The latest Greenwich restaurant, takeaway and cafe food hygiene ratings
Environmental health officers from Greenwich have been busy this fortnight visiting businesses across the area to see if they are meeting hygiene requirements.
Based on guidelines set by the Food Standards Agency, inspectors look to see how clean the facilities are; what food safety management procedures are in place and how hygienic food handling is.
Ratings are then dished out from five to zero — with the higher score the better the result.
Five — Very Good
Banh Mi Leo at 19 Lovibond Lane, Greenwich, rated 5 on June 25, 2025.
Boots at 51 Greenwich Church Street, Greenwich, rated 5 on July 1, 2025.
Busy Bees at London Mottingham at 35 West Park, Eltham, rated 5 on June 30, 2025.
Café Madre, rated 5 on June 27, 2025.
Candy Kings at 38 Hylton Street, Plumstead, rated 5 on June 27, 2025.
Favourable Fried Chicken at 64 Eltham High Street, Eltham, rated 5 on July 1, 2025.
Greenwich Spirits at 8 Gun Carriage Walk Duke Of Wellington Avenue, Woolwich, rated 5 on June 30, 2025.
Iceland Food Warehouse at Unit 1a Stone Lake Retail Park 601 Woolwich Road, Greenwich, rated 5 on June 30, 2025.
Little Goblins at 17 Newmarket Green, Eltham, rated 5 on June 30, 2025.
Medi Set Go Ltd, rated 5 on June 30, 2025.
Meridian Fitness at 38 Creek Road, Deptford, rated 5 on July 1, 2025.
MERKUR Slots at 111 Eltham High Street, Eltham, rated 5 on June 30, 2025.
Morrisons Petrol Station at Petrol Filling Station 3 Twin Tumps Way, Thamesmead, rated 5 on July 1, 2025.
Mydetoxdiet at Unit 12 Lansdowne Workshops Lansdowne Mews, Charlton, rated 5 on July 1, 2025.
Nando's at 25 Entertainment Avenue, Greenwich, rated 5 on June 25, 2025.
Oldschoolcrumbs, rated 5 on July 1, 2025.
Read more
New Abercrombie & Fitch store set to open at Bluewater shopping centre
Premier League darts star prepares shoot for Dartford FC's new kit
The latest food hygiene ratings in Bromley including Costa, Sainsbury's and more
Osiris lounge at 108 Woolwich High Street, Woolwich, rated 5 on June 26, 2025.
Papa Johns at 119 Woolwich Road, Greenwich, rated 5 on July 2, 2025.
PH Wisdom Ltd, rated 5 on June 30, 2025.
Severndroog Castle at Castle Wood Severndroog Castle Shooters Hill, Plumstead, rated 5 on June 26, 2025.
St Margaret's C of E Primary School at St Margarets Ce Primary School St Margarets Grove, Plumstead, rated 5 on June 26, 2025.
St Thomas A Beckett RC Primary School at St Thomas A Beckett Primary School 230 Mottisfont Road, Abbey Wood, rated 5 on July 1, 2025.
Starbucks Coffee at 54 - 56 Greenwich Church Street, Greenwich, rated 5 on June 30, 2025.
THE WHALE TEA at 47 Greenwich Church Street, Greenwich, rated 5 on June 27, 2025.
TJ's E'cigarettes at 52 Well Hall Road, Eltham, rated 5 on July 1, 2025.
Top Fryers Fish Bar at 37 The Village, Charlton, rated 5 on June 26, 2025.
Businesses may have been reinspected since and this will be reflected in our next round-up.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Most important part of chancellor's annual Mansion House speech was what wasn't said
The real story from Tuesday night's Mansion House was more what didn't happen than what did happen. These speeches are traditionally the chancellor's big annual opportunity to announce reforms to the financial sector, and to the way the government taxes and regulates the money system. Speculation was rife in the run-up to this one that Rachel Reeves would impose new constraints on the amount that people can put into tax-free ISA savings. Some wondered, too, whether the chancellor would impose new taxes on the banking system, softening the blow slightly by loosening the capital requirements and certification rules that make it harder to recruit top bankers. In the event, neither happened. The chancellor did not announce any changes to the ISA scheme, though she added that she "will continue to consider further changes to ISAs". She didn't announce an increase of the bank levy, as some suspected, though she did loosen some of the regulations facing bankers. Read more: There was a host of other plans announced, collected into a package Ms Reeves has dubbed the "Leeds Reforms" (after the city which contains her constituency - also home to many financial firms). The chancellor said these amounted to "the most wide-ranging package of reforms to financial services regulation in more than a decade". But given the previous chancellor, Jeremy Hunt, made very similar noises three years ago when he announced his own "Edinburgh Reforms", and given many in the financial sector judge that very little has changed, you have reason to be a little sceptical. Impactful reforms None of which is to say you won't be affected by any of the reforms announced on Tuesday night. If you are planning to buy a home, one change just announced (actually by the Bank of England, not the Treasury) should serve to make more high loan-to-value mortgages available for buyers - in particular, mortgages at more than 4.5 times a buyer's income. However, perhaps the most significant of all the elements of the chancellor's speech wasn't the "Leeds Reforms" or the fact that there weren't changes to the ISA regime or the bank levy - it was the fiscal elephant in the room. Because only a couple of weeks ago, everything changed. The government performed a drastic u-turn on its welfare reforms, leaving a gaping hole in the public finances, that (all else equal) will have to be filled with either higher taxes, less spending or more borrowing. Shortly afterwards, the chancellor was pictured in tears in the House of Commons. Markets responded dramatically. This was the chancellor's first speech since that moment. So the real question on Tuesday night was whether she would refer either to the black hole or to the tears. Well, there was a glancing reference to the latter. Referring to a recent visit to a school, where she was asked what job she most wanted in the world, the chancellor said: "Given the events of the last few weeks, I suspect many of you would sympathise if I had said: 'anything but chancellor.' "But I didn't. "I am proud to stand here tonight and address you for a second time at Mansion House as the Chancellor of the Exchequer." Speaking of the fiscal rules hemming her in, she also said: "This government and I remain committed to our non-negotiable rules." All of which raises the question: how will the government meet those rules? The most likely answer is: higher taxes. The real question is: which taxes, and when do we learn about them? The Mansion House speech provided no further answers.