
‘These murders still live with me': the show that goes inside Fred and Rose West's ‘house of horrors'
Hope faded one day in 1994. Calling her from the UK, Dez's mother-in-law cried down the phone. There was panic, there was confusion, 'so I had to ask her. And then she said it was in the papers that the remains had been identified as Alison.'
Back in England, one story was gripping the nation: Fred and Rose West. With every detail plastered on news channels and filling newspapers, the country was obsessed with the serial killers who for nearly three decades had been on an undetected murder spree, abducting young women, torturing them, mutilating them, and burying the bodies in the garden of their Gloucester home. Some of those bodies were the West's own children.
Alison had gone missing in the late 1970s. A rough relationship with authority meant she ended up in care as a teenager, then ran away, social services told her family. She was taken in by a couple in Gloucester, looking after their children and doing housework in return. 'They know that I was in care, and are more than willing to help me on my feet,' Alison wrote in a letter to her mother in the early 80s. 'I have accepted them as a second family.'
It was the worst second family she could have had: the Wests, whose gruesome crimes – and the people who were left to pick up the pieces – are the subject of Netflix's new three-part documentary series, Fred and Rose West: A British Horror Story.
It's a documentary which, using unseen police video and unheard interview recordings with Fred West, brings new insight to some of the worst serial killers Britain has ever seen. The show reveals how the pair abused and murdered 12 young women, how the police carried out their investigation, and how the families coped, featuring interviews with relatives of the deceased – some of whom have never spoken in public before.
Those interviews were the stories director Dan Dewsbury wanted front and centre. 'I really wanted to make sure that people understood this was a real thing that still affects these people today,' he says. 'It's one of the world's most known crimes. The hope is that [viewers] will come out of it thinking a lot of different things beyond just the crime that was committed.'
It's a new approach for the now omnipresent true-crime format. While most focus on the twists and turns, the mystery and bloodshed, Dewsbury's version of this well-known case tries to put empathy for those affected at the heart of the storytelling. 'They wanted to bring the victims to life, and I wanted to do that too,' says Chambers, who has turned down other interviews in the past for fear of objectifying her little sister and reopening traumatic wounds. 'That's why I agreed to do this one, to bring Alison to life, but also for myself – for the closure.'
Despite Dewsbury's victim-first approach, the series does still hit notes required for any Netflix true-crime series. There's creepy music with reversed vocals, glossy talking heads mixed with grainy archive footage, and ghostly Polaroids frequently popping up on screen. Dewsbury says he had to pick his battles regarding how far he could shake up the format. 'The advantage is you've got a readymade audience,' he says of the genre. 'The disadvantage is they may have a predisposition of what they want that series to be. It's up to me to push against some of that.'
This is a story that has been told many times, and it required input from the lawyers, police and forensic experts involved in the case. How hard was it to keep these interviewees fresh? 'They become desensitised to it,' Dewsbury says. He kept notes of what the contributors had said in previous interviews, and alerted them when they were repeating themselves. 'I want people to give an authentic interview, really connect into what I'm trying to do – not resort to media-speak or what worked last time.'
The previously unseen footage is bone-chilling. Viewers see tapes of West family home videos, police digging up bodies in the garden, shots from inside the 'House of Horrors' punctuated by archive material of the media frenzy around the case. But perhaps most shocking is the police footage of Fred at his home, handcuffed to detectives, being forced to locate his victims buried in the foundations. 'There was a bone in there last time,' West grunts in his thick Gloucester accent, pointing at a corner of his excavated garden and referencing a previous visit.
In one scene, we're carried via police camcorder through the house, into the bespoke voids where carpenter West filmed his crimes. 'It was clear that Fred had been able to adapt the building to his sexual pleasure,' forensic psychologist Paul Britton says to the cameras.
During the research period, Dewsbury digested hundreds of hours of grisly archive material, which included footage of locals expressing their disbelief that a friendly couple from the community was committing these atrocities under everyone's noses. 'I think about the reconciliation those people must have gone through, because it genuinely felt like a shock, to that road, to that street, to that town, to that country,' he says. 'It made me come face to face with this idea of the mask that people can put on.'
Those involved in the case make for compelling viewing. Some are cartoonish and others understated – it's remarkable to think this motley crew were at the heart of the biggest murder story in the world at the time. There's Howard Sounes, the caricature Fleet Street hack who pays sources for exclusive stories. There's Howard Ogden, the small-time local lawyer brought in to represent Fred in a case that may have been above his pay grade. There's even an appearance from Brian Leveson, at the time a rising star in the legal world and the prosecuting lawyer in the West's trial. 'I have prosecuted all sorts of crime,' he says. 'But if I had to identify one case that lives with me the most, this is the case.'
