Treasurer Jim Chalmers 'pouring cold water on investment' with Labor's proposed unrealised gains tax, Geoff Wilson warns
Mr Chalmers on Wednesday vowed a boost to Australia's productivity and deliver major tax reform in a speech to the National Press Club.
His promise drew criticism from Wilson Asset Management founder Geoff Wilson, who lambasted Labor's plans to alter how large superannuation funds are taxed - which includes targeting unrealised capital gains.
"You can't say the economy lacks dynamism and innovation, then introduce a tax that penalises long-term investment and risk-taking,' Mr Wilson told SkyNews.com.au.
'Taxing unrealised gains in superannuation does the opposite of what's needed — it punishes prudence, discourages capital formation and undermines confidence in the rules of the game.
'The Treasurer admits we need more innovation — while taxing the very gains that fund it.
'You can't light a fire under the economy by pouring cold water on investment."
A common criticism of the plan to tax unrealised gains on assets – including properties and shares – above the threshold in super funds is the impact it will have on small businesses.
Many small business owners put assets in their self-managed super funds (SMSF), but under Labor's plan those above the threshold would be forced to pay tax on paper gains.
Similarly, some investors use their SMSF as a low tax investment vehicle for startup businesses.
Wilson Asset Management sent a note to shareholders warning if the tax were applied to a company like US$40b design platform Canva, which achieved its massive valuation after 18 funding rounds, the company would have failed.
'Under taxing of unrealised gains every funding round would require tax to be paid on a hypothetical valuation,' the report reads.
'Most startups operate with negative cashflow and when capital is raised it is to fund growth, not to provide liquidity to investors.
'Therefore, there is no liquidity to pay tax on an unrealised gain.'
Labor's changes to super accounts $3m will also not be indexed and capture more and more Australians over time.
AMP's chief economist Shane Oliver said the lack of indexing across the tax system, including under Labor's proposed super tax changes, was something the government needed to change.
'We should be looking at removing areas where, as far as possible, we're not indexing,' Mr Oliver told SkyNews.com.au.
'The ideal should be indexing things, not leaving more parts of the tax system unindexed and at the behest of what future governments might do.'
The government insists its super change affects only the top 0.5 per cent of accounts, however, modelling from AMP deputy chief economist Diana Mousina suggests otherwise.
'An average 22-year-old today, who's earning average full-time earnings, will hit the cap when they get to about 62 years old on my analysis,' Ms Mousina told Sky News.
'So that's before they actually reach retirement.'
She warned the government's failure to index the $3 million cap means growing numbers of Australians will eventually be drawn into the tax net.
'My estimates were actually, I think, understating the amount of people that will hit the cap because I used quite low return assumptions,' Ms Mousina said.
She also flagged broader economic distortions that may result from the policy as people try to find a way around the taxes.
'If people know that their super is going to be hit, then inheritances will go elsewhere,' she said.
'More people will probably go to purchase a home, which has implications for home prices in the future.
'So people will find a way around this system to try and reduce their taxable income as much as possible.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
23 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
This $215b Asian investor just went private. Two Aussies are in charge
Two Australians have taken charge at ESR, one of the Asia-Pacific region's largest property investors with a $215 billion portfolio and which has just been taken private by a consortium led by US group Starwood Capital. Under the new ownership, ESR's newly promoted top executive, in the role of president, is Phil Pearce. Previously the group's deputy chief executive and also running ESR's Australian operations, Pearce will now be responsible for ESR's day-to-day operations. He joined the group in 2017 and is well-known in the property industry, after senior positions at Goodman Group and roles at Ascendas REIT in Singapore and AMP Capital.
