Brazil's markets face testing time after Trump tariff blow
Currency volatility gauges were at their highest since the back end of April's 'Liberation Day' panic, after the real slumped as much as 2.8% on Wednesday in reaction to what Deutsche Bank described as an escalation of tensions.
U.S.-listed shares of Brazilian firms and banks sank in premarket trading, with Itau Unibanco losing 2.7%, Banco Santander down 2.4% and state oil firm Petrobras (PETR4.SA), opens new tab down nearly 1%.
Bond traders were also bracing for the local market to reopen. Brazil's bonds have been a strong performer in emerging markets this year, with international dollar-denominated bonds returning nearly 8% and local real ones a whopping 20%.
MSCI's dollar-denominated Brazil stock index is up nearly 25%, too, helped by the year's 13% surge in the real.
Graham Stock at RBC BlueBay Asset Management said Trump's reasoning for the 50% tariff level had centred on his grievances around a court case against right-wing former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro, as well as legal moves against U.S. social media firms.
"The economic implications are nevertheless fairly modest," Stock said, as just over 10% of Brazil's exports go to the U.S., and were worth only around 1% of the former's GDP.
"The risk is that President Lula seeks to exploit his defiance of U.S. interference as a badge of honour in the run-up to the October 2026 elections, in which case de-escalation becomes less likely," he said.
Wednesday's decision by Trump followed a threat on Monday to impose an additional 10% tariff on the BRICS group of developing nations - of which Brazil is the 'B' - which he called "anti-American."
The tariffs on Brazil could have a significant impact on food prices in the United States.
Around a third of the coffee consumed in the U.S., the world's largest drinker of the beverage, comes from Brazil and more than half of all the orange juice sold in the U.S. also comes from the South American agricultural powerhouse.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Top DOJ official to meet today with Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell inside a Florida federal prison
A senior Justice Department official plans to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend and accomplice, on Thursday in Florida, where she is serving time for her role in a scheme to abuse girls, according to a report. As questions swirled around the handling of the so-called Epstein files, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced Tuesday he planned to meet with Maxwell in the 'coming days.' That meeting is expected to happen Thursday, ABC News reported. Earlier this week, Maxwell's attorneys confirmed their client was 'in discussions' with the government. The 63-year-old was sentenced to 20 years in 2021 for her role in a scheme to sexually exploit and abuse multiple girls with Epstein and is serving time at the Florida Correctional Institution-Tallahassee. Her attorneys have taken an appeal of her conviction to the Supreme Court. The development comes amid an uproar around the Epstein files after the Wall Street Journal reported that President Donald Trump was told in May that his name appeared in the files 'multiple times.' The president filed a $10 billion defamation suit against the paper and its owners after it published a report claiming that Trump gave Epstein a bawdy birthday card in 2003; he has vehemently denied the claims. 'This is another fake news story, just like the previous story by The Wall Street Journal,' White House communications director Steven Cheung told the paper about the claims Trump was named. However, Attorney General Pam Bondi confirmed Trump was told that he is in the files. Being mentioned is not an indication of wrongdoing and officials say hundreds of names appear. Shortly after Blanche's announcement Tuesday, the House Oversight Committee approved a subpoena for Maxwell. Speaking to reporters at the White House later that day, Trump said that the subpoena for Maxwell "sounds appropriate." Last week, Trump requested Attorney General Pam Bondi release 'any and all pertinent' grand jury transcripts related to the Epstein case. Bondi then asked the judges overseeing the cases of Epstein and Maxwell; two judges have so far denied these requests. Trump's request came as the White House attempted to quell the noise following the DOJ's July 6 memo, which stated that no further disclosures were necessary in the Epstein matter.
