Tasha Kheiriddin: A Carney pipeline means an angry Liberal base
For months, Prime Minister Mark Carney has spoken about making Canada an energy superpower. He said it on the campaign trail, mentioned it again in an interview with CTV news in May, and dropped it again last weekend at the Calgary Stampede. While he usually inserts the qualifier of 'both clean and conventional energy,' in an interview Saturday he stated that it's 'highly, highly likely' that at least one oil pipeline will make the government's list of national strategic infrastructure projects.
Article content
Article content
Those words aren't a dog whistle — they're a bugle call to western premiers, notably Alberta Premier Danielle Smith. At a press conference with Ontario Premier Doug Ford this week, Smith waxed enthusiastic about a 'grand bargain' involving pipelines and the Pathways Alliance, a group of energy producers promoting carbon capture as a means of 'decarbonizing' fossil fuel production. The two premiers agreed to study the construction of a pipeline to the East and a rail line to the West, to send Alberta oil to eastern Canada and critical minerals from Ontario's Ring of Fire to western ports.
Article content
Article content
Article content
Those national infrastructure projects appear to be chugging along, full steam ahead. But they still need the federal government on board — and despite his talk, Carney still must walk the walk. And that may not be as easy as some may hope.
Article content
First, Carney has a very verdant past. He is a longtime climate finance evangelist, promoting green energy projects as chair of Brookfields, authoring a book on 'value(s),' arguing for ESG investment frameworks, and serving as the UN Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance. Will he turn his back on those beliefs — or find a way to reconcile them with pro-development positions?
Article content
Second, the Liberal Party's green flank is likely to see red. Former and current environment ministers Steven Guilbault and Julie Dabrusin are part of the anti-oil crowd, as are many rank and file members of the party in urban Ontario, Quebec, and B.C. Until now, they called the tune: under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, the Liberals were the party of carbon taxes, not carbon capture, of emissions caps, not Energy East.
Article content
Third, there are potential roadblocks that are out of Carney's control. Opposition is brewing among environmental and indigenous groups to his recently passed Bill C-5, the 'One Canadian Economy Act,' which promises to streamline approval for resource projects. Canada has seen civil disobedience before, when members of the Wet'suwet'en band blocked railways in early 2020 to protest pipeline construction: a sequel could be coming to a rail line near you, and it's not clear how Carney would respond.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Michael Higgins: Mark Carney abandons Canadian principles for pinky promises on Palestine
There's an axiom that you don't negotiate with terrorists. Give credit where it is due, Prime Minister Mark Carney didn't negotiate with Hamas, he just surrendered to them. Article content Carney's announcement on Wednesday that Canada would recognize the state of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September is a direct consequence of the butchery, slaughter, rape and abductions carried out by Hamas on October 7, 2023. Article content Article content Article content It is a reward for terrorism. Article content Article content To be sure, there has been a lot of death and destruction since that date, and Israel cannot escape all the blame — but that mayhem could have been avoided if Hamas had handed over the hostages they took 21 months ago. Article content At his press conference Wednesday, Carney said, 'The deepening suffering of civilians leaves no room for delay in coordinated international action to support peace, security and the dignity of human life.' Article content Terrific. But what if those fine words had been offered by a Liberal prime minister on October 8, 2023? What if he had been joined by the British prime minister of the time (since the current one, Keith Starmer, is also intent on recognizing a Palestinian state)? What if the UN had joined them? Article content If international action had been mobilized on October 8 against the obscenity that is Hamas, we wouldn't be where we are today. Article content Carney also said, 'Canada is always among the first to stand to defend peace and security around the world.' Article content Article content Not on October 8, 2023 it wasn't. Article content Article content Carney said, 'International cooperation is essential to securing lasting peace and stability in the Middle East and Canada will do its best to help lead that effort.' Article content Carney's official statement reads, 'For decades, it was hoped that this outcome (a two-state solution) would be achieved as part of a peace process built around a negotiated settlement between the Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority. Regrettably this approach is no longer credible.' Article content To clarify, it's almost nine decades since a two-state solution was first proposed and then rejected by the Palestinians. Article content It is instructive to look back at that proposal by the Peel Commission which issued a report in 1937 urging the partition of the British Middle East into a Jewish and an Arab homeland. Article content Because almost ninety years later nothing has changed. Article content The Peel Commission said, 'For Partition means that neither will get all it wants. It means that the Arabs must acquiesce in the exclusion from their sovereignty of a piece of territory, long occupied and once ruled by them. It means that the Jews must be content with less than the Land of Israel they once ruled and have hoped to rule again. But it seems possible that on reflection both parties will come to realize that the drawbacks of Partition are outweighed by its advantages. For, if it offers neither party all it wants, it offers each what it wants most, namely freedom and security.'
