
Trump's pharmaceutical tariffs will dig America deeper into medical debt
A vast number of Americans today rely on prescription medications. Over 60 percent of adults have at least one prescription filled every year.
These statistics rise dramatically as we grow older. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found an estimated nine out of 10 people over the age of 65 rely on these drugs to maintain their long-term health.
Many adults admit to not taking their medications due to fears over cost. Almost half of adults age 50 and older 'have either skipped filling a prescription due to costs or know someone who has,' according to research by the American Association of Retired Persons.
U.S. prescription drug prices are almost three times higher than those of other countries. The U.S. 'pays higher prices for prescription drugs than any other country in the world,' notes the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
In part, that's because some of the most widely used drugs in America are imported from other countries.
Pharmaceutical imports have more than doubled in recent decades, rising from $65 billion in 2006 to $151 billion in 2019. They include many popular drugs that treat diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, cancer, blood clots, schizophrenia and obesity, among others.
The long-term goal of boosting U.S. drug manufacturing to make America less reliant on pharmaceutical production from other countries, lower drug costs and increase medication access is an important endeavor.
But the policies we enact to try and achieve this desired outcome must be weighed carefully to avoid creating short-term price spikes and drug shortages that could hurt millions of people.
Trump initially said his tariff proposal wouldn't go into effect for another year. He has since changed this view by indicating the U.S. may 'start off' with a lower tariff as early as Aug. 1, and raise it to a 'very high tariff' in a 'year or so.'
But experts have issued warnings about the possible impact these tariffs will have on public health, saying even a year isn't enough time for the U.S. drug industry to build the required infrastructure necessary to meet U.S. supply demands.
'That would be potentially disastrous for every person because we need those pharmaceuticals, and it takes those companies a long time to produce them here in the U.S.,' said Afsaneh Beschloss of RockCreek Group in response to Trump's proposed tariff plan.
UBS analysts noted Trump's initial proposal to delay enforcement of a 200 percent tariff by 12 months still provides ' insufficient time ' for drug companies to relocate manufacturing operations to the U.S.. A four-to-five-year horizon is more realistic, they say.
What's more, research commissioned by the pharmaceutical industry lobby group PhRMA found that a mere 25 percent tariff would increase U.S. drug prices by almost $51 billion.
Trump's tariff proposals will hurt those dependent on generic medications especially hard. That's because nearly 80 percent of generic capsules and tablets Americans consume come from outside the U.S.
Analysis by Brookings found that, given the low margins on generic prescriptions, tariff pressure could result in the discontinuation of certain drugs that, for many, are their only affordable option.
As of last year, Americans owed at least $220 billion in collective medical debt. Fourteen million owed over $1,000. Three million owed over $10,000.
Americans cannot absorb billions in added drug price hikes as a result of ill-designed and poorly timed tariff increases. It will place undue economic burden on those who can least afford it by creating drug shortages and impacting access to critical therapies people need to lead long, healthy lives.
Trump's policies will be shouldered most by the elderly, the disabled and the marginalized — communities that require access to reasonably-priced prescription drugs.
It took decades for U.S. pharmaceutical production to move overseas; moving it back to America can't happen overnight.
