SpaceX launches two new O3b mPOWER satellites for SES
SES has announced the launch of two additional O3b mPOWER satellites aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, which lifted off from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida at 5:12 pm local time. The newly launched satellites will enhance global coverage and increase capacity for SESs second-generation medium Earth orbit (MEO) network, O3b mPOWER.
In operation since 2024, the O3b mPOWER system has been delivering high-performance connectivity to a range of customers across mobility, government, enterprise and cloud sectors worldwide. The two new satellites join eight others already in orbit, providing scalable services from tens of megabits to multiple gigabits per second to users anywhere on the globe.
Three more satellites are currently in production and are scheduled to launch in 2026. Once the full constellation is deployed by 2027, SES expects a threefold increase in total system capacity, further strengthening its global service offerings.
SES CEO Adel Al-Saleh said: 'Im proud of our SES team and partners for continuously pushing the boundaries of whats possible in space to bring critical connectivity where it matters most. Over the past year, our O3b mPOWER services have been transforming industries and empowering our key customers including telco operators, cruise lines, airlines, NATO, the Government of Luxembourg, the Government of United States and many other allied governments. With this launch we continue adding incremental capacity to our initial O3b mPOWER constellation, strengthening our MEO network and delivering high throughput and predictable low latency services at scale.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TECHx
2 days ago
- TECHx
Starlink Outage Hits Thousands After Software Failure
Home » Latest news » Starlink Outage Hits Thousands After Software Failure SpaceX's Starlink suffered a major outage on Thursday, affecting tens of thousands of users globally. The Starlink outage was caused by an internal software failure, according to the company. Users across the U.S. and Europe reported connectivity issues around 3 p.m. EDT (1900 GMT), as per Downdetector, which recorded up to 61,000 user reports. Starlink, which serves over 6 million users in nearly 140 countries and territories, acknowledged the problem on its official X account. The company announced that it was actively working on a solution. Service was mostly restored after 2.5 hours, Michael Nicolls, vice president of Starlink Engineering, revealed on X. 'The outage was due to failure of key internal software services that operate the core network,' Nicolls wrote, apologizing for the disruption and confirming efforts to find the root cause. Elon Musk also apologized, stating, 'Sorry for the outage. SpaceX will remedy root cause to ensure it doesn't happen again.' Experts commented on the incident, noting the unusual scale of the Starlink outage. Doug Madory, an analyst at internet monitoring firm Kentik, reported that the outage was global. 'This is likely the longest outage ever for Starlink, at least while it became a major service provider,' he said. The outage has sparked discussions about possible causes, including a software glitch, a failed update, or even a cyberattack. Gregory Falco, director of a space and cybersecurity lab at Cornell University, speculated, 'I'd guess this is a bad software update, not entirely dissimilar to the CrowdStrike issue with Windows last year, or a cyberattack.' Key details include: SpaceX launched more than 8,000 Starlink satellites since 2020 to build its low-Earth orbit network. The company is partnering with T-Mobile to provide direct-to-cell text messaging services in rural areas. Starlink's growing user base has pushed SpaceX to focus on enhancing network speed and bandwidth. The company's Starshield unit, which handles military satellite services, holds significant contracts with the Pentagon and U.S. intelligence agencies. It remains unclear if these services were affected by the Starlink outage. The incident is being compared to a 2024 CrowdStrike cybersecurity software update that caused worldwide flight cancellations and disrupted 8.5 million Microsoft Windows devices. Source: Reuters
Broadcast Pro
2 days ago
- Broadcast Pro
NASA launches mission to study Earths magnetic shield
