Miscarriages of justice more likely due to forensic science crisis, report finds
The three-year inquiry set up by the all-party parliamentary group on miscarriages of justice has outlined how a series of 'reckless policy decisions' over the past decade have brought forensic science to a point of crisis. A near-monopoly in the commercial sector means there is now a dangerous single point of failure and the increasing reliance on in-house police laboratories risks compromising scientific impartiality, the inquiry found.
'Forensic science in England and Wales as currently configured isn't working for anyone – not for the police, not for the lawyers or for the courts, not for the scientists themselves, and not for the general public who get caught up in the criminal justice system,' said Prof Angela Gallop, co-chair of the Westminster Commission on Forensic Science.
'Like a plane hurtling downwards in what has become known as a 'graveyard spiral', with the pilot in desperation making increasingly erratic decisions, it can only be a short time now before it impacts the ground.'
Since the closure of the Forensic Science Service in 2012, work has been divided between commercial providers and, increasingly, in-house police laboratories. However, the inquiry said there were now real concerns about bias due to the expanding types of investigations the police conduct, paired with inadequate legal aid funding for defence experts.
The report recommends an immediate halt to the expansion of police in-house forensic provision and, in the long term, removing forensic science provision from police oversight.
'The increased risk of miscarriages of justice is self-evident and the potential for investigative failures leading to further injustices is continuing to grow,' said Gallop.
The report also highlights the imminent collapse of the forensics market, which is heading toward a 'last man standing' monopoly after the UK's largest forensics provider, Eurofins, acquired the second largest provider, Cellmark, which was on the brink of insolvency last year. Eurofins now delivers more than 85% of external science provision, the report estimates, a proportion that could rise further, creating the risk of a single point of failure.
Another concern raised is the police handling of crucial evidence used to prosecute the most serious crimes, with a growing number of cases dropped due to 'disappearing material' including DNA samples, CCTV footage, weapons, drugs and mobile phone data.
Missing evidence was recorded as the reason for 30,552 prosecutions being dropped between October 2020 and September 2024, the report reveals. This included 70 homicides and 554 sexual offences, and represented just over 2% of all prosecutions nationally. The Metropolitan police had 4.6% of cases dropped because of missing evidence.
Prof Carole McCartney, a criminologist at the University of Leicester, who helped compile the figures, said: 'The most obvious cause for alarm is that each of these cases is potentially a victim who will never see their perpetrator in court or see their case brought to justice.
'And if we're not retaining evidence, people who are victims of miscarriages of justice can't get out of prison and cold cases will stay unsolved if you lose the evidence. It's a fundamental part of the criminal justice process.'
The inquiry adds to continuing criticism of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), after the cases of Andrew Malkinson, who spent 17 years in jail for a rape he did not commit, and Peter Sullivan, whose murder conviction was overturned last month after 38 years. The report describes a culture of 'complacency in respect of a lack of scientific knowledge and understanding' among CCRC staff and recommends the recruitment of permanent staff members with scientific backgrounds.
Kim Johnson MP, the chair of the APPG on miscarriages of justice, said the Post Office Horizon scandal and the exonerations of Malkinson and Sullivan highlighted the need for urgent reform of forensic provision.
'These cases are not isolated incidents but symptoms of deep, systemic failings in our criminal justice system,' she said. 'We owe it to victims, their families, and the wider public to demand transparency, accountability, and meaningful reform. We must see the government act on this report without delay to restore trust and prevent future injustices.'
A CCRC spokesperson said that in response to an independent review of its handling of the Malkinson case it had taken a number of steps to improve its forensics provision, including training sessions for staff. It said its Forensic Opportunities Programme, announced last year, was analysing pre-2016 convictions to assess whether advances in DNA technology could identify an offender and that it had recently recruited a full-time forensic science and evidence adviser.
A government spokesperson said: 'We understand the importance of high-quality, timely forensic evidence for an effective criminal justice system that prevents crime, prosecutes suspects and gives victims the justice they deserve.