We need measured policy approaches, not knee-jerk ones, to prevent America's most vulnerable from digging themselves further in debt to pay for medications many already can't afford.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Bizarrely Claims He Wants Elon Musk To ‘Thrive' After Threatening Him
President Donald Trump says he wants Elon Musk to 'thrive' just weeks after threatening to end the tech billionaire's government contracts. 'Everyone is stating that I will destroy Elon's companies by taking away some, if not all, of the large scale subsidies he receives from the U.S. Government. This is not so!' Trump wrote Thursday on Truth Social. He continued, 'I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE, in fact, THRIVE like never before! The better they do, the better the USA does, and that's good for all of us. We are setting records every day, and I want to keep it that way!' The POTUS' comments appear to be a total 180 from his recent statements from both himself and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt amid the ongoing drama with Musk, the former head of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency. On Wednesday, Leavitt said that she does not think Trump supports federal agencies contracting with Musk's artificial intelligence company, xAI. After Leavitt was questioned about whether she thinks Trump would seek to have the government cancel the contract with the corporation, which was announced last week, Leavitt said she would discuss it with the president. Musk scored the contract for up to $200 million with the Department of Defense alongside three other major tech firms — Anthropic, Google and OpenAI. In June, Trump also threatened to axe federal contracts with Musk-run businesses, such as SpaceX. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' the president wrote in a June 5 Truth Social post. Musk quickly fired back on X, formerly Twitter, writing, 'Go ahead, make my day …' Trump and Musk have been at odds since May after the businessman's temporary advisory role in the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency ended. Following Musk's exit, the pair have taken several digs at each other. Trump announced in June that he would 'look' into Musk's deportation (Musk was born in South Africa). Meanwhile, the Tesla head has publicly slammed Trump's controversial spending and tax bill, also known as the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Related... Tesla Shares Sink As Elon Musk Predicts 'Rough Quarters' Ahead Looming Over Two Cases Threatening Musk's Car Company Is A Single Question: Can He Be Trusted? Elon Musk Soft Launches 'NSFW' AI Companion A Week After Chatbot Goes On Antisemitic Tirade
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's order to block 'woke' AI in government encourages tech giants to censor their chatbots
Tech companies looking to sell their artificial intelligence technology to the federal government must now contend with a new regulatory hurdle: prove their chatbots aren't 'woke.' President Donald Trump's sweeping new plan to counter China in achieving 'global dominance' in AI promises to cut regulations and cement American values into the AI tools increasingly used at work and home. But one of Trump's three AI executive orders signed Wednesday — the one "preventing woke AI in the federal government' — also mimics China's state-driven approach to mold the behavior of AI systems to fit its ruling party's core values. Several leading providers of the AI language models targeted by the order — products like Google's Gemini, Microsoft's Copilot — have so far been silent on Trump's anti-woke directive, which still faces a study period before it gets into official procurement rules. While the tech industry has largely welcomed Trump's broader AI plans, the anti-woke order forces the industry to leap into a culture war battle — or try their best to quietly avoid it. 'It will have massive influence in the industry right now,' especially as tech companies 'are already capitulating' to other Trump administration directives, said civil rights advocate Alejandra Montoya-Boyer, senior director of The Leadership Conference's Center for Civil Rights and Technology. The move also pushes the tech industry to abandon years of work to combat the pervasive forms of racial and gender bias that studies and real-world examples have shown to be baked into AI systems. 'First off, there's no such thing as woke AI,' she said. 'There's AI technology that discriminates and then there's AI technology that actually works for all people.' Molding the behaviors of AI large language models is challenging because of the way they're built. They've been trained on most of what's on the internet, reflecting the biases of all the people who've posted commentary, edited a Wikipedia entry or shared images online. 'This will be extremely difficult for tech companies to comply with,' said former Biden official Jim Secreto, who was deputy chief of staff to U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, an architect of many of Biden's AI industry initiatives. 'Large language models reflect the data they're trained on, including all the contradictions and biases in human language.' Tech workers also have a say in how they're designed, from the global workforce of annotators who check their responses to the Silicon Valley engineers who craft the instructions for how they interact with people. Trump's order targets those 'top-down' efforts at tech companies to incorporate what it calls the 'destructive' ideology of diversity, equity and inclusion into AI models, including 'concepts like critical race theory, transgenderism, unconscious bias, intersectionality, and systemic racism.' For Secreto, the order resembles China's playbook in 'using the power of the state to stamp out what it sees as disfavored viewpoints." The method is different, with China relying on direct regulation through its Cyberspace Administration, which audits AI models, approves them before they are deployed and requires them to filter out banned content such as the bloody Tiananmen Square crackdown on pro-democracy protests in 1989. Trump's order doesn't call for any such filters, relying on tech companies to instead show that their technology is ideologically neutral by disclosing some of the internal policies that guide the chatbots. 