Romualdez calls for no red carpet SONA amid massive flooding
Romualdez made the call four days before his cousin and President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr. is set to deliver his fourth SONA in Batasang Pambansa Complex in Quezon City.
'Mayy of our fellow Filipinos are struggling to get back on their feet. It would be out of touch to maintain a show of pageantry while our people are still in recovery,' Romualdez said.
'I have requested the Office of the Secretary General, if possible, to retain formal protocols but forego red carpet fanfare, fashion coverage and ceremonial staging. We will still observe decorum and tradition, but without the spectacle. The red carpet will be used for its functional purpose, not as a platform for display,' Romualdez added.
Romualdez, however, said that members of the House remain free to speak with journalists on their way in, as is customary.
'This is not about restricting access or silencing anyone. It's about setting the tone: focused, grounded and responsive. The opening of Congress is not a fashion event, it is a working session. Let's begin it with the seriousness and humility our times demand,' Romualdez said.
Iloilo Rep. Janette Garin backed Romualdez, saying it is the message of the President, not the pomp, that matters.
'We have to dress simply so people will be able to feel that we are one with them. SONA should not be projected as an event for the elite. It is an event for the people, for our people to know of the government's plans and how they are able to benefit from it,' Garin said.
'We won't have a lavish menu, and other expenses should be for things that we can still use for everyday work in Congress. And most of the preparations I have seen so far are related to the day-to-day operations in Congress,' Garin added.
The First Regular Session of the 20th Congress will formally open on July 28, ahead of the President's SONA at 4 pm. — LA, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
9 minutes ago
- GMA Network
SC ruling may lead to sham impeachment complaints, legal experts warn
Legal experts warn that the Supreme Court ruling that redefines when an impeachment proceeding is considered 'initiated' could be weaponized through the filing of sham complaints to block legitimate attempts at accountability. Last week, the Supreme Court declared the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte "unconstitutional," saying their filing violated Article XI Section 3 paragraph 5 of the Constitution, which states that "No impeachment proceedings shall be initiated against the same official more than once within a period of one year." Four impeachment complaints had been filed in the House. The first three impeachment complaints were filed in December 2024, and were archived and deemed terminated or dismissed on February 5, 2025, when the House of Representatives endorsed the fourth impeachment complaint. According to a 24 Oras report by Joseph Morong, in its decision the Supreme Court held that the unacted-on complaints, which were not referred to the House Committee on Justice, already marked the start of impeachment proceedings. According to the Supreme Court, the fourth complaint, which was adopted and transmitted to the Senate on the same day, therefore violated the one-year bar rule. Lawyer Rene Sarmiento, a framer of the 1987 Constitution, criticized the Court's reversal of its previous ruling that an impeachment complaint is only considered initiated once it is referred to the House Committee on Justice. Former Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonio Carpio also called out the decision: "The people did not know that there was this requirement because there was no requirement like this. You cannot make it retroactive, it should be prospective—'yun ang doctrine of operative fact. If there is a new requirement, you cannot say, 'Uy, bakit hindi mo sinunod ito?' Eh paano mo isunod na wala nga 'yun, it did not exist at the time." (You cannot say, 'Why didn't you follow this rule?' You can't hold people accountable for a rule that didn't exist when the action happened.) Critics also slammed the part of the decision that stated Duterte was denied due process, and laid out new procedural requirements that had not been previously imposed. 'Ang sabi ngayon ng Supreme Court, it cannot be an ex parte hearing, it has to be an actual hearing and that will require time. Kapos ka sa oras and that was never intended and nobody knew that there was such a requirement,' Carpio said. (The Supreme Court now says it can't be an ex parte hearing—it needs a full hearing, which takes time. That was never required before.) UP Law Assistant Professor Paolo Tamase backed these concerns, pointing out that even the impeachment of former Chief Justice Renato Corona proceeded without such requirements. "Hindi rin naman nagkaroon ng hearing doon at hindi rin naman kinwestiyon 'yun… Pareho lang circumstances niya, kaya mahirap paliwanagan kung bakit iba yung mga patakaran ngayon," he said. (There was no hearing then, and no one questioned it. The circumstances are the same, so it's hard to explain why the rules are suddenly different.) The legal group 1Sambayan also challenged the Court's timeline, arguing that House records show the fourth complaint was acted on and adopted first, before the earlier three were archived. Thus, they claim the one-year bar should not apply to it. "If anything, ang dapat tamaan ng one-year bar rule ay 'yung tatlo na inihain na nauna supposedly at hindi 'yung finile ng House of Representatives," Tamase said. (If anything, the one-year bar should apply to the earlier three, not the one officially filed and adopted by the House.) The House of Representatives has announced it will appeal the Supreme Court's ruling, citing procedural and factual errors. Tamase warned that the ruling might be abused: "Seryoso siya na problema dito sa desisyon ng Korte Suprema. Maghahain siya ng mga sham complaints upang magsimula 'yung one-year bar rule. Kung hindi aksyunan ng House kasi clear naman na sham 'yung complaint, parang napagdesisyunan na rin at nagsisimula na 'yung one-year bar rule." (This is a serious problem with the Court's decision. Anyone can file sham complaints to trigger the one-year bar rule. Even if the House doesn't act because it's clearly a sham, the clock starts running anyway.) In response, the Supreme Court clarified in its decision that baseless or unendorsed complaints should be immediately dismissed and would not trigger the one-year ban. "Obviously, sham complaints, for example, those that are not verified, should be dismissed immediately, even if endorsed. Complaints that are not properly endorsed by a member of the House of Representatives within a reasonable period should also be dismissed. These types of dismissals will not trigger the one-year ban,' it said. — Sherylin Untalan/BM, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
