logo
Game on for state election 'referendum' on AFL stadium

Game on for state election 'referendum' on AFL stadium

Perth Now06-06-2025
Opponents of a billion-dollar waterfront stadium proposal that would play home to a Tasmanian AFL team vow to step up campaigning if a snap election is called.
They will be met with the voices of Tasmanian AFL legends - such as the Riewoldts, Matthew Richardson and Brendon Gale - in an election one analyst describes as a "referendum" on the project.
Tasmanian politics was up-ended this week by the successful vote of no confidence in Premier Jeremy Rockliff.
Unless the Liberal party opts to remove Mr Rockliff and negotiate a new deal with crossbenchers, an election is set to be called no earlier than Tuesday.
It will be the first winter campaign on the island state for more than two decades and the fourth in seven years.
Senior Liberal figures including senator Jonno Duniam are calling the prospect of a snap election "nuts".
"I would have thought every effort should be put into not going to an election ... the people that lose out most in all this - forget the parliamentarians - it's the people of Tassie," he told ABC Radio.
Analysts tip an unpredictable campaign given the nature of the political turmoil, with fresh candidates from the federal election in May adding another dimension.
Ex-federal Liberal MP Bridget Archer is viewed as a likely candidate in Bass should Mr Rockliff hang on.
Anti-salmon independent Peter George, who ran Julie Collins close in the safe federal seat of Franklin, told AAP he was considering his options.
Opposition leader Dean Winter moved the no-confidence motion due to the state budget, which included ballooning deficits and debt forecasts, as well as proposals to privatise state assets.
However, it's the stadium that looms as the biggest issue.
Veteran political campaigner Brad Stansfield, who has worked on the Liberals' last four election wins, said it would be issue No.1.
"At the last election ... we mostly kept it hidden from the campaign," he said on his FontCast podcast.
"This campaign is going to be the referendum on the AFL stadium that we haven't yet had. It is coming like a steam train."
The roofed Macquarie Point stadium is a condition of the AFL licence, with the state government responsible for delivery and cost overruns.
But recent polls suggest Tasmanians are not sold on the need for a new stadium.
Labor and the Liberals support the stadium, but Mr Stansfield said Mr Rockliff would be the one who paid the electoral price.
"If you don't like the stadium, you will vote against the Liberals," he said.
Roland Browne, spokesperson for the anti-stadium Our Place group, told AAP they would campaign if there is an election.
Firebrand senator Jacqui Lambie, independent federal MP Andrew Wilkie and acclaimed author Richard Flanagan are among well-known Tasmanians to front their cause.
Mr Browne said he foresaw a scenario where one or both of the major parties would join the Greens in opposing the project.
"Everybody wants the AFL teams. But the stadium is a millstone," he told AAP.
Stadium supporters hope the Devils, who have employed favourite son Brendon Gale as its chief executive, can win over stadium opponents.
Senator Duniam said while the state government was copping flack for its struggles to complete the project, the AFL should look to amend the deal or its timelines.
"There's one party to this debacle which seems to keeping pretty quiet for the most part and that's the AFL," he said.
"How about the AFL actually look at what's going on here because of what they've asked us to do?"
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Treating a gangrenous arm with painkillers': Silencing Islamic preacher Wissam Haddad's sermons leaves our community no safer
'Treating a gangrenous arm with painkillers': Silencing Islamic preacher Wissam Haddad's sermons leaves our community no safer

Sky News AU

time32 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

'Treating a gangrenous arm with painkillers': Silencing Islamic preacher Wissam Haddad's sermons leaves our community no safer

The Federal Court's ruling on Wissam Haddad is a win for the Jewish community, but a hollow one. A true victory would have seen Mr Haddad address the media outside the court and say 'I have seen the error of my ways. Jews are not the descendants of pigs, but my fellow Australians. I will now spread that message publicly and privately.' But that's not what we heard. We instead have a ruling from the Federal Court that the videos of offending sermons from Mr Haddad must be scrubbed from the internet, and the teachings not to be repeated in public. What person who believes Jews control the world would have their mind changed by that ruling? Surely they are more likely to have a deeper belief of their anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. Australians have a strong sense of justice. When people spread hateful messages, we want there to be punishment for it. So when a hate preacher suffers legal consequences, it is easy to sit back and think the issue is solved. But the goal must be set higher than that. We want a harmonious society. One where different religions co-exist and hateful ideologies are rejected. Forcing these ideologies underground and away from public scrutiny does not remove them from society but lets them fester in the dark. This is the problem with 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which Mr Haddad was found to have breached. It is not a cure for hatred in society. It is treating a gangrenous arm with painkillers instead of surgery. Reality is kept from the patient as the situation worsens. Section 18C makes it illegal to harass, intimidate, humiliate or insult someone on the basis of their race. These are all worthy objectives, as society is better without people suffering those feelings for immutable characteristics. But 18C can only catch people saying hateful things in the presence - physically or digitally - of those who can be offended. It cannot catch people saying those views in private or thinking them - no law could. People who believe Mr Haddad's hateful teachings will not be swayed by non-believers saying those expressions can't be repeated. If anything, it gives them justification to think the truth is being silenced, and that it is not just holy to spread their views in secret, but brave and exciting. And what becomes exciting to say becomes enticing to hear. The views spread - unchallenged, as we who believe in a harmonious society remain ignorant of these hidden conversations - and the rot of antisemitism in our society grows. Free speech is scary. It permits the spread of good ideas and bad ones alike, and bad ideas must be stopped from spreading. History shows what happens when they spread too far. But the solution to bad speech isn't less speech but more. Bad ideas can be quietened by the law but not snuffed out. It is only the advocacy of good ideas that has been the antidote to bad ones. Support of slavery was the default position of the West for centuries. This stain on our history wasn't scrubbed out by the law. It was through right-minded people continuously and loudly preaching abolition that the public was won over, and slavery became erased through advocacy. It will be a long journey for our society to rid itself of the hateful thoughts Mr Haddad preaches. No society has managed it. But every time these debates are played out in public, it gives us another opportunity to inch closer to the goal. When these stories come up, they display the problem in full view. They give our society a platform to state its morals. They give right-minded influential Islamic leaders in Australia an impetus to reassert to their followers that hateful views aren't acceptable. When these stories stop coming up - because the holders of these views avoid the law's sight - we don't have these opportunities. It is good that Jewish leaders are advocating for their community, especially when so many of our institutions are playing dumb about the spread of anti-Semitism. They should be applauded for their vigorous defence of people who rightly feel marginalised. But for those who think the law is the way to combat anti-Semitism, I would ask: Would you feel safer knowing how many people wanted to cause you harm, or not knowing? James Bolt is a Sky News Australia contributor.

