Minister Malatsi's policy direction on EEIPs faces backlash from Cosatu
Image: X/IOLGraphics
Cosatu has expressed concerns over the proposed policy direction on equity equivalent investment programmes (EEIPs) in the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) sector.
Communications and Digital Technologies Minister Solly Malatsi gazetted a policy direction on the role of EEIPs in the ICT sector, aiming to provide policy certainty and attract investment.
The policy direction allows companies to meet empowerment obligations through alternatives to 30% ownership, such as investing in local suppliers, enterprise development, and job creation according to Malatsi.
However, Cosatu spokesperson Matthew Parks, said the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) Act provides two options for investors that include a 30% shareholder option or an equity equivalent option.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
The trade federation giant believes that the BBBEE Act is inclusive and provides accommodating options for all investors and not only for the wealthy.
The federation is concerned that the proposed policy direction might allow companies like Starlink to bypass BBBEE requirements.
"It's critical that Starlink, like all other investors, comply with the BBBEE Act, whether it is the shareholder or equity equivalent option," Parks emphasised.
Parks cited examples of companies like IBM and Microsoft that have utilised the equity equivalent option.
Cosatu argues that exempting one company from BBBEE requirements would be unfair.
The Black Business Council's (BBC) spokesperson Masedi Sesele also shut down the idea saying it would be 'bending of legislation' to accommodate an individual or company.
'Legislation is there for all to comply with, no exception. Otherwise, the country will become lawless…The BBBEE legislation together with the Codes of Good Practice prescribes that any company wanting to do business in South Africa should implement all the elements of the BBBEE codes being ownership, management control, skills development, enterprise and supplier development, and socio-economic development. We don't know how the rumoured R2 billion is going to implement those important elements."
Malatsi, through his spokesperson Kwena Moloto, said the policy direction sought to provide the 'much-needed' policy certainty to attract investment into the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) sector, and specifically with regards to licensing for broadcasters, internet service providers, mobile networks, or fixed and mobile networks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
US tariffs threaten South African jobs, warns Cosatu
Cosatu Parliamentary Coordinator, Matthew Parks, on Tuesday said Cosatu is deeply concerned about the 30% tariff announced by US President Donald Trump, because it will have a devastating impact on the economy that has been languishing at 1% growth rate and a shockingly high unemployment rate of 43.1% Image: AFP South Africa is facing a looming economic crisis following the United States' announcement of a sweeping 30% tariff on its exports - a move that has sparked widespread concern among trade unions, political leaders, and business analysts. Cosatu Parliamentary Coordinator, Matthew Parks, on Tuesday said Cosatu is deeply concerned about the 30% tariff announced by US President Donald Trump, because it will have a devastating impact on the economy that has been languishing at 1% growth rate and a shockingly high unemployment rate of 43.1%,. Sectors that will be hard hit include the automotive, agriculture, clothing, chemical and jewelery. "Worryingly, the impact of the impending tariff is already being felt in the Eastern Cape with 900 jobs on the line at Good Year SA and Mercedes Benz "temporarily" shutting down its vehicle production," it said. Cosatu said it is clear more engagement with the US government is required is find alternatives that will be beneficial for jobs and businesses in both countries. "It is also critical that South Africa works to expand relations with other trading partners to mitigate reliance on the US," it said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Cosatu said it supports Department of Trade, Industry and Competition engagements with the US government to put in place a new trade agreement that is favourable to both nations and in particular workers. "We hope the US Congress will renew Agoa (African Growth and Opportunity Act) as this would help ensure continued favourable access to South African and African exports to the US markets," it said. It further said that it was key that the UIF's TERS administrative challenges be urgently addressed to offer affected companies support while they put in place plans to manage this potential calamity. John Steenhuisen, leader of the Democratic Alliance, said while not explicit, the announcement would signal the end of the Agoa which gives South Africa duty-free access to the US for more than 6 000 products, including goods in the automobiles, agriculture and textile industries. He said thousands of farmers, manufacturers and workers jobs are now at