Super Earth in ‘Goldilocks zone' discovered with new alien-hunting tool – now it will search for more habitable planets
Searching for Earth -like planets - and Earth-like life - is the ultimate goal for planetary science.
3
3
And finding planets that lie in the Goldilocks zone of their sun-like stars – where the conditions are 'just right' to possibly host life – is key to that mission.
An international team of scientists, led by the Yunnan Observatories of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), have used a new technique to find these potentially habitable worlds.
It's called the Transit Timing Variation (TTV) technique - which looks for changes in the predicted transit times of an exoplanet.
If the time changes, it could indicate the presence of other unseen planets in the system that are gravitationally influencing the transiting planet.
The technique is a good way to detect smaller planets that would otherwise be difficult to find
By analysing the TTV signals of Kepler-725b, a gas giant planet in the same system, the team were able to find its hidden sister planet Kepler-725c, according to a new study published in Nature Astronomy.
Researchers said the technique offers a promising alternative in the hunt for "Earth 2.0."
Kepler-725c has 10 times the mass of Earth and is located in the habitable zone of the sun-like star Kepler-725.
It receives roughly 1.4 times the solar radiation than Earth does.
Best-ever sign of ALIEN life found on distant planet as scientists '99.7% sure of astounding biological activity signal'
Located in the Lyra constellation, the Super Earth planet completes an orbit of its nearby star every 207.5 days.
During part of this orbit, the planet enters its star's habitable zone - meaning it could host alien life.
Little else is known about the planet so far.
It is the first time it has been used to discover a Super-Earth, a type of rocky exoplanet that is larger than Earth but too small to be considered a gas giant like Neptune.
Astronomers have relied on alternative techniques to find exoplanets for decades.
Like the transit method, where astronomers track how the light from a host star dims when a planet passes in front of it.
Or through radial velocity (RV) observations, which is when scientists watch the slight wobble of a star as it interacts with the gravitational pull of an orbiting planet.
However, both of these techniques have their flaws and make it difficult to detect planets with long orbital periods.
The transit approach, for example, requires a planet's orbit to align exactly with our line of sight from Earth.
Whereas the RV method requires extremely high-precision measurements, which makes it harder to find smaller planets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
BYD Sealion 7 vs Tesla Model Y: Which mid-size SUV is best?
You can hardly move for new mid-size electric SUVs in 2025. The category has become the de facto battleground for the world's car makers and, for years now, the Tesla Model Y has topped sales charts. The planet's best-selling car is the obvious benchmark against which all newcomers are measured. One of the latest hopefuls seeking to challenge Tesla's dominance, the BYD Sealion 7 arrives from China with more than a hint of the Model Y about it. Tesla built its reputation on a minimalist, software-first approach, prioritizing range, efficiency and charging network. Chinese battery and automotive giant BYD takes a more traditional route, focusing on premium materials, lavish interior design and a feature-rich experience from the moment you step inside. Families and company car drivers making the switch to electric have a decision to make. Can the Sealion 7's build quality and luxurious cabin justify a higher price tag against the newly refined and more affordable Model Y? We've compared both cars to find out. How we tested and compared We've driven both the Tesla Model Y and BYD Sealion 7 extensively on a variety of roads in the UK and abroad. Close attention is paid to performance and handling when navigating around town centres, along country roads and at motorway speeds. As well as assessing ride quality, we put their infotainment systems through their paces and tested the practicality of their back seats and boot capacity. Specs Independent rating: 6/10 Independent rating: 9/10 Pros: Now rides better, super quiet, the best tech, efficient Cons: Still a firm ride, others do quality better, no Apple CarPlay or Android Auto Price range: £44,990 to £60,990 Battery size: 75kWh Maximum claimed range: 387 miles Miles per kWh: 4.4v Maximum charging rate: 250kW Battery, range and charging Winner: Tesla Model Y – it goes further on a smaller, more efficient battery and is backed by a convenient charging network The BYD Sealion 7 enters the arena with a larger top-spec battery at 91.3kWh, but only manages a maximum claimed range of 312 miles from it. The Sealion 7's 230kW peak charging speed is respectable, but that shorter range means that overall efficiency is just average. In contrast, the newly updated Tesla Model Y offers a maximum range of 387 miles from a smaller and lighter 75kWh battery. The charging speed is roughly similar