Papal conclave begins: Sistine Chapel shut as Cardinals choose next Pope
In a ritual dating back to medieval times, 133 cardinal electors walked slowly into the chapel before taking an oath of perpetual secrecy under the gaze of the stern Christ depicted in Michelangelo's Last Judgement fresco, which adorns the chapel.
Archbishop Diego Ravelli, the Vatican's master of ceremonies, then pronounced the Latin command "Extra omnes!" (Everyone out!), telling all those not involved in the conclave to leave.
The chapel's doors were slammed shut, allowing the cardinals to hold their first ballot to look for a successor to Pope Francis, who died last month.
No pope has been elected on the first day of a conclave for centuries and voting could continue for several days before one man receives the necessary two-thirds majority to become the 267th pontiff.
There will be only one ballot on Wednesday. Thereafter, there can be as many as four votes a day.
During a formal procession into the Sistine Chapel, the cardinals beseeched nearly 100 men and women believed to reside in heaven to pray for them as they prepare to make the momentous decision.
The only expected signal from the cardinals during the conclave will come in the form of smoke from a chimney atop the chapel, as the clerics burn their ballots.
Black smoke will mark an inconclusive vote; white smoke and the pealing of bells will signal that the 1.4-billion-member Church has a new leader. 'WATCHFUL CARE' OVER THE WORLD
At a Mass in St. Peter's Basilica on Wednesday before entering the conclave, the cardinals prayed that God would help them find a pope who would exercise "watchful care" over the world.
In a sermon, Italian Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re told his peers they must set aside "every personal consideration" in choosing the new pontiff and keep in mind "only ... the good of the Church and of humanity".
In recent days, cardinals have offered different assessments of what they are looking for in the next pope.
While some have called for continuity with Francis' vision of greater openness and reform, others have said they want to turn the clock back and embrace traditions. Many have indicated they want a more predictable, measured pontificate.
A record 133 cardinals from 70 countries were expected to enter the Sistine Chapel, up from 115 from 48 nations in the last conclave in 2013 - growth that reflects efforts by Francis during his 12-year reign to extend the reach of the Church.
No clear favourite has emerged, although Italian Cardinal Pietro Parolin and Filipino Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle are considered the front-runners.
However, if it quickly becomes obvious that neither can win, votes are likely to shift to other contenders, with the electors possibly coalescing around geography, doctrinal affinity or common languages.
Among other potential candidates are France's Jean-Marc Aveline, Hungary's Peter Erdo, American Robert Prevost and Italy's Pierbattista Pizzaballa.
The cardinal electors are all aged under 80. Re, who cannot take part in the conclave as he is 91, suggested the cardinals should look for a pope who respected the Church's diversity. "Unity does not mean uniformity, but a firm and profound communion in diversity," he said in his sermon.
The average length of the last 10 conclaves was just over three days and none went on for more than five days. The last conclave, which picked Francis in 2013, lasted just two days.
The cardinals will be looking to wrap things up quickly again this time to avoid giving the impression they are divided or that the Church is adrift.
Some 80% of the cardinal electors were appointed by Francis, increasing the possibility that his successor will in some way continue his progressive policies, despite strong pushback from traditionalists.
Among their considerations will be whether they should seek a pope from the global South where congregations are growing, as they did in 2013 with Francis, from Argentina, hand back the reins to Europe or even pick a first US pope.
Tune In
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
The case for liberal education in technical fields
Recently, I was part of a panel discussion on the topic 'Liberal Education in the Age of Intelligence,' organised by the Rajagiri Round Table Conference. The topic provoked questions and reflection: Is the term 'liberal education' a misnomer or perhaps even redundant, since the very idea of education implies openness, inquiry, and freedom of thought? Are we truly living in an age of intelligence, or is it more accurately the age of Artificial Intelligence? Can the principles of liberal education be meaningfully integrated into technical and vocational training? Perhaps most significantly: What truly defines a liberal educator or a genuine champion of liberal education? Origins Etymologically, the word education originates from the Latin terms educare and educere, both of which convey the idea of drawing out or bringing forth what already exists within an individual. Viewed this way, education is not simply the transmission of knowledge, but the cultivation and development of a person's inherent potential; ideally in an environment that fosters freedom and growth. If we believe that education should inherently develop intellectual freedom, critical thinking, and open-mindedness — qualities central to the very concept of education — then the term 'liberal education' might seem redundant. After all, does the word education itself not suggest a liberal spirit, making the qualifier 'liberal' appear unnecessary? However, in practice, education is not always liberal. There is a wide gap between the ideal and the reality. Education systems that prioritise narrow specialisation or vocational training frequently neglect the broader and more reflective goals that liberal education seeks to advance. This is precisely where the term liberal education becomes meaningful. It underscores an approach that values a multidisciplinary perspective over a single-discipline focus, critical and creative inquiry over routine skill-based training, and civic responsibility over mere career preparation. Thus, we can argue that, in essence, liberal education is not a superfluous label and is a necessary reminder of what education is truly meant to be. The true purpose of education is to liberate the mind from all forms of shackles. Only when individuals are free can they truly think, imagine, and create. Without freedom, independent thought becomes impossible and without independent thought, new ideas cannot emerge. 