risk. Billions of rands will be lost in export revenue, making this a crippling blow to the economy. Meanwhile, Andrew Bahlmann, the CEO of Corporate & Advisory, Deal Leaders International, warned the imposition of a sweeping 30% tariff by the United States on "any and all South African products," effective August 1, represents a seismic shift with profound implications for Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) into South Africa. Bahlmann said, "This unilateral move, ostensibly aimed at correcting a perceived trade imbalance, fundamentally alters the economic calculus for both existing and prospective investors." Firstly, Bahlmann said, the tariffs act as a significant disincentive for FDI into South Africa. "Why would a foreign entity establish or expand manufacturing operations in South Africa if a crucial export market like the US is subject to a prohibitive 30% penalty?," he said, adding that this directly undermines South Africa's attractiveness as a production hub for goods destined for the American consumer. He said President Donald Trump's explicit offer of "There will be no tariff if South Africa, or companies within your country, decide to build or manufacture product[s] within the United States" was a clear directive to redirect FDI away from South Africa and other countries into the US, potentially leading to capital flight or a re-evaluation of global supply chains. Secondly, Bahlmann said the tariffs will undoubtedly chill M&A activity within South Africa. Companies heavily reliant on US exports, particularly in sectors like automotive and agriculture (already flagged for devastating job losses), become less appealing acquisition targets. Their revenue streams are now threatened, and their valuations will likely decrease, making them less attractive for foreign buyers seeking growth or market access. This increased uncertainty and reduced profitability will likely lead to a slowdown in deal-making as investors adopt a wait-and-see approach or seek opportunities in less volatile markets. "This environment of heightened trade friction and perceived governmental unpreparedness creates an unfavourable climate for long-term capital commitments, impacting both greenfield FDI and strategic M&A. While calls for diversification are valid, building new trade relationships and industrial resilience is a long-term endeavour that cannot immediately offset the impact on established export channels," he said. Despite these significant headwinds, Bahlmann said the South African market, with its inherent value, diverse sectors and resilient businesses, continues to present compelling M&A opportunities for discerning foreign investors. "While the landscape is undoubtedly more complex, it is precisely in such times of disruption that strategic advantages can be forged," he said. BUSINESS REPORT
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Trump's budget is not the end: it's the beginning of the end of America
In the end it passed. But, as is the case with American politics these days, it was not without drama; Donald Trump's signature tax-and-spending legislation, dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' Act ('OBBA' in the parlance), overcame a record-breaking eight-and-a-half-hour filibuster attempt by Democratic house leader Hakeem Jefferies, who used his so called 'magic minute' to delay the vote. It was in vain. By late Thursday the house had approved the bill, and on Friday – Independence Day in America – Trump signed it into law. Now the country, and the global economy, awaits the fallout. The bill marks the culmination of Trump's first five months in power, and never has he looked so politically dominant. Regardless of whether one likes him or agrees with his policies, Trump has shown a ruthless efficiency in getting his agenda passed. 'There could be no better birthday present for America than the phenomenal victory we achieved just hours ago,' Trump declared last Thursday night at a celebratory rally in Des Moines, Iowa, where he achieved his first victories in the two elections he has won. Referencing the passage of OBBA, he assured the crowd that it will 'make America great again'. The moment caps a period of aggressive policymaking in which Trump has consolidated and centralised power. 'I think I have more power now, actually I do,' he said to journalists shortly before flying to Iowa for the victory rally. In the past month alone, Trump has escalated his immigration crackdown through his ICE security state within a state, ordered the military to the streets of Los Angeles, launched stealth bomber strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and strong-armed Nato allies into massive increases in defence spending. He also notched a critical win at the Supreme Court, which has curtailed the ability of federal judges to issue sweeping injunctions against his swathe of executive actions. Meanwhile, strong economic data has muted the shrill criticism from Wall Street and business leaders. Job growth has remained steady, inflation subdued, and stock markets have rebounded from April's collapse, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq