HRF condemns AP Cabinet's proposed 10-hour work day
In a statement on Tuesday, V. Rajesh, HRF AP State general secretary, and V.S. Krishna – HRF AP & TG Coordination Committee member—said that the amendment to the Factories Act, 1948, is no 'reform' but rather a regressive and exploitative move. It undermines decades of hard-fought battles by the working class that established a humane and sustainable working environment.
The HRF leaders pointed out that the State government now seeks to dismantle these rights to benefit corporate interests. The 8-hour workday is the cornerstone of modern-day labour rights, achieved through decades of working-class resistance. B.R. Ambedkar, who played a decisive role in institutionalising the 8-hour workday, was in many ways its architect. Ambedkar's relentless efforts in the 1940s, in conjunction with the working-class struggles, led to an 8-hour cap on daily work. This is now being sought to be rolled back.
Mr. Krishna and Mr. Rajesh noted that HRF was of the view that the much-talked-about 'ease/speed of doing business' has become a euphemism for curtailing labour rights so as to appease the capital investors. In the current policy discourse in the State, 'attracting investment' is shorthand for systematic deregulation, casualisation, weakening of regulatory oversight, and erosion of labour rights.
Extending the maximum daily working hours amounts to entrenching exploitation and a rollback of hard-won labour safeguards. It normalises overwork, erodes the right to rest and leisure, and deprives workers of dignity from labour. This measure constitutes a fundamental breach of the government's Constitutional obligations.
The HRF leaders called upon all democratic forces to oppose this devious and retrograde move.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
PM Modi slams TMC for aiding infiltration, vows legal action on non-citizens
Kolkata: Lashing out at Trinamool Congress for assisting Infiltration for 'appeasement politics', Prime Minister Narendra Modi gave a stern message in Bengal that all legal actions will be taken against the people, who are not citizens of India, and infiltrators, as per Constitutional provisions. This comes in the backdrop when Trinamool Congress, including party chairperson Mamata Banerjee , raised voice and hit the streets on Wednesday for Bengali-speaking migrants allegedly detained in various parts of the country. 'In West Bengal, Trinamool, for its self-interest, is putting Bengali identity at stake. Infiltration has increased, with a forged documents ecosystem developed by TMC. Bengal and the country's safety and security are at stake. For appeasement politics, Trinamool is crossing all limits. For BJP, Bengal's 'asmita' (identity) is of prime importance,' PM stressed. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category Product Management Technology Cybersecurity Project Management Public Policy Data Science CXO Design Thinking Operations Management Others Leadership Finance MBA PGDM others healthcare Data Science Artificial Intelligence Healthcare Digital Marketing MCA Management Degree Data Analytics Skills you'll gain: Product Strategy & Competitive Advantage Tactics Product Development Processes & Market Orientations Product Analytics & Data-Driven Decision Making Agile Development, Design Thinking, & Product Leadership Duration: 40 Weeks IIM Kozhikode Professional Certificate in Product Management Starts on Jun 26, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Creating Effective Product Roadmap User Research & Translating it to Product Design Key Metrics via Product Analytics Hand-On Projects Using Cutting Edge Tools Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business ISB Product Management Starts on May 14, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Product Strategy & Roadmapping User-Centric Product Design Agile Product Development Market Analysis & Product Launch Duration: 24 Weeks Indian School of Business Professional Certificate in Product Management Starts on Jun 26, 2024 Get Details 'Those who are not citizens of India and have come to India through infiltration, all legal actions will be taken as per the Constitution. No conspiracy will be allowed against Bengal,' Modi noted. The PM said that Trinamool has created a complete ecosystem of infiltrators with forged identity cards. "All actions will be taken against the infiltrators, with fake Identity cards, as per the Constitution of India. No infiltrators will be spared, who are hampering India's safety and security. All necessary legal actions will be taken against them," Modi said from a rally in Bengal's Durgapur. " TMC is crossing all limits for them and appeasement politics. Trinamool has even started protests now supporting infiltration,' Modi stressed. Live Events Saying " Viksit Bangla " is PM's guarantee, Modi said Bengal can become one of the top industrial states in the country after BJP is voted to power. "Trinamool stands as a wall, blocking the path of development and growth in the state. If that wall falls, Bengal will move ahead in the path of development and become one of the fastest growing states in the country.' 'It is important to bring investment to Bengal. But till the Trinamool government is in power, it will never allow it. In the last decade, the party has created a situation, which was anti-investment and anti-employment, Modi said. He criticized the state for Murshidabad riots, violence and police probe and questioned how can anyone invest in such a situation. Modi raised the slogan, 'TMC hatao-Bangla Banchao.' Modi touched upon the precarious condition in the education sector and expressed sympathy for the SSC Teachers who have lost jobs and how many families are affected. He spoke about children's future in 'deep darkness' due to the lack of teachers in schools. 