logo
Border Force chief who ‘suggested game of Naked Attraction' with colleagues was able to leave civil service with unblemished record

Border Force chief who ‘suggested game of Naked Attraction' with colleagues was able to leave civil service with unblemished record

The Guardian5 days ago
A Home Office investigation has found one of its most senior officials harassed and behaved inappropriately towards a female colleague, before being able to leave the civil service with an unblemished record after a 'shambolic' disciplinary process.
The case has caused such alarm in the department that the new permanent secretary, Antonia Romeo, has ordered an immediate review of complaints, conduct and disciplinary procedures to 'ensure confidence in the integrity of the system'.
Steve Dann, the former chief operating officer (COO) of Border Force, was effectively banned from visiting the organisation's offices in Paris in 2023 after he suggested to female officers that regional directors could play a game of Naked Attraction, the Channel 4 dating show in which contestants stand in front of each other fully nude. He told investigators he did not recall the incident.
Dann, who was in the £120,000-a-year post for four years, faced other allegations of misogynistic name-calling and making comments to women with sexual connotations, according to Home Office sources.
He denied the allegations, suggesting comments had been taken out of context and that selective evidence had been used during the investigation by the Home Office's professional standards unit (PSU). He acknowledged during the process that some of his comments may have been careless, but said he had never intended to upset or offend.
After a chaotic HR process, which one source said was littered with 'procedural errors and delays', the original grievance was eventually upheld on appeal.
However, Dann was not informed about the process until the initial stage was completed. He was also subject to a parallel misconduct investigation into the claims which was not upheld.
Dann decided to leave the Home Office in December last year, standing down as the COO of Border Force, a role that placed him at the centre of the organisation's key responsibilities, including securing the UK's borders by enforcing immigration regulations and patrolling coastlines during the small-boats crisis. He has since entered the private sector in the field of security and law enforcement operations, and public safety.
The complainant first reported Dann in February 2024, after working with him for 18 months. An initial internal grievance inquiry was launched two months later, with the final PSU report quoting named Home Office officials who appeared to confirm a series of sexist and misogynistic comments, according to sources.
While the complaint was not initially upheld, it was later upheld on appeal in October 2024. Dann was not involved in this process and was not given the opportunity to respond.
At the same time a separate misconduct process was launched, also based on evidence in the PSU report. This was not upheld, no formal disciplinary sanction was imposed, and there was no record of it on Dann's file, although Home Office sources said he was asked to undergo training in response.
The claims being investigated included the colleague being told in a voice note that she was 'very pretty', which the PSU report concluded was 'reasonable' for her to have interpreted as harassment. Other comments were described by the report as 'inappropriate and offensive' and 'unprofessional topics with a sexual connotation'.
According to sources, the report said he messaged about one person who attended a meeting suggesting that she had a 'porn star name', which he told the inquiry was meant in a 'lighthearted' way. On a separate occasion, he was said to have misnamed a female colleague 'kinky', although he later admitted this had been a 'careless' thing to say.
During a discussion on the diversity of his office, Dann allegedly said: 'Don't forget the sweaty woman in the corner', referring to a colleague going through menopause. In the report, he denied making this comment.
In another meeting, in December 2022, he asked junior colleagues if they knew what a 'fluffer' was, and then explained it was 'someone whose job was to keep a porn star's penis erect', sources said. He denied to investigators that he had made the remarks.
On the official visit to Border Force in Paris in April 2023, he brought up the Channel 4 naked dating show Naked Attraction to two female officers working in intelligence. In remarks corroborated by witnesses, he added: 'We were thinking it could be all the regional directors and, you know, people had to look at it and guess whose penis it was.'
The officers were 'very shocked' by the conversation and felt 'incredibly uncomfortable', a senior official told investigators, but when they were asked if they wanted to make a complaint they said they would prefer that Dann not return to the Paris office. This was reported to Border Force chiefs. Dann told them he did not recall the incident.
One senior official who witnessed the exchange said they were 'disappointed' by Dann's conduct, which they felt was 'inappropriate'. Several others said they considered that he was 'prone to oversharing' about his private life at work, sources with knowledge of the report said.
The appeal, which was based on the same evidence in the PSU report, was finally concluded eight months after the initial complaint. It was after the Labour government entered office, and six weeks later Dann left his role, declaring that after nine years at the Home Office it was time to 'embrace new challenges'.
In a letter to the complainant in October 2024, the Home Office upheld the grievance, acknowledging that Dann's conduct had fallen below the standards expected from a senior official and was in breach of the department's policies on appropriate behaviour, sources said.
However, Dann – who was previously a 'people champion' and diversity lead in the civil service, roles that focused on improving the workplace environment, as well as representing the organisation in parliament and in the media – avoided any formal consequences because the separate earlier disciplinary process had already concluded and the rules meant it could not be reopened.
According to sources, Dann told the initial investigation he had worked incredibly hard in a stressful frontline environment. Much of his time running Border Force operations was when the Tory government was struggling to get control of irregular migration, including small-boat crossings.
Several of the witnesses said they had not been offended by his behaviour. However others, including senior civil servants and junior frontline operational staff, found his conduct inappropriate and unprofessional, according to sources who have seen the final PSU report and with knowledge of the final outcome.
During the PSU investigation, Dann denied some of his conduct and said other incidents had been taken out of context, and that selected evidence had been used. But sources said he added that 'on reflection' there had been times when some of his comments had been 'careless', although they were not meant in a malicious way. When approached by the Guardian, he declined to comment.
Yvette Cooper, who was home secretary throughout the latter part of the grievance process, has repeatedly and vocally called out workplace discrimination, misogyny and harassment. The case was flagged with her office although she is understood not to have been personally aware.
A Home Office spokesperson said: 'While we do not comment on individual HR cases, where there are allegations of inappropriate behaviour or sexual harassment the Home Office will investigate and take appropriate action.
'The Home Office expects the highest standard from all members of staff and does not tolerate anyone displaying or taking part in unacceptable behaviour.
'The new permanent secretary has already commissioned a review of complaints, conduct and disciplinary procedures, to ensure absolute confidence in the integrity of the system.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What is Your Party? Confusion reigns over name of Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana's new party
What is Your Party? Confusion reigns over name of Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana's new party