Riding along with TRACERS aboard the Falcon 9 were NASAs Athena EPIC, PExT and REAL missions, three small satellites to demonstrate new technologies and gather scientific data. NASA has launched its latest space science mission, TRACERS, aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California. Short for Tandem Reconnection and Cusp Electrodynamics Reconnaissance Satellites, the twin TRACERS spacecraft will explore how Earths magnetic field interacts with solar activity, offering new insights into the forces shaping space weather and their impact on the planet. This mission marks a pivotal moment in NASAs heliophysics research, as the twin satellites will orbit through the polar cusp, an open area of Earth's magnetic field near the North Pole, to examine magnetic reconnection events. These magnetic explosions occur when the Suns magnetic field, carried by solar wind, collides with Earth's magnetosphere, triggering rapid changes that send charged particles hurtling into the atmosphere. Flying just seconds apart, the two TRACERS satellites will collect a 3,000 measurements within a year to build a detailed, time-sequenced picture of how this dynamic process unfolds. Acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy said: 'NASA is proud to launch TRACERS to demonstrate and expand American preeminence in space science research and technology. The TRACERS satellites will move us forward in decoding space weather and further our understanding of the connection between Earth and the Sun. This mission will yield breakthroughs that will advance our pursuit of the Moon, and subsequently, Mars.' Joe Westlake, Heliophysics Division Director at NASA Headquarters in Washington, added: 'NASAs heliophysics fleet helps to safeguard humanitys home in space and understand the influence of our closest star, the Sun. By adding TRACERS to that fleet, we will gain a better understanding of those impacts right here at Earth.' Ground controllers successfully established communication with both TRACERS spacecraft within hours of launch. Over the next month, engineers will conduct a commissioning phase to ensure all instruments and systems are functioning correctly. Once operational, the satellites will begin their 12-month mission, measuring how incoming solar particles interact with Earth's magnetic shield and affect near-Earth space. David Miles, TRACERS Principal Investigator at the University of Iowa, stated: 'The successful launch of TRACERS is a tribute to many years of work by an excellent team. TRACERS is set to transform our understanding of Earths magnetosphere. Were excited to explore the dynamic processes driving space weather.' In addition to TRACERS, three other NASA missions, Athena EPIC, PExT and REAL, rode along on the Falcon 9 rocket. These small satellites are designed to test new technologies and gather scientific data. Athena EPIC, led by NASAs Langley Research Centre in partnership with NOAA and the US Space Force, will demonstrate a flexible commercial satellite architecture and collect longwave radiation measurements from Earth. PExT will test a wideband polylingual terminal that can switch between commercial and government networks, paving the way for more adaptable space communications. REAL, a CubeSat from Dartmouth College, will study how energetic electrons are scattered from the Van Allen radiation belts into the atmosphere, improving understanding of particles that pose risks to spacecraft and astronauts. The TRACERS mission is led by the University of Iowa with support from the Southwest Research Institute and other academic partners, including UCLA and UC Berkeley. The mission is managed by NASAs Heliophysics Explorers Programme at Goddard Space Flight Centre under the Heliophysics Division in Washington. The launch was carried out under NASAs Venture-class Acquisition of Dedicated and Rideshare (VADR) contract, overseen by the Launch Services Program at Kennedy Space Centre.
Middle East Eye
2 days ago
- Middle East Eye
Starmer's 'all guns, no butter' policy will cost him dearly
The recent Nato summit demanded that member states agree to reach a target of five percent of GDP on defence spending over the next decade. Nato secretary general Mark Rutte was beside himself with joy. This will make Nato 'more lethal', he vowed. Rutte was in no doubt as to why Nato had successfully agreed on this historic high in arms spending: US President Donald Trump, or 'daddy', as Rutte called him. In embarrassingly fulsome messages to Trump, made public by the US president, Rutte put to shame the most obsequious courtier in an 18th-century absolute monarchy, as he verbally prostrated himself at the feet of the ruler of the empire. In all fairness to Rutte, he was correctly summarising the view of European governments. Much as some claim to dislike Trump, they have fallen in line with his demands for increased arms expenditures in double-quick time. All but Spain endorsed the five-percent defence spending target, despite the fact that the US spends only 3.5 percent of GDP on arms. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Trump was triumphant, using the Nato news conference to rub the noses of European leaders in the latest proof that the US is the organisation's top dog. Never has founding secretary general Lord Ismay's aphorism - that Nato exists to keep 'the Soviet Union [read Russians] out, the Americans in, and the Germans [read Europeans] down' - been more true. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is an unqualified enthusiast for rearmament. The most clearly defining policy of his prime ministership so far, where so much else is shrouded in serial U-turns, is a commitment to US-led rearmament. The picture of Starmer at the recent G7 summit bowing at Trump's knee to pick up papers that the president had dropped went viral, because it accurately captured the political relationship between the two governments. Credibility gap Starmer, of course, signed up to the five percent of GDP rearmament target and coupled it with a commitment to buy a dozen American F35A fighters capable of carrying a nuclear payload, marking the first time the UK will have the capacity to deliver airborne nukes since the Cold War. The cost of this programme alone will be £15bn. More broadly, the newly publicised Strategic Defence Review underpins Starmer's over-inflated rhetoric about the UK needing to prepare to fight on the 'home front' in the case of a full land invasion of the UK. Such a project, unsuccessfully contemplated by Napoleon and Hitler, was last accomplished in 1066. There is no plausible modern candidate for this project. Russia, with an economy the size of Spain's and a military depleted by three years of unsuccessful war in Ukraine, is certainly not the 21st-century equivalent of either Napoleon or Hitler when their empires spanned the continent. Indeed, having failed to reach Kyiv, it is improbable to the point of absurdity to think that Russian troops might soon be on the Normandy beaches. The period of high Starmerism is past. Now the pendulum is swinging in the other direction, back towards traditional centrist Labourism The UK defence establishment and government are well aware that this huge credibility gap exists in the minds of British voters. The Strategic Defence Review spends an unusual amount of time worrying about how rearmament can be sold to the population. It calls for a 'national endeavour', first mooted by the previous Tory government, in which a wide variety of propaganda and 'educational' weapons will be fired at hapless citizens in order to reduce them to compliance with the warmongers' project. And there is no Starmer speech that does not echo the Strategic Defence Review's insistence that there will be a 'defence dividend', in the Orwellian language now common in government circles, that will result in more jobs. So far, the 'national endeavour' project is failing spectacularly. The purchase of F35A jets is a case in point. It's a slap in the face for Unite the Union general secretary Sharon Graham, who campaigned relentlessly for a renewal of the Eurofighter Typhoon fleet in the name of British jobs. In a sharp lesson in the UK's defence subservience to the US arms industry, Starmer ignored her and opted instead to flatter Trump with a purchase of American planes manufactured by Lockheed Martin, with only 15 percent of UK-made components. Leadership in danger But even when money spent by the UK government isn't pouring directly into the bank accounts of US defence contractors, it will never produce the same number of jobs as the same amount of money spent on civilian industry. Defence spending is simply a massively inefficient way of generating jobs. Beyond these specific arguments is the gigantic fact that Starmer is advocating huge increases in arms expenditures, while hacking away at the already emaciated welfare budget. The assault on welfare, the defining project of the first year of the Labour administration, has already produced a record-breaking back bench rebellion. This in turn produced yet another screeching U-turn from Starmer. Accompanying the U-turn is the blame game. At the moment, No. 10 guru Morgan McSweeney and 'iron chancellor' Rachel Reeves are the ones catching it in the neck. Starmer is running out of road Read More » As tens of thousands of people at the recent Glastonbury Festival cursed Starmer's name, Starmer himself has been busy apologising for his own mistakes to any journalist who will listen. A sure sign that Starmer's leadership is endangered was Health Secretary Wes Streeting's recent TV interview, in which he refuted criticism of the Glastonbury crowd by saying that Israel should get its 'own house in order'. Starmer is now a couple of by-election losses away from a leadership challenge. Perhaps he can make it to the May 2026 council elections if the fates spare sitting MPs and no by-election takes place. But whatever the timing proves to be, the period of high Starmerism is past. Now the pendulum is swinging in the other direction, back towards traditional centrist Labourism. A number of important consequences follow. Firstly, the time for Jeremy Corbyn to launch a new leftist party is now. Secondly, no new party can afford to be merely an electoral project: it must have the closest possible relations with Palestine and antiwar movements whose activists will be its core constituency. Thirdly, the antiwar movement will be central to ongoing opposition to the government. Reeves or her successor will return to the task of extracting the money for rearmament from working people, one way or another. The defence of working-class living standards at home will be intimately bound to opposition to the preparation for war abroad. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
