Canopy Growth to Report First Quarter Fiscal 2026 Financial Results on August 8, 2025
Following the release of its first quarter fiscal year 2026 financial results, Canopy Growth will host an audio webcast with Luc Mongeau, CEO and Tom Stewart, Interim CFO on August 8, 2025 at 10 AM Eastern Time (ET).
Webcast Information
A live audio webcast will be available at:
https://onlinexperiences.com/Launch/QReg/ShowUUID=8135284A-F8CD-45B7-A384-634DE6714986
Replay Information
A replay will be accessible by webcast until 11:59 PM ET on November 6, 2025 at:
https://onlinexperiences.com/Launch/QReg/ShowUUID=8135284A-F8CD-45B7-A384-634DE6714986
About Canopy Growth
Canopy Growth is a world-leading cannabis company dedicated to unleashing the power of cannabis to improve lives.
Through an unwavering commitment to consumers, Canopy Growth delivers innovative products from owned and licensed brands including Tweed, 7ACRES, DOJA, Deep Space, and Claybourne, as well as category defining vaporization devices by Storz & Bickel. In addition, Canopy Growth serves medical cannabis patients globally with principal operations in Canada, Europe and Australia.
Canopy Growth has also established a comprehensive ecosystem to realize the opportunities presented by the U.S. THC market through an unconsolidated, non-controlling interest in Canopy USA, LLC ('Canopy USA'). Canopy USA's portfolio includes ownership of Acreage Holdings, Inc., a vertically integrated multi‑state cannabis operator with operations throughout the U.S. Northeast and Midwest, as well as ownership of Wana Wellness, LLC, The Cima Group, LLC, and Mountain High Products, LLC, a leading North American edibles brand, and majority ownership of Lemurian, Inc. , a California-based producer of high-quality cannabis extracts and clean vape technology.
At Canopy Growth, we're shaping a future where cannabis is embraced for its potential to enhance well-being and improve lives. With high-quality products, a commitment to responsible use, and a focus on enhancing the communities where we live and work, we're paving the way for a better understanding of all that cannabis can offer.
For more information visit www.canopygrowth.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
26 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Kmart in Legal Crosshairs Over Suspected Ties to China's Forced Labour Camps
An Adelaide-based Uyghur group is taking Australian retail giant Kmart to court for allegedly sourcing its products from factories connected to forced labour camps in China. The Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women's Association (AUTWA) filed its application in the Federal Court to compel Kmart to produce documents demonstrating what it knows about two clothing suppliers listed on its 2024 and 2025 factory lists with links to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. The Region is home to systemic state-sponsored forced labour camps and well-documented atrocities against Uyghur and Turkic Muslim people. 'Kmart, and all companies, must ensure they are not profiting from forced labour in China. China's mass imprisonment, repression and forced labour of Uyghur people is well-documented. Our community has lost family members, friends, and loved ones because of China's brutal treatment of Uyghurs,' said Ramila Chanisheff, president of AUTWA, in a statement. 'Kmart is a go-to store for so many people in Australia. If the company has profited in any way from this sort of systematic repression, I am sure Australians would be horrified.' Jennifer Kanis, the principal lawyer representing AUTWA from Maurice Blackburn, said this is the first case seeking to hold Australian retailers accountable for forced labour in their supply chains, and urged Kmart to be transparent. 'Kmart tells customers that it supports ethical sourcing and the protection of human rights – but we know there are credible links between two of its factories/suppliers and the use of Uyghur forced labour in Xinjiang,' she said. 'Documents will be sought from Kmart to determine whether Kmart engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct about the use of Uyghur forced labour… and the Court will be asked to compel Kmart to hand over information about what due diligence it has conducted on suppliers with links to Xinjiang. Kmart Says It Provides Details of Factories, Sourcing Kmart has denied the AUTWA's allegations, saying it was disappointed the group took the legal action, and that it 'invited the AUTWA to meet' with them several times. 'Kmart has been in correspondence with the applicant's lawyers for over 12 months and has provided extensive details of our Ethical Sourcing Program,' a spokesperson for the Wesfarmers-owned retailer told The Epoch Times. 'For over 15 years, we have had in place an Ethical Sourcing Program, which helps us to identify and mitigate modern slavery risks, including the risk of forced labour, in our operations and supply chains. 'Suppliers in the Kmart Ethical Sourcing Program are regularly monitored through activities including our site visits, audit programs and investigations if we receive any reports or complaints of concern,' they said. 'We encourage any organisation to raise its concerns with us, so we can investigate in line with our policy and commitments.' Kmart's website has details on its stance on slavery and a list of where it sources products. Weaknesses in Australian Laws Highlighted Freya Dinshaw, the associate legal director of Human Rights Law Centre, which is representing AUTWA along with Maurice Blackburn, said that the case highlights some of the weaknesses in Australia's modern slavery laws. 'It shouldn't be left to members of the public to take companies to court and force them to open their books where there are suspicions of links to modern slavery,' said Dinshaw. 'Australian companies should be legally required to investigate and prevent forced labour in their supply chains and face hard consequences if they don't. Australia should also follow the example of other countries like Canada and the U.S. and ban imported goods made with forced labour, so they don't end up on our shop shelves.' The United Nations and human rights organisations have long accused the ruling Chinese Communist Party of crimes against humanity and possible genocide against Uyghurs and other predominantly Muslim ethnic groups in China's Xinjiang region. Unlike the United States and several European nations, Australia has yet to enact laws banning goods tied to the abuse of Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities, despite repeated calls from human rights groups and a Senate inquiry recommending action.
