
France's top diplomat calls for foreign press access to Gaza
He spoke after the AFP news agency warned that the lives of Palestinian freelance journalists it was working with in Gaza were in danger and urged Israel to allow them and their families to leave the occupied coastal territory.
"I ask that the free and independent press be allowed to access Gaza to show what is happening there and to bear witness," Barrot told France Inter radio in an interview from eastern Ukraine.
Asked if France would help AFP stringers leave Gaza, Barrot said France was "addressing the issue" and hoped to be able to evacuate freelancers working with French journalists "in the coming weeks."
On Monday, an association of journalists at AFP called the Societe des Journalistes (Society of Journalists) sounded the alarm, urging "immediate intervention" to help reporters working with the agency in Gaza.
The SDJ cited the example of one such freelancer, a 30-year-old living with his family in Gaza City, who reported on Sunday that his older brother "fell because of hunger."
"We have lost journalists in conflicts, we have had injuries and prisoners in our ranks, but none of us can remember seeing a colleague die of starvation," it said.
AFP management responded in a statement posted on X and Instagram which said that it shared the anguish about the "dire situation" of colleagues in Gaza.
"Since October 7, Israel has prohibited access to the Gaza Strip for all international journalists.
"In this context, the work of our Palestinian freelancers is crucial to inform the world," it said.
"But their lives are in danger, which is why we urge the Israeli authorities to allow their immediate evacuation along with their families."
AFP evacuated its eight staff members and their families from Gaza between January and April 2024.
Barrot called for an "immediate ceasefire" after Israel on Monday expanded military operations to the central city of Deir el-Balah.
"There is no longer any justification for the Israeli army's military operations in Gaza," he said.
"This is an offensive that will exacerbate an already catastrophic situation and cause new forced displacements of populations, which we condemn in the strongest terms."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
17 minutes ago
- The Sun
ICJ climate ruling to reshape global environmental laws
THE HAGUE: The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is set to issue a historic advisory opinion on climate change, defining nations' legal duties to curb emissions and address environmental harm. The ruling, expected to influence global climate policies, stems from a push by Pacific island nations frustrated with slow progress in UN climate talks. Vanuatu's Climate Change Minister Ralph Regenvanu called the decision a potential 'game-changer' for climate justice. 'We've been going through this for 30 years... It'll shift the narrative, which is what we need to have,' he told AFP. The ICJ was tasked by the UN to clarify two key questions: what legal obligations states have to protect the environment from emissions, and what consequences they face for harming vulnerable nations. While the opinion is non-binding, experts believe it could pressure governments to strengthen climate policies. Andrew Raine of the UN Environment Programme noted the ruling could 'clarify how international law applies to the climate crisis,' influencing courts and lawmakers worldwide. Over 100 countries and organizations submitted arguments, with small island states urging reparations from major polluters. Margaretha Wewerinke-Singh, representing Vanuatu, argued that 'responsible states are required to make full reparation for the injury they have caused.' Island nations like Tuvalu warned of existential threats, with Eselealofa Apinelu stating, 'Tuvalu will disappear completely beneath the waves.' The case highlights growing legal battles over climate inaction, with activists hoping the ICJ's moral authority will spur faster action. Vishal Prasad of the Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change stressed the urgency: 'The seriousness of why we're here is not lost upon all Pacific Islanders.' - AFP


New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
As Gaza hunger crisis deepens, where do truce talks stand?
