Asda sacks staff behind Mohsin Issa's IT upgrade disaster
More than 200 employees have been sacked without consultation at the troubled supermarket, which is battling to cut costs as part of a radical turnaround plan.
The latest departures were triggered as the retailer finally prepares to conclude a long-running process aimed at disentangling its technology systems from former owner Walmart.
Hundreds of employees were hired to work on the three-year 'Project Future', which was championed by Issa and deemed 'mission-critical' to Asda's success.
However, the project has been beset by problems and delays over the past year, recently leading Walmart to extend the completion deadline to help Asda swerve a multimillion-pound penalty.
It marks the second round of redundancies in five months under Allan Leighton, the new chairman who was presented as a 'man of the people' in an interview last week.
He swung the axe in January following Asda's worst Christmas trading performance since 2015, sacking 13 regional managers as part of an internal restructuring.
This came after he also scrapped 10,000 staff bonuses, raising concerns over the impact on morale across the retailer's workforce.
Questions may also be raised over the decision to again sack staff without any forewarning.
Asda made 500 staff redundant without a consultation period last November, fuelling criticism from union chiefs who threatened to bring discrimination claims.
Government rules typically require companies to carry out a 45-day consultation when dismissing 100 employees or more, although there is no suggestion Asda has broken any laws.
Lord Rose, then Asda chairman, insisted at the time that no employee rules had been breached, instead claiming that it was the most 'humane way' to carry out the lay-offs.
The latest job cuts have emerged as Asda continues to lose customers to rival supermarkets. Over the past year its market share has fallen from 13.7pc to 12.6pc.
This faltering performance prompted Asda's majority owner, TDR Capital, to appoint Mr Leighton late last year.
He was credited with turning Asda into a retail powerhouse during his first stint at the company in the 1990s, and he has since pledged to restore what he calls the 'Asda DNA'.
However, he is already facing an uphill battle. The most recent trading figures from Kantar revealed sales at Asda dropped by 5pc in the four weeks to Feb 23 compared with the same period last year.
This meant it was the only major grocer to suffer a decline in sales in February.
In contrast, sales at Tesco grew by 5.8pc and Sainsbury's posted growth of 4.8pc.
An Asda spokesman said: 'The majority of our operations have successfully transitioned to new systems as part of Project Future. For many teams the work is done and so it is natural that colleagues leave the project as the specific workstreams they are working on are completed or as their contracts finish.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
40 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Costco has a nearly secret way members can save more money
If you're someone who pays $65 or $130 a year to get access to Costco, you're no doubt doing it for the savings involved. After all, why pay an annual membership fee to get into Costco when you could instead waltz into your local Walmart or Target and shop to your heart's content? Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter The reason so many people are willing to pay Costco's membership fees is that they get great value in exchange. And that value comes in the form of not just low prices, but also outstanding customer service. Related: Costco's latest price change shocks members There aren't many retailers with a return policy as flexible as Costco's. With very few exceptions, any item that doesn't meet your needs or expectations can be brought back to the store for a complete refund. And if you're worried that returning a jacket you bought a year ago will result in some major customer-service stink eye, think again. Costco wants members to be happy with the products they buy. And the company has no problem processing returns that are reasonable in nature. It's one thing to buy a piece of furniture, use it for two years, and then bring it back to the store on the basis of not being satisfied now that it's worn and tattered. But if you're returning items in store-bought condition long after the fact, there shouldn't be any issue. Image source: Shutterstock While it's nice to be on the receiving end of great customer service, the main value of a Costco membership lies in the savings you can reap. Most of us go through things like milk, eggs, toilet paper, tissues, and cleaning products on a regular basis. Being able to pay less for those items is a great way to stretch your budget at a time when life seems to have gotten obnoxiously expensive. Related: Costco finishes rolling out massive food court menu change Plus, Costco offers savings on more than just groceries and household staples. If you've ever shopped for clothing or outerwear at Costco, you may have saved yourself a small fortune compared to buying similar items at a department store. And if you're someone who has the budget for travel, booking a trip through Costco could save you hundreds of dollars. The savings on a single vacation, in fact, could be enough to cover the cost of a membership for many years, making your $65 or $130 investment more than worth it. Even if you've been a Costco member for many years, there are certain lesser-known benefits you may not be aware of. And one of them could save you a boatload of money. We're talking about Costco Next, and it's a program that gives you access to different suppliers from which you can buy goods directly. Related: Costco CEO admits warehouse club may change its hours You can