Limpopo Speaker denies R6m luxury car claims
In response to the claims, Makurupetje has called for a full investigation into the legislature's vehicle procurement practices. She rejected reports suggesting she bypassed National Treasury guidelines, which cap the cost of official vehicles at R1.2m.
'I was really shocked to hear that a vehicle was bought for me, and I deny the R6.5m expenditure,' she said.
Makurupetje clarified that upon assuming office in June, the official vehicle used by her predecessor had already exceeded its mileage limit, and the deputy speaker's vehicle had been involved in an accident. As a result, a procurement process for new vehicles was already underway before she and her deputy took office.
She disclosed that the vehicle assigned to her cost R1.4m, while a Mercedes-Benz purchased for the deputy speaker cost R1.5m.
Although both figures exceed the Treasury cap, she explained that the purchases fall under the Financial Management of Parliament and Provincial Legislatures Act of 2009 and not the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA), which applies to other government entities.
Makurupetje has ordered a detailed review to determine whether Treasury guidelines were breached. She also revealed that she recently learned of a third vehicle, which she has never seen. She is awaiting a full report from Legislature to clarify this issue. 'If it turns out that I was misled by the Secretary regarding the procurement of any vehicle, I will take decisive action,' she said.
The Speaker also referred to ongoing forensic audits within the legislature, which were launched following the resignation of the chief financial officer and the suspension of another senior finance official. She suggested that the recent media reports may be linked to resistance to internal reforms underway in the legislature.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
14 hours ago
- The Citizen
Mpumalanga mourns ‘the Cat': Tributes continue to pour in for DD Mabuza
The Mpumalanga Provincial Legislature's speaker, Linda Masina, said they are sending their deepest condolences to former deputy president and former premier of Mpumalanga, David 'DD' Mabuza. Mabuza passed away in hospital on July 3 at the age of 64, following a short illness. 'He was affectionately known as 'the Cat' after he referred to himself as such during a public address in front of the Legislature building. He jokingly said 'ngizwile ukuthi amagundane bekazenzela ngo-cheese (the rats were doing as they please with cheese) while the cat was away; now the cat is back',' Masina said. ALSO READ: Mpumalanga ANC mourns DD Mabuza's passing: 'A great tree has fallen' She described his death as a great loss. 'During his tenure as premier, Mabuza put important systems in place, ensuring Mpumalanga truly became the Place of the Rising Sun and that it works hard for its people. Mabuza will be sorely missed by every person who enjoys the privilege of shared experiences with and fond memories of him. 'His noble contribution will inspire the current and future generations of activists and leaders in governance and other aspects of life to pick up this baton and march forward,' said Masina. The funeral service will be held on Saturday, July 12. There will be three memorial services for Mabuza that will take place in the three regions of the province on Thursday, July 10. The family spokesperson, Desmond Moela, said other details about the funeral are still being discussed. According to him, the South African government will communicate its decision on how these proceedings will be run. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
IOL News
17 hours ago
- IOL News
DA supports Tshwane municipal manager amid ANC's challenge
Tshwane city manager Johann Mettler has faced criticism from the ANC over his 2022 appointment, which they claim was unlawful. Image: File The political battle over Tshwane municipal manager Johann Mettler's 2022 appointment is set to intensify in the coming weeks, with the DA backing him amid the ANC's continued efforts to have him removed over legality concerns. The ANC plans to mount efforts to remove Mettler by having its councillors request Speaker Mncedi Ndzwanana to convene a special council meeting to debate the validity of his appointment. On Friday, ANC regional secretary George Matjila said the party will also push for a council resolution to file a court application seeking a declaratory order to declare Mettler's appointment unlawful and have it set aside. In response, the DA is consulting lawyers to act against such an attempt and has called on Mayor Nasiphi Moya to pronounce her stance on the latest attack to get rid of Mettler. The ANC's attack on Mettler centres on three main grounds, which include his alleged lack of qualifications at the time of appointment in 2022, irregularities in the selection panel's composition, and his failure to acquire the required minimum competency levels within the 18-month period that ended on February 28, 2024. 'Therefore, the appointment of Mr Mettler as the City Manager is null and void and stands to be set aside in a competent court,' Matjila said. Mettler is accused of lacking the requirement of 12 years' experience, with at least five years at a senior management level, as he has only 11 years' experience. Matjila claimed that the selection panel's composition contravened the Municipal Systems Act, as it included four councillors instead of the prescribed maximum of two. DA Tshwane caucus leader Cilliers Brink dismissed the claims, highlighting Mettler's experience as municipal manager in Drakenstein and Nelson Mandela Bay. He added that Mettler was also involved in drafting the White Paper on Local Government in the late 1990s, making him one of the most experienced local government practitioners still working. Brink said Mettler possesses the minimum competencies required by the Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA) and completed the necessary courses in 2023. He noted that the National Treasury and the Finance Minister have never questioned Mettler's competencies under the MFMA. Regarding the composition of the interview panel, Brink said the panel was in compliance with the regulations.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
SA's Debt Crisis: A Crippling Embrace of the World Bank
