logo
This Barely Used Child Care Tax Break For Employers Just Got An Overhaul

This Barely Used Child Care Tax Break For Employers Just Got An Overhaul

Forbes5 days ago
The Employer-Provided Childcare Tax Credit just got a revamp. Matt Roth for The Washington Post via Getty Images
Before CAKES body cofounder Taylor Capuano had her moment of fame on Shark Tank in 2023 for putting one of her retail company's nipple covers on judge Kevin O'Leary's head, she, like many working parents, had nearly reached a breaking point at her nine-to-five job.
Capuano and her husband had their first child during the Covid pandemic while she was working in marketing, and it was a financial struggle. After paying for basic monthly expenses–including a hefty child care bill and health insurance–there was barely anything left to save. Coupled with a boss who she says told her to start looking for another job when she needed additional daytime flexibility, Capuano knew the corporate world was failing parents like her. Like so many others, she turned to entrepreneurship and cofounded CAKES body with her sister, Casey Sarai in 2022. It's now a $92 million (2024 revenue) viral undergarments startup with 30 employees.
As the Trump Administration is floating ideas to boost the U.S. birth rate, including (as part of the just-passed tax and budget bill), putting $1,000 into a 'Trump Account' for babies born between 2025 and 2028, employers are increasingly stepping up to address one of the biggest challenges for working parents: the child care crisis.
Major companies, notably Chobani, UPS and Etsy, have unveiled new child care benefits for employees in recent years, from on-site facilities to stipends for backup care. And while such programs don't typically cover the full price of daycare, research shows they're making a difference and helping companies' bottom lines by reducing absences and turnover.
Still, few firms are taking advantage of one of the key incentives in the U.S. tax code to help cover some of the cost of providing such a program to their employees.
Bigger Tax Breaks On The Horizon
Until recently, the Employer-Provided Childcare Tax Credit allowed companies to offset 25% of the cost of building or operating a child care facility for employees, or contracting with a qualified provider, for up to a $150,000 tax break annually. But according to data Forbes obtained from the IRS, just 176 businesses operating as C corporations and pass-through corporations, including S corporations, claimed the tax credit in 2021, the most recent year the data was available. That's a minuscule fraction of the 6.7 million corporate income tax returns filed that year.
The expense of constructing a facility compared to how much a business can get from the credit is one of the reasons it is underutilized, says Aaron Merchen, executive director of policy and programs at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation. The maximum amount businesses could claim under the tax break had not been updated since its creation in 2001, until last week.
President Donald Trump's just-signed reconciliation package more than triples the amount that businesses can claim under the credit, while also allowing them to use a third-party to arrange child care for their employees. Companies will now be allowed to claim 40% of qualified child care expenditures up to $500,000, or 50% up to $600,000 in the case of small businesses.
Investing In Retention And Productivity
Since founding CAKES body three years ago, Capuano and Sarai are set on creating a supportive workplace culture for the parents on their staff, who they view as crucial to the firm's success. So they began looking into offering a subsidy for child care.
After researching whether they could take advantage of child care benefits tax credits, they hit a brick wall in 'about 20 minutes,' says Sarai. None of the existing programs would completely cover their subsidy budget, or make sense for a remote workforce. They wound up offering every full-time staff member a reimbursement of up to $3,000 per month toward nanny, daycare or babysitter costs, with a prorated program for part-time employees. The startup—which expects to clear $150 million in revenue this year—has budgeted up to $500,000 for the program in 2025, which they say translates to 100% employer-sponsored child care.
'It is not just a nice thing to do,' Sarai tells Forbes . 'This is part of our growth strategy and part of investing in the top talent that we have and maintaining them.'
In a 2024 study for Boston Consulting Group, Emily Kos, a managing director and partner, and her team examined five companies in a range of industries that offered childcare benefits such as reimbursements and on-site daycare: Etsy, Fast Retailing, Steamboat Ski Resort in Colorado, Synchrony, and UPS. Every single one saw a positive return on investment, which Kos says was calculated by looking at retention and productivity, ranging from 90% to 425%.
Before Covid-19 hit, financial services company Synchrony provided 10 days a year of backup child care as a benefit. Now, says Aaron Brown, senior vice president of Total Rewards, the company reimburses 60 days of backup care up to $100 per day, which can cover anything from summer camp to a babysitter.
'We're glad that people are using the benefit because it means that we're getting better business performance,' he says.
The company receives requests for around 4,000 days per year, which Forbes estimates would cost the company roughly $400,000. He says the cost is well worth it—the firm has had a 30% increase in applicants post-pandemic and low turnover.
'The care economy underpins the full economy,' says BCG's Kos. 'If parents can't go to work or if caregivers more broadly than just parents can't go to work, it's a significant portion of the workforce.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Powell asks watchdog to probe Fed HQ renovations as Trump pressure grows
Powell asks watchdog to probe Fed HQ renovations as Trump pressure grows

