All about China's new missile that can be launched from space, technology is based on....
China new missile: In what could be a major concern for India and US, China has achieved a technological breakthrough pertaining to capability to launch missiles directly from space. The report in the South China Morning Post claims that China has developed hypersonic missiles capable of reaching speeds up to Mach 20, 20 times the speed of sound. With this technology, China can now launch missiles from space, including from existing or small space stations. China's might has been so upgraded that The design of these space-launched missiles is so advanced that conventional air defence systems may not be able to detect or intercept them in time. By the time conventional systems identify the trajectory of the missile, it is already very close to its target. It wont be wrong to say that China has got its Brahmastra.
How does this technology work?
The technology behind these missiles is based on hypersonic glide vehicles (HGVs), which operate in two stages. If China installs such missiles in any of its space stations, they can be controlled by command centres on Earth. These command centres can remotely launch hypersonic glide vehicles from space stations. The glide vehicles, traveling at extremely high speeds, will first re-enter Earth's atmosphere and then head toward their targets, making their trajectory unpredictable and difficult to intercept.
China launched its hypersonic missile program in 2010. By 2017, it had conducted the first successful test and soon after began working on technology to launch missiles and rockets from space. According to an American scientific report, China tested its hypersonic missile program again in 2021, and now, in just 15 years, China's hypersonic missile capability has moved from theoretical calculations to operational reality in space.
Can this threat be countered?
There are some ways to counter such threats from Chinese space-launched missiles. For example, it is possible to destroy the satellite or orbital platform from which the missile was launched. Along with the United States, China, and Russia, India has also acquired technology known as anti-satellite weapons to destroy satellites in space.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
39 minutes ago
- Mint
China eyes Level 3 autonomy rollout by 2026, tightening grip on assisted-driving tech after fatal Xiaomi crash
China is stepping up regulatory oversight of assisted-driving technology, even as it urges domestic carmakers to accelerate innovation in the race for global dominance in autonomous vehicles. Following a fatal crash involving a Xiaomi SU7 in March, in which three passengers died shortly after the driver switched from assisted mode to manual control, regulators are finalising new safety rules for driver-assistance systems. The Xiaomi incident has triggered increased scrutiny, with Beijing determined to prevent the overpromotion of these systems' capabilities. Officials are walking a fine line, encouraging rapid technological advancement without compromising road safety. Analysts suggest this balanced approach, if executed well, could offer China a competitive edge over markets like the United States, where regulatory frameworks for autonomous vehicles remain fragmented. Under current Chinese regulations, systems that control steering, acceleration, and braking under limited conditions are permitted, but drivers must remain alert. The use of terms such as 'autonomous' or 'smart' in marketing is prohibited to avoid misleading consumers. The revised regulations are expected to include stricter standards for hardware and software that monitor driver attentiveness and response times. State-backed firms such as Dongfeng and Huawei have been enlisted to assist in drafting the rules, with the government seeking public feedback over a month-long consultation period ending Friday. Despite the push for caution, Chinese authorities are continuing efforts to roll out more advanced Level 3 systems. These allow drivers to take their eyes off the road in specific scenarios, such as highway driving, while still requiring them to be ready to retake control. State-owned Changan had been preparing to begin Level 3 validation tests in April, but those were halted in the wake of the Xiaomi crash. A source familiar with the matter indicated the government aims to resume testing later this year, with an initial Level 3 vehicle approval targeted for 2026. Driver-assistance technology has become a major area of competition in China's increasingly crowded car market. Level 2 systems, which still require driver supervision, have already become widespread, featured in vehicles from domestic giants like BYD and foreign players such as Tesla. According to Canalys, over 60 per cent of new vehicles sold in China this year are expected to offer Level 2 capabilities. Companies have also been able to lower costs enough to offer such features at little or no additional expense. BYD, for instance, now includes its 'God's Eye' driving software across all models without a surcharge. Globally, China is positioning itself to lead in assisted-driving technology much as it did with electric vehicles. Last year, the government selected nine automakers for public road testing aimed at advancing self-driving technologies. As part of its regulatory shift, China will also hold carmakers and component suppliers legally accountable for system failures, a move that mirrors similar legislation passed in the UK last year. At the Shanghai Auto Show in April, firms including Huawei and Geely's Zeekr showcased Level 3-ready technologies. Huawei claimed its system, designed for highways, had undergone over 600 million kilometres of simulated testing. Zeekr unveiled the 9X luxury SUV, stating it was ready for mass production in the third quarter, pending regulatory approval. In contrast, global brands like Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen have been more conservative. While highlighting progress in assisted-driving features, they have refrained from introducing Level 3 systems, citing liability concerns and cost barriers. Mercedes-Benz's CTO Markus Schaefer noted that while hardware costs have decreased, meeting Level 3 safety standards remains significantly expensive. (With inputs from Reuters)
News18
an hour ago
- News18
After Moonlighting, Techie Soham Parekh Accused Of Manipulating CEOs With Operation Sindoor
