Scotrail alcohol ban 'ignored' by passengers as SNP policy branded 'unenforceable'
The SNP's booze ban on ScotRail services is being widely ignored by passengers as the policy is "unenforceable", trade union chiefs have warned.
Passengers were previously allowed to drink alcohol on trains on the country's biggest passenger network before 9pm.
But the Scottish Government introduced a "temporary" ban in November 2020 - and have since refused to lift it despite other covid restrictions being ditched.
Other rail service providers in Scotland, such as LNER and Avanti West Coast, have no restrictions on the sale or consumption of alcohol.
Appearing before Holyrood's transport committee today, two railway union chiefs were quizzed on the impact of the controversial policy.
Gordon Mackay, the Scotland organiser for the RMT union, described the ban as 'unenforceable' and told the committee that it was being 'ignored' by passengers.
Kevin Lindsay of the ASELF union said Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop was 'listening' to unions on the issue - and said there was an 'ongoing debate' within the Scottish Government about the ban being removed.
Critics of the ban claim deprives the publicly-owned railway of badly needed revenues, as well as penalising the majority of law-abiding passengers.
The busiest mainline services previously sold a range of alcoholic drinks via catering trolleys that passed through carriages.
Sue Webber, Scottish Conservatives transport spokeswoman, previously said: "ScotRail's ongoing booze ban is unenforceable, but SNP ministers refuse to accept this.
"Scrapping this measure would not only allow the law-abiding majority of passengers to enjoy a quiet drink, it would be a revenue-raiser for nationalised ScotRail that could go towards cutting fares."
Transport Scotland could not offer a date on when the controversial policy would finally be reviewed when asked by the Record last month - or whether it will be lifted before the next Holyrood election in 2026.
A Scottish Government spokesman said at the time: 'We are aware that passengers, ScotRail staff and other interested parties hold a wide range of views about alcohol on trains.
"While we do appreciate that the majority of passengers who consume alcohol would not cause any concerns to train staff or other passengers, we know that alcohol can play a role in anti-social behaviour displayed on public transport and in wider society.
"Passenger safety, especially women and girls', on public transport is paramount. This is why safety is considered an important factor in our deliberations on this matter.
"Ministers will take time to consider the wide range of diverging views in line with the broad range of recommendations made in our report on women and girls' safety on public transport, before making any final decision."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
SNP pays growing number of ‘fat cat' civil servants £100k
The number of senior Scottish civil servants earning more than £100,000 a year has grown under the SNP, figures show. The Scottish Government currently employs 73 senior civil servants (SCS), who are the heads of various departments and directorates. The highest paid is Caroline Lamb, the director-general of the health department and head of the Scottish NHS, whose annual salary is listed as between £205,000 and £209,000. Last year, only 66 staff were on six-figure salaries, adding up to a total of £7.5m. But the top tier of civil servants now costs taxpayers £8.6m a year in wages with many earning in excess of £110,000 – three times the average annual salary in Scotland. Levels of pay for SCS are set by the UK Government in Westminster, but the size of the civil service in Scotland is determined by Holyrood. There were 52 senior officials earning salaries of more than £100,000 in 2023, 38 in 2021 and just 14 as recently as 2018. This year, top earners included Joe Griffin, now the permanent secretary to the Scottish Government, who was paid £140,000 per year in his former role of director general of strategy and external affairs, and Alyson Stafford, who earns £160,000 per year as director general of the Scottish Exchequer. The growing wage bill has emerged after the Scottish Government launched a round of cuts to the budgets of NHS and mental health services citing growing financial pressures. Last September, Shona Robison, the finance secretary, announced £115.8m in cuts to health and social care as part of the SNP government's savings plan. Critics have criticised the 'out of control' cost of civil service wages to taxpayers, and accused the SNP of having the wrong priorities. Craig Hoy, the spokesman for finance and local government for the Scottish Conservatives, told the Mail: 'The civil service, and the cost of it, have ballooned out of control under the SNP's watch, and by far the biggest expansion has been in those on the highest salaries. 'When Scots are paying the UK's highest taxes, but seeing worsening services, there's no excuse for fat cat pay packages of this sort.' Equalities and rights roles also surged In May, it emerged that the number of civil servants working on equalities and human rights in Scotland had also grown under the SNP, surging by almost 50 per cent in two years. Scottish Government figures released under Freedom of Information laws showed the costs of its Equalities and Human Rights Directorate had risen sharply after a huge increase in staffing and salary levels. The number of officials on the department's payroll rose from 105.6 in 2022-23 to 152.7 in 2024-25 – an increase of 44.6 per cent. The period of the increase coincided with Nicola Sturgeon's government tabling the Gender Recognition Reform (GRR) Bill, which would have allowed biological men to change legal gender by simply signing a declaration.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
What is Yvette Cooper's plan to fast-track asylum claims?