reaching new highs. The market is now forecasting two interest rate cuts in 2025. On Thursday, officials celebrated better-than-expected employment figures as proof that the administration's fiscal and trade plans are working. The passage of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' marks not just a legislative victory for Trump but proof that he now commands almost complete control over an often-fractured GOP. Yet, at this moment of hubris, there can be no doubting the risks that lie ahead for Trump, the US economy, and particularly America's most vulnerable citizens. Mounting debt and cost of cuts First – the effects of the bill on US public finances. Economist Kathryn Anne Edwards has warned that the bill could be an 'economy killer', with forecasts projecting it will add $3.3-trillion (R58-trillion) to the already burgeoning national debt over the next decade. Most of that increase stems from the permanent extension of the tax cuts introduced during Trump's first term in the White House. When confronted with these numbers, the White House offers little in the way of economic justification. As economist Adam Tooze has written, their answer is 'Baathist-style denial': growth will go up and deficits come down because Trump says so. The fact is that this budget is less about economics than politics. Trump's campaign was funded by billionaires to whom he made one central promise; he will make sure their taxes do not go up. On this, he duly delivered. The second key channel of harm comes from the bill's sweeping cuts to healthcare and nutrition support for low- and middle-income Americans. Roughly 12 million Americans are expected to lose access to Medicaid, primarily due to new work requirements. An additional 17 million are projected to become uninsured as subsidies from the Affordable Health Care Act are gutted. At least two million will lose food stamps, while benefits for a further 40 million will be sharply reduced. That such deep cuts to social welfare programs still result in a $3-trillion (R53-trillion) addition to the national debt is a stark indicator of the cost of the tax cuts being handed to the wealthy. This is a last gasp of looting what they can before the deficit spirals out of control. Consider that the average annual household food benefit is $4,000 (R71,000) and average spending per enrollee in Medicaid is around $7,600 (R135,500). In contrast, the top 10% of households – about 12.7-million of them – will receive an annual tax cut of $13,500 (R240,700). Recession coming But what is even more sobering is that these are almost best-case scenarios; none of these forecasts consider the increasingly likely reality that the US will enter a recession at some point over the next 18 to 24 months. In that case, the damage to public finances and low-income households will be far more severe. Some economists are already comparing OBBA's timing and effects to the infamous Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of the 1930s, which exacerbated the Great Depression and became emblematic of economic blunders. The third major risk to the economy is trade. It is simply impossible to know what will actually transpire with Trump's mooted tariffs, given that he changes his mind seemingly by the hour. Perhaps the only thing which is certain is that nothing which results from this 'reciprocal tariffs' idea is going to work. They won't close the US current account deficit, they won't lead to a manufacturing revival, and they won't replace revenue from slashed federal income tax. But they will harm the economy, both through the endless uncertainty his dithering creates and by increasing the cost of doing business. Average US tariff rates are likely to jump dramatically from their current 12.6% over the next few months, which is already a sharp rise from the pre-Trump level of 1.7%, according to Bloomberg data. This will hurt profits and the US consumer. The dollar's recent slide, attributed largely to tariff uncertainty, was the steepest for any first half of the year since the oil crisis year of 1973. The rest of the world will also pay. Despite President Cyril Ramaphosa's desperate attempts at bootlicking in the White House, flanked by golfers and a billionaire, South Africa is in the firing line. The opening salvo was Monday's letter announcing 30% tariffs on South African imports. While it is impossible to know where this will end, given Trump's propensity for art-of-the-deal-type gambits, these are pivotal weeks in the US president's trade war. More disciplined, strategic Trump Trump has always relished playing the bully, but this time around he is more organised, better advised and dangerous than in his first term. Five months in, the masterplan is becoming clearer, and the damage it will wreak on the US economy, society and the world. Steve Bannon, the high priest of MAGA and a key Trump ally and advisor, recently told the Financial Times that Trump is 'America's third world-historic leader' after George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. 'Trump's not leaving,' he added, hinting at a third-term run. 'He's going to be in your head for a long time.'