access Costco Next through the company's website or app. From there, you can browse to see what items are available and purchase the products you want or need directly through Costco's curated list of suppliers. It's that simple. The reason Costco Next offers so much savings is that it cuts out the middleman, so to speak. Because you're buying directly from a vetted supplier, you're actually taking Costco out of the equation. When Costco sells you products at its stores, it's making a profit by charging you more than the cost of acquiring those goods. That doesn't happen with Costco Next. Now you may be wondering: What's in it for Costco? And the answer is simple. First, Costco benefits by providing a service to members that's likely to increase customer loyalty. Secondly, with Costco Next, Costco gains information on member purchasing trends. One thing Costco always strives to do is keep its inventory fresh and exciting. By using data from Costco Next, the company can make strategic decisions on what items to bring into its warehouse club stores. All told, Costco Next is a win-win for everyone involved - Costco, suppliers, and members. It pays to check it out so you can get even more value out of your membership. Maurie Backman owns shares of Costco. Related: Costco quietly pulls popular product, upsets fans The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Analysis shows Trump's tariffs would cost US employers $82.3 billion
WASHINGTON — An analysis finds that a critical group of U.S. employers would face a direct cost of $82.3 billion from President Donald Trump's current tariff plans , a sum that could be potentially managed through price hikes, layoffs, hiring freezes or lower profit margins. The analysis by the JPMorganChase Institute is among the first to measure the direct costs created by the import taxes on businesses with $10 million to $1 billion in annual revenue, a category that includes roughly a third of private-sector U.S. workers. These companies are more dependent than other businesses on imports from China, India and Thailand — and the retail and wholesale sectors would be especially vulnerable to the import taxes being levied by the Republican president . The findings show clear trade-offs from Trump's import taxes, contradicting his claims that foreign manufacturers would absorb the costs of the tariffs instead of U.S. companies that rely on imports. While the tariffs launched under Trump have yet to boost overall inflation , large companies such as Amazon, Costco, Walmart and Williams-Sonoma delayed the potential reckoning by building up their inventories before the taxes could be imposed. The analysis comes just ahead of the July 9 deadline by Trump to formally set the tariff rates on goods from dozens of countries. Trump imposed that deadline after the financial markets panicked in response to his April tariff announcements, prompting him to instead schedule a 90-day negotiating period when most imports faced a 10% baseline tariff. China, Mexico and Canada face higher rates, and there are separate 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum . Had the initial April 2 tariffs stayed in place, the companies in the JPMorganChase Institute analysis would have faced additional direct costs of $187.6 billion. Under the current rates, the $82.3 billion would be equivalent on average to $2,080 per employee, or 3.1% of the average annual payroll. Those averages include firms that don't import goods and those that do. Asked Tuesday how trade talks are faring, Trump said simply: 'Everything's going well.' The president has indicated that he will set tariff rates given the logistical challenge of negotiating with so many nations. As the 90-day period comes to a close, only the United Kingdom has signed a trade framework with the Trump administration. India and Vietnam have signaled that they're close to a trade framework. There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that more inflation could surface. The investment bank Goldman Sachs said in a report that it expects companies to pass along 60% of their tariff costs onto consumers. The Atlanta Federal Reserve has used its survey of businesses' inflation expectations to say that companies could on average pass along roughly half their costs from a 10% tariff or a 25% tariff without reducing consumer demand. The JPMorganChase Institute findings suggest that the tariffs could cause some domestic manufacturers to strengthen their roles as suppliers of goods. But it noted that companies need to plan for a range of possible outcomes and that wholesalers and retailers already operate on such low profit margins that they might need to spread the tariffs costs to their customers. The outlook for tariffs remains highly uncertain. Trump had stopped negotiations with Canada , only to restart them after the country dropped its plan to tax digital services . He similarly on Monday threatened more tariffs on Japan unless it buys more rice from the U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a Tuesday interview that the concessions from the trade talks have impressed career officials at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and other agencies. 'People who have been at Treasury, at Commerce, at USTR for 20 years are saying that these are deals like they've never seen before,' Bessent said on Fox News Channel's 'Fox & Friends.' The treasury secretary said the Trump administration plans to discuss the contours of trade deals next week, prioritizing the tax cuts package passed on Tuesday by the Republican majority in the Senate. Trump has set a Friday deadline for passage of the multitrillion-dollar package, the costs of which the president hopes to offset with tariff revenues. ___ Follow the AP's coverage of President Donald Trump at .