39 minutes ago
- GMA Network
SONA 2025 by the numbers
President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. delivered his fourth State of the Nation Address (SONA) on Monday, laying out his plans for the last three years of his administration. The 2025 SONA lasted for 1 hour and 11 minutes, starting at exactly 4:06 p.m. until 5:17 p.m. Among the promises he delivered is the expansion of the P20 per kilo subsidized rice nationwide and providing internet access to all public schools in the country before the end of 2025. Here is a breakdown of Marcos' SONA promises by the numbers: Economy 2.5 million: Number of Filipino families the government targets to assist in establishing small businesses 200: Number of plants the government is targeting to provide electricity to 4 million Filipino homes 4 million: Number of households the President is eyeing to energize before the end of his term 1 million: Additional number of households to be provided with electricity by 2028 using solar power Food and hunger alleviation P20: Price of subsidized rice per kilo nationwide 600,000: Number of food-poor households targeted under the Walang Gutom Program by 2025 750,000: Targeted Walang Gutom Program beneficiaries by 2028 P1 billion: Promised budget for the feeding programs for daycare centers and public schools Agriculture 15 million: Number of hybrid and high-quality sedlings the administration aims to plant nationwide 100 million: Target number of coconut trees the government wants to plant across the country Education P1 billion: Promised funding for the establishment of 300 barangay child development centers and 'Bulilit Centers' in the country 40,000: Number of classrooms the government is eyeing to build before the end of the administration P60 billion: Budget for free tertiary education and technical vocation (tech-voc) programs in the country Transportation 0 — fees for 'Love Bus' service 3 days —Waiting period for the release of motor vehicle plates Infrastructure 32 kilometers —Length of the proposed Bataan-Cavite Interlink Bridge that will connect Mariveles, Bataan to Naic, Cavite. It will shorten travel time from five hours to 45 minutes. 45 minutes —Travel time from Bataan to Cavite after the completion of the proposed Bataan-Cavite Interlink Bridge —LDF, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
39 minutes ago
- GMA Network
Diokno, De Lima point out SONA hits and misses
Akbayan Representative Chel Diokno and ML party-list Rep. Leila de Lima on Monday said President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s fourth State of the Nation Address (SONA) should have included issues that tackle accountability among public officials. 'Unang-una, sa issue ng accountability, nandyan 'yung pagbabalik natin sa ICC (International Criminal Court). Nandyan 'yung pagpapanagot sa likod ng mga EJK (extrajudicial killings) nung nakaraan,' Diokno said in an ambush interview following Marcos' speech. (First of all, on the issue of accountability, there is our return to the ICC. There is the holding accountable of those behind the EJKs in the past.) 'Nandyan 'yung issue sa corruption na hanggang ngayon ay wala pa rin tayong nakikitang konkretong mga hakbang na parusahan ang mga nasa likod ng iba't ibang sindikato at iba't ibang malalaking kompanya,' he added. (There is the issue of corruption, which until now we still haven't seen concrete steps to punish those behind the various syndicates and major companies.) Diokno was referring to the ICC case of former President Rodrigo Duterte, who was arrested last March, for crimes against humanity over his administration's war on drugs. Asked how he will rate this year's SONA, Diokno said they will give an 'incomplete' grade. ML party-list Rep. De Lima opined that President Marcos should have addressed the Supreme Court decision junking the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte. 'I just wished he could have spoken about accountability because of the decision of the Supreme Court. He could have said something about how significant is accountability in our Constitution,' de Lima said after the SONA. 'Maybe the President is just being careful about it. [But] without necessarily taking issue with the SC decision, he could have stressed the importance of accountability,' de Lima added. In a separate interview, De Lima's fellow former impeachment prosecutor and Oriental Mindoro Rep. Arnan Panaligan said there are other ways to exact accountability outside of the Supreme Court decision and the SONA. 'Maybe the President is just allowing other independent government agencies, like the one will stop the Ombudsman if it wants to conduct an investigation [on a public official],' Panaligan said. 'The Ombudsman is an independent body and are free to investigate government officials. So there is no inconsistency concerning the President not mentioning the impeachment while he calls for accountability,' Panaligan added. In his speech, Marcos tackled issues related to the sports, economy, education, the missing sabungeros, water service interruptions, and flood control projects. He warned that government personnel who steal public funds, such as those for flood control projects, will be dealt with under the law as various parts of the country suffer from inclement weather. — BAP, GMA Integrated News
