logo
Wall Street Thinks This Weight Loss Drug Stock Could More Than 3X Over the Next 12 Months -- and It's Not Eli Lilly or Novo Nordisk

Wall Street Thinks This Weight Loss Drug Stock Could More Than 3X Over the Next 12 Months -- and It's Not Eli Lilly or Novo Nordisk

Yahoo24-02-2025
Few big pharma stocks have been bigger winners over the last three years than Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk. Lilly now ranks as the largest drugmaker in the world, with a market cap of $844 billion, after its shares skyrocketed more than 270%. Novo Nordisk stock is up around 75% despite a pullback in recent months.
There's no secret to their success: Both companies have blockbuster weight-loss drugs. But the obesity market could soon have a new contender. Wall Street thinks this weight-loss drug stock could more than 3x over the next 12 months -- and it's not Eli Lilly or Novo Nordisk.
Viking Therapeutics' (NASDAQ: VKTX) share price currently hovers around $32. The average analysts' 12-month price target for the biotech stock is $99.29 -- more than 200% higher.
The great expectations for Viking Therapeutics aren't limited to only a few outlier analysts, though. Of the 17 analysts surveyed by LSEG in February who cover the stock, seven rated it as a "strong buy." Another nine analysts viewed Viking as a "buy." The remaining analyst recommended holding the stock.
This optimism on Wall Street remains pretty solid despite Viking's less-than-stellar performance over the past few months. The small drugmaker's share price has plunged nearly 60% since late October 2024.
Why the steep decline? Some investors were concerned about the outlook for weight-loss drugs after Donald Trump won a second term as president. Trump appointed Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services, and Kennedy has expressed skepticism in the past about relying on medications to lose weight.
Also, Viking was seen by some as a potential acquisition target for Merck. However, Merck announced in December 2024 it was licensing Hansoh Pharma's obesity drug HS-10535. This move added a new (and potentially formidable) competitor for Viking and greatly reduced the likelihood that Merck would acquire the company.
Why do many Wall Street analysts like Viking Therapeutics so much? It has an especially promising pipeline.
The company's lead pipeline candidate is subcutaneous VK-2735. Viking plans to advance the drug into phase 3 clinical studies in treating obesity in the second quarter of this year. VK-2735 is a dual agonist of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor and the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor. This is the same mechanism of action as Lilly's tirzepatide, which is marketed as Mounjaro in the U.S. for treating type 2 diabetes and as Zepbound for treating obesity.
Viking is also evaluating an oral tablet formulation of VK-2735 in phase 2 testing. The company thinks this tablet could be more attractive for patients who are reluctant to receive injections, or for those trying to maintain weight loss achieved with an injection.
Unlike many clinical-stage biotech companies, though, Viking isn't a one-trick pony. Its pipeline includes another candidate that could soon advance into late-stage studies -- VK-2809. This experimental therapy targets the severe liver disease metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), which is also known as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).
As they say on the infomercials, "But wait! There's more!" Viking is also evaluating VK-0214 in a phase 1 clinical trial as a potential treatment for X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD), a rare neurodegenerative disease. There are currently no approved drugs for treating X-ALD.
You shouldn't buy Viking stock solely because Wall Street likes it. Clinical-stage biotech stocks aren't well-suited for risk-averse investors, and Viking is no exception. There's no guarantee that the company's pipeline programs will be successful.
However, I think Viking Therapeutics could be a great pick for aggressive investors. The prospects for VK-2735 and VK-2809 appear to be good based on their phase 2 results. Viking's market cap is below $3.6 billion right now. If either or both of these drugs fulfill their potential, the company should be worth a lot more in a few years.
Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this.
On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves:
Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $348,579!*
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $46,554!*
Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $540,990!*
Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of February 21, 2025
Keith Speights has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Merck. The Motley Fool recommends Novo Nordisk and Viking Therapeutics. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Wall Street Thinks This Weight Loss Drug Stock Could More Than 3X Over the Next 12 Months -- and It's Not Eli Lilly or Novo Nordisk was originally published by The Motley Fool
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): 'This Stock Should Be Up Much More,' Says Jim Cramer
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): 'This Stock Should Be Up Much More,' Says Jim Cramer

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): 'This Stock Should Be Up Much More,' Says Jim Cramer

We recently published . Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Cramer regularly discussed tech mega-cap Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOGL) ahead of its earnings. The firm's shares have reversed course in July and are up by 1.9% year-to-date, primarily due to July's 9.9% gain. Before the report, Cramer was explicit in sharing that he regretted selling Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOGL)'s stock. This time, he discussed the firm's businesses and shared that the stock should be higher after the earnings: [GOOGL]'[On earnings report] Yeah, look cloud was important. I think the big focus is frankly, uh, that paid clicks picked up 4%. I mean I was thinking paid clips might be down, I was worried that I felt that this was the beginning of the erosion and the cannibalization versus Gemini. That was completely wrong. YouTube up 200 million. Really, really fantastic. . . .Look the story here is this that the more chips that they get, better they're doing. They have so much demand I was quite surprised. 20 New Technology Trends for 2024 'This stock should be up much more than that. While we acknowledge the potential of GOOGL as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)'s 'A Cult Stock,' Says Jim Cramer
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)'s 'A Cult Stock,' Says Jim Cramer