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Powell asks watchdog to probe Fed HQ renovations as Trump pressure grows

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell told lawmakers on Monday that he has asked the central bank's watchdog to scrutinize renovations of the Fed's headquarters, in response to growing criticism from the Trump administration of the plan. Powell called on the Fed's inspector-general, Michael Horowitz, to examine the project's cost, which has ballooned to $2.5 billion, as well as any other aspect he deems appropriate, according to a person familiar with the request. The request was referenced in a letter, first reported by POLITICO, that Powell sent to Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott (R-S.C.) and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), the top Democrat on the committee. Speculation has mounted that President Donald Trump, who has clashed with Powell for refusing to cut interest rates, might try to use the renovations to remove the Fed chief 'for cause,' as allowed by statute. Still, it is unclear what type of behavior would fall under that standard. It has generally been interpreted to mean that the president cannot fire Fed board members over policy disagreements, and the Supreme Court signaled in a recent order that it might block a move to remove the Fed chair without cause. Horowitz, who was appointed by Powell last month, was previously the inspector general for the Justice Department, where he won praise from Trump and his supporters for uncovering problems in the FBI's handling of the investigation into potential collusion between Trump's 2016 campaign and Russia. Powell wrote in the letter that the IG has had 'full access to project information on costs, contracts, schedules, and expenditures and receives monthly reports on the construction program.' 'The Board's IG conducted an audit in 2021 to assess the Board's process for planning and managing multiple renovation projects as well as procuring services under various renovation-related contracts,' he added. 'I have asked the Board's IG to take a fresh look at the project.' A spokesperson for Scott said the Banking chair looks forward to receiving more information about 'the costly renovations at the Fed's headquarters.' 'Chairman Scott has continued to call for increased transparency and accountability at the Federal Reserve, and this letter is consistent with improving the communication and transparency he is seeking,' a spokesperson for the senator said in a statement to POLITICO. Axios earlier reported news of Powell's request to the IG. The headquarters renovation, which has been underway for multiple years, is a new front in the administration's criticism of the Fed. Powell was asked at a hearing last month by Scott about the project after a New York Post article characterized it as akin to the 'Palace of Versailles,' a characterization the Fed chief disputed. White House Budget Director Russ Vought — along with the National Capital Planning Commission — is investigating Powell over both the testimony he provided to Congress and questions about whether the construction project adhered to the National Capital Planning Act. Powell wrote in his letter that the Fed chose to consult with NCPC but is not subject to its jurisdiction. He also said the project has changed from its original proposal. 'As is to be expected in the major renovation of nearly 100-year-old historic buildings, the Board's designs have continued to evolve over the course of the project, and some features of the buildings, including rooftop spaces and new water features on the building grounds, were scaled back or eliminated as the project moved forward,' Powell said in the letter. 'These changes simplified the project and reduced the likelihood of further delays and cost overruns. None of them added cost to the project. We do not consider these changes to be substantial.' National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said on ABC News on Sunday that the question of whether Trump can fire the Fed chair is 'a thing that's being looked into.' Hassett is one of four candidates to replace Powell when his term ends next year, according to people familiar with the administration's deliberations.

Tony Clark says FBI investigation hasn't changed his job leading MLB players' union
Tony Clark says FBI investigation hasn't changed his job leading MLB players' union

New York Times

time24 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Tony Clark says FBI investigation hasn't changed his job leading MLB players' union