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Copper's physical tariff trade is rapidly unwinding
LONDON, July 24 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump sprang a double surprise on the copper market when he announced import tariffs of 50% effective next month. The market was betting that tariffs would be set lower and come with a longer lead-time. The futures market is rapidly readjusting, with the CME copper contract punching out record highs as it prices in the higher tariff differential with the London Metal Exchange (LME) contract. So too is the physical supply chain. The August 1 start date signals the end of the race to ship physical metal to the United States to capture the tariff arbitrage. A lucky few with cargoes already afloat may yet cross the finishing line in time, but the physical tariff trade is rapidly unwinding. That's already manifest in rising inventory and loosening time-spreads on the London market. The tariff trade has been a bonanza for merchants and traders ever since the Trump administration announced the launch of a national security investigation into U.S. copper import dependency back in February. It's been such a money-spinner that they've stripped both the physical supply chain and markets of last resort, such as the LME and the Shanghai Futures Exchange (ShFE), for available copper. U.S. imports of refined copper surged to 541,600 metric tons between March and May, equivalent to 60% of imports over the whole of 2024. Flows from traditional sources such as Chile and Peru have accelerated, and they've been supplemented by arrivals of Australian, Asian and European brands of copper. CME inventory has more than doubled since the start of March and at 222,723 tons is now just shy of the 2018 peak. More copper is sitting in the off-market shadows. Analysts are pegging the excess at somewhere between 400,000 and 500,000 tons, which in the view of Citi would "negate U.S. copper import demand for the rest of 2025." Allowing for continued flows of metal under long-term supply contracts, it could take up to nine months to work off the mountain of metal, according to Macquarie Bank. It won't take that long for the global supply chain to adjust, judging by rising stocks and looser spreads on the London market. Indeed, the benchmark cash to three months period flipped from backwardation to contango almost immediately on the tariff confirmation, as 25,000 tons of copper earmarked for physical load-out were dumped back in the market. With the shipping window to the United States now closed, LME inventory has jumped by 33,525 tons this month, thanks in large part to shipments by Chinese producers. Chinese exports of refined copper have been accelerating since March in response to the U.S. drain on LME stocks and the resulting spread tightness. LME warehouses in Taiwan and South Korea have traditionally been the prime locations for receiving Chinese metal, but the opening of exchange warehouses in Hong Kong now allows for faster delivery. Exchange warehouses on the island have already received 5,975 tons of copper since opening for business on July 15. There may be more to come. The LME benchmark spread is now in a comfortable contango of $66 per ton, compared with a backwardation of more than $300 per ton at the end of June. Trump's tariffs have split global copper pricing between the United States and the rest of the world. Copper bulls are cheering CME's rise to new historic highs, but this is a direct reaction to higher than expected import tariffs rather than a reflection of global market dynamics. The CME spot premium over the LME price has jumped from $1,233 per ton on July 7 to $3,095. In terms of the implied tariff impact on U.S. pricing, the CME price differential has widened from 13% to 31% since Trump pulled the tariff trigger. The LME three-month price , by contrast, remains locked in a sideways range just below $10,000 per ton, still a good way short of the record highs above $11,000 per ton seen in May 2024. Despite the mass relocation of global inventory towards the United States, total exchange stocks are little changed on the start of the year. Including both LME off-warrant stocks and copper registered with ShFE's international INE arm, global exchange inventory is currently down by just 18,000 tons on the start of January. The stable LME price, rather than the overheated U.S. price, captures that ambiguous reality. The devilish detail in the new tariffs is conspicuously lacking. Will copper product imports be included? Will there be restrictions on U.S. exports of copper scrap? Will there be exemptions for favoured suppliers? We don't yet know, but it's clear that global pricing has just fractured. Doctor Copper now has a transatlantic double, but the real reflector of global manufacturing activity is the one in London, not the U.S. doppelganger. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Why Trump's political playbook is failing in the Epstein case