But this is not just a documentary about two of the worst killers in British history. It's a story of miscarriages of justice, incompetent authorities who didn't join the dots, and vulnerable young women – some runaways, some leaving care – who became easy to hide when the state wasn't looking for them. The Wests had been in contact with social services since the 60s, and a string of sexual assaults had gone unpunished. Dewsbury believes the lessons of the case apply to 2025. 'I think the process by which Fred and Rose got away with what they did might be slightly unique to that period of time, but the undercurrent of what was going on is really relevant to now,' he says.
One truly staggering missed opportunity is the case of Caroline Owens, one of the Wests' nannies who was abducted, raped and abused by the pair in 1973. She escaped and bravely reported the crimes to the police, but the Wests inexplicably got off with a £50 fine. 'It was a missed opportunity to raise the profile of Fred and Rose and identify them as possible sex offenders who could carry out abductions, kidnapping and imprisonment,' says detective constable Russ Williams in the documentary. 'They did get off lightly with it.'
Chambers wouldn't usually watch a documentary with 'Fred and Rose West' in the title, but she plans on tuning in to this one. 'It'll be tough, because there's things I likely didn't know, and things I might have forgotten,' she says. 'But I stand behind it, because it's about the victims. I'll have to watch it all in one go, because I won't be able to sleep in between.'
Fred and Rose West: A British Horror Story is on Netflix on 14 May.
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Peaceful pink-wearing mothers' migrants protest turns to violence: Masked men hijack demonstration, trying to rush gates at asylum seekers hotel before police crack down
A peaceful protest by mothers wearing pink turned to violence this afternoon as masked thugs hijacked the demonstration outside a migrant hotel. The group of women and children gathered outside the four-star Britannia International hotel in Canary Wharf, London, today where they sat and chanted 'stop the boats'. The group held up England flags and wore pink clothing to raise awareness of how women and young people are being 'let down' by the migrant crisis. But the peaceful protest quickly turned to chaos as a group of up to 30 balaclava-clad men - all with their faces covered - swarmed the crowd. The thugs caused a huge bang as they set off smoke bombs and chanted ' Keir Starmer is a w*****'. After trying to charge the fence surrounding the hotel, the group of far-right activists ran back in the direction they came from - but were caught by police and several arrests were made. Protester Kim, 60, a resident of the area, said she was demonstrating as she worries for the safety of her family. 'I live in this area, I have kids and grandkids and it needs to be safe for them to live. We don't know them [asylum seekers], we don't know what they've done. My son can't get a house; he has been on the council list since he was 17.' Speaking about the disruption from masked protesters, Kim said: 'It is disgraceful. It completely upset the atmosphere. I don't want to see that and I don't want my kids to see. 'If that was one of my children I would embarrassed. It ruined the atmosphere. This was meant to be a peaceful protest for women and children.' A 17-year-old protester, who goes by the nickname of 'Young Bob', said he is concerned migrants will struggle to 'integrate' if they are housed in hotels in Canary Wharf. Young Bob, who was part of the peaceful mothers' protest, said: 'The counter demonstrators libel us as Nazis. 'But financial districts like these are not ideal for refugees who in the long term need integration. 'During the weekday there are not a lot of people around. 'How will they assimilate into Britishness in this environment? 'Business people who had bookings in the hotel are being turned away which will impact businesses round here.' He added: 'The biggest diversity we can have is the diversity of opinion. 'The protesters who disagree with us should relax in the expletives because it demonstrates a childishness.' On Saturday, people believed to be asylum seekers appeared to move into the four-star hotel in London under the cover of darkness. A coach full of suspected migrants was seen arriving at the Britannia International Hotel at around 1.40am on Saturday morning. Tower Hamlets Council confirmed the Government intends to use the hotel - which has around 500 rooms - for asylum seekers in a move that has angered anti-migrant protesters and guests whose bookings have been cancelled. Footage of the passengers getting off the coach showed they were all men, with the vast majority dressed in matching grey tracksuit tops and bottoms. They were helped by masked security guards, some of whom appeared to be wearing body cameras. Last week, workers were seen hauling beds and mattresses into the hotel in preparation for the arrival of 'hundreds' of asylum seekers. A barricade of metal fencing was placed around the hotel by the Metropolitan Police after anti-migrant demonstrators protested the plan for immigrants to be housed there. The Daily Mail has contacted the Met Police for comment.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Prince Harry denies giving Prince Andrew bloody nose at family gathering