Indianapolis Star
26 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Should you pay to reserve you seat on Greyhound? You might not get what you pay for
Going Greyhound and got a seat preference? Those who'd rather have a window or an aisle seat or want to make sure they're able to sit next to a companion – or no one at all – can choose their spots. The low-cost long-distance bus service allows riders to select their seats when purchasing tickets. It costs, though — between $1.99 and $19.99, according to the Greyhound website. A traveler can also opt for a 'Neighbor-free' ride by reserving two seats next to one another, getting the second seat at a 45% discount. The 111-year-old Dallas-headquartered Greyhound system began assigning seats after its 2021 acquisition by Munich, Germany-based Flix, which also owns FlixBus, another low-cost bus service that launched in 2013. Enforcement of assigned seating is inconsistent. Some drivers appear indifferent to the policy and others ignore it altogether. 'At Greyhound, we understand the importance of comfort and convenience during travel, which is why we offer the option for passengers to purchase assigned seats,' a company representative told IndyStar. 'Customers who buy assigned seats can expect to use those seats unless there is an unexpected operational or safety-related reason that prevents it.' During a recent trip from Chicago, Illinois, to Cincinnati, Ohio, the driver announced there was no assigned seating and told a middle-aged couple they were unable to sit in the front-of-the-bus seats for which they'd paid extra. The driver told them they could wait and try to purchase tickets on a later bus or find seats elsewhere on his coach. He told other passengers he keeps the row behind and to the right of him empty regardless of whether a customer has paid to reserve those seats. There's not widespread awareness of the policy, and some passengers meet with resistance from others who have settled into reserved seats not assigned to them and are reluctant to give them up. YouTuber Nomadic Introvert had purchased two seats together for a recent trip from Las Vegas, Nevada, to Detroit, Michigan. In a video of the trip, she said a driver told passengers they could sit anywhere (3:05) when she boarded. But on another portion of the route, even after a different driver confirmed her seat numbers when scanning her tickets (9:53), someone was in her seat when she got on the bus. They moved without incident. Later in the trip, a dispute between passengers led the driver to order the folks to go to their assigned seats. (23:00) In some circumstances, the driver can determine a passenger needs to move for their reserved seat due to 'safety or operational purposes' or for a minor, an elderly person or a person with a disability. If a passenger with a seat reservation is moved and can't get a seat in the same or superior seat reservation category, the passenger can get the seat reservation fee refunded through
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
How a Gen Xer clawed his way back to a $900K income working 5 remote jobs after layoffs demolished his overemployment strategy
Back in March, Harrison was riding high. He was on track to earn roughly $800,000 this year thanks to a carefully engineered strategy of secretly juggling six remote IT jobs — and hiring a team of global freelancers to help him manage the load. But then, over the course of several weeks, his operation collapsed. Harrison lost four of his six jobs, slashing his annualized income to about $200,000. The sudden drop forced him to delay buying a car, consider skipping a family wedding, and rethink how much he could support his children financially. "Three-quarters of my income was gone — it really shook me," said Harrison. Business Insider verified his identity but agreed to use a pseudonym. He lives abroad most of the year but uses a VPN to work his US-based jobs. "You question yourself, you question God, you question the world." Over the past two months, Harrison has made a comeback. He's now on track to earn $900,000 annually across five jobs — a mix of W2 and contract roles related to quality assurance — and says a sixth in the works could push that figure above $1 million. Roughly one-third of his income goes toward paying the four employees who help him complete his work tasks, but he estimated he's on pace to profit more than $500,000 annually. He plans to keep the applications flowing to hedge against future layoffs. "I don't want to be there again," he said of his time with two jobs. "If I can handle it and make it work, I'm going to keep looking." Over the past three years, Business Insider has interviewed 30 "overemployed" workers