at a peak of 250kW, but the Model Y benefits from Tesla's greatest asset: the Supercharger network. The car's navigation leads you to the best charger for any given journey and automatically preconditions the battery before you arrive, a value-add that BYD can't match. Performance and drive When it comes to performance, both the BYD Sealion 7 and Tesla Model Y offer a snappy 0-62mph time of 4.5 seconds and more than enough instant acceleration for any situation. BYD is so proud of that figure it puts it on the badge on the boot. Although performance is the same, the difference is in how they behave on the road. Our full BYD Sealion 7 review describes the ride as an unsatisfying combination of 'wallowy and firm'. The mid-size SUV leans through corners and can feel bouncy, but it's also firm over potholes, with unresponsive steering that fails to live up to the sporty performance figures. This is where the new and updated Model Y pulls ahead. The biggest flaw of the original car – its harsh ride – has been addressed. Our full Tesla Model Y review calls it 'far more composed over bumps' and a 'much more mature, even luxurious car.' While still firm, the Model Y is no longer uncomfortable and a lot more pleasant to drive, giving it an edge over the BYD. Interior and practicality Winner: BYD Sealion 7 – for its superior materials and premium cabin Here's where the Sealion 7 lands its most convincing punches. Stepping inside, the cabin feels genuinely premium, with high-quality, posh materials and an intricate, flowing design. The build quality is impressive and passenger space is excellent, especially in the rear. The Tesla Model Y's minimalist cabin has been subtly upgraded with more comfortable seats and better materials, but it can't match the traditional luxury or lavish feel of the BYD. For buyers who value plushness and smart design, the Sealion 7 has the clear advantage. In terms of practicality, both of these mid-size SUVs are evenly matched. The BYD has a slightly bigger 520-litre boot and a 58-litre frunk, and holds a healthy 1,789 litres with the seats folded down. The Tesla officially lists its boot size as 854 litres, though that's measured to the roof. Measure to the window-line like most brands and you get something nearer to Sealion 7. Fold down the seats and the Model Y boasts a total cargo volume of 2,138 litres. Price and value Winner: Tesla Model Y – it's cheaper to buy across all trim levels while offering significantly more range Undercutting the market leader on price is a proven strategy for any challenger brand, so it's odd that BYD has chosen to do the opposite. The entry-level Sealion 7 starts at £46,990, a full £2,000 more than the entry-level Tesla Model Y at £44,990, despite the Tesla offering more range for the money. The price gap only widens as you add more kit. The top-spec, all-wheel-drive Sealion 7 Excellence is priced at a hefty £58,990, whereas the new Model Y Long Range All-Wheel Drive seems cheap by comparison at just £51,990. For your extra £7,000, the BYD gives you significantly less driving range, too. While BYD does offer a longer six-year vehicle warranty compared to Tesla's four, it's not enough to overcome a fundamental shortcoming in price and performance – the value proposition is not in the Sealion 7's favour. Technology and infotainment Winner: Tesla Model Y – Tesla is renowned for its slick and integrated user experience, but BYD isn't far behind in terms of intuitive software. Compatibility with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto give the Sealion 7 an undeniable usability boost, too BYD has equipped the Sealion 7 with a showstopping 15.6in rotating touchscreen that's crisp, responsive and supports both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. With clever usability touches and a brilliant Dynaudio sound system, it's an excellent standalone piece of kit. The Tesla Model Y sticks to its minimalist principles with a single 15.4in screen that controls everything. It still doesn't offer Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, which will be a deal-breaker for some. However, its strength lies in its neatly integrated software ecosystem. The native navigation, seamless link to the Supercharger network and the best-in-class smartphone app give drivers a hassle-free user experience. The addition of a new 8in screen for rear passengers is another advantage over the BYD. The verdict: BYD Sealion 7 vs Tesla Model Y The BYD Sealion 7 would be a compelling rival to the Tesla Model Y, but it's scuppered out of the gate by its pricing strategy. It's a spacious and well-built SUV with a premium-feeling interior and some excellent technology – in a vacuum, the Sealion 7 is an impressive car. But in a market dominated by the Model Y, the Sealion 7 is edged out by the Tesla in too many key areas. The Sealion 7 is more expensive, has less range, is less efficient and offers a less composed driving experience than its main rival. The 2025 update puts the Tesla Model Y back at the top of its game. It may not have the luxury feel of the BYD's cabin, but it's the superior EV and the more rewarding and economical car to own and drive.