Sky News AU
38 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Australian Tax Office issues warning to Australians about using sites like ChatGPT and Meta AI for advice on filling or seeking tax deductions
The Australian Tax Office has issued a warning to Australians about the risk of using artificial intelligence to seek out advice on filling out their tax returns. Bookkeepers have sounded the alarm about the rise of software such as ChatGPT and Meta AI in seeking general advice and information on how to maximise their tax returns. According to financial comparison site Compare Club, 17 per cent of Australians are already harnessing its power for financial management, which has prompted the tax office to issue a warning. As AI has become a growing tool for Australians, the ATO has warned against relying on the open-source websites for financial advice. 'The ATO is warning people to be careful when seeking tax advice on Australian tax law using new technologies. While new technologies can help improve our lives, there may be risks associated with a number of new platforms offering inaccurate tax advice," an ATO spokesperson told The spokesperson said taxpayers were responsible for the information that they supplied to the tax office, and advice should be sought through official ATO sources. "When looking for advice, always use ATO sources such as or seek tax advice from the ATO or a registered tax professional." Many of these AI platforms are not Australian based, but are instead operated in the United States, and so any advice that may be generated could either be inaccurate or even misleading. H&R Block Director of Tax Communications Mark Chapman acknowledged that there was a growing number of self-lodgers who were turning to AI to get advice and information about deductions. He said the increased reliance on artificial intelligence was potentially dangerous. "There is a growing use of AI in tax return preparation, particularly amongst self-lodgers (for example, using it to determine whether you are entitled to a work-related deduction based on your income) however this is potentially dangerous," he told Mr Chapman said AI use was increasing every year and urged taxpayers who are self-lodging to either exercise caution or not use them at all. "Self-preparers are particularly prone to use using these open-source AI programs and I would recommend using them with caution or not at all", he said. "Having said that, the use of AI is increasing every year as people try to use it as a short cut to preparing their tax return but nothing beats getting a human tax expert for some accurate tax advice." prompted ChatGPT on whether it could help with lodging 'my Australian tax returns'. Instead of being redirected to the ATO website, it said that it could help, but wanted clarification on what was needed. The prompt was then refined to ask about maximising tax deductions. It generated a list, and directed to myDeductions, which the ATO acknowledges is powered by AI. The same questions were then asked of Meta's AI platform It gave roughly the same advice as ChatGPT, but stated that it had searched Bing for its advice. We then prompted it to give a response on how to maximise tax deductions, without specifying a country. did not prompt DeepSeek or Google's Gemini platform for advice, nor 'Grok' AI on X or Microsoft's Co-pilot AI and does not suggest that individuals rely on any of the information provided from ChatGPT in this article. With the exception of DeepSeek, which was created by Chinese company, High Flyer, the majority of the open-sourced AI platforms are based in the United States, and so any advice that is generated could either be inaccurate or even misleading. The ATO encourages Australians to use myTax or to call the ATO on 13 28 65.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The inside story of how Australia's moment to shine in the arts world went horribly wrong
The historic grip of major galleries over Australia's representatives had been broken, and the newish selection process seemed to be serving Australia well. On December 16 last year, Collette and Creative Australia's head of visual arts, Mikala Tai, conferred and the pair's selection was confirmed, the decision tightly held in the organisation for weeks for fear it would leak. Among the select few with knowledge of the successful team, the decision was regarded as 'bold' or 'courageous' – Sabsabi's Lebanese heritage and public pro-Palestinian stance connected him to the Middle East at a time when conflict in that region was emotive and polarising. But a week before the planned February 7 announcement, police lobbed their own explosive device into this febrile mix, going public with their investigations into a caravan loaded with explosives in north-west Sydney. The incident was quickly labelled a 'terrorism threat', although later the Federal Police would describe it as 'a criminal con job'. By then, a federal election was imminent and polling showed voters were starting to turn against Labor. Loading Two days after the caravan discovery, Creative Australia briefed Minister for Arts Tony Burke on its upcoming announcement. Mention was made in the ministerial dispatch that Sabsabi, along with other artists, had withdrawn from the Sydney Festival in 2022 in protest after the festival accepted funding from the Israeli Embassy, 'out of solidarity with the Palestinian people and the Palestinian cause'. But the minister's office was not alerted to historical works which would later be raised in the Murdoch press and in parliament, including You (2007), a multichannel video and sound installation featuring imagery of the late Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, in the collection of the Museum of Contemporary Art. 