logo
Alligator Alcatraz in the Florida Everglades: Videos of ICE detention center in Ochopee

Alligator Alcatraz in the Florida Everglades: Videos of ICE detention center in Ochopee

Yahooa day ago
What is Alligator Alcatraz, and what does it look like?
Alligator Alcatraz, the immigration detention center in the Florida Everglades, had a special visitor July 1 − President Donald Trump. It marked the first visit back to his home state in two months.
Championed by Gov. Ron DeSantis and State Attorney General James Uthmeier, the state transformed the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport in Ochopee into Alligator Alcatraz in a quick turnaround (see below). Florida's Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center was previously a 39-square-mile airport facility with a 10,500-foot runway to temporarily detain 'illegal aliens.'
However, not everyone is on board with Alligator Alcatraz. Since ground broke at transforming the lone airport strip into the ICE detention center, environmental groups have protested against Alligator Alcatraz.
Some stats about Alligator Alcatraz, Florida's ICE detention center, as of Tuesday, July 1, 2025, or 'opening day':
maximum capacity of detainees: 3,000
Alligator Alcatraz staff members: 1,000
Alligator Alcatraz security personnel: more than 400
There is a legal service on-site 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
Alligator Alcatraz has access to a clergy.
Alligator Alcatraz has a laundry service.
There is a recreation yard at Alligator Alcatraz.
Alligator Alcatraz is air-conditioned.
How long did it take to build Alligator Alcatraz: 8 days
number of security cameras: more than 200
barbed wire at Alligator Alcatraz: more than 28,000 feet
The ICE detention center hosted VIP guests for its opening day, including President Donald Trump, Kristi Noem, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, and Florida Rep. Byron Donalds.
Below are videos of Alligator Alcatraz, including a tour of what it looks like, protesters who oppose the ICE detention center in the Florida Everglades, and what the airport site could have been.
Sangalang is a lead digital producer for USA TODAY Network. Follow her on Twitter or Instagram at @byjensangalang. Support local journalism. Consider subscribing to a Florida newspaper.
This article originally appeared on Naples Daily News: Alligator Alcatraz video of ICE detention center in Ochopee, Florida
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Husband Refuses To Take Trump Flags Down After Wife Detained by ICE
Husband Refuses To Take Trump Flags Down After Wife Detained by ICE

Newsweek

time30 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Husband Refuses To Take Trump Flags Down After Wife Detained by ICE

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A supporter of President Donald Trump has refused to take down MAGA flags outside his home even after federal agents arrested his Iranian wife. Arpineh Masihi was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in Diamond Bar, California, last week, according to FOX 11 Los Angeles. However, her husband Arthu Sahakyan told the outlet: "I'm still supporting [Trump]. Even though my friends say take the flag down, you're going through a lot. I'm like no. The flag stands." Federal agents move to reopen the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office in Portland, Oregon, on June 28, 2018. Federal agents move to reopen the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office in Portland, Oregon, on June 28, 2018. Alex Milan Tracy/Sipa via AP Images Why It Matters Tensions are heightened between the U.S. and Iran after Trump ordered airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites. There are growing concerns about potential terror cells that could be activated in response. More than 130 Iranian nationals were detained in the United States last week, according to Fox News. What To Know In footage obtained by Fox 11 Los Angeles, Masihi is seen going into her home to say goodbye to the couple's four children as federal agents wait outside. "She came and kissed the kids and that was it," Sahakyan told the outlet. "That was the last time we saw her." Masihi was born in Iran and arrived in the United States as a refugee when she was three years old, per the report. Her green card was revoked around 15 years ago following a theft-related conviction, it added. The family has been navigating the immigration system ever since in hopes of restoring Masihi's American citizenship, Sahakyan said. He told the outlet that his family has long supported Trump, believing his immigration policies aim to strengthen national security. However, he acknowledged that his views on the issue have shifted somewhat in light of recent events. "Trump is not trying to do anything bad," Sahakyan said, per the report. "We understand what he's doing. He wants the best for the country. I'm just trying to make the best of it. I don't want any families to go through this. If they are, I apologize for what they're going through because it's hard." What People Are Saying Arthu Sahakyan told Fox 11 Los Angeles: "I'm very for [the United States vetting] Iranian nationals because of the sleeper cells." "I think [the recent arrests of Iranians] will resolve a lot of issues because we'll know exactly who's in here for what reasons. Even though I miss [my wife] dearly. I think we could have a faster process [where they determine] she's not a radical, or tied to the crazies, let her out." Arpineh Masihi told Fox 11 Los Angeles: "I'm on the list to be going to a different facility."

Tesla stock sinks as Trump threatens to cut subsidies across Musk's sprawling empire
Tesla stock sinks as Trump threatens to cut subsidies across Musk's sprawling empire

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla stock sinks as Trump threatens to cut subsidies across Musk's sprawling empire

