AI could destroy entire justice system by sending innocent people to JAIL with fake CCTV, Making a Murderer lawyer warns
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
AI could wreak havoc in the justice system by sending innocent people to jail, a top lawyer has warned.
Jerry Buting, who defended Steven Avery in Netflix hit Making a Murderer, said video doctoring is becoming so sophisticated it is increasingly hard to spot.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
3
Deepfake technology is advancing to clone the features of a person and map them onto something else. Stock picture
Credit: Alamy
3
Jerry Buting argued to jurors that Steven Avery had been framed in Netflix documentary Making a Murderer
Credit: NETFLIX
3
Avery remains is prison after being given a lift sentence
Credit: Splash News
He believes advanced AI convincingly fabricating evidence could lead to innocent people being thrown behind bars.
Buting, author of Illusion of Justice, told The Sun: 'More and more people could get convicted.'
Deepfake technology is becoming worryingly advanced and exceedingly more difficult to regulate.
Experts have previously told The Sun that deepfakes are the "biggest evolving threat" when it comes to cybercrime.
More on AI
MORE TO LIFE Four ways humans are trying to 'resurrect' & come back from the dead
Deepfakes are fraudulent videos that appear to show a person doing - and possibly saying - things they did not do.
Artificial intelligence-style software is used to clone the features of a person and map them onto something else.
It could see people accused of crimes they didn't commit in a chilling echo of BBC drama The Capture.
The show saw a former British soldier accused of kidnap and murder based on seemingly definitive CCTV footage which had actually been altered.
Buting said: "The tricky part is when AI gets to the point where you can doctor evidence without it being obvious, where you can alter videos.
'There are so many CCTV cameras in the UK, virtually every square foot is covered.
Deepfakes: A Digital Threat to Society
'But if that could be altered in some way so that it is designed to present something that's not true, it could be damaging to the defence or prosecution.
"Then what can we believe if we can't believe our own eyes?'
Buting, who defended Avery in his now infamous 2007 murder trial, said AI is now in a race with experts who are being trained to tell the difference.
But the US-based criminal defence lawyer claims that is no guarantee to stop sickos twisting the truth.
Buting claimed: 'It may result in dismissals but I think it's more likely to result in wrongful convictions because law enforcement and the prosecution just have more resources.
"Nobody really knows how AI is going to impact the justice system.
"But there are also very skilled people who are trying to develop techniques of being able to tell when something has been altered, even at a sophisticated level.
"How AI actually affects the legal system is still very much up in the air.
Deepfakes – what are they, and how do they work?
Here's what you need to know... Deepfakes are phoney videos of people that look perfectly real
They're made using computers to generate convincing representations of events that never happened
Often, this involves swapping the face of one person onto another, or making them say whatever you want
The process begins by feeding an AI hundreds or even thousands of photos of the victim
A machine learning algorithm swaps out certain parts frame-by-frame until it spits out a realistic, but fake, photo or video
In one famous deepfake clip, comedian Jordan Peele created a realistic video of Barack Obama in which the former President called Donald Trump a 'dipsh*t'
In another, the face of Will Smith is pasted onto the character of Neo in the action flick The Matrix. Smith famously turned down the role to star in flop movie Wild Wild West, while the Matrix role went to Keanu Reeves
"If people are able to discover that evidence has been altered, let's say it's a situation where the defence has an expert who can look at the metadata and all the background, then that may very well result in a dismissal of the case, and should.
'Because the evidence was altered, it's original destroyed, how can we believe anything anymore?"
Former White House Information Officer Theresa Payton previously warned The Sun about the huge risks deepfakes pose to society.
She said: "This technology poses risks if misused by criminal syndicates or nation-state cyber operatives.
"Malicious applications include creating fake personas to spread misinformation, manipulate public opinion, and conduct sophisticated social engineering attacks."
In Black Mirror style, Payton warned malicious actors could exploit this technology to sow confusion and chaos by creating deepfakes of world leaders or famous faces - dead or alive.
Buting warned that although teams are being urgently equipped with skills to spot deepfakes, the pace at which the technology is advancing could soon become a real issue.
Who is Steven Avery?
STEVEN Avery is serving a life sentence at Wisconsin's Waupun Correctional Institution.
He and his nephew Brendan Dassey were convicted of the 2005 murder of Teresa Halbach.
He has been fighting for his freedom ever since he was found guilty of murder in 2007.
Avery argued that his conviction was based on planted evidence and false testimony.
In 1985, Avery was falsely convicted of sexually assaulting a young female jogger.
It took 18 years for his conviction to be overturned and he was given a $36million (£28.2million) payout in compensation.
