neil Duncan-Jordan, Brian Leishman and Chris Hinchliff. Party sources said the decision to suspend the whip was taken as a result of persistent breaches of discipline rather than a single rebellion.

Heat pump handout? It'll take 25 years to get your money back
Heat pump handout? It'll take 25 years to get your money back

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Heat pump handout? It'll take 25 years to get your money back

Ed Miliband could offer homeowners with heat pumps £200 off their bills - meaning it would take around 25 years to pay off the upfront cost. The Energy Secretary would offer the grants to reduce the running costs of the green technology, under plans to phase out gas boilers. Heat pumps typically cost around £5,000 once a taxpayer-funded subsidy of £7,500 is applied, so it would take decades to recoup the upfront cost through savings to bills. Under the plans, all homes with heat pumps would see an average fall in energy bills of 15 per cent, paid for by taxpayers. And the money would come from the £13.2billion 'warm homes' fund agreed by Chancellor Rachel Reeves at the spending review last month. Industry figures are understood to have put forward the submissions to the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero to incentivise homeowners to quit gas boilers. The cost of electricity per unit for consumers is about four times higher than gas, which can make heat pumps more expensive to run. An additional £200 off bills could help to plug this gap. This could be funded through a levy on gas bills, covered by a Government fund. The cost to taxpayers would increase each year if more houses install heat pumps. There could also be support for the 300,000 households that have already got the technology, and taxpayers could completely cover the cost of heat pumps for low-income families. A Labour source said the proposals were not under active consideration by the department but were requests from the industry. However, they added that Mr Miliband is looking to help those who do want to install the environmentally-friendly technology. Heat pumps produce three to four times the energy they use, making them much more efficient than a gas boiler, but they also have a far higher upfront cost. The UK's climate change committee said earlier this year that half of homes should have pumps installed by 2040 to meet the country's legal goal of net zero emissions by 2050, up from about only 1 per cent now. There will be a consultation on the plans in October, according to The Times, and a Bill would need to pass through Parliament to enact them. A spokesman for the Department for Energy said: 'We do not recognise this speculation. Our clean energy mission is the best route to bring down bills for good.' Meanwhile, the Conservatives announced they would remove blocks on building new nuclear power plants to lower bills if they win the next election. They said the current 'green tape' adds millions of pounds to project costs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store