As tensions flare up in the UK over migration, with protests taking place in Newcastle, Manchester and north London, the government is pursuing a new plan to reduce the asylum backlog. The home secretary has said she plans to introduce a fast-track scheme to turn around asylum decisions within weeks, via a 'major overhaul' of the appeal process. The plan is part of a wider attempt to crack down on the number of people crossing the Channel, with Ms Cooper announcing a 'one-in-one-out' returns deal with France earlier this year. But despite their efforts, last week it was revealed that the number of migrants arriving in the UK after crossing the English Channel topped 25,000 in record time, piling pressure on the government to take further action. It is hoped that the new plan will make a dent in the backlog and return people to safe countries faster, reducing the number of asylum seekers who are housed in hotels while awaiting the outcome of a claim or appeal. Here, The Independent takes a look at everything we know about the plan so far and how it will work in practice. How would the fast-track system work? Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation, including hotels, if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. But Yvette Cooper has now promised a 'major overhaul' of the appeal process, speeding up the time it takes for decisions on claims and appeals to be made. There are currently limited details on how this system would work, but sources told the Sunday Times it would allow decisions to be taken within weeks, rather than months or even years. Once a decision has been taken, those who have been rejected will be returned to their home country – reducing the number of people housed in temporary accommodation. 'If we speed up the decision-making appeal system and also then keep increasing returns, we hope to be able to make quite a big reduction in the overall numbers in the asylum system, because that is the best way to actually restore order and control,' Ms Cooper said. When will it be implemented? The home secretary has said she will legislate for the changes in autumn, when MPs return from their summer break. But it could take months for any legislation to pass through parliament, meaning we are unlikely to see the fast-track system implemented until the new year. How big is the asylum backlog and why is tackling it a priority? As of the end of March 2025, there were 78,745 asylum applications awaiting an initial decision – an 8 per cent decrease from the end of June 2024 and a 13 per cent decrease compared to the end of December 2024, official immigration statistics show. These outstanding cases related to 109,536 people, including both main applicants and their dependents. Labour has put a pledge to fix the 'broken' asylum system and crack down on the number of people coming to the UK on small boats at the centre of its plan for government. But with boat crossings at a record high, and the asylum backlog still above 75,000, there is mounting pressure on ministers to take more drastic action, a pressure exacerbated by the success of Reform UK in the polls. The government has also promised to end the use of asylum hotels before the end of this parliament, a promise it is unlikely to meet unless the backlog is reduced. Tensions over asylum hotels have flared up in recent weeks, with a protest and counter-protest taking place on Saturday outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel in north London, and also in Newcastle and Manchester.
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
SNP members set for second meeting to challenge Swinney's indyref bid
Party members are set to hold a meeting in September in Glasgow, ahead of the conference in Aberdeen the following month. It is understood that the Glasgow Kelvin branch has drafted a motion to challenge Swinney's three-point strategy. This follows more than 40 SNP branches backing a separate challenge to the First Minister's independence strategy, who are set to hold a meeting in Perth on August 9. READ MORE: I am a Palestinian. Keir Starmer's recognition plan is an insult The resolution states that while members believe the SNP is the only party to deliver independence, a 'new strategy is required'. It states that the next step should be to convince a 'significant majority' of people in Scotland to support independence. 'Determining this as the settled will of the majority will be demonstrated by ongoing national opinion polls over an extended time period,' it adds. It argues that to achieve this, the party should provide 'credible, objective and impartial' answers on questions voters have about independence, as well as separating the issue from 'day-to-day issues regarding the governance of Scotland'. The motion then calls on the SNP leadership to engage with non-political groups and political parties as a 'matter of urgency' on the issue of independence. It adds that this should be 'with a view to articulating as far as possible a common prospectus for independence and establishing a cross-party and non-party campaign to ensure that these objectives are firmly established before the next Holyrood elections'. The National understands that former [[SNP]] MEP and MP Alyn Smith was consulted during the drafting of the resolution, and then invited members from the Kelvin branch to outline the plan to members in Stirling. And now, Glasgow [[SNP]] branches will be invited to an event on Saturday September 20 at The Boardwalk Theatre, where Smith will be joined by professor John Curtice and professor Nicola McEwen. After the experts give their talks, members will be presented with the Kelvin branch's motion, and asked to vote on it. We previously told how members unhappy with Swinney's strategy argued that the party should 'prioritise obtaining a mandate from the sovereign Scottish people to deliver independence'. They argued this would be achieved with a majority vote for pro-independence parties at the next election. Whereas Swinney has insisted that an SNP majority is the most credible route forward.