The Independent

time15 minutes ago

  • The Independent

What is Your Party? Confusion reigns over name of Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana's new party

Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana have confirmed the formation of an as yet unnamed political party to take on Sir Keir Starmer and Labour from the left. The populist outfit, which has been temporarily dubbed Your Party, was announced by the former Labour leader and Ms Sultana on Thursday. Mr Corbyn said it was 'time for a new kind of political party – one that belongs to you' and he called for the 'mass redistribution of wealth and power'. The group, which will bring together MPs currently sitting as independents, will'build a democratic movement that can take on the rich and powerful – and win', he said. It came weeks after the party's initial launch, through Ms Sultana's social media pages, descended into chaos, with Mr Corbyn apparently unaware she was planning to announce their co-leadership. Then, she promised to offer an alternative to 'managed decline and broken promises'. But now the party is forming, what exactly will that look like in practice? Here, The Independent runs through everything we know so far about the new left-wing offering in Westminster. What is their mission? And do they have any policies? Unveiling more details on Thursday, Mr Corbyn said his party would tax the rich and invest in council houses. He also said it would support Palestine and be 'made up of people of all faiths and none'. He said millions of people were 'horrified by the government's complicity in crimes against humanity'. 'Now, more than ever, we must defend the right to protest against genocide,' he wrote. 'We believe in the radical idea that all human life has equal value. That is why we will keep demanding an end to all arms sales to Israel, and for the only path to peace: a free and independent Palestine'. With growing contempt for Labour under Sir Keir after he suspended four MPs for rebelling against his planned benefit cuts, Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana are attempting to unite the left in opposition to the party. Further details of how the party will work, who will lead it, what its policies will be and, crucially, what it will be called will be decided by members at an inaugural conference, expected this autumn. Who is involved? Ms Sultana initially said she will be leading the party with former Labour leader Mr Corbyn. While the ex-Labour leader initially declined to comment, sparking rumours he had not fully committed to join, he later issued a statement confirming that 'discussions are ongoing' about the party's formation. Thursday's formal launch letter was signed by both Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana, and discussions about the party's formation are believed to have involved independent MPs sitting in parliament as well as campaigners and local coucillors across the country. One of those expected to join is Leanne Mohamad, a British-Palestinian activist who almost unseated Wes Streeting in last summer's general election and is planning to run against him again. Another potential member is Andrew Feinstein, who stood against Sir Keir in his Holborn and St Pancras seat, coming second with 7,312 votes. How much support do they have? It is too early to tell what kind of backing Ms Sultana's party would have in practice. In three weeks, she had gained more than 70,000 sign-ups to her page. More broadly, polling conducted by More in Common last month – well before the MP unveiled her party – asked the public how they would vote if a left-leaning party led by Mr Corbyn emerged. The hypothetical scenario saw 10 per cent of voters say they would back the party, taking three points from Labour, four points from the Greens, one point from the Lib Dems and one point from the SNP. Labour was left with 20 per cent support, neck and neck with the Tories, while Reform UK was on 27 per cent. What is happening with the name? The pair sparked mass confusion online with the formation of the party, directing supporters to a website under the title Your Party. Reform chairman Zia Yusuf said that from a branding perspective it was 'one of the worst party names ever'. And, responding to a news outlet on X, formerly Twitter, Ms Sultana sought to clarify, writing: 'It's not called your party!' 'From the launch to the party, conference, structures & yes - even the name! - we're building it together,' she added, confirming that members will decide the name. Labour MPs also piled in on the chaos, with Mike Reader saying: 'I strongly recommend Votey McVote Face.'