ATLANTA — Asked if a federal investigation has jeopardized his work leading the baseball players' union, Tony Clark said Monday afternoon that his job is unchanged. 'My work is the same as it's always been,' Clark said during batting practice prior to the Home Run Derby at Truist Park. 'And our responsibility is to continue to protect and advance the rights of our players.' Advertisement In some of his first public comments on the matter, Clark, the executive director of the Major League Baseball Players Association, gave little insight into the probe that has embroiled officials inside both the MLBPA and the NFL's union. The investigation, which is being conducted by the Eastern District of New York, is related to OneTeam Partners, a licensing company the two unions co-own with three other sports unions. Clark declined to say whether he personally is under investigation. Nor would he disclose what he understands the status of the probe to be or when he believes it could conclude. 'My response to those three (questions), and probably any other one you're going to ask associated with it, is going to be the same,' Clark said. 'We understand that there's an investigation. That investigation is ongoing. We have been and will continue to be fully cooperative as a result.' Clark and the players in the union have retained different outside lawyers in response to the investigation. So too have Lloyd Howell Jr., the head of the NFL Players Association, and his union. The Athletic previously reported on a move that raised alarm within one of the unions. In that instance, a proposal to modify an equity program at OneTeam Partners created controversy last year when an NFLPA official alleged that the plan had the potential to lead to union officials enriching themselves. Officials from multiple sports unions, including Howell and Clark, sit on OneTeam's board of directors. Both Clark and Howell signed a resolution last June supporting the plan. OneTeam Partners, which the NFLPA owns a 44 percent stake in and the MLBPA a 22 percent stake, said the plan was not ultimately enacted and that it was part of 'an exploratory review to determine whether the company could lawfully offer incentive-based compensation to current and prospective board members.' Advertisement OneTeam has also said that 'OneTeam is not the subject of the investigation and has not been accused of any wrongdoing in any way.' The company declined additional comment Monday. The NFLPA last winter retained an outside firm, Linklaters, to review the matter. Now, the FBI is involved. The full scope of the investigation is unclear. The Eastern District of New York has not publicly commented. It's been a long run of controversy for Clark. Just before Opening Day in 2024, some players and a former MLBPA lawyer challenged Clark and pushed him to fire his second-in-command, Bruce Meyer. Later, at the end of 2024, an anonymous complaint about Clark was filed to the National Labor Relations Board. It's a crucial time for the union with the sport's owners and players nearing another round of collective bargaining. The current agreement expires after the 2026 season, and negotiations are expected to get underway no later than next summer. 'Regardless of what is going on around us, my first focus, my second focus and my last focus is going to be to ensure that the players are educated on the things that they need to be educated on in preparation for whatever tomorrow's going to look like,' Clark said Monday when asked about the string of bad news. Commissioner Rob Manfred said in June that he was following news of the federal investigation into Clark. 'Honestly, I've read the articles. I think you would think I was somewhat negligent if I haven't,' Manfred said. 'Beyond reading the articles, there's not much for us to do. One thing: you know, I did spend a year in a federal district court when I was a kid. One thing you learn about FBI investigations: let them do their thing and stay out of their way, and that's where we are.' Manfred subsequently said players have been out of step with the MLBPA's leadership. Clark responded at the time in a statement saying Manfred was trying to divide players. (Photo of Tony Clark from 2022: Luis Magana / Associated Press)

Tech giants scramble to meet AI's looming energy crisis
Tech giants scramble to meet AI's looming energy crisis

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tech giants scramble to meet AI's looming energy crisis

The artificial intelligence industry is scrambling to reduce its massive energy consumption through better cooling systems, more efficient computer chips, and smarter programming -- all while AI usage explodes worldwide. AI depends entirely on data centers, which could consume three percent of the world's electricity by 2030, according to the International Energy Agency. That's double what they use today. Experts at McKinsey, a US consulting firm, describe a race to build enough data centers to keep up with AI's rapid growth, while warning that the world is heading toward an electricity shortage. "There are several ways of solving the problem," explained Mosharaf Chowdhury, a University of Michigan professor of computer science. Companies can either build more energy supply -- which takes time and the AI giants are already scouring the globe to do -- or figure out how to consume less energy for the same computing power. Chowdhury believes the challenge can be met with "clever" solutions at every level, from the physical hardware to the AI software itself. For example, his lab has developed algorithms that calculate exactly how much electricity each AI chip needs, reducing energy use by 20-30 percent. - 'Clever' solutions - Twenty years ago, operating a data center -- encompassing cooling systems and other infrastructure -- required as much energy as running the servers themselves. Today, operations use just 10 percent of what the servers consume, says Gareth Williams from consulting firm Arup. This is largely through this focus on energy efficiency. Many data centers now use AI-powered sensors to control temperature in specific zones rather than cooling entire buildings uniformly. This allows them to optimize water and electricity use in real-time, according to McKinsey's Pankaj Sachdeva. For many, the game-changer will be liquid cooling, which replaces the roar of energy-hungry air conditioners with a coolant that circulates directly through the servers. "All the big players are looking at it," Williams said. This matters because modern AI chips from companies like Nvidia consume 100 times more power than servers did two decades ago. Amazon's world-leading cloud computing business, AWS, last week said it had developed its own liquid method to cool down Nvidia GPUs in its servers - - avoiding have to rebuild existing data centers. "There simply wouldn't be enough liquid-cooling capacity to support our scale," Dave Brown, vice president of compute and machine learning services at AWS, said in a YouTube video. - US vs China - For McKinsey's Sachdeva, a reassuring factor is that each new generation of computer chips is more energy-efficient than the last. Research by Purdue University's Yi Ding has shown that AI chips can last longer without losing performance. "But it's hard to convince semiconductor companies to make less money" by encouraging customers to keep using the same equipment longer, Ding added. Yet even if more efficiency in chips and energy consumption is likely to make AI cheaper, it won't reduce total energy consumption. "Energy consumption will keep rising," Ding predicted, despite all efforts to limit it. "But maybe not as quickly." In the United States, energy is now seen as key to keeping the country's competitive edge over China in AI. In January, Chinese startup DeepSeek unveiled an AI model that performed as well as top US systems despite using less powerful chips -- and by extension, less energy. DeepSeek's engineers achieved this by programming their GPUs more precisely and skipping an energy-intensive training step that was previously considered essential. China is also feared to be leagues ahead of the US in available energy sources, including from renewables and nuclear. tu/arp/bjt Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store