Ottawa Citizen
an hour ago
- Ottawa Citizen
'Dangerous and premature': Canada's Jewish advocacy groups decry Carney's Palestinian announcement
Article content Jewish groups in Canada reacted swiftly and negatively to Prime Minister Mark Carney's announcement Wednesday that the country will recognize a State of Palestine at the United Nations in September. Article content Carney told reporters that the recognition was conditional on the Palestinian Authority, which governs the West Bank, going forward with significant reforms including demilitarization and holding a general election in 2026. He also accused the Israeli government of failing to 'prevent the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian disaster in Gaza.' Article content Today, the Prime Minister stated that Canada will pre-emptively recognize a Palestinian state. This is predicated on misplaced faith in vague commitments by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, notorious for his corruption, lack of democratic credibility, and funding of… — CIJA (@CIJAinfo) July 30, 2025 Article content Article content Noah Shack, CEO of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, released a statement Wednesday on what the group called 'Canada's Middle East Position.' The CIJA is the advocacy agent of Jewish Federations of Canada-UIA, representing Jewish Federations across Canada. Article content 'Today, the Prime Minister stated that Canada will pre-emptively recognize a Palestinian state,' Shack said. 'This is predicated on misplaced faith in vague commitments by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, notorious for his corruption, lack of democratic credibility, and funding of terrorists.' Article content He continued: 'Extending recognition absent real change on the ground is a recipe for another failed Palestinian pseudo-state controlled by terrorists. It is deeply concerning that the government did not make statehood recognition contingent on the removal of Hamas from Gaza and the return of Israeli hostages. This only emboldens Hamas and condemns Palestinians and Israelis — including the hostages and their families — to more suffering.
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
'Dangerous and premature': Canada's Jewish advocacy groups decry Carney's Palestinian announcement
Jewish groups in Canada reacted swiftly and negatively to Prime Minister Mark Carney's announcement Wednesday that the country will recognize a State of Palestine at the United Nations in September. Article content Carney told reporters that the recognition was conditional on the Palestinian Authority, which governs the West Bank, going forward with significant reforms including demilitarization and holding a general election in 2026. He also accused the Israeli government of failing to 'prevent the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian disaster in Gaza.' Article content Article content Today, the Prime Minister stated that Canada will pre-emptively recognize a Palestinian state. This is predicated on misplaced faith in vague commitments by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, notorious for his corruption, lack of democratic credibility, and funding of… — CIJA (@CIJAinfo) July 30, 2025 Article content Article content Noah Shack, CEO of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, released a statement Wednesday on what the group called 'Canada's Middle East Position.' The CIJA is the advocacy agent of Jewish Federations of Canada-UIA, representing Jewish Federations across Canada. 'Today, the Prime Minister stated that Canada will pre-emptively recognize a Palestinian state,' Shack said. 'This is predicated on misplaced faith in vague commitments by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, notorious for his corruption, lack of democratic credibility, and funding of terrorists.' Article content He continued: 'Extending recognition absent real change on the ground is a recipe for another failed Palestinian pseudo-state controlled by terrorists. It is deeply concerning that the government did not make statehood recognition contingent on the removal of Hamas from Gaza and the return of Israeli hostages. This only emboldens Hamas and condemns Palestinians and Israelis — including the hostages and their families — to more suffering.