'Situation is such that the court was even forced to refer to it as 'a systematic fraud',' Modi said. A government which talks about Ma Mati Manush, cannot protect its women, PM said, adding, that 'Torture on women gives deep anguish and pain.' Modi also pointed out about lack of safety of women prevails in colleges, referring to the RG Kar incident, and pointed out about the recent rape in South Kolkata Law college in Kolkata. 'BJP has big dreams for Bengal- a prosperous Bengal, a 'Viksit Bengal'-several projects have been inaugurated today to make the dream true. West Bengal's land is full of inspiration. This country's first industry minister Syma Prasad's land, gave India's first industrial policy. This is the land of Dr BC Ray who chose Durgapur for his big vision. Dwarkanath was a great reformer to Bengal and had shown path banking reforms in that time,' PM said. 'Industry had prospered in Durgapur. But today youth is forced to exodus-forced to go to other states. The industries are closed. We need to bring Bengal out of this,' he said. 'Bengal will be the engine of India's growth. We will make Bharat Viksit by 2047. Durgapur gets Rs 5400 crore project foundation inaugurated and the Steel City will bloom. it will help make lives of Bengal easy,' PM said. The PM laid the foundation stone for Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd (BPCL) City Gas Distribution (CGD) project in Bankura and Purulia worth around Rs 1,950 crore. It will provide PNG connections to households, commercial establishments and industrial customers and provide CNG at the retail outlets. Syndicate raj in Bengal Slamming syndicate raj, extortion and goonda-raj of Trinamool in Bengal, the Prime Minister said, 'True 'Parivartan' will come once BJP comes to power. The BJP has big dreams for West Bengal and it wants to witness a prosperous Bengal.' "Syndicate raj prevails here, extortions done and TMC goons threaten people, 'Goonda tax' prevails in Bengal and these factors block investments here. The state government gives free hand for corruption. This is the reason-investors have left Bengal despite Bengal being the land of opportunities,' Modi said. After the BJP government came to power in Assam, Odisha and Tripura, these states have seen development, he said. 'Odisha will soon be the country's fastest developing states in the country soon'.
Mint
3 days ago
- Mint
Will SC's push for online content rules bring clarity or stifle free speech?
The spotlight has returned to the limits of free speech for content creators in India, as the Supreme Court recently asked the government to frame a set of guidelines to curb obscenity and vulgarity in online content without curtailing freedom of expression. Multiple benches of the court, while hearing different cases on 15 July involving comedians and influencers, stressed the need for clear guidelines to curb objectionable content while protecting Constitutional rights. The apex court's directive has left content creators divided. While some welcome the move, hoping it will define clear boundaries for permissible online behaviour and reduce legal uncertainties and arbitrary measures, others fear it could threaten their creative freedom and lead to self-censorship. 'I'm open to guidelines that promote responsible content creation without stifling creative expression. As a roast comedy content creator, I already self-censor to avoid offence, but clarity on what's acceptable would help," said Shivamsingh Rajput, a Surat-based YouTuber who has close to 10.5 million subscribers across his five YouTube channels. 'A content classification system would be great. It would let audiences choose what they watch and take the pressure off creators. Dark humour has its audience worldwide and I believe India could benefit from a more open approach. This would allow our content economy to grow and evolve," Rajput added. Rohan Cariappa, a Bangalore-based creator who creates short comedy skits on Instagram and content about India's growing hip-hop and rap culture on YouTube, expresses skepticism on executing such guidelines. He has close to 500,000 followers across platforms. 'The idea of having a set of guidelines for creators doesn't sound bad to me, but the real problem lies in the execution. With the kind of population and the number of creators we have in this country, it is really difficult to fast-track anything," Cariappa highlighted, adding that as per the latest data, India is home to over 8 million active content creators. 'I also fear that such rules can be misused to arm-twist creators with different ideologies and affinities, be they religious, political, or any other kind. I have personally faced this when a comedy video of mine attracted a legal notice last year after a few complaints and my phone was confiscated only for the case to be quashed by the court later. People have also tended to try to pull down creators who have grown very fast. So, as much as the proposal sounds good, I am unsure whether it is feasible given the size of our community and country," Cariappa further added. The influencer marketing industry in India is expected to grow to ₹3,375 crore in 2026 from ₹2,344 crore last year, as per EY data reported by Mint earlier. The fresh debate on the creation of such guidelines for creators began with India's Got Latent controversy, where Cure SMA India Foundation accused five stand-up comedians, including Samay Raina, of making insensitive remarks about persons with disabilities. While hearing a plea, Justice Surya Kant verbally asked Attorney General R. Venkataramani to draft guidelines in consultation with stakeholders to ensure they align with Constitutional principles. 