The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
China summons Nvidia over 'backdoor safety risks' in H20 chips
China 's cyberspace regulators on Thursday summoned Nvidia over security concerns that its H20 chips can be tracked and turned off remotely, the Cyberspace Administration of China said on its website. In the meeting, Chinese regulators demanded that the U.S. chip company provide explanations on 'backdoor safety risks' of its H20 chips to be sold in China and submit relevant materials, the office said. ' Cybersecurity is critically important to us. NVIDIA does not have 'backdoors' in our chips that would give anyone a remote way to access or control them,' an Nvidia spokesperson said in a statement to AP. It came just about two weeks after the Trump administration lifted the block on the computing chips and allowed Nvidia to resume sales of H20 chips to the Chinese market. Jensen Huang, chief executive of Nvidia, made the announcement with fanfare when he was in Beijing earlier this month. The latest episode appears to be another turbulence in the tech rivalry between the United States and China, which have left businesses in both countries tussling with governments over market access and national security concerns. Any safety concern by Beijing could jeopardize the sale of H20 chips in China. Citing unnamed U.S. AI experts, the Chinese regulators said Nvidia has developed mature technology to track, locate and remotely disable its computing chips. The regulators summoned Nvidia to 'safeguard the cybersecurity and data security of Chinese users,' in accordance with Chinese laws, the statement said. The statement also referred to a call by U.S. lawmakers to require tracking and locating capabilities on U.S. advanced chips sold overseas. In May, Rep. Bill Huizenga, R.-Michigan, and Rep. Bill Foster, D.-Illinois, introduced the Chip Security Act that would require high-end chips to be equipped with 'security mechanisms' to detect 'smuggling or exploitation.' The bill has not moved through Congress since its introduction. Foster, a trained physicist, then said, 'I know that we have the technical tools to prevent powerful AI technology from getting into the wrong hands.' The U.S. still bans the sale to China of the most advanced chips, which are necessary for developing artificial intelligence. Both countries aim to lead in the artificial intelligence race. The Trump administration in April blocked the sales of H20 chips, which Nvidia developed to specifically comply with U.S. restrictions for exports of AI chips to China. After the ban was lifted, Nvidia expected to sell hundreds of thousands more H20 chips in the Chinese market. But the easing of the ban has raised eyebrows on Capitol Hill. On Monday, a group of top Democratic senators, including Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer, wrote to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to express their 'grave concerns". While chips like the H20 have differing capabilities than the most advanced chips such as Nvidia's H100, 'they give (China) capabilities that its domestically-developed chipsets cannot,' the senators wrote. Shortly after the ban was lifted, Rep. John Moolenaar, R.-Michigan, who chairs the House Select Committee on China, objected. 'The Commerce Department made the right call in banning the H20. Now it must hold the line,' Moolenaar wrote in a letter to Lutnick. 'We can't let the CCP use American chips to train AI models that will power its military, censor its people, and undercut American innovation," Moolenaar wrote, referring to the Chinese Communist Party by its acronym.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Nvidia says its chips have no 'backdoors' after China flags H20 security concerns
BEIJING/SAN FRANCISCO, July 31 (Reuters) - Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab said on Thursday its products have no "backdoors" that would allow remote access or control after China