But days later, he was re-arrested for the murder of Teresa Halbach.
The 62-year-old is continuing serving life in prison without the possibility of parole.
In the 2015 Netflix original series Making a Murderer, Avery documented his struggle for "justice."
In the last episode of the series, viewers were told that Avery had exhausted his appeals and was no longer entitled to state-appointed legal representation.
He added: 'I do fear it could be an issue sooner rather than later.
"There has been a steady erosion in the defence in the UK, for example barristers make very little money, really, for what they have to do.
'There is a real imbalance. The whole idea of an adversary system which the UK employs as do we in the US, is if you have two relatively skilled, equal parties on each side presenting their view of the evidence against the others that the truth will come out.
'Or that the jury will be able to discern the truth or close to it in anyway, whatever justice might be.
'But to the extent that there is this big imbalance and the defence is unskilled or underpaid, then you tend to get lower quality or lower experienced attorneys.
'That's been going on for a long time, so then when you add something like AI to it, it's going to be even harder."
Buting became internationally renowned after appearing on the 2015 Netflix documentary series Making a Murderer.
He alleged Avery had been convicted of a murder he didn't commit, falling foul of a set-up.
But Avery, now 62, was found guilty and is serving a life sentence for the murder of Teresa Halbach in 2005.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Gruesome pics show woman covered in blood after Japanese Akita bit her 4 TIMES in horror attack outside home
She lost consciousness throughout the attack SAVAGE MAULING Gruesome pics show woman covered in blood after Japanese Akita bit her 4 TIMES in horror attack outside home Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) GRUESOME pictures show the aftermath of a woman who was viciously mauled by a Japanese Akita. The 34-year-old Exeter woman was savagely mauled by the dog, leaving her covered in horrific scratches and bites. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 5 She was bitten four times leaving her with gruesome bite marks Credit: BPM 5 She lost consciousness throughout the attack but remembers screaming Credit: BPM 5 The woman was savagely attacked by a Japanese Akita Credit: Getty 5 She is campaigning to raise awareness for dangerous breeds Credit: BPM 5 The injuries left her needing plastic surgery Credit: BPM She believes she lost consciousness during the attack but remembers screaming in the aftermath. The victim needed plastic surgery following the attack. She also suffered an open fracture to her wrist and a chipped bone. She has been left terrified of dogs. A police investigation is underway. The woman is now campaigning to raise awareness for other dangerous breeds, as Japanese Akitas are not on the UK's banned list of dogs. They are, however, classified as a restricted breed under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991. The woman told Devon Live: "There was blood everywhere, I remember people slapping me in the face as I was in and out of consciousness. They said my lips were turning blue." The dog had escaped from a nearby garden and attacked the woman after she tried to encourage it home. She said: "I have multiple scars that include a mouth-sized bite to my right leg, right shoulder, right arm and the operation scars on my left arm." Armed police gave the woman oxygen before paramedics attended once the dog had been detained by its owner. She was taken to the RD&E where her wounds were cleaned and she was given a tetanus jab. The woman added: "People need to be warned. I've been told that this breed doesn't show any aggression when they are going to attack. "There's a lot of publicity about Staffies and XL Bullys but there are more breeds out there that people should know about. "I'm now scared of large dogs, even my own at times." A spokesperson for Devon and Cornwall Police told Devon Live: "We were notified following a report of a dog biting a woman in, Exeter, on Thursday 22 May. It was reported the woman suffered a number of puncture wounds. Enquiries are ongoing."