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)'s 'A Cult Stock,' Says Jim Cramer

We recently published . Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) continues to face a horrible time on the stock market in 2025. The firm's shares have lost 16.7% year-to-date and fell by 8.2% after its latest earnings report, which missed analyst revenue and earnings estimates. The results were so bad that even Cramer, who believes that Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA)'s potential is in emerging technologies such as robotics, was forced to do somewhat of a turnaround: '[on revenue, vehicle sold, carbon credit all down] Okay, so you listen to the conference call, and they made it so that those don't matter. All that matters is self drive, autonomous. I'm not kidding. Robotaxi, uh, Austin, California. And then there's some lines, which says, where he's saying, and David you'll get a kick out of this I'm sure, he's talking about like in a few years like everyone's gonna be in this. The robotaxi's like going great. I mean, it's not doing anything. This was a call that was a fatuous call. David, I left out Turkey, number one. Netherlands and Austria. I knew that Austrian market, that was it. 'It's a cult stock. . . This was not the kind of conference call that I expected. I did not expect an immediate pivot to robots and the self driving and the robotaxi. While we acknowledge the potential of TSLA as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Analysis-Out-gunned Europe accepts least-worst US trade deal
Analysis-Out-gunned Europe accepts least-worst US trade deal

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Analysis-Out-gunned Europe accepts least-worst US trade deal

By Mark John LONDON (Reuters) -In the end, Europe found it lacked the leverage to pull Donald Trump's America into a trade pact on its terms and so has signed up to a deal it can just about stomach - albeit one that is clearly skewed in the U.S.'s favour. As such, Sunday's agreement on a blanket 15% tariff after a months-long stand-off is a reality check on the aspirations of the 27-country European Union to become an economic power able to stand up to the likes of the United States or China. The cold shower is all the more bracing given that the EU has long portrayed itself as an export superpower and champion of rules-based commerce for the benefit both of its own soft power and the global economy as a whole. For sure, the new tariff that will now be applied is a lot more digestible than the 30% "reciprocal" tariff which Trump threatened to invoke in a few days. While it should ensure Europe avoids recession, it will likely keep its economy in the doldrums: it sits somewhere between two tariff scenarios the European Central Bank last month forecast would mean 0.5-0.9% economic growth this year compared to just over 1% in a trade tension-free environment. But this is nonetheless a landing point that would have been scarcely imaginable only months ago in the pre-Trump 2.0 era, when the EU along with much of the world could count on U.S. tariffs averaging out at around 1.5%. Even when Britain agreed a baseline tariff of 10% with the United States back in May, EU officials were adamant they could do better and - convinced the bloc had the economic heft to square up to Trump - pushed for a "zero-for-zero" tariff pact. It took a few weeks of fruitless talks with their U.S. counterparts for the Europeans to accept that 10% was the best they could get and a few weeks more to take the same 15% baseline which the United States agreed with Japan last week. "The EU does not have more leverage than the U.S., and the Trump administration is not rushing things," said one senior official in a European capital who was being briefed on last week's negotiations as they closed in around the 15% level. That official and others pointed to the pressure from Europe's export-oriented businesses to clinch a deal and so ease the levels of uncertainty starting to hit businesses from Finland's Nokia to Swedish steelmaker SSAB. "We were dealt a bad hand. This deal is the best possible play under the circumstances," said one EU diplomat. "Recent months have clearly shown how damaging uncertainty in global trade is for European businesses." NOW WHAT? That imbalance - or what the trade negotiators have been calling "asymmetry" - is manifest in the final deal. Not only is it expected that the EU will now call off any retaliation and remain open to U.S. goods on existing terms, but it has also pledged $600 billion of investment in the United States. The time-frame for that remains undefined, as do other details of the accord for now. As talks unfolded, it became clear that the EU came to the conclusion it had more to lose from all-out confrontation. The retaliatory measures it threatened totalled some 93 billion euros - less than half its U.S. goods trade surplus of nearly 200 billion euros. True, a growing number of EU capitals were also ready to envisage wide-ranging anti-coercion measures that would have allowed the bloc to target the services trade in which the United States had a surplus of some $75 billion last year. But even then, there was no clear majority for targeting the U.S. digital services which European citizens enjoy and for which there are scant homegrown alternatives - from Netflix to Uber to Microsoft cloud services. It remains to be seen whether this will encourage European leaders to accelerate the economic reforms and diversification of trading allies to which they have long paid lip service but which have been held back by national divisions. Describing the deal as a painful compromise that was an "existential threat" for many of its members, Germany's BGA wholesale and export association said it was time for Europe to reduce its reliance on its biggest trading partner. "Let's look on the past months as a wake-up call," said BGA President Dirk Jandura. "Europe must now prepare itself strategically for the future - we need new trade deals with the biggest industrial powers of the world." (Additional reporting by Jan Strupczewski in Brussels; Christian Kraemer and Maria Martinez in Berlin; Writing by Mark John; Editing by Nick Zieminski) Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store