The problem with a successful playbook is that you eventually keep doing the same thing mechanically. Fresh from intimidating ABC and CBS with meritless lawsuits, Donald Trump is suing Rupert Murdoch and the Wall Street Journal reporters who broke the story of a lewd birthday message for Jeffrey Epstein. But, unlike with the frivolous allegations against the big broadcasters, there's clearly a fact of the matter here: an authentic letter either exists or it does not; and there is plenty to be revealed in the process of finding out. Trump's time-proven move – whatever happens, just counter-attack – is likely to keep the very story he wants to kill alive. Meanwhile, the other elements of his playbook – deny, deflect, distract – only work if journalists and Democrats play along. They, not the seemingly all-important Trump base, are the actors to watch. We still debate whether Trumpism is a substantial ideology or not; what we are missing is that Trumpism, for sure, is a set of tactics for exploiting weaknesses in the US political, legal and media systems. Some of these tactics were inherited from his mentor Roy Cohn and many are now being adopted by Trump's followers – one must never admit guilt; one must always swing back; and one must reject, or ideally entirely bury, defeats (such as Trump's case against Bob Woodward and Woodward's publisher being dismissed recently). But there is also a less obvious element and it has to do with managing political time (a challenge for all politicians, come to think of it). The point is not just seizing opportunities or exploiting opponents' weaknesses in a timely manner; rather, it is about the art of speeding things up or slowing them down to one's advantage. Think of how we appear to have become inured to Trump doing and saying things that would have ended previous presidencies (OK, previous presidents did not have AI-generated images of themselves as kings or popes available, but still). One reason is this: an administration that faces one or two big scandals in a four-year period may well be damaged beyond repair; one that produces three very big scandals a day seems to have nothing to worry about since no one can keep up. It is difficult to stick with one story, as the newest outrage already appears so much bigger (the Qatar plane scandal can feel like it happened years ago). To be sure, not all scandals are consciously produced, but there is little doubt that Trump's posting an AI-generated clip of Barack Obama being arrested in the White House and identifying Obama as a 'ringleader' of election fraud are meant to distract – which is not to deny that they would justify impeachment. While the frequency of scandals is maximized to game the news cycle, the legal system is used to slow things down. Releasing the grand jury testimonies in the Epstein case will take time, if the request is not rejected altogether by courts (as has already happened in Florida). Even if they are released, they are unlikely to contain anything relevant about Trump. The calculation is that, a few weeks from now, the files will be forgotten. None of this is to suggest Trump is a master Machiavellian who can manipulate Americans (or even just his base) at will. His approach partly works because institutional and cultural contexts have changed: news cycles are shorter, as are attention spans. His behavior has become progressively normalized – and generalized: shamelessness once unique to him is now in the manual of required GOP conduct (just think of blatant lies about Medicaid). Most important, a free press sticking relentlessly with scandals and ignoring intimidation can no longer be taken for granted; broadcasters in particular have become vulnerable to parent companies putting profits before everything else. Democrats, understandably not wanting to look like they mainly focus on the sordid details of the Epstein story, are tempted to move on and deal with the vaunted 'kitchen-table issues'. But it should give them pause that the story is apparently so scary for the other side that Republicans would rather shut down the House than deal with it in any shape or form. Are they right to panic? For sure, Trump made a mistake with his social media post urging followers to move on, which was the equivalent of 'don't think of an elephant' (while also providing further evidence for the Streisand effect: censorship generates the very attention meant to be avoided). Trump lobbying Murdoch to kill the story will give pause to all still naive enough to think of Republicans as free speech defenders. By now, the fact that releasing only the grand jury testimony is relatively meaningless has sunk in and – never mind the base – what political scientists call 'low-information voters' will be left with a lasting impression of a Trump-Epstein connection or at least a chaotic administration. In the lawsuit, Trump has to prove 'actual malice' on the part of the newspaper – a difficult hurdle to jump. Unlike with the Russia investigation, Trump himself is the instigator of a lengthy process overshadowing his presidency; unlike with the many investigations between his presidential terms, when his lawyers outran the clock, time is not really on his side. In fact, he might be lucky if the case is dismissed on a technicality – he apparently failed to comply with a Florida law that requires giving defendants five days' notice. Jan-Werner Müller is a Guardian US columnist and a professor of politics at Princeton University