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Analysis shows Trump's tariffs would cost US employers $82.3 billion
WASHINGTON (AP) — An analysis finds that a critical group of U.S. employers would face a direct cost of $82.3 billion from President Donald Trump's current tariff plans, a sum that could be potentially managed through price hikes, layoffs, hiring freezes or lower profit margins. The analysis by the JPMorganChase Institute is among the first to measure the direct costs created by the import taxes on businesses with $10 million to $1 billion in annual revenue, a category that includes roughly a third of private-sector U.S. workers. These companies are more dependent than other businesses on imports from China, India and Thailand — and the retail and wholesale sectors would be especially vulnerable to the import taxes being levied by the Republican president. The findings show clear trade-offs from Trump's import taxes, contradicting his claims that foreign manufacturers would absorb the costs of the tariffs instead of U.S. companies that rely on imports. While the tariffs launched under Trump have yet to boost overall inflation, large companies such as Amazon, Costco, Walmart and Williams-Sonoma delayed the potential reckoning by building up their inventories before the taxes could be imposed. The analysis comes just ahead of the July 9 deadline by Trump to formally set the tariff rates on goods from dozens of countries. Trump imposed that deadline after the financial markets panicked in response to his April tariff announcements, prompting him to instead schedule a 90-day negotiating period when most imports faced a 10% baseline tariff. China, Mexico and Canada face higher rates, and there are separate 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum. Had the initial April 2 tariffs stayed in place, the companies in the JPMorganChase Institute analysis would have faced additional direct costs of $187.6 billion. Under the current rates, the $82.3 billion would be equivalent on average to $2,080 per employee, or 3.1% of the average annual payroll. Those averages include firms that don't import goods and those that do. Asked Tuesday how trade talks are faring, Trump said simply: 'Everything's going well.' The president has indicated that he will set tariff rates given the logistical challenge of negotiating with so many nations. As the 90-day period comes to a close, only the United Kingdom has signed a trade framework with the Trump administration. India and Vietnam have signaled that they're close to a trade framework. There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that more inflation could surface. The investment bank Goldman Sachs said in a report that it expects companies to pass along 60% of their tariff costs onto consumers. The Atlanta Federal Reserve has used its survey of businesses' inflation expectations to say that companies could on average pass along roughly half their costs from a 10% tariff or a 25% tariff without reducing consumer demand. The JPMorganChase Institute findings suggest that the tariffs could cause some domestic manufacturers to strengthen their roles as suppliers of goods. But it noted that companies need to plan for a range of possible outcomes and that wholesalers and retailers already operate on such low profit margins that they might need to spread the tariffs costs to their customers. The outlook for tariffs remains highly uncertain. Trump had stopped negotiations with Canada, only to restart them after the country dropped its plan to tax digital services. He similarly on Monday threatened more tariffs on Japan unless it buys more rice from the U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a Tuesday interview that the concessions from the trade talks have impressed career officials at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and other agencies. 'People who have been at Treasury, at Commerce, at USTR for 20 years are saying that these are deals like they've never seen before,' Bessent said on Fox News Channel's 'Fox & Friends.' The treasury secretary said the Trump administration plans to discuss the contours of trade deals next week, prioritizing the tax cuts package passed on Tuesday by the Republican majority in the Senate. Trump has set a Friday deadline for passage of the multitrillion-dollar package, the costs of which the president hopes to offset with tariff revenues. ___ Follow the AP's coverage of President Donald Trump at Josh Boak, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