'In November 2024 at the NPCC/APCC summit, the home secretary acknowledged that the adoption of forensic science across the board has been uncoordinated. That's why we are appointing a national forensic science lead who will transform our approach by helping to create a new model of delivery with the police and forensic leaders to raise standards and improve efficiency, and ultimately build greater public confidence in our criminal justice system.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
100 years ago: Lloyd George airs plans to solve the mining crisis
Lloyd George, speaking at an open-air meeting at Cinderford today in support of the Liberal candidate, referred to the mining crisis and dealt with the plan for the unification of the coalfields that was rejected in 1919 and 1921. 'That scheme,' he said, 'would have had a most beneficial effect on the mining industry but it was gibed at by the extremists of the time. Now those very men are ready to advocate it as a remedy.' As a result there was the prospect of strife and of a disastrous struggle, which had been brought about by the rejection of the proposals of which he had spoken. The Labour candidate, Albert Purcell, he said, belonged to that section of the Labour Party that had done the most mischief in the coalfields in recent years. He and the extremists on the other side had swept away the moderate men; hence the trouble which was now being experienced. Lloyd George remarked that men like Purcell wanted the moon. 'Well, there is no coal in the moon,' said Lloyd George, 'and if men of that type get hold of England it will be as desolate as that sterile orb.' • Robert Colvile: Keir Starmer isn't the new Attlee — but who could be? Purcell was too much even for the working men of Coventry. They put him out and he fled to Moscow, and now he was seeking the suffrages of moderate Labour in the Forest of Dean. Lloyd George said the government had muddled the gold standard: trade had been kept down and the cost of things had increased. This had led to the neutral markets of the world being handicapped by the most formidable competition with our exports. This resulted in the government putting up the price of coal abroad by 1s 6d per ton. That had given the advantage to Germany and the United States, he said. ⬤ At Dayton, Ohio, the jury in the evolution trial are going about their business as usual, not being confined or kept together. They are only instructed not to talk to anybody about John Scopes. If annoyed or questioned, the jurors are authorised to call the town marshal to protect them. Most of them have returned to their farms. The 'City Fathers' are debarred from holding revival meetings on the court lawn during the sessions on account of the noise, shouting and singing, and the possibility of a collision between zealous antagonists and supporters of evolution. • Mein Kampf at 100 — why the most reviled book in history still haunts us The crux of the trial [Scopes was charged with violating state law by teaching Darwin's theory of evolution] comes in the argument over the admissibility of scientific evidence, which will determine the length of the trial. Monkey man: John Scopes, second left, at his trial in 1925 for teaching Darwin's Theory of Evolution in high-school science classes HULTON ARCHIVE/GETTY IMAGES The defence counsel states: 'If we are permitted to defend ourselves, the trial will last at least three weeks; but if the scientific testimony of thirty-five defence-witnesses is barred, the trial will end very quickly.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The law change that could transform toxic workplaces
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) were created to stop sensitive commercial information being shared. But the MeToo movement – and the crimes of Harvey Weinstein – shone a light on how the contracts were being used to silence victims of workplace abuse. Zelda Perkins was Harvey Weinstein's PA. When she broke the NDA that stopped her from talking about her terrible experiences with the film mogul she helped galvanise the MeToo movement. Since then she has been campaigning against the use of NDAs, which she says have helped cover up abuse in the workplace and allow powerful people to escape the consequences of their actions. Alexandra Topping tells Nosheen Iqbal how widespread the use of NDAs has become in British workplaces and how a change in the law could help put an end to them being misused. She explains how allowing employees to speak out could help change workplace culture for the better.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
The BBC must react more decisively to scandal
Gregg Wallace subjected programme staff to sexually explicit language over a prolonged period JEFF SPICER/GETTY IMAGES N o one could accuse the British Broadcasting Corporation of being undermanaged. In the year 2023-24 there were 88 senior executives commanding salaries of £178,000 or more, up 21 from 2022-23. Layer upon layer of lavishly remunerated executives, courtesy of the licence payer. All, presumably, capable of spotting potholes in the road; all able to anticipate trouble and deal with it before it becomes an issue. Well, no actually. If there is one thing the BBC can be depended upon to do it is to allow a problem to fester for years without tackling it, or to fail in a basic area of responsibility such as ensuring journalistic neutrality. The results of this systemic failure were on show on Monday when the national broadcaster released the results of reviews into two scandals. One involved the MasterChef presenter Gregg Wallace, who was found to have subjected programme staff to sexually explicit language over a prolonged period, without obvious challenge from above. The other involved the failure of those overseeing a documentary on Gaza to realise that its child presenter was the son of a Hamas minister. Different situations, but the product of the same neglect. • Gregg Wallace: I never set out to harm or humiliate Dame Melanie Dawes, head of the media regulator Ofcom, said at the weekend that the BBC was guilty of 'own goals', explaining: 'What frustrates me and others is that when these things go wrong it can take a long time for the BBC to see that something's happened, when everybody else was there within a matter of hours. So I would say to the BBC: they need to get a grip quicker, get these reports and investigations concluded sooner, otherwise there is a real risk of a sort of loss of confidence in the BBC.' Dame Melanie is correct. Even when the most serious crimes have been involved the corporation has previously displayed a lamentable lack of curiosity about the off-screen behaviour of its 'talent'. In 2016 Dame Janet Smith, author of a report on the crimes of Jimmy Savile, spoke of a 'climate of fear' at the BBC that prevented staff from speaking out in case it resulted in the loss of their jobs. The organisation, she said, needed to reassess its attitude to big stars. Fear of harming the BBC's reputation trumped concern even about the safety of children. This instinctive corporate circling of the wagons is still the order of the day. After the BBC's transmission of the Glastonbury act Bob Vylan calling for the deaths of IDF soldiers, Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary, asked why no one had been sacked for airing the documentary Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone, giving voice to a narrator linked to Hamas. On Monday, however, Ms Nandy declined to repeat her call for deputy heads to roll, saying the broadcaster had made 'big strides' to ensure that such fiascos could not be repeated. It is true that first-hand reporting from Gaza by news organisations has been blocked by Israel, but that does not allow the BBC to lay most of the blame on the independent production company that made the documentary. It was the duty of BBC bosses to ensure it adhered to the corporation's editorial standards as rigidly as any in-house production. Ms Nandy may be confident that the BBC has finally got a grip on itself. History is not encouraging, but it must be hoped that this is the case. There is a danger that once the heat has died down, the innate complacency of the BBC bureaucracy will reassert itself. That would only result in more scandal, more obfuscation and more loss of trust.