'That the work was seen as highly ambiguous, and already nearly 20 years old … appears to have given staff confidence that any controversy connected with the work could be managed,' the report says. A staff member later left a message with Burke's office alerting them to the work's existence but appears not to have followed that call up. A 'questionable' matter The board of Creative Australia was backgrounded on the winning team but played no direct role in the selection process. Members were not alerted to any potential controversies. Days after the team's announcement, as its sister tabloid paper defended allegations it tried to entrap a Sydney cafe in an antisemitic sting, The Australian described Sabsabi's use of imagery of Nasrallah as 'ambiguous' and 'questionable'. Collette and senior members of his team were unaware of a second sensitive work, Thank you very much (2006) featuring imagery of the 9/11 attacks and US President George W. Bush, until Senate question time two days later when the Coalition's then-shadow arts minster Claire Chandler rose to her feet. By all accounts, Chandler's questions sparked panic. Soon after, around 3pm, the CEO, chair and head of public affairs held a call with Creative Australia's external communications advisers, who concluded the negative media narrative around the artist and his prior artworks posed a significant risk to the reputation of Creative Australia if the stories continued to run. Burke then called Adrian Collette at 3.30pm asking why he was not alerted to the contentious artwork. He later insisted he did not demand Sabsabi's head. The report found that the minister's statement was consistent with the information received by the panel during its review. Loading Collette later recalled in testimony to Senate estimates: 'We anticipate always that the selection of the Venice artist will be controversial. It has been from time immemorial. 'Everyone has a view on the artist, on the art. We don't resile from any of those decisions; we haven't in the past. But what happened at that moment was a recognition by me and the board that this entire process was going to be mired in the worst kind of divisive debate.' At 6.05pm an emergency meeting of the board had been convened, and it was determined to offer the artistic team the opportunity to withdraw from the project under threat of sacking. The board did not seek the advice of the head of visual arts or its head of communications, and did not allow the artist to present his case. It was beyond the panel's terms of reference to judge the legitimacy of the board's decision, but it's clear the board acted hastily without drawing breath. The board could have announced a review of the team's selection. Instead, it brought a gun. 'Nobody except those involved can ever know how fraught and heartbreaking that meeting was,' board member and artist Lindy Lee later recalled. She resigned the next day. Officially, the board said it acted to avoid the unacceptable risk to public support for Australia's artistic community of a 'prolonged and divisive debate'. The panel found the board felt compelled by 'a strongly negative narrative [that] was expected in the media around the artworks and the artist, and the decision to select the artist had become a matter of political debate'. Another factor that may have been weighing on some board members was the potential for the controversy to be used as a battering ram to reduce the funding and independence of Creative Australia. With an election imminent, Creative Australia faced an existential threat from cuts, real or imagined, as conservatives made every noise they would follow the playbook of Donald Trump in stirring up the culture wars. Notably, it is in a more benign political environment with Labor securing a thumping majority that Sabsabi and Dagostino have now been reinstated. In any event, at 7.41pm on February 13, Collette contacted the artistic team and advised them of the board's decision. Sabsabi and Dagostino refused to resign. Forty minutes later, after the board's statement was prepared, Collette made three unsuccessful attempts to contact them. Sabsabi and Dagostino later recalled being stunned by the turn of events: 'The Venice Biennale is one of the biggest platforms in Australian art,' Sabsabi told this masthead. 'To be selected and then have it withdrawn was devastating. It was heartbreaking and has caused ongoing anxiety. It's had a serious impact on my career, my wellbeing and my family's wellbeing.' By 6pm the following day the Herald had broken the news that philanthropist Simon Mordant had resigned, along with Mikala Tai and program manager Tahmina Maskinyar. Petitions and protests followed, the outrage lasting four months until the board voted two weeks ago to rescind its decision. Had Creative Australia been as well-prepared for the public announcement as it should have been, it is possible that its senior leadership and board may have reached a conclusion that any controversy around both works could be sensibly managed, the report concluded. The organisation was caught between its conflicting desire to do right by the artists and political realities. Ultimately, the entire mess could have been avoided if cooler heads had prevailed and due processes were followed. Changes afoot Former publisher Louise Adler is not the only commentator to draw parallels between the Sabsabi debacle and Antoinette Lattouf, the radio broadcaster who was last week awarded $70,000 after a Federal Court found she was unfairly sacked by the ABC for her political opinions concerning the war in Gaza. Like Lattouf, Sabsabi's pro-Palestinian views were well known at the time of his appointment, and complaints flooded Creative Australia as soon as the appointment was publicised, cheered on by the Murdoch media. Holding or expressing a political opinion was held by the federal court as not a valid reason for terminating Lattouf's employment, even at the national broadcaster. Sabsabi and Dagostino had been selected by an open expression of interest process, by an organisation founded on the principle of artistic independence. Both stand as an abject lesson to the dangers of knee-jerk reactions to pressure tactics. Sabsabi and Dagostino speak of a sense of renewed confidence that allows them to move forward with optimism and hope after a period of significant and collective hardship. The arts world feels vindicated by their intervention. Loading It's likely there will be changes to the Venice selection process, and there is every indication that Collette, an experienced arts administrator, will seek to make things right, and then make a diplomatic exit. 'At the end of the day, Adrian became the kingmaker,' said one campaigner. 'He brought the recommendation to the board. The buck stops with him.' Mikala Tai made a rare statement via social media after a period of media silence in which she said she had come to learn why she wanted to work in the arts industry. 'I have also learnt a lot about cultural leadership. That we have conferred leadership on administrators and that this is a distraction from the fact that artists remain the heart of the industry and that the moment we forget the artist, we sacrifice the industry.'