DOHA: Mediators have been shuttling between Israeli and Hamas negotiators since July 6 as they scramble to end nearly two years of war in Gaza where fears of mass starvation are growing. Through 21 months of fighting both sides have clung to long-held positions preventing two short-lived truces being converted into a lasting ceasefire. The stakes are higher now with growing numbers of malnutrition deaths in the Palestinian territory casting a spotlight Israel's refusal to allow in more aid. With pressure for a breakthrough mounting, Washington said top envoy Steve Witkoff will travel to Europe this week for talks on a Gaza ceasefire and aid corridor. US officials said he might head on to the Middle East. As the humanitarian situation in Gaza deteriorates drastically, are the two sides closer to reaching an agreement? After more than two weeks of back and forth, efforts by mediators Qatar, Egypt and the United States are at a standstill. The proposal on the table involves a 60-day ceasefire and the release of 10 living hostages in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners. Hamas insists any agreement must include guarantees for a lasting end to the war. Israel rejects any such guarantees, insisting that Hamas must give up its capacity to fight or govern as a prerequisite for peace. "The cold hard truth is that for domestic political considerations neither (Israeli Prime Minister) Benjamin Netanyahu nor Hamas leaders in Gaza have an interest in seeing a swift outcome and a comprehensive ceasefire," said Karim Bitar, a lecturer in Middle Eastern studies at Paris's Sciences Po university. "Both would have to answer serious questions from their own constituencies," he added. While Israeli officials have said they are open to compromise, troops have expanded their operations this week into areas of Gaza that had largely been spared any ground offensives since the war began in October 2023. Israeli media have reported that Hamas negotiators in Doha have been unable to communicate directly with the military leadership in Gaza to approve Israeli pullback maps. Logistical issues compound existing rifts within the militant group. There are "technical aspects which are quite difficult to overcome because there is a growing disconnect between Hamas leadership in Gaza and the negotiators in Doha," Bitar said. For Andreas Krieg, a Middle East analyst at King's College London, "the talks are technically progressing, but in practical terms, they are approaching a stalemate." "What is on the table now is effectively just another prisoner swap deal, not a real ceasefire deal," he said. Hamas faces a dilemma: it is under pressure to secure some Israeli concessions but "on the other hand, it faces an increasingly desperate humanitarian situation." "The leadership may be debating how far it can compromise without appearing to surrender politically," he said. More than two million people in Gaza are facing severe food shortages, with more than 100 NGOs warning of "mass starvation." On Tuesday, the head of Gaza's largest hospital said 21 children died of malnutrition and starvation in three days. "Humanitarian pressure is mounting fast," Krieg said, with Hamas facing "rising desperation among the population, which could force it to accept an interim deal to alleviate suffering." But even if Hamas makes concessions, Israel has the upper hand and there can be no lasting ceasefire unless it wants one. "Unless the United States and Qatar... increase significantly their pressure on Israel, I am afraid that this round of negotiations will fail like the previous rounds," Bitar said.


New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Ukraine curbs anti-corruption agencies, sparking rare protests
KYIV: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed a bill on Tuesday revoking the autonomy of two anti-corruption agencies, a proposal that has sparked rare street protests in Kyiv and alarm among the country's international backers. Critics say the legislation consolidates power in Zelenskyy's hands and will allow government meddling in high-profile graft cases. The European Union called the decision a "serious step back", while hundreds gathered in central Kyiv to oppose the measure – a show of anti-government anger rarely seen since Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Lawmakers in Ukraine's parliament voted 263 to 13 to approve the bill, the majority of those in favour being from Zelensky's ruling party. Zelenskyy later signed the bill into law, a senior official told AFP. The bill would place the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) under the direct authority of the prosecutor general, who is appointed by the president. The NABU investigates instances of corruption among state institutions, while the SAPO prosecutes other corruption. The Anti-Corruption Action Center, an NGO, said the law would render the agencies meaningless as Zelenskyy's prosecutor general would "stop investigations into all of the president's friends." Protesters in the capital expressed anger at the measure. Some chanted "veto the law." "The bill is being rushed through," said 26-year-old game designer Anastasia. "It is clear that this is a targeted effort," she added. The protesters jeered and booed after Zelenskyy signed the bill into law, an AFP reporter saw. NABU began work in 2015, as Kyiv sought to bring the country closer to Europe after a 2014 pro-European revolution. Since its inception, the agency has uncovered widespread graft, including among figures in Zelenskyy's administration. Many opponents of the law voiced concern that Ukraine was reversing course after a decade of democratisation. Ukraine has taken a tough stance on corruption in recent years, both as a prerequisite to joining the EU and to reassure allies who have sent wartime aid, but investigators say it remains a serious problem. EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos slammed the vote and said anti-graft institutions were "essential for Ukraine's EU path." "Seriously concerned over today's vote," Kos wrote on X. "The dismantling of key safeguards protecting NABU's independence is a serious step back." The chair of the Ukrainian parliament's anti-corruption committee, Anastasia Radina, said the bill ran counter to Ukraine's EU accession process. One European diplomat speaking on the condition of anonymity described the move as "unfortunate." "Is it a setback? Yes. Is this a point of non-return? No," the official told a small group of reporters, including AFP. Ukraine's former foreign minister Dmytro Kuleba, who resigned from the government in 2024, said the measures marked a "bad day for Ukraine." "Now the President has a choice – to stand on the side of the people or not," he said. On Monday, law enforcement conducted large-scale raids at the NABU, detaining one employee on suspicion of spying for Russia. Transparency International's Ukraine office called the raids an "attempt by the authorities to undermine the independence of Ukraine's post-Revolution of Dignity anti-corruption institutions." Transparency International ranked Ukraine 105th out of 180 countries in its "corruption perceptions index" in 2024, up from 144 in 2013.