Spain's blackout story is disintegrating
Faith in the current investigation has reached rock-bottom. The socialist government of Pedro Sánchez is trying to buy time with explanations that either make no technical sense or veer into absurdity.
Red Eléctrica, which runs the grid, is accused of stonewalling everybody.
Sources in Brussels have told The Telegraph that the authorities were conducting an experiment before the system crashed, probing how far they could push reliance on renewables in preparation for Spain's rushed phase-out of nuclear reactors from 2027.
The government seems to have pushed the pace recklessly, before making the necessary investments in a sophisticated 21st-century smart grid capable of handling it.
One is reminded of the Chernobyl meltdown in 1985, which began as a test to simulate what happens to a cooling reactor in blackout conditions. Operators ignored warnings that the Number Four reactor had too little power. It set off a cascading failure.
If it is established that the blackout was a controlled experiment that went wrong, and if this information has been withheld from the public for almost four weeks, the Spanish Left faces electoral oblivion for a political generation.
The government has de facto control over Red Eléctrica through a golden share (in breach of EU norms). It put a socialist politician and party loyalist in charge even though she had no experience in the field and faced withering criticism at the time. Her salary in this plum job is six times higher than the Spanish prime minister.
The previous chief resigned in protest over political meddling. He accused the government of pushing its green agenda with 'messianic' zeal – but without taking the accompanying steps needed to pull it off.
The Spanish Association of Electrical Energy Companies (AELEC) has finally lost patience. It came close to calling the whole inquiry a travesty in a caustic statement this week.
How this saga unfolds has ramifications far beyond Spain. Blackouts always raise the ideological temperature in the culture war. Spain's dystopian apagón comes at the moment of peak backlash against all things green in the Western democracies.
Old Energy and the global Right have together seized on the episode to prosecute and convict renewable power before trial, hoping to drive a stake through the heart of net zero.
'Spain reminds us that intermittent energy sources cannot replace the reliable base power provided by fossil fuels or other stable sources,' said Republican senator Steve Daines at a hearing on Capitol Hill this week.
The apagón tells us no such thing. Several countries have a higher share of renewables in the electricity mix without suffering blackouts, including the industrial powerhouse we call Germany. Sen Daines is conflating the issue of intermittency with the separate issue of inertia and grid frequency.
GERMANY CHART
AELEC, which includes Endesa, IBM, Iberdrola and Schneider Electric, said the authorities had inverted the likely chain of causality. It was not the generators that failed to deliver stable power to the grid: it was the grid that failed to manage it and then automatically shut down the generators, whether solar, wind, nuclear or gas.
This is exactly what I had been told earlier by José Donoso, the head of Spain's photovoltaic association. 'We were victims like everybody else. They just cut us off. We still haven't been told anything,' he said.
The solar companies in the southern belt of Badajoz, Granada and Sevilla are indignant at the finger-pointing after the blackout, which insinuated that they had supplied too much power or too little power – the story keeps changing – without ever seeing any evidence for either. Mr Donoso says the solar farms were generating power exactly as programmed on the day of the blackout.
AELEC said the authorities had essentially confined the inquiry to a 20-second span on April 28, wilfully ignoring the elephant in the room: a series of wild oscillations in tension that began days earlier and surpassed 'emergency' levels across the peninsula for two hours leading up to the blackout. The voltage spiked from the normal 220 kilovolts (kV) to extremes of 250kV. This triggered safety shutdowns.
It said the authorities had furnished nothing to substantiate their claim that it all began with a sudden drop of 2.2 gigawatts in power supplied to the grid, and that this in turn set off the chain reaction. The system can handle drops of three gigawatts in any case.
SOLAR CHART
One suspects that the government is trying to deflect attention from its own responsibility: Bank of America says Spain has invested in the grid at a ratio of 0.35 compared to spending on renewables over the last five years, versus 0.8 in Germany and the UK.
'Years of underinvestment have left the grid struggling to keep up,' said Tancrede Fulop, an analyst from Morningstar. The returns allowed by the regulated electricity networks have persistently failed to keep pace with inflation.
Claims have been aired – and denied – that there was a lack of inertia in the grid just before the blackout, causing the frequency to fall below 50 hertz. Gas and nuclear plants retain kinetic energy from spinning rotors for a few seconds after losing power, which provides a critical buffer. Wind and solar do not.
But this has been known for a long time. Modern systems replicate the inertia through other means, such as 'grid-forming' inverters at wind and solar plants. You can install synchronous condensers at substations. Britain has a fleet of flywheels that come to the rescue.
Andries Wantenaar, from Rethink Energy, says none of this is difficult or costs much money. 'Spain was simply negligent,' he said.
Foes of green energy like to mix up the inertia problem with the separate issue of what happens when the sun isn't shining and the wind isn't blowing. The short-term answer is batteries, cryogenic compressed air and interconnectors. Spain lacks enough of any of them.