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Reeves Pledges to Reform UK's Ring-Fencing Rules
CC-Transcript 00:00 Now let me turn to the changes I'm making to capital requirements to allow UK banks to do more lending and release more capital for investment into our infrastructure and into our businesses. First, I'm supporting the Bank of England's decision to raise the asset threshold for AML requirements to between 25 and £40 billion. This will both benefit the Challenger banks and bring increased competition and innovation to the market and support those businesses to expand their footprint here in the UK. Second, I am confirming our approach to Basel 3.1 implementing lower capital requirements for domestically focused banks from January 2027, while preserving flexibility on our approach for international banks to ensure that the UK always remains competitive whilst aligning with international standards. Third, I have committed to meaningful reform of the UK's ring fencing regime. Recognizing that now is the time to go further in tackling inefficiency and boosting growth. While retaining the aspects of the regime that support financial stability and protect consumer deposits. And fourth, following the new growth focused remit letter I sent in November, I welcomed the Financial Policy Committee's announcement that it will review the overall level of bank capital needed for UK financial stability. Reporting back to me by the end of this year. The review will inform the work that the Treasury is taking forward with the bank to ensure the prudential framework strikes the optimal balance to deliver resilience, growth and competitiveness.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Davey proposes major shake-up of green energy contracts to ‘slash bills'
Sir Ed Davey will propose that all green energy projects be moved to a Government subsidy scheme in a speech accusing Nigel Farage and Kemi Badenoch of peddling 'myths' about net zero. The Liberal Democrat leader will call for a 'rapid' transition to Contracts for Difference (CfD), which work by guaranteeing generators a fixed 'strike price' for electricity regardless of the wholesale price. CfDs are awarded by Government auction to firms bidding to produce renewable energy for the UK grid, with developers either paid a subsidy up to the strike price or repaying the surplus while the market price fluctuates. In a speech at the Institute for Public Policy Research think tank, Sir Ed will say that only 15% of green power is produced under such contracts, with the rest still coming from an old legacy scheme. The 2002 Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROC) scheme, which does not involve a strike price guarantee, closed to new generation in 2017 but still governs some projects on contracts due to expire by 2037. Sir Ed will argue that the ROC scheme was introduced 'when ministers didn't have the foresight to realise that renewable power would get so much cheaper over the next two decades'. He will call on ministers to move all legacy agreements on to CfD, saying the transition would slash household energy bills by 'breaking the link' between gas prices and electricity costs. The party leader is expected to say: 'People are currently paying too much for renewable energy. 'But not for the reasons Nigel Farage would have you believe. 'Because generating electricity from solar or wind is now significantly cheaper than gas – even when you factor in extra system costs for back-up power when the wind isn't blowing or the sun isn't shining. 'But people aren't seeing the benefit of cheap renewable power, because wholesale electricity prices are still tied to the price of gas.' Sir Ed will add: 'Unlike Contracts for Difference, companies with ROCs get paid the wholesale price – in other words, the price of gas – with a subsidy on top. 'Subsidies paid through levies on our energy bills – costing a typical household around £90 a year.' The Lib Dem leader will describe the legacy system as 'manifestly unfair' for consumers and call on the Government to 'start today a rapid process of moving all those old ROC renewable projects on to new Contracts for Difference.' Taking aim at the Reform UK and Tory leaders, who have both expressed scepticism about the Government pledge to achieve net zero by 2050, Sir Ed will say: 'The narrative – seized upon by Nigel Farage and Kemi Badenoch – says the reason energy bills are so high is that we're investing too much in renewable power. 'And if we just stopped that investment – and relied more on oil and gas instead – bills would magically come down for everyone. 'The experience of record high gas prices in recent years shows that's not true… we know that tying ourselves ever more to fossil fuels would only benefit foreign dictators like Vladimir Putin – which is probably why Farage is so keen on it. 'But refusing to engage hasn't stopped his myths from spreading, from gaining traction in the new world of fake news. So we must change that.'