'We're here': Australia joins the race for US academics
'We're here': Australia joins the race for US academics

Perth Now

time2 hours ago

  • Perth Now

'We're here': Australia joins the race for US academics

Australia hopes to bring America's brightest minds Down Under as Donald Trump's research cuts spark a US brain drain. The US president has taken a chainsaw to science funding, slashing thousands of government grants and transforming the global state of research. Former Labor leader Bill Shorten, now vice-chancellor of the University of Canberra, said efforts by the Australian Academy of Science to attract American talent was good national co-ordination. "I'm very pro-American, but if their current government doesn't want some of their best to brightest minds, why should we let them go to Europe or Asia?" he told AAP. "We haven't invented this challenging environment for American higher education ... but that doesn't mean that we should sit back and watch the French, the Germans, the Asian nations, recruit these clever people without at least Australia saying 'we're here too'." The academy has designed a relocation package which includes research funding, access to facilities, family relocation support and visa acceleration in a bid to recruit leading US scientists and Australians returning home. About 70 people have already indicated interest. Some were directly impacted by the Trump administration's budget cuts and lost either their positions or support for their areas of research. Though there have been cuts across a range of disciplines, some of the more significant slashes have been applied to areas such as virology and immunology, alongside cuts to the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration which enables researchers to forecast weather and model climate change. Other interested researchers have seen the havoc wreaked on American academia and become "disillusioned or despairing" of their ability to pursue their interests in the US, Australian Academy of Science chief executive Anna-Maria Arabia said. By comparison, Australia's research landscape is more stable and less politically driven. "Whilst it's a volatile situation and quite an unfortunate one that we are experiencing, there is a tremendous opportunity for Australia," she told AAP. By bringing more to Australia, they can contribute to research and development which can eventually open up new economic sectors, new trade potential and a plethora of other benefits, Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering chief executive Kylie Walker said. "You're looking at a decade or more to show benefits from that investment, but when they come - my goodness - they come," she told AAP. Australia isn't the only nation hoping to capitalise on Mr Trump's attack on academia. His cuts have ignited a "global race" for science and technology talent, and Australia's universities, research organisations and agencies such as the CSIRO are all trying to attract them. Almost half of the academy's fellows, which are Australia's most distinguished scientists, were born overseas and many had a multiplier effect when they arrived in Australia as they trained the next generation and helped seed industries. "This is the Australian story, this is what science is in Australia," Ms Arabia said. "It's multicultural, it's of the highest standard, it's undertaken in a supportive environment and in a democratic environment where we nurture science and our scientists."

Councillor launches bid to be council's first woman mayor
Councillor launches bid to be council's first woman mayor

Perth Now

time4 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Councillor launches bid to be council's first woman mayor

A woman who holds the record for the youngest elected councillor at Joondalup is hoping to become its next mayor. Christine Hamilton-Prime, who was elected at the age of 19 and has been a councillor for nearly 16 years, is among the first to declare her candidacy for the top job along with ex-Federal Liberal Ian Goodenough. It follows mayor Albert Jacob exclusively revealing to PerthNow this week he would not recontest the mayoral post at the October local government election. Cr Hamilton-Prime, a stakeholder relations director with WA-based aerospace company Space Angel, says she has represented the community with integrity, passion and leadership since 2009. She wants to drive economic growth, improve community wellbeing and strengthen Joondalup as a thriving, future-ready city. 'I'm running for mayor because I believe Joondalup deserves strong, united leadership that delivers real results,' she said in a statement. 'This is our moment to unlock the full potential of our city — to drive the local economy, support local jobs, create vibrant communities, and ensure smart, sustainable growth.' Cr Hamilton-Prime's interest in running for council so young was piqued in high school when she was on two council committees: a streetscape group and the crime prevention and community safety committee. 'It gave me an appreciation of how local government works from a resident's perspective and how you can make an impact,' she said. 'That inspired me to run for council because there were many projects I was passionate about.' As deputy mayor she promoted Joondalup on the State-led 2022 Invest and Trade WA Mission to India. She is a cyber security advocate and vice-patron of the Sorrento Surf Life Saving Club. If elected, she would become the first woman to hold the office of mayor at Joondalup.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store