Children of Briton jailed in India for seven years without trial protest Modi's UK visit
Children of Briton jailed in India for seven years without trial protest Modi's UK visit

The Independent

time15 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Children of Briton jailed in India for seven years without trial protest Modi's UK visit

As prime minister Sir Keir Starmer toasted what he called a 'historic day' for British- Indian relations at Chequers, just yards from Downing Street two young Britons stood with posters taped to their jackets and baggage. Alois Christian Michel and his sister Alienor were not protesting a government policy or trade deal. They were pleading for the freedom of their father Christian Michel. Michel, a British national, has spent over six years incarcerated in India's notorious Tihar Jail without trial. Despite bail orders from both the Delhi High Court and India's Supreme Court, he remains imprisoned after failing to meet the conditions set – leaving him trapped in a legal and political limbo with no end in sight. Michel's son, who gave an exclusive interview to The Independent during the protest with his sister, says they have lost patience with successive UK governments. 'The UK government has miserably failed to address human rights violations across Commonwealth countries, particularly in India,' says Alois, 27. 'A British national such as my father has now been illegally detained by Indian authorities for seven years, yet neither the previous government nor the present one has taken any concrete action against this inhumane conduct.' Their protest took place at the same time as Sir Keir and Indian prime minister Narendra Modi were meeting to approve a sweeping trade agreement worth £6bn in investment that is expected to boost Britain's GDP by nearly £5bn. Referring to British officials, Alois says: 'They say they'll 'raise interest' in the case. After seven years, is that all? It's ridiculous.' Michel, a businessman and consultant, was extradited from Dubai to India in 2018 over allegations he acted as a middleman in a 2010 defence deal involving Italian firm AgustaWestland. Indian investigators allege bribes were paid to secure a £322m contract to supply helicopters – charges he denies. India's legal system is notoriously slow and overburdened, which is why it has a law stipulating that a suspect must be released from prison once they have served half of what would have been the maximum sentence if they were convicted. In Michel's case that was seven years, meaning he should have been released midway through 2021. His lawyers argue he should be freed unconditionally – instead, the courts have granted him bail while investigators continue to probe his case. It means that Michel remains in prison because he cannot meet the stringent conditions imposed. He has no address in India, no family members in the country, and no one willing to act as a guarantor – factors that have rendered the bail order effectively meaningless. At a hearing in April, Michel revealed to the court that the only person willing to vouch for him was Jo Johnson, former MP and brother to ex-prime minister Boris Johnson. Back in London, his children remain cut off from their father, their only contact being brief, choked phone calls. 'The last time I spoke to him was last weekend. Less than 10 seconds,' Alois tells The Independent. 'That's all we get. I haven't seen him in nearly seven and a half years.' He was just 20 when his father was extradited. 'I was in the middle of my studies. Everything just stopped,' he recalls. 'Emotionally, financially, it's been really tough. And for my sister… she was just a teenager when our father was taken away.' The siblings have never visited their father in India. The reason, Alois says, is fear. 'He's in Tihar prison. I would like to see him, but how much am I risking by going there? In a country that doesn't follow its own laws, they could arrest me too – use me as leverage with my father,' he says. 'It's too dangerous. And I won't have me put in a position where my father is forced to do anything because of my arrest in India.' They have justification to be concerned. Michel has alleged two separate attempts on his life in prison, claiming that a hired killer confessed to being paid to assassinate him. Despite his appeals, no meaningful investigation was launched, he claims. 'A professional killer tried to kill me twice,' Michel told The Independent during an earlier court appearance. 'He was paid money, and they never investigated who paid him or why.' Michel's legal team argues that the entire case is politically motivated, a claim that gained traction after the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention ruled in 2021 that his detention was arbitrary and called for his immediate release. 'The United Nations has said he should be released. Indian law states he should be released. And yet, here we are,' says Michel's son. 'All we're asking is for the Indian government to follow its own laws. And for the UK government to hold them to it.' 'We really just desperately want something to happen,' says Alois. 'Some people wait in hope. In our case, we wait in despair.' As his ordeal has stretched on, Michel's health has suffered. Earlier this year he was admitted to the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) hospital in Delhi for hip surgery, and he has walked with a cane when attending court appearances since. 'We have one fear now,' Alois says. 'That he never comes back.' The broader implications of Michel's detention extend far beyond a single family's suffering. His case has become a litmus test of the UK government's willingness to protect its citizens abroad – particularly when doing so risks complicating lucrative diplomatic engagements. 'The people of Great Britain gave a clear and resounding mandate to the Labour Party to reclaim the country from the grip of bureaucratic dominance and restore the nation's pride,' says Michel's son. 'But this government, too, is proving weak – submissive to bureaucracy, unwilling to defend its own citizens.' Trade, security cooperation and joint efforts against organised crime dominated the headlines around the Modi-Starmer summit. But despite the family's heartbreak, Michel's imprisonment was not raised publicly during Modi's UK visit. Neither leader allowed the media to ask any questions and their talks took place in the prime minister's country residence, away from any public displays of anger in London. 'We are just asking both governments to respect the UN ruling,' Alois says. 'Follow the law, and let him go.'