Prince Harry has denied that he gave Prince Andrew 'a bloody nose' during a fight at a family gathering in 2013. According to an excerpt from a new biography of the disgraced Duke of York, published in the Daily Mail on Saturday, the pair had a heated argument that escalated into a physical altercation. 'Punches were thrown over something Andrew said behind Harry's back', the author Andrew Lownie claimed. The alleged fight began when 'Harry told [his uncle] he was a coward not to say it to his face. Harry got the better of Andrew by all accounts, leaving him with a bloody nose before the fight was broken up.' Lownie's biography, Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, also claimed that Andrew told his nephew marrying Meghan Markle, now the Duchess of Sussex, would 'not last more than a month'. He allegedly 'accused Meghan of being an opportunist and thought she was too old for Harry, adding that his nephew was making the biggest mistake ever,' and told his nephew he had gone 'bonkers', accusing him of not doing 'any due diligence into her past' before they got engaged in 2017. Late on Saturday, a spokesperson for Harry and Meghan said: 'I can confirm Prince Harry and Prince Andrew have never had a physical fight, nor did Prince Andrew ever make the comments he is alleged to have made about the Duchess of Sussex to Prince Harry.' The duke and duchess have also sent a legal letter to the Daily Mail over the publication of what their spokesperson described as 'gross inaccuracies, damaging and defamatory remarks'. The Guardian has approached Buckingham Palace and representatives for the Duke of York for comment. Prince Andrew fell from grace after a disastrous Newsnight interview in 2019 about his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the late American financier and convicted sex offender. The duke was stripped of his royal and military titles in 2021. The book claims that Harry and his brother William had 'problematic' relationships with Andrew for years, and that Andrew was also rude about William's wife Catherine, the Princess of Wales. King Charles has allowed his younger brother to stay in the Royal Lodge, a 30-room mansion in Windsor Great Park owned by the crown estate. However, last year the king ended Andrew's allowance, estimated at £1m annually, raising questions about future arrangements. The source quoted in Lownie's biography claims that the Prince of Wales is keen to 'evict' the duke and his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, who lives with Andrew though the couple divorced in 1996. According to Entitled's source: '[William] also loathes Sarah … and can't wait for the day when his father throws them both out. If Charles doesn't, I guarantee you the first thing William does when he becomes king is to get them evicted.' Harry broke ties with his family citing the 'toxicity' of royal life and alleged racism towards his wife, moving with his young family to Canada and then the US in 2020. In 2022, he published a memoir, Spare, in which he detailed strains in his relationships with his father and brother. Earlier this year, he told the BBC he had 'forgiven' his family and would 'love a reconciliation'.


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Gloucestershire Police chief pledges to tackle racism in force
Gloucestershire Police's temporary Chief Constable has acknowledged that racism still exists within the force. T/CC Maggie Blyth met the public at a community engagement forum in Gloucester on Thursday, and answered questions the force's concerns raised about racism, a lack of professionalism and worries over hate crimes, there was some praise for neighbourhood acting head of the force said she recognised the importance of responding to feedback in order to maintain public trust in the force to "protect and keep people safe". The forum, which was jointly hosted by the independent Community Legitimacy Panel (CLP) and Gloucestershire Police, was attended by dozens of people from across the county, and held at the Church of God of Prophecy on Melbourne Street of the questions posed was whether racism existed within the force - T/CC Blyth accepted that it did, based on conversations with colleagues, the National Black Police Association and members of the added while the force still has a long way to go, tackling racism remained "an absolute priority". Members of the public also claimed armed officers sometimes showed a "lack of respect" when responding to response, T/CC Blyth said she would work hard to ensure all force employees carried out their work with respect, empathy and of the people who attended the meeting praised the work of the Neighbourhood Policing Team for their efforts in building and maintaining "strong relationships with all communities". The panel, which included other senior officers, was also told how victims of hate crime often lack the confidence their report would be investigated.T/CC Blyth said she recognised people sometimes find it difficult to report crimes for a variety of reasons, but wanted to reassure any victim of hate crime they would be taken seriously. 'Words and actions' "It's so important for police services to listen to their communities, take on board any concerns they may have and positively respond with both words and actions to them," T/CC Blyth said. "If we don't, we will inevitably have a negative impact on levels of public trust and confidence in our service; in our ability to protect and keep people safe; to investigate any crimes people have had the misfortune of being victims of; and to act with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity."She was appointed to the role following the suspension of former Chief Constable Rod Hansen after allegations of gross misconduct.