(From left) President of World Bank, Mr Ajay Banga, Brazil President Lula da Silva, India Prime Minister Narendra Modi, President Cyril Ramaphosa and US President Joe Biden on the margins of the G20 Leaders' Summit held at the Bharat Mandapam International Exhibition Convention Centre in New Delhi, India on September 9, 2023. Image: GCIS Zamikhaya Maseti On June 24, 2025, the National Treasury released an official statement: 'South Africa and the World Bank sign USD 1.5 billion loan agreement to support infrastructure modernisation and development.' According to Treasury, the loan will 'unlock key infrastructure bottlenecks,' particularly in the energy and freight transport sectors. The financing terms are said to be generous: a 16-year maturity, a three-year grace period, and an interest rate benchmarked at the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) + 1.49%. In simple Development Finance terms, this interest margin suggests that the loan carries relatively favourable conditions compared to commercial borrowing. The World Bank technocrats would have us believe that this Development Policy Loan (DPL) is both progressive and developmental. But behind this clinical language of policy and project finance lies a deeper crisis, a State slowly surrendering its developmental autonomy in exchange for liquidity. In 2022, South Africa was granted a US$750 million COVID-19 relief loan, drawn from the same DPL mechanism. It was intended to stabilise the health system and support social protection. But that loan was scavenged shamelessly and systematically by the compradorial bourgeoisie and economic vultures. They tore through it like hyenas around a carcass. Who can forget, during the great looting spree, how overnight, car guards, taxi owners, tavern tycoons, traditional leaders, and healers became registered 'suppliers' of the Personal Protective Equipment (PPEs)? Most of the PPEs were of dubious quality, grossly overpriced, and delivered late, if at all, while the dying masses gasped for breath in overcrowded, under-equipped COVID-19 wards. Those who survived the pandemic awoke in a country where the crisis had been monetised, and the hospital became a feeding trough for a corrupt elite dressed in designer ethics. Yes, another World Bank loan. Another embrace of the very institution that generations of African Political Economists from Walter Rodney to Samir Amin warned us would never be a partner in liberation. The intellectual bloodlines of our radical thinkers have long declared: the Bretton Woods institutions are not development partners; they are enforcers of dependency. Walter Rodney, in How Europe Underdeveloped Africa, did not write in polite ambiguity. He was precise and surgical. Underdevelopment, he argued, was not a historical accident nor a technical gap, but a deliberate act imposed through imperial finance, colonial infrastructure, and economic coercion. Today, that analysis breathes again. South Africa, a constitutional democracy, a supposed developmental State, is now borrowing from the very institution that has for decades rehearsed economic suffocation across the continent: Ghana, Zambia, Kenya. We are told this loan will modernise transport corridors, reform Eskom, and support a 'green economy transition.' But herein lies the enduring warning of African Political Economy scholars of the 1960s and 70s: World Bank conditionalities were never neutral technocratic tools. They were ideological weapons designed to discipline post-colonial states and re-inscribe Western hegemony in economic terms. In the first decade of economic development and independence (1960–1970), newly independent nations like Ghana and Tanzania pursued bold paths of import substitution, state-led industrialisation, and social welfare. The World Bank responded by pressuring them to liberalise trade, dismantle subsidies, and invite foreign capital. When they resisted, funding was frozen. Sovereignty was punished. In the second decade of economic development and independence (1970–1980), as oil shocks and collapsing commodity prices crippled African economies, the World Bank returned not with solidarity, but with Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs): austerity masquerading as reform. Zambia was forced to privatise its mines, slash public spending, and devalue its currency. These were not technical corrections. They were ideological assaults driven by a neoliberal agenda to open Africa's veins to global capital. Development was delayed. Poverty was institutionalised. Today, South Africa, which still boasts of its economic sophistication, appears to have forgotten these lessons. Our gross government debt has now ballooned to R5.2 trillion, more than 74% of GDP, with R385 billion spent annually just to service that debt. This is not fiscal management, this is economic haemorrhaging. And we have yet to account for the hidden costs of this new loan: procurement dependency, policy capture, and technocratic drift. At the centre of this crisis lies the crumbling foundation of our public health system. For decades, it leaned heavily on foreign aid, especially from USAID, which supported HIV, TB, and maternal health programmes. But now, under Donald Trump's second term with its evangelical, nationalist, anti-globalist turn, USAID funding has been pulled. The consequences are immediate and brutal: clinics without ARVs, retrenched health workers, and rural hospitals collapsing. The system is already disintegrating. And into these vacuum steps, the World Bank not with a health rescue package, but with a spreadsheet of infrastructure loans and governance reforms. So, we must ask, again: what exactly is this new loan for? What does a 'green transition' mean when rural clinics can't even keep the lights on? Will Eskom's restructured grid serve the poor, or simply power private extraction? Why has there been no public debate, no parliamentary interrogation, no provincial consultation? Is South Africa bankrupt? Not yet, in the narrow technical sense. But ideologically, we are bankrupt of imagination. Development has been outsourced to multilateral lenders with no stake in our sovereignty. The borrowing continues, but each loan chips away at our autonomy, our dignity, our democratic will. We must re-read Walter Rodney. Revisit Samir Amin. Reclaim the dreams of Kwame Nkrumah, Samora Machel, Steve Biko, and Robert Sobukwe. Maybe we must begin to learn from Captain Ibrahim Traoré of Burkina Faso, who is sending the imperialists packing.