From friends to foes: Why Corbyn's new ‘Your Party' could be a real problem for Starmer
From friends to foes: Why Corbyn's new ‘Your Party' could be a real problem for Starmer

The Independent

time15 minutes ago

  • The Independent

From friends to foes: Why Corbyn's new ‘Your Party' could be a real problem for Starmer

Keir Starmer and Jeremy Corbyn have a shared love for Arsenal football club and have both captained the Labour 'red team' in politics against the Tory blues. But that is about as far as they go in terms of any bonds in one of the most turbulent relationships in recent British politics. While the relationship between the pair is beyond repair, Sir Keir's predecessor has today added to the prime minister's headache with the launch of his new 'kinder' party, which threatens to pinch supporters at a time when Labour's poll rating continues to drop. A recent poll put Labour in third equal place with a new Corbyn party, with both on 15 per cent and even the Tories ahead on 17 per cent, behind Reform on a massive 34 per cent. Just five years ago, after Labour's dismal defeat to Boris Johnson in the 2019 election, Sir Keir described him as a 'colleague' and, more importantly, a 'friend'. But once the leadership was in the bag – courtesy of the support and strategy of his now chief of staff Morgan McSweeney – Sir Keir suddenly had a very different view of his predecessor. From 2016 he had been loyal to Corbyn, denied there was an antisemitism problem under his leadership, and continued to serve in a shadow cabinet while other prominent Labour MPs refused. But within months of taking charge of Labour, he had suspended the former leader and attempted to distance himself from Corbyn's time in charge. When Corbyn was kicked out in 2023, Sir Keir insisted that contrary to his previous statement, the former Labour leader 'was never a friend'. As various U-turns have shown, Sir Keir has not worried about changing his mind and rewriting history when circumstances required it. Now though, the former friend is a real problem. On one side it will allow Sir Keir to emphasise that he is the sensible centrist leader in a political world dominated by extremes of Corbyn on the left and Farage on the right. But on the other side there will be fears that the issues around trying to cut disability benefits, failing to really take on Israel over Gaza and the infamous winter fuel cuts will encourage many to switch to this new party. Another ex-Labour leader Lord Kinnock has warned that Corbyn's new party will only help the Tories and Reform. The issue for the prime minister, though, may be that Corbyn remains a more charismatic figure on the left. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch suffers the same in comparison to Farage. The one effect of his former friend's new party may be that it forces the prime minister to be more of a man of the people – less Sir Keir and more just Keir. A quality his premiership has been lacking so far.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store