Last Updated: The businessman shared a screenshot of a conversation he had with Soham Parekh during the events of Operation Sindoor. Soham Parekh, the Indian techie accused of moonlighting for several companies, has been at the centre of a controversy. With many companies coming forward with their own experience of getting scammed by Parekh, another American co-founder has shared a concerning incident involving the techie. The latest case involves allegations of manipulating his employers emotionally in the name of Operation Sindoor. Leaping AI founder Arkadiy Telegin added more to the discussion on X by sharing an anecdote from the time of Operation Sindoor. Calling it an India-Pakistan thing, he also shared a screenshot of a conversation with an individual appearing to be Soham Parekh. 'Soham also used to guilt-trip me for his being slow on PRs when the India-Pakistan thing was going on, all while he was in Mumbai. Next person should hire him for the Chief Intelligence Officer role," the CTO wrote in the post. The conversation shows Soham speaking about a drone attack near his house, further adding that he has been told to stay at home. Telegin explained, 'Context here is that Mumbai was nowhere near the conflict, being 1000km+ away from Jammu & Kashmir." Carried out by the Indian Armed Forces, Operation Sindoor was a calibrated military operation in response to the terrorist attack in Pahalgam. The forces targeted terrorist sites and camps through airstrikes and missiles. At the time of the operation, while states bordering Pakistan like Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh were on high alert, Maharashtra had no major reports of airstrikes or attacks as claimed in the text messages. The post instantly reignited online criticism towards Parekh, with many calling out his repeated instances of scamming employees. One wrote, 'This guy single-handedly destroyed the reputation of remote work for devs while adding fuel to the fire on racism against India," while another added, 'Oh my God! On the one hand, it's funny ngl, but on the other hand, once you abuse the trust in a high-trust society, there's going to be consequences. Soham himself may get away as he looks to be a pretty cracked dev, but the consequences could be on others…sigh." Another comment read, 'What a way to tarnish the image of the hard-working population of India." Amid the intense backlash against Soham, the techie has publicly admitted to working at multiple companies at the same time, citing his financial distress. First Published:
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
The Dragon's Own Goal: How China's Trade War Is Boosting India's Manufacturing Rise
The recent recall of over 300 skilled technicians from smartphone manufacturing plants in India sent a jolt through the global technology industry. But this dramatic move, coupled with restrictions on critical materials like rare earth magnets and fertilizers, reveals more than just escalating trade tensions. It exposes the fundamental weakness of a strategy that may ironically accelerate the very outcome it seeks to prevent: the shift of manufacturing dominance. What we are witnessing is not merely another trade dispute, but a desperate attempt to cling to manufacturing supremacy through increasingly extreme measures. The irony is profound: these actions are likely to backfire, creating the perfect storm for India to emerge as the world's next manufacturing powerhouse. The Desperation Behind the Restrictions The decision to pull hundreds of skilled workers from Indian facilities represents a significant escalation in economic warfare. These technicians weren't just employees; they were the vital conduits for knowledge transfer, making high-end smartphone production possible in sudden departure has, predictably, disrupted production lines and temporarily delayed plans to manufacture the latest generation of devices. Similarly, the restrictions on rare earth magnets—crucial for electric vehicles and advanced electronics—and specialized fertilizers like di-ammonium phosphate signal a coordinated effort to impede India's industrial progress. With India historically importing over 80 percent of its rare earth magnets from a single source, delays in export approvals could indeed disrupt production by months and significantly inflate prices. But here lies the fundamental miscalculation. These measures reveal not strength, but vulnerability. When a dominant player resorts to denying competitors access to skilled workers and raw materials, it's a clear signal that competitive advantages built on sheer cost and scale alone are no longer sufficient to maintain an insurmountable lead. India's Unstoppable Ascent: The Numbers Don't Lie Despite these calculated disruptions, India's manufacturing trajectory continues its robust upward climb. Between March and May 2025, smartphone exports from India soared to an impressive $3.2 billion, with an overwhelming 97 percent destined for the United States. This marks a dramatic pivot from previous years, when only about half of India's smartphone exports found their way to American markets. The broader figures are even more compelling. In just the first five months of 2025, smartphone shipments from India to the United States totaled a staggering $4.4 billion—already surpassing the entire previous year's total of $3.7 billion. May 2025 alone saw shipments worth nearly $1 billion, with March setting a new record at $1.3 billion. This accelerating growth suggests that India's manufacturing ecosystem has reached a crucial tipping point. It now possesses the resilience to absorb temporary disruptions and continue its expansion. The strong foundation built over recent years—including improved infrastructure, a rapidly developing skilled workforce, and supportive government policies—provides a level of stability that external pressures cannot easily undermine. The Folly of Dependency Warfare The strategy of restricting access to critical materials and expertise rests on a flawed assumption: that alternative sources cannot be developed, or that dependencies cannot be diversified. This assumption is proving increasingly brittle. India's swift and adaptive response to these restrictions demonstrates the agility of a dynamic, growing economy. Government sources confidently describe the current disruptions as 'temporary,' while companies are already deploying alternative skilled workers and aggressively hiring and training a significant number of local employees. The ambitious goal of training 500 to 1,000 Indian workers this month alone underscores that knowledge transfer, once disrupted, can be rebuilt with far greater local ownership and self-reliance. More fundamentally, these restrictions