We can argue about the answer to longer-term renewable droughts and Dunkelflaute. I am relaxed about using unabated gas to plug the holes and get through deep winter, whether in Spain or the UK. What matters is maintaining broad public consent for decarbonisation, and if we only get to 90pc clean power by the mid-2030s that is still a success.
Absolutism is the enemy.
In the case of Spain, Mr Sánchez might do better to stop waging guerrilla war against his nuclear industry. Foro Nuclear said Spain's seven reactors have an average age of 47 years and could safely be extended to 60 years or longer.
Until we know why the tension went haywire before the blackout, it is impossible to know what really happened, and Mr Sánchez and his friends seem determined to stop us from finding out.
It is the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party that ought to be on political trial in this fiasco. Green energy is the collateral casualty.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Trump escalates attacks on Obama and Clinton as questions swirl about Epstein
'Obama was trying to lead a coup,' Trump said. 'And it was with Hillary Clinton.' Trump's extended digression, which came during a visit with President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. of the Philippines, was a stark example of his campaign of retribution against an ever-growing list of enemies that has little analogue in American history. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up It even prompted a rare response from Obama's office. Advertisement 'These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction,' said Patrick Rodenbush, a spokesperson for Obama. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes.' After Trump's attack on Obama, reports continued to surface about his relationship with Epstein. CNN published photos of Epstein at Trump's 1993 wedding to Marla Maples, the president's second wife. Gabbard's report, which claimed there was a 'treasonous conspiracy' by top Obama officials, contradicted a lengthy study by the Senate Intelligence Committee that was signed by all Republican members of the committee, including Marco Rubio, now the secretary of state. Advertisement The Obama administration never contended that the Russians had manipulated votes; instead, the administration, and the Democrats and Republicans on the Senate Intelligence Committee, concluded that Russia mounted a major effort to influence voters. Still, in his remarks Tuesday, Trump claimed that he could have sent Clinton, the former secretary of state and another of his political rivals, to prison but chose not to. He said he would show no such leniency to Obama. 'I let her off the hook, and I'm very happy I did, but it's time to start after what they did to me,' Trump said. 'Whether it's right or wrong, it's time to go after people. Obama's been caught directly.' The president then listed even more enemies he wanted his Justice Department to target, including his former FBI director, James Comey and James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence, and former President Joe Biden. 'It would be President Obama,' Trump said. 'He started it, and Biden was there with him, and Comey was there, and Clapper, the whole group was there.' 'He's guilty,' he said of Obama. 'This was treason. This was every word you can think of.' Trump's campaign to exact revenge against his perceived enemies has taken many forms. Over the past six months, he has pulled protective details from former colleagues facing death threats from Iran. He has revoked or threatened to revoke the security clearances of Biden, members of his administration and dozens of others. His administration has taken steps to target members of the media seen as unfriendly, taken the hatchet to entire agencies perceived as too liberal, and fired or investigated government workers deemed disloyal. Advertisement The re-examination of the intelligence around the 2016 election began with John Ratcliffe, the CIA director, ordering a review of the agency's tradecraft that went into the intelligence community assessment in December of that year. The review was deeply critical of the Obama administration and the former CIA director, John Brennan. CIA analysts took issue with the speed of the assessment and accused Brennan of allowing an unverified dossier prepared by a former British intelligence officer to influence the assessment. But Brennan has long denied that the so-called Steele dossier had any impact on the assessment, and other former officials said that the analysts working on the report paid no attention to it, maintaining that it was unverifiable rumor. Ratcliffe wrote on social media that the review had shown that the process was corrupt, and then he made a criminal referral to the FBI. Last week, Gabbard issued another report that criticized the findings of the intelligence assessment even more directly. Gabbard's report suggested that in the winter of 2016, intelligence officials under pressure from the White House changed their assessment from one that Russia had failed to mount a significant effort to hack election infrastructure to one that the Kremlin was trying to boost Trump and denigrate Clinton, the Democratic nominee. But Gabbard's report conflated two different intelligence findings. Intelligence officials had concluded that Russia had not engaged in any major effort to hack election systems and change votes. But they also believed that Russia had tried to influence the election in various ways by releasing hacked documents to harm Clinton and sow dissent. Advertisement Gabbard has also called for several Obama officials to face criminal investigation, without naming them. This article originally appeared in


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Thousands gather to protest as Zelenskyy signs bill weakening anti-corruption agencies
KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — Thousands of people gathered in Kyiv and other cities across Ukraine on Tuesday to urge the president to veto a controversial bill that threatens anti-corruption infrastructure. It marked the first major rally against the government in more than three years of war. Ukraine 's parliament passed legislation that will tighten oversight of two key anti-corruption agencies, which critics say could significantly weaken their independence and give President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's circle greater sway over investigations. Zelenskyy signed the bill into law, according to the parliament's website late Tuesday. Fighting entrenched corruption is crucial for Ukraine's bid to join the European Union and maintain access to billions of dollars in Western aid. The legislation's passage has triggered public outrage in Ukraine, with some saying it appeared to be a greater moral blow than the routine Russian drone and missile attacks. The changes would grant the prosecutor general new authority over investigations and cases handled by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO). 'In effect, if this bill becomes law, the head of SAPO will become a nominal figure, while NABU will lose its independence and turn into a subdivision of the prosecutor general's office,' the agencies said in a joint statement on Telegram. In a post on X, the EU's Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos expressed concern over the vote in the parliament, called the Rada, calling it 'a serious step back.' Kos added: 'Independent bodies like NABU & SAPO are essential for Ukraine's EU path. Rule of Law remains in the very center of EU accession negotiations.' While rallies have taken place during the war in Ukraine, they have largely focused on the return of prisoners of war or missing people. Protests, however, remain a traditional form of public pressure in Ukraine, where two previous revolutions were victorious for the public. 'Corruption is a problem in any country, and it must always be fought,' said Ihor Lachenkov, a blogger and activist who urged people to join the protest through his social media platforms, which reach more than 1.5 million followers. 'Ukraine has far fewer resources than Russia in this war,' he said. 'If we misuse them, or worse, allow them to end up in the pockets of thieves, our chances of victory diminish. All our resources must go toward the fight.' The Ukrainian branch of Transparency International criticized parliament's decision, saying it undermines one of the most significant reforms since what Ukraine calls its Revolution of Dignity in 2014 and damages trust with international partners. The group urged Zelenskyy to veto the law, warning that otherwise he would share responsibility with the Rada for 'dismantling Ukraine's anti-corruption infrastructure.' Many protesters carried signs reading 'Veto the law,' 'Protect the anti-corruption system, protect Ukraine's future,' or simply 'We are against it.' The mood of anger and frustration among the war-weary Ukrainians prevailed in the crowd. Some protesters accused Ukraine's leadership of prioritizing loyalty and personal connections over the fight against corruption. 'Those who swore to protect the laws and the Constitution have instead chosen to shield their inner circle, even at the expense of Ukrainian democracy,' said veteran Oleh Symoroz, sitting in a wheelchair because both his legs were amputated after he was wounded in 2022. 'Instead of setting an example of zero tolerance for corruption, the president is using his power to take control of criminal cases involving his allies,' he said. On Monday, Ukraine's domestic security agency detained two NABU officials on suspicion of links to Russia and searched other agency employees on unrelated allegations. Zelenskyy's office didn't respond to a request for comment. Last week, the president carried out a reshuffle of his wartime Cabinet, a move widely viewed as further consolidating power within his inner circle.


USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
President Trump announces 'massive' trade deal with Japan that sets 15% tariff
WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump says his economic team has secured a long-sought trade deal with Japan that will lower the steep tariffs the country faced under a looming Aug. 1 deadline. Trump said the U.S. will impose a 15% tariff on Japanese imports under the agreement, which he hailed as "a massive deal" in a July 22 post on Truth Social. The tariff rate would be lower than the 24% tariff Trump had threatened on Japan. "I just signed the largest trade deal in history ‒ I think maybe the largest deal in history ‒ with Japan," Trump said Tuesday night during a White House reception with Republican lawmakers. More: Trump announces trade deal with Philippines and 19% tariff Japan is the fourth largest trading partner of the U.S. behind Canada, Mexico and China. Trump did not disclose the full details of the deal but said Japan would "invest $550 Billion Dollars into the United States," with the U.S. receiving 90% of the profits. He said Japan has also agreed to open its country to trade on products that include vehicles, rice and other agricultural products "This is a very exciting time for the United States of America, and especially for the fact that we will continue to always have a great relationship with the Country of Japan," Trump said. Trump officials had suggested being close to a deal with Japan ever since the president in April postponed sweeping reciprocal tariffs on goods from most countries. More: 'No extensions will be granted': Trump vows new tariff deadline is a firm one Since the April delay, the Trump administration has imposed a lower 10% universal tariff on goods from most countries including Japan. But Trump has set an Aug. 1 deadline for the higher tariff rates on some 170 countries to kick in. Speaking early on Wednesday in Tokyo, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said he had received an initial report from his trade negotiator in Washington but declined to comment on the specifics of the negotiation. Trump's Japan announcement came after the president earlier in the day touted a new trade deal with the Philippines that coincided with the country's president, Ferdinand Marcos, visiting the White House. Trump's three other trade deals are with the United Kingdom, Vietnam and Indonesia. Contributing: Reuters Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.