'Education is freedom,' proclaimed Paulo Freire, a strong advocate for critical pedagogy and liberation education. The idea highlights that true education is not about enforcing conformity but about fostering liberation. When education is meaningful, it frees people from ignorance and passivity, empowering them to think critically, act purposefully and live responsibly and liberates learners from conformist, dogmatic, and passive mindsets. If it fails to cultivate the ability to think for oneself, it stops being education and turns into indoctrination. As Noam Chomsky points out, education and indoctrination are fundamentally different: the former encourages critical inquiry and independent thought, while the latter imposes unquestioned beliefs and suppress critical analysis. Liberal vs. technical The core principles of liberal arts education emphasise holistic development, multidisciplinary learning, and the idea of education as a means to enrich life, not merely a tool for survival. This raises an important question: Does technical education in India go against these principles? Opinions may differ, as institutions vary in their approach. However, broadly speaking, technical education in India tends to prioritise specialised skills, offers limited scope for interdisciplinary learning, and remains largely focused on employment and industry needs. In the U.S. and many other countries, Engineering and Medical programmes incorporate Humanities courses such as Literature, Philosophy, History, Political Science, and Economics to offer a more well-rounded education. Unfortunately, this kind of integration is still largely absent in India. Recently, during a conversation with a group of engineers and academics, I brought up the importance of including Humanities subjects in Engineering curricula. To my surprise, the idea was quickly dismissed by many, who regarded such courses as irrelevant and a waste of time. Liberal education complements science and technology. When its principles are integrated into technical fields like Engineering and Medicine, they help produce well-rounded, ethically grounded, and adaptable professionals equipped with critical thinking, effective communication, and interdisciplinary understanding. In their paper 'Toward a Liberal Education in Medicine,' Raymond H. Curry and Kathryn Montgomery propose a model that goes beyond ensuring competence in core knowledge, skills, and clinical perspectives. They argue for a more holistic approach—one that prepares not only competent physicians but also reflective, well-rounded individuals capable of navigating the moral, cultural, and intellectual challenges of contemporary medical practice. Technical education can become a true form of education and even a tool of liberation if it nurtures intellectual autonomy, ethical reflection, and critical inquiry. Without these elements, it risks becoming merely utilitarian training. A true champion of liberal education is not merely a teacher or academic, but a custodian of the liberal spirit; someone who embodies intellectual curiosity, upholds freedom of thought, and is deeply committed to the lifelong pursuit of knowledge. In the 21st century, this role is not limited to liberal arts educators; engineers, doctors, and other professionals, too, are expected to advocate for the values of liberal education. Today, qualities and values matter more than mere employability skills. A highly skilled individual lacking emotional intelligence may achieve technical success but is likely to struggle with empathy, leadership, collaboration, and earning public trust. Integrating liberal education into technical fields can not only help engineer minds but also doctor the hearts of society. The writer is an ELT resource person and education columnist. Email rayanal@
News18
7 hours ago
- News18
‘Not In Favour Of…' Italy's Meloni On France Move To Recognise State Of Palestine
Last Updated: Italian PM Giorgia Meloni opposes recognizing Palestine as a state before its establishment, contrasting with French President Macron's recent UN announcement. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni on Saturday resisted the growing momentum in Europe to recognise Palestine as a state, describing the move as 'counter-productive. 'I am very much in favour of the State of Palestine, but I am not in favour of recognising it before establishing it," Meloni told Italian daily La Repubblica. 'If something that doesn't exist is recognised on paper, the problem could appear to be solved when it isn't," she added. Meloni's remarks come just days after French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France would recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September, a move that has drawn sharp criticism from both Israel and the United States. In addition to Italy, Germany also signalled that it won't recognise Palestine as a state anytime soon, adding that its priority now is to make 'long-overdue progress" towards a two-state solution. Macron's announcement represents a major shift in European diplomacy, sparking intense debate across EU capitals. 'True to its historic commitment to a just and lasting peace in the Middle East, I have decided that France will recognise the State of Palestine. I will make a formal announcement at the United Nations General Assembly in September," the French head of state wrote on X and Instagram. According to an AFP tally, Palestinian statehood is now recognised by 142 countries after the inclusion of France, though Israel and the United States strongly oppose recognition. A resolution of the UN General Assembly decided on the partition of Palestine in 1947, then under a British mandate, into two independent states — one Jewish and the other Arab. The State of Israel was declared the following year. For decades, most UN member states have backed the two-state solution, envisioning Israelis and Palestinians living in peace and security, side by side. (With inputs from AFP) view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hindustan Times
9 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Italy's Meloni on France move to recognise State of Palestine: 'Something that doesn't exist…'
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni on Saturday pushed back against growing European momentum toward recognising the state of Palestine and called such a move "counter-productive". Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said on Saturday that recognising the State of Palestine before it is established.(AFP) "I am very much in favour of the State of Palestine, but I am not in favour of recognising it before establishing it," Meloni told Italian daily La Repubblica. "If something that doesn't exist is recognised on paper, the problem could appear to be solved when it isn't," she added. Also Read | What UN meet amid grave tragedy in Gaza aims to achieve, and what it might In addition to Italy, Germany also indicated that it was not planning to recognise the state of Palestine in the short term, adding that its priority now is to make "long-overdue progress" towards a two-state solution. France set to recognise Palestinian state Her remarks come just days after French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France would recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September, a move that has drawn sharp criticism from both Israel and the United States. Macron's announcement marks a significant shift in European diplomacy and has sparked debate across EU capitals. Also Read | Palestinians stare at 'die hungry or leave territory' as Gaza starvation peaks, Israel blames Hamas again "True to its historic commitment to a just and lasting peace in the Middle East, I have decided that France will recognise the State of Palestine. I will make a formal announcement at the United Nations General Assembly in September," the French head of state wrote on X and Instagram. 142 nations recognise Palestine After the inclusion of France, Palestinian statehood is now recognised by 142 countries, according to an AFP tally, though Israel and the United States strongly oppose recognition. In 1947, a resolution of the UN General Assembly decided on the partition of Palestine, then under a British mandate, into two independent states — one Jewish and the other Arab. The following year, the State of Israel was proclaimed. For several decades, the vast majority of UN member states have supported the idea of a two-state solution: Israeli and Palestinian, living side-by-side peacefully and securely. (with AFP inputs)