are accelerating precisely the kind of supply chain diversification that global companies have been actively seeking. When faced with the stark choice between dependence on an increasingly unreliable supplier and strategic investment in alternative sources, rational businesses overwhelmingly choose diversification. India's Built-In Advantages for Manufacturing Leadership India enters this global manufacturing competition with several distinct and formidable advantages that external pressures cannot easily erode. The country's vast and rapidly expanding domestic market provides an exceptionally stable foundation for manufacturing operations, making it highly attractive to establish local supply chains that can serve both the burgeoning domestic demand and lucrative export markets. The demographic advantage is equally significant. India's growing middle class, projected to encompass an estimated 38 percent of the population by 2031, creates a powerful dual benefit: a substantial and eager consumer base, alongside a massive pool of skilled and semi-skilled dual role—as both a robust producer and a voracious consumer—provides an economic resilience that heavily export-dependent economies often lack. Furthermore, India's policy frameworks have evolved strategically to support this ambitious transition. Pioneering initiatives like the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes provide concrete financial incentives for companies that invest in Indian manufacturing and meet specific output targets. These targeted interventions address critical bottlenecks while allowing market forces to guide optimal resource allocation. Recent comprehensive trade agreements with major partners like the United Kingdom and ongoing negotiations with the European Union provide a robust framework for expanded market access. These agreements significantly reduce the perceived risk for companies making long-term manufacturing investments in India, assuring them of stable export pathways. The Electric Vehicle Opportunity: India's Electrifying Leap Perhaps nowhere is the potential for transformative supply chain shifts more evident than in the burgeoning electric vehicle (EV) battery manufacturing sector. Current restrictions on critical battery materials from traditional suppliers are creating urgent pressure for diversification, and India is strategically positioning itself to seize this monumental opportunity. The country has set an ambitious target to localize an impressive 60 percent of its EV battery manufacturing supply chain by 2030, backed by significant government investments supporting domestic production capabilities. Companies are already pouring capital into developing cathode materials, electrolyte production, and essential raw material processing to forge a truly integrated, self-sufficient ecosystem. This represents far more than mere import substitution; it positions India to emerge as a global supplier in one of the fastest-growing and most strategically important technology sectors worldwide. As global EV adoption accelerates, nations that control the vital battery supply chains will undoubtedly capture a disproportionate share of value and influence. Broader Implications: A Resilient Future for Global Manufacturing The current disruptions are not mere skirmishes; they reveal a fundamental and irreversible shift in how global manufacturing will be organized. The era of single-source dependency for critical components and materials is rapidly drawing to a close. It is being replaced by diversified, multi-country supply chains that prioritize resilience and geopolitical stability just as much as cost efficiency. India's manufacturing sector, currently contributing approximately 17 percent to its GDP with an ambitious target of 25 percent, represents exactly the kind of robust alternative that global companies desperately need. The compelling combination of cost competitiveness, rapidly expanding technical capabilities, and a stable political environment makes India an increasingly attractive long-term partner for global industry. The recall of skilled workers and the imposition of material restrictions, while creating short-term challenges, are paradoxically accelerating a transition that was already underway. Companies that were merely considering diversification for long-term strategic reasons now have immediate, pressing operational incentives to establish alternative supply chains with urgency. Looking Forward: India's Moment to Shine The true test of any manufacturing strategy is not whether it can maintain dominance through restrictive controls, but whether it can continue to innovate, adapt, and compete effectively on its own merits. The current approach of denying competitors access to expertise and materials suggests a tacit acknowledgment that competing purely on economic fundamentals has become increasingly challenging for established players. For India, the path forward requires unwavering, continued investment in world-class infrastructure, high-quality education, and robust institutional capabilities. The country's ultimate success will depend not on the failures of others, but on its own ability to proactively create a vibrant and attractive ecosystem where global companies actively choose to invest and operate. The recent disruptions, far from derailing India's manufacturing ambitions, may very well accelerate them. When faced with artificial constraints, economies often tap into capabilities they did not even know they possessed. India appears to be entering precisely such a phase of accelerated discovery, innovation, and self-reliant development. The global manufacturing landscape is irrevocably shifting toward greater diversification and resilience. Countries that can consistently provide political stability, a highly skilled workforce, and competitive operational costs will undoubtedly capture the lion's share of benefits from this profound transition. India's compelling combination of progressive policy support, immense demographic advantages, and rapidly growing industrial capabilities positions it powerfully to be among the primary beneficiaries of this global transformation. The question is no longer if supply chain diversification will continue—the current disruptions make that an absolute inevitability. The more pressing question is which countries will emerge as the preferred, reliable alternatives to traditional manufacturing centers. Based on current trends and rapidly expanding capabilities, India is exceptionally well-positioned to provide that compelling and resilient alternative.