who have secretly held multiple remote jobs to boost their incomes. Harrison is among an even smaller group of job jugglers who have hired people to do some of their work, a trend enabled by the remote work revolution, globalized social networks, and growing access to software tools that make outsourcing possible. Despite the tech advancements that make it easier,holding multiple jobs without employer approval could have professional repercussions and lead to burnout. Additionally, return-to-office mandates, a hiring slowdown, and tech layoffs have made it harder to sustain job juggling. Despite those headwinds, Harrison managed to rebuild his operation by leaning on automation, scaled-back staffing, and a bit of luck. Cutbacks and automation: His response to losing 4 jobs Before the layoffs began, Harrison spent most of his days attending work meetings and reviewing the output of his employees, who were based in the US, Canada, India, and Pakistan. His outsourcing operation was made possible by software tools like Zoom, TeamViewer, and UltraViewer, which allowed his team to remotely access his work computers. But once the job cuts started, Harrison said he began to question how sustainable his operation really was. Harrison doesn't know why some of his jobs were cut, but he suspects two were tied to government budget constraints related to the Department of Government Efficiency — or DOGE. He said one contract role on a government project ended without notice, while another was ultimately scrapped due to approval delays at a government office that had recently undergone major staffing cuts. A third job was cut when the company decided to hand over his contract duties to full-time employees, while a fourth — a full-time gig he thought was particularly secure — was eliminated during a company reorganization. The swift series of job losses caught Harrison off guard. "I thought I was good at sensing the room temperature and feeling how things are going," he said. "But I think nowadays with all these other factors going around, there's no way to know." In addition to government budget cuts, Harrison pointed to organizational restructuring, economic uncertainty, and the rise of AI as reasons it's become harder to predict the hiring landscape. When Harrison started looking for new jobs, it was a struggle early on. "I was sending 100, 150 résumés a day, literally getting almost nowhere," he said. So, like many businesses experiencing a sudden downturn, Harrison looked for ways to cut costs. In addition to pausing payments to his contract employees who had supported his previous roles, he parted ways with the two workers he'd been paying to apply for jobs on his behalf. Harrison turned to AI tools to replace that lost labor. He relied on the automated application platform LazyApply to send out hundreds of applications a day and experimented with the job-search tool Simplify to help tailor his résumé for specific roles. Back to 6 jobs, but not back to normal After a couple of weeks without much traction, Harrison did something that would have been almost unthinkable a few months earlier. He accepted a role that required occasional in-person work. Around the same time, other doors started to open, and he landed two more jobs over the course of a few weeks. Roughly a month after losing four roles, he'd secured three new ones — and more recently, he said he landed a sixth through a personal connection. Two of the roles are W-2 positions, while the rest are contract jobs, all but one of them billed as full-time. Harrison said he's not sure why his luck changed, but he'll take it. Landing new jobs meant bringing employees back on board, but Harrison's operations didn't go entirely back to normal. For one, working part-time from the office has been a major adjustment, making it harder for him to keep tabs on his other jobs. This change has forced him to rely more on his employees. "Ideally, I can keep my head on a swivel and look at four screens at once, but on-site, I can have one or two computers up — I can't have four," he said. Now that he's back to six jobs, Harrison said he's thought about quitting the in-office role. But after losing so many positions so quickly, he's hesitant to make any sudden moves. Looking ahead, Harrison said he's trying to focus on roles where his skillset is particularly valued — the idea being these roles will be more secure. While he was admittedly a bit "cocky" before the job cuts began, he said he's learned his lesson. His operation is more fragile than he thought it was, and he'll likely have to work harder to sustain it. "Even if you have two or three jobs, they could be gone tomorrow before your coffee's cold," he said.