'The Trump administration is taking a softer but still coercive route by using federal contracts as leverage,' Secreto said. 'That creates strong pressure for companies to self-censor in order to stay in the government's good graces and keep the money flowing.' The order's call for 'truth-seeking' AI echoes the language of the president's one-time ally and adviser Elon Musk, who frequently uses that phrase as the mission for the Grok chatbot made by his company xAI. But whether Grok or its rivals will be favored under the new policy remains to be seen. Despite a 'rhetorically pointed' introduction laying out the Trump administration's problems with DEI, the actual language of the order's directives shouldn't be hard for tech companies to comply with, said Neil Chilson, a Republican former chief technologist for the Federal Trade Commission. 'It doesn't even prohibit an ideological agenda,' just that any intentional methods to guide the model be disclosed, said Chilson, who is now head of AI policy at the nonprofit Abundance Institute. 'Which is pretty light touch, frankly.' Chilson disputes comparisons to China's cruder modes of AI censorship. 'There is nothing in this order that says that companies have to produce or cannot produce certain types of output,' he said. 'It says developers shall not intentionally encode partisan or ideological judgments. That's the exact opposite of the Chinese requirement.' So far, tech companies that have praised Trump's broader AI plans haven't said much about the order. OpenAI on Thursday said it is awaiting more detailed guidance but believes its work to make ChatGPT objective already makes the technology consistent with what the order requires. Microsoft, a major supplier of email, cloud computing and other online services to the federal government, declined to comment Thursday. Musk's xAI, through spokesperson Katie Miller, a former Trump official, pointed to a company comment praising Trump's AI announcements as a 'positive step' but didn't respond to a follow-up question about how Grok would be affected. Anthropic, Google, Meta, and Palantir didn't immediately respond to emailed requests for comment Thursday. AI tools are already widely used in the federal government, according to an inventory created at the end of Biden's term. In just one agency, U.S. Health and Human Services, the inventory found more than 270 use cases, including the use of commercial generative AI platforms such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini for internal agency support to summarize the key points of a lengthy report. The ideas behind the order have bubbled up for more than a year on the podcasts and social media feeds of Sacks and other influential Silicon Valley venture capitalists, many of whom endorsed Trump's presidential campaign last year. Much of their ire centered on Google's February 2024 release of an AI image-generating tool that produced historically inaccurate images before the tech giant took down and fixed the product. Google later explained that the errors — including one user's request for American Founding Fathers that generated portraits of Black, Asian and Native American men — was the result of an overcompensation for technology that, left to its own devices, was prone to favoring lighter-skinned people because of pervasive bias in the systems. Trump allies alleged that Google engineers were hard-coding their own social agenda into the product, and made it a priority to do something about it. 'It's 100% intentional,' said prominent venture capitalist and Trump adviser Marc Andreessen on a podcast in December. 'That's how you get Black George Washington at Google. There's override in the system that basically says, literally, 'Everybody has to be Black.' Boom. There's squads, large sets of people, at these companies who determine these policies and write them down and encode them into these systems.' Sacks credited a conservative strategist for helping to draft the order. 'When they asked me how to define 'woke,' I said there's only one person to call: Chris Rufo. And now it's law: the federal government will not be buying WokeAI,' Sacks wrote on X. Rufo responded that, in addition to helping define the phrase, he also helped 'identify DEI ideologies within the operating constitutions of these systems.' Matt O'brien, The Associated Press Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hims & Hers (HIMS) Soars 16% on Bullish Analyst Outlook
We recently published . Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (NYSE:HIMS) is one of the biggest performers on Wednesday. Hims & Hers rallied for a second day on Wednesday, adding 16.02 percent to close at $58.02 apiece as investors took path from an investment firm's bullish outlook and rating for the company. In a market note on Wednesday, Zacks Research gave Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (NYSE:HIMS) a 'strong buy' recommendation on expectations that its 2025 earnings per share will improve by 177.8 percent year-on-year. Zacks also underscored Hims & Hers Health, Inc.'s (NYSE:HIMS) expansion program with the recent acquisition of ZAVA, a European digital health platform operating in the UK, Germany, France, and Ireland. 'This acquisition, announced in June 2025, grants Hims & Hers access to over 1.3 million active customers and nearly 2.3 million consultations delivered in 2024 by ZAVA's in-house medical team,' Zacks noted. 'The integration of ZAVA's technology with Hims & Hers' established brand positions it to deliver personalized, seamless digital healthcare across key European markets,' it added. Pixabay/Public Domain According to Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (NYSE:HIMS), it is scheduled to announce the results of its April-June earnings performance after market close on August 4. While we acknowledge the potential of HIMS as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data