Trump Says Coca-Cola to Switch to Cane Sugar in US
The company currently uses high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) in its domestic beverages -- a sweetener that has long drawn criticism from Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his Make America Healthy Again movement, AFP said.
"I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.
"I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them -- You'll see. It's just better!"
The US president did not explain what motivated his push for the change, which would not impact his well-known favorite beverage, Diet Coke.
Since his return to the White House, Trump has re-installed a special button in the Oval Office which summons a helping of the sugar-free carbonated drink.
Coca-Cola did not immediately confirm the ingredient shift.
"We appreciate President Trump's enthusiasm for our iconic Coca‑Cola brand. More details on new innovative offerings within our Coca‑Cola product range will be shared soon," the company said in a short statement.
HFCS became popular in the 1970s, with its use skyrocketing thanks to government subsidies for corn growers and high import tariffs on cane sugar.
Any shift away from corn is likely to draw backlash in the Corn Belt, a Midwestern region that has been a stronghold of support for Trump.
Both HFCS and sucrose (cane sugar) are composed of fructose and glucose. However, they differ structurally: HFCS contains free (unbonded) fructose and glucose in varying ratios -- 55/45 in soft drinks -- while sucrose consists of the two sugars chemically bonded together.
These structural differences, however, don't appear to significantly affect health outcomes.
A 2022 review of clinical studies found no meaningful differences between HFCS and sucrose in terms of weight gain or heart health.
The only notable distinction was an increase in a marker of inflammation in people consuming HFCS. Overall, both sweeteners appear similarly impactful when consumed at equal calorie levels.
Despite this, Mexican Coke -- which is made with cane sugar -- is often sold at a premium in US stores and prized for its more "natural" flavor.
Trump's prized Diet Coke is sweetened with aspartame -- a compound classified as a "possible carcinogen" by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
35 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
President Donald Trump will sign a new cryptocurrency bill into law on Friday
President Donald Trump on Friday will sign into law a new set of regulations for a type of cryptocurrency that are seen as a way to legitimize the burgeoning industry. The GENIUS Act sets initial guardrails and consumer protections for stablecoins – a type of cryptocurrency that is tied to a stable asset like the US dollar to reduce price volatility. It passed both the House and Senate with wide bipartisan margins. The measure is meant to bolster consumer confidence in the rapidly growing crypto sector. Its passage comes as Trump makes it a mission to make the US the crypto capital of the world. 'Congratulations to our GREAT REPUBLICANS for being able to accomplish so much – a record in so short a period of time,' Trump wrote on his social media site Friday morning as he announced the bill signing. The House also passed two other bills Thursday that are meant to boost the legitimacy of the crypto industry. One creates a new market structure for cryptocurrency and the other bans the Federal Reserve from issuing a new digital currency. Both measures now go to the Senate.
Al Arabiya
35 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump's firing of 2 democrats on the federal trade commission was unconstitutional, judge rules
A federal judge has ruled that President Donald Trump illegally fired two Democrats on the Federal Trade Commission earlier this year in his efforts to exert control over independent agencies across the government. One of the commissioners, Alvaro Bedoya, resigned after suing to challenge the firings. The other plaintiff, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, can now resume her duties as commissioner because Trump lacks the constitutional authority to remove her, the judge ruled Thursday. Attorneys for the Trump administration almost immediately declared their intent to appeal. US District Judge Loren AliKhan cited decades of legal precedent in her written opinion, including a 1935 US Supreme Court decision that found a similar attempt by President Franklin D. Roosevelt was unlawful because commissioners could be removed only for cause, not at the president's whim. She said her ruling would uphold clearly established law that has been enacted by a coequal branch of government, reaffirmed by another coequal branch, and acquiesced to by thirteen executives over the course of ninety years. Trump fired the commission's two Democratic members in March. The FTC is a regulator created by Congress that enforces consumer protection measures and antitrust legislation. Its seats typically include three members of the president's party and two from the opposing party. Commissioners Bedoya and Slaughter said they'd been dismissed illegally and immediately promised to sue. Bedoya later submitted his resignation in June. Slaughter has four years left in her term as commissioner. 'As the Court recognized today, the law is clear and I look forward to getting back to work,' Slaughter said in a statement Thursday. During a May court hearing in federal court in Washington D.C., plaintiffs' attorneys warned against granting the president absolute removal power over any executive officer, saying it would effectively eliminate an important check on his power. 'That has never been the case in this country,' said attorney Aaron Crowell. 'That's not the law. That has never been the law.' But attorneys for the Trump administration argued that the FTC's role has expanded since the 1930s and as such, its members should answer directly to the president. 'The president should be able to remove someone who is actively blocking his policies, for example,' Department of Justice attorney Emily Hall said during the hearing. AliKhan, who was nominated to the federal bench by President Joe Biden in 2023, noted the long line of presidents before Trump who didn't try to push the limits. Commissioners are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. They serve seven-year terms that are staggered to prevent multiple vacancies at once. They can be fired for displaying specific bad behaviors including inefficiency, neglect of duty, and malfeasance in office. Trump told Bedoya and Slaughter that he was dismissing them because their service on the commission was inconsistent with his administration's priorities, according to the lawsuit. In its 1935 decision, the Supreme Court unanimously held that the president couldn't fire leaders of independent agencies without cause. Otherwise, the agencies would become more political and less independent. While that restriction was eroded in a subsequent decision that came in 2020, it has largely remained in place. The case, known as Humphreys Executor, has been central to a number of court challenges against the Trump administration's personnel moves targeting boards and government executives. The legal fight over the firings could have consequences for other independent agencies, including the Federal Reserve, an institution that has long sought to protect its independence. Economists and financial markets broadly support an independent Fed because they worry a politicized version would be more reluctant to take unpopular steps to fight inflation, such as raise interest rates. Plaintiffs argue that a politicized FTC could also favor powerful corporations while driving up prices for consumers. Attorney Amit Agarwal said the case isn't just about his clients keeping their jobs. He said it's about protecting the will of the American people and their right to have independent agencies working on their behalf. 'America is already suffering from an excess of executive power and the last thing we need is to hand vast new powers to the president over Congress's explicit and longstanding objection,' Agarwal said in a statement responding to the ruling, adding that if Trump wants even more power, he should ask the people's elected representatives in Congress, not unelected and politically unaccountable courts.
Argaam
35 minutes ago
- Argaam
Fed's Waller calls for interest cut by July-end
Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller said he supports a 25-basis-point interest rate cut at the upcoming monetary policy meeting scheduled for July 29–30, citing escalating economic risks and weakening labor market momentum. Speaking at a New York University event on Friday morning, Waller said that data still points to ongoing economic growth, but at a slower pace - reinforcing the need for monetary easing. Moreover, inflationary pressures stemming from the tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump's administration are likely to be temporary. The Fed can look past them and instead focus on broader economic trends, Waller added. Waller pointed out that the current interest rate range of 4.25% - 4.5% remains above the estimated neutral level of around 3%, and said that if growth continues to slow and inflationary pressures remain contained, he would support further gradual rate cuts in future meetings.