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Monzo created bank accounts for people claiming to live in 10 Downing Street
Monzo handed out bank accounts to new customers claiming to live in 10 Downing Street and even Buckingham Palace. The digital bank has been fined £21million by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)for failing to enforce strict anti-financial crime measures. The FCA investigation found that Monzo had no means to verifycustomer's addresses no matter how 'implausable' they were. One customer even gave their address as Monzo's own headquarters. The financial watchdog had imposed a requirement preventing Monzo from opening new accounts for high-risk customers. But between August 2020 and June 2022, they said the digital bank, which has no physical branches, repeatedly failed to comply with their terms and signed up over 34,000 high-risk customers. Monzo claims that the hefty fine draws a line under issues resolved three years ago and 'substantial improvements' have now been made. In their ruling, the FCA said: '[Monzo] allowed customers to provide obviously implausible UK addresses when applying for an account, such as well-known London landmarks including 'Buckingham Palace' and '10 Downing Street', and even Monzo's [own] business address. 'Monzo's decision not to verify, or otherwise monitor, customer addresses also gave rise to other issues.' Therese Chambers, FCA joint executive director of enforcement and market oversight, said that banks were a vital line of defence in the fight against financial crime. '[Landmark addresses] illustrates how lacking Monzo's financial crime controls were. This was compounded by its inability to properly comply with the requirement not to onboard high-risk customers.' 'They must have the systems in place to prevent the flow of ill-gotten gains into the financial system,' she said. 'Monzo fell far short of what we, and society, expect.' Monzo's customer base has substantially increased, growing from approximately 250,000 customers in early 2017 to over 12 million by April 2025. Group CEO of Monzo, TS Anil told Metro: 'The FCA's findings relate to a historical period that ended three years ago and draw a line under issues that have been resolved and are firmly in the past – with our learnings at the time leading to substantial improvements in our controls. 'I'm pleased the FCA recognises the significant investments we have made, as well as our ongoing commitment to managing these risks today, as we go from strength to strength as a business approaching 13 million customers. 'Financial crime is an issue that affects the entire industry – and at Monzo, we have the right team, best-in-class technology and an unwavering commitment to doing all we can to stop it in its tracks.' MORE: I discovered £5,000 in my wife's secret savings account — do I have a right to be angry? MORE: Avoid making this 'costly mistake' while on holiday abroad this summer MORE: Using AI to help plan your finances? Here's what ChatGPT gets wrong
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
I was fined £150 for putting my bins out 4 hours too EARLY before going on hol – I'll be seeing the council in court
The defiant man is refusing to pay the fine LOAD OF RUBBISH I was fined £150 for putting my bins out 4 hours too EARLY before going on hol – I'll be seeing the council in court Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A HOMEOWNER who returned from his honeymoon was shocked to discover he had been slapped with a £150 fine for putting his bins out too early. Leon Wright, 40, came home with wife Amy, 34, to discover an enforcement notice had been posted through his letterbox. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 5 Leon and his wife Amy were away for their honeymoon when they were fined Credit: SWNS 5 The council claims Leon broke the rules when he left his bins outside four hours early Credit: SWNS 5 Leon refuses to pay a penny of the £150 fine Credit: SWNS The couple live in a flat above a row of shops in East Twickenham, southwest London. Following council guidance the pair leave their bins out on the pavement in colour coded bags. Their local authority, Richmond Council, says residents should not put their bags out before 8pm the night before collection. Wright admits that he put his bins out four hours early at 3:25pm but claims the fine is undeserved. He put his bins out at the latest possible time before leaving to Heathrow Airport. The couple then jetted off on a flight at 7:10pm for a honeymoon cruise in Greece. Mr Wright said: "I only put it out a few hours before. It was the last thing I did before we left for holiday and the latest time that I could leave it out. "I came back from my honeymoon with a fixed penalty notice from Richmond council. It said that we had to pay it within ten days, but we couldn't because we weren't even there. "It was very surprising. We had never had any problems with the council before. "I do my best to follow the rules but it was literally just a few hours before the collection window so I never thought they would send fines straight away." Scotland's £45 Garden Waste Bin Charge Sparks Outrage Ten days later, Mr Wright claims he and his wife Amy returned home to discover the fine on their doorstep. He claims the penalty is against government guidelines but the local council has "refused" to cancel it. He said: "It says in black and white on the website that you can't issue penalties for leaving bins out a few hours early, which is exactly what they have done. "They weren't in the middle of the walkway or obstructing anyone. This is just a blatant cash grab to me. 5 Leon and his wife honeymooned in Greece Credit: SWNS 5 The fine was waiting for the couple when they returned Credit: SWNS "I am not paying it. This kind of thing just can't happen. It is absolutely wrong. I will take them to court if it comes to that. "It is not the money but the principle. There is no way I am going to let them get away with it." The council fined Mr Wright under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 Section 87. They have since agreed to offer Mr Wright an extended timeframe to pay the fine at a discounted rate of £100. Mr Wright, however, is refusing to pay a single penny to the local authority. He said: "It is definitely not what you want to see when you come back from holiday. Especially when you are trying to do your best. "My neighbours couldn't believe it. They were all shocked." A Spokesperson for Richmond Council said: "Richmond Council is committed to keeping the borough's streets clean, safe, and accessible for everyone. "To help achieve this, we encourage residents to follow the guidance on when to put waste out for collection. "Waste should only be placed out between 8pm the night before and 6am on the day of collection. When these rules are not followed, enforcement action may be taken where appropriate. "We understand that residents can sometimes make genuine mistakes, which is why there is a clear appeals process in place. "While we don't comment on individual cases, any new information submitted through this process will be carefully considered."