'What we would like is guidelines in conformity with Constitutional principles, balancing freedom and the limits of that freedom where rights and duties start. We want it to be comprehensive and debated openly," remarked Justice Kant. Justice Kant clarified that Article 21 (right to live with human dignity) of Indian Constitution overrides Article 19 (freedom of speech), especially in cases involving insensitive comments against vulnerable groups. On the same day, another bench of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and K.V. Vishwanathan discussed ways to curb 'divisive tendencies" on social media while hearing West Bengal-based Wazahat Khan's plea to club FIRs against him for posts on Hindu deities. The bench called for detailed deliberations to frame guidelines that balance objectionable content with Constitutional rights. Meanwhile, a third bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Aravind Kumar expressed concern over the tendency of citizens to post 'anything and everything" online while hearing cartoonist Hemant Malviya's plea for protection against a case filed for posting a 'revolting" cartoon on Prime Minister Narendra Modi. 'What is happening today is people say and write all kinds of things without caring about the language they use online and on their shows," Justice Dhulia remarked. Mint spoke to lawyers practising technology law in India's top courts. They noted that the court's discussions and the government's plan to bring new rules align with existing laws like the Information Technology Act, 2000. However, they cautioned that new rules should not create vague or subjective definitions for terms like vulgarity and obscenity, as this could lead to misuse. 'The Intermediary Guidelines to follow already define such content under existing law to allow takedown. New rules shouldn't create separate or vague standards that risk curbing legitimate online expression," said Sidhant Kumar Marwah, Partner at Unum Law. The guidelines mentioned by Marwah refer to The Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 that are a set of rules that require digital intermediaries such as YouTube, X, Instagram and Facebook to respond to user grievances expeditiously and remove harmful content. Nakul Gandhi, founding partner of NG Law Chambers, said the framework must begin by recognising that freedom of expression is deeply subjective. 'What's vulgar to one may be satire to another. The danger lies in converting personal offence into legal prohibition. Instead of rigid definitions, the law should focus on principled thresholds, such as: Does the content incite violence? Does it exploit or endanger a specific group? These are measurable parameters. But matters of taste, tone, or personal offence should remain outside the scope of legal sanction." Lawyers also stressed the need for safeguards under new rules to prevent arbitrary takedowns by platforms. According to Ankit Sahni, partner at Ajay Sahni & Associates, any government takedown request must have a written order with legal grounds and give creators a chance to respond. 'Transparency reports, time-bound reviews, and oversight by an independent grievance body can build trust." Marwah from Unum Law suggested setting up an independent regulatory body manned by experts, similar to the UK's Online Safety Act, to issue takedown orders based on clear, well-defined standards. However, legal experts warned of what overregulation can do. 'Vague or broad rules may stifle creativity, comedy, and critical commentary. Guidelines must be clear, transparent, and proportionate to protect free expression," noted Anupam Shukla, technology law and privacy practice at Pioneer Legal. Gandhi from NG Law Chambers further cautions that 'the direction seems more cautionary than empowering for creators. Seen in that light, moves towards broad guidelines, without any defined limits, risk becoming tools against creators, especially the independent ones who don't have the backing of big platforms or studios."
The Hindu
4 days ago
- The Hindu
HRF opposes land acquisition for Indosol project at Karedu
Opposing the State government's proposed plan to acquire agricultural lands at Karedu village of Ulavapadu mandal in Prakasam district for the Indosol Solar Private Limited's solar module manufacturing plant, the members of Human Rights Forum (HRF) and Rashtra Cheneta Jana Samakhya (RCJS) demanded to immediately call off the project. The State government has already released multiple notifications to acquire the farm lands at Karedu and other villages. On Wednesday, they campaigned along with the villagers against the land acquisition of more than 8,500 acres in various villages for the proposed project. They addressed street meetings and distributed pamphlets to the local people. Addressing the public, HRF Sate general secretary Y. Rajesh and secretary G. Rohith said that the State government is unnecessarily acquiring such a large extent of land when a fraction of it is enough for the project. They also pointed out that the government is facilitating a company that has no track record in taking up such a big project. During the campaign, RCJS president M. Mohan Rao alleged that the government had taken an undemocratic decision to waive off the consent and Social Impact Assessment (SIA) requirements of the project. 'The legal standing of this waiver is on shaky grounds, given that such waiver can only be done in the public interest. Except providing gains to a private company, one is hard pressed to find any public interest in this project. This proposed project involves silica processing, which has been established as highly toxic and polluting,' he said. The HRF and RCJS members questioned the government's largesse to Indosol Solar Limited to the tune of around ₹45,000 crore, which is a staggering 60 per cent of the total proposed investment. The alleged it as socialising costs and privatising profits to a private company. Farmers meet Jagan Earlier, farmers from Karedu met former Chief Minister and YSR Congress Party (YSRCP) president Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy at the party's central office in Tadepalli on Tuesday. They had submitted a request letter seeking his support in protecting their agricultural lands at Karedu from industrial use. The farmers expressed strong opposition to the government's decision to allocate these lands for the project and explained that the area supports two crops a year and sustains thousands of farming and fishing families. They are afraid that the industrial takeover would threaten their livelihood and disrupt the local environment.