Tesla stock (TSLA) sank 5% Tuesday as the feud between CEO Elon Musk and President Trump reignited, with the president once again threatening to cut government subsidies across Elon Musk's businesses, including Tesla and SpaceX ( "Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa," Trump wrote on his social media platform, Truth Social, early Tuesday. "No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE," Trump added. "Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!" Read more about Tesla's stock moves and today's market action. The threats followed Musk's criticism of Trump's "big, beautiful" tax and spending bill over the weekend after the Senate advanced it with last-minute changes that would eliminate electric vehicle tax credits — which benefit Tesla customers — earlier than expected and add $1 trillion to the bill's original price tag. The megabill was passed by the Senate on Tuesday, bringing it one step closer to becoming law. Its provision ending the EV credit would cut an estimated $1.2 billion from Tesla's annual profit. Meanwhile, SpaceX has received more than $21 billion in federal contracts, according to US spending data. In one of his series of posts on his own platform, X, Musk called the bill "utterly insane and destructive [with] handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future." Musk's critiques continued into the trading week, with the tech mogul proposing the formation of a new political party for the second time last month. Tesla shares dropped 1.9% Monday as the Senate began voting on amendments to the bill in what's called a vote-a-rama, which dragged into Tuesday morning. Late Monday night, Musk posted an AI-generated image of Pinocchio with the word 'liar' stamped across it, writing: 'Anyone who campaigned on the PROMISE of REDUCING SPENDING , but continues to vote on the BIGGEST DEBT ceiling increase in HISTORY will see their face on this poster in the primary next year.' Trump's Truth Social post threatening subsidies on Musk's empire followed just a few hours later. 'Elon Musk knew, long before he so strongly Endorsed me for President, that I was strongly against the EV Mandate,' the president wrote. The barbs revived a feud between the world's two most powerful men in early June that erased more than $150 billion in value from Tesla in a single day. Those exchanges last month saw Trump and Musk trade a wide array of insults on social media, exposing the risk of the electric vehicle stock's "Musk premium." Musk has been highly critical of Trump's "big, beautiful" bill since he left his role in D.C. running the newly created federal agency DOGE, the Department of Government Efficiency, which aimed but ultimately failed to eliminate government debt with highly controversial spending cuts. 'The jabs between Musk and Trump will continue as the Budget rolls through Congress but Tesla investors want Musk to focus on driving Tesla and stop this political angle ... which has turned into a life of its own in a roller coaster ride since the November elections,' Wedbush analyst Dan Ives wrote in a note to clients Tuesday morning. 'At the end of the day being on Trump's bad side will not turn out well ... and Musk knows this and Tesla investors want this back and forth to end,' Ives wrote. Also driving Tesla shares down Tuesday, fresh data showed Tesla's sales dropped for the sixth straight month in Sweden and Denmark in June. The company is set to report overall global deliveries on Wednesday. Wall Street expects deliveries to slide 11% from the prior year. Laura Bratton is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Bluesky @ Email her at

Judge blocks Trump's rule barring migrants at US-Mexico border from claiming asylum
Judge blocks Trump's rule barring migrants at US-Mexico border from claiming asylum

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Judge blocks Trump's rule barring migrants at US-Mexico border from claiming asylum

A federal judge blocked a Trump administration policy barring migrants who cross the US-Mexico border from seeking asylum, issuing a major blow to President Donald Trump, who has sought to seal off access to protections on the border. In a sharply worded decision issued Wednesday, US District Judge Randolph Moss found that the administration overstepped its authority by bypassing immigration law. 'The President cannot adopt an alternative immigration system, which supplants the statutes that Congress has enacted,' Moss wrote. The ruling – targeting a signature element of Trump's agenda – comes as the administration touts low border crossings. Current and former Homeland Security officials have previously cited the clampdown on the US southern border as contributing to a sharp decline in unlawful crossings. In June, the US Border Patrol recorded just over 6,000 encounters, according to federal data. Earlier this year, immigrant rights advocates, including the American Civil Liberties Union, Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center and Florence Immigrant & Refugee Rights Project, sued over a presidential proclamation that effectively shut down asylum at the southern border. The challengers argued that the proclamation endangered thousands of lives by preventing people from seeking refuge in the US. The lawsuit tested whether presidential power can override protections guaranteed by Congress for people fleeing persecution and marked one of the most sweeping efforts by the Trump administration to restrict immigration. 'This an enormous victory for those fleeing danger and the rule of law,' said ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt. 'The court properly recognized that the president cannot simply ignore laws passed by Congress.' The judge said that neither immigration statutes nor the Constitution give the president power to unilaterally deny access to asylum for people who have already entered the US, no matter how they arrived. 'Nothing in the (Immigration and Nationality Act) or the Constitution grants the President or his delegees the sweeping authority asserted in the Proclamation and implementing guidance,' the ruling states. Moss stayed his decision for 14 days. The administration is expected to appeal. In a statement to CNN, Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin cast Moss as a 'rogue district judge,' and said she expected the administration to be vindicated by a higher court. 'The President secured the border in historic fashion by using every available legal tool provided by Congress. Today, a rogue district judge took those tools away, threatening the safety and security of Americans and ignoring a Supreme Court decision issued only days earlier admonishing district courts for granting nationwide injunctions,' she said. White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller also blasted the ruling. 'To try to circumvent the Supreme Court ruling on nationwide injunctions a marxist judge has declared that all potential FUTURE illegal aliens on foreign soil (eg a large portion of planet earth) are part of a protected global 'class' entitled to admission into the United States,' Miller said in a post on X. 'The West will not survive if our sovereignty is not restored,' Miller added in another post. The Trump administration argued that the president has broad authority under federal law to suspend the entry of people deemed detrimental to US interest – especially in what it described as a national security and public health emergency at the border. Tensions flared during oral arguments in April in a packed federal courtroom in Washington, DC. DOJ lawyers argued that the proclamation was unreviewable under the immigration statutes in question. Moss pressed that argument, at one point posing a hypothetical: Would a presidential order to shoot migrants at the border be legally immune from judicial review? DOJ attorney Drew Ensign acknowledged that such an order would raise constitutional issues, but hesitated to say what legal limits might apply—drawing a pointed rebuke from the bench. The plaintiffs had highlighted that at least two of their clients had already been deported under the policy. While those individuals had expressed a desire to seek asylum, government attorneys argued that they had not established an imminent intent to file claims – raising further questions about who the policy actually applied to and how it was enforced. This story has been updated with additional developments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store