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Trump's tariff threat: implications for the BRICS bloc and global trade
South Africa will be hit with a 30% tariff on all its exports to the United States from August 1, following a formal letter from US President Donald Trump to President Cyril Ramaphosa demanding action on trade imbalances and long-standing market restrictions. Image: GCIS The threat of higher tariffs on BRICS nations by US President Donald Trump has sparked a heated debate about the future of global trade and economic stability. According to Trump, BRICS, conceived two decades ago as a forum for fast-growing economies, and its growth and expansion pose a threat to US dominance in the global economy. At a recent summit in Rio de Janeiro, the 11-nation bloc, which includes South Africa Brazil, Russia, India, and China, criticised Trump's imposed tariffs. In response, Trump accused the group of "anti-Americanism" and pledged an additional 10 percent tariff on their goods. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has condemned Trump's threat, saying efforts to "punish" the bloc were disappointing. "BRICS does not seek to compete with any other power," Ramaphosa said on Monday. "The bloc advocates for the emergence of various centres of power in the world," he said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ramaphosa emphasised that the BRICS bloc's goal is to promote cooperation and advance humanity's interests, not to compete with any particular country. "There should never be vengeance. There should never be retribution against countries that are seeking to cooperate and to advance the interests of humanity," he said. The potential impact of Trump's tariffs on South Africa's economy is a major concern to many organisations representing workers. Cosatu spokesperson Matthew Parks said the federation supports Ramaphosa's articulation in defence of the need for BRICS and how such multilateral engagements help strengthen world peace and boost trade and investment opportunities. 'Cosatu is deeply concerned about the 30% tariff announced by US President Donald Trump, because it will have a devastating impact on the economy that has been languishing at 1% growth rate and a shockingly high unemployment rate of 43.1%. He said sectors that would be hard hit included the automotive, agriculture, clothing, chemical and jewellery industries "Worryingly, the impact of the impending tariff is already being felt in the Eastern Cape with 900 jobs on the line at Good Year SA and Mercedes Benz 'temporarily' shutting down its vehicle production,' he said. Parks said it was clear that more engagement with the US government was required to find alternatives that would be beneficial for jobs and businesses in both countries. However, the South African Communist Party (SACP) spokesperson Mbulelo Ndlazana said that the party was not surprised by Trump's stance and South Africa should consider more options other than the US. 'The SACP has consistently advocated for an economic delinking South Africa from economies of the north, particularly the United States. 'The anticipated spinoffs of BRICS economic relationships and agreements have not yet materialised, providing insufficient cushioning for the South African economy from economic decisions and actions by the United States and the West. This reality exposes us to heightened economic peril,' Ndlazana said. Trade union Solidarity said South Africa can avoid the US's 30% trade tariff if Ramaphosa acts swiftly. It said that despite the tariff taking effect on August 1, negotiation room remains as it critised the government's inaction, noting that the US seeking both a political and economic settlement. Dr. Dirk Hermann, Solidarity CEO, said the SA government missed chances for a favorable trade deal, blaming "ideological narrow-mindedness and political arrogance" for potential job losses. He stresses the government's failure to understand the US's demands and South Africa's trade dependence. The Union highlighted South Africa's failure to escape tariffs unlike other nations. Hermann urged Ramaphosa to engage the Trump administration to avoid the tariff, warning it could effectively terminate the AGOA trade agreement, which Solidarity worked hard to preserve. International relations expert Dr. Noluthando Phungula believes that Trump's motivation for threatening the BRICS bloc is rooted in his desire to maintain US dominance in the global economy. "As the Head of State and a representative of the unipolar superpower bloc, Trump is reasonably threatened," Phungula said. "The BRICS expansion and growth speak to a clearer call from the Global South towards multilateralism. This inadvertently challenges Western dominance and calls for a reformation of international power structures,' Phungula said. She said South Africa should stand firm in the face of US pressure, particularly when considering the leveraging strategies used by Trump. Another international relations expert Saul Molobi, who is also a former Consul-General to Italy, BRICS does not directly compete with the US economy, but it does challenge America's global dominance. "It's a push for a multipolar system – from alternative development banks to talk of de-dollarisation – it chips away at Washington's leverage," Molobi said. "For Trump, that's a threat to his 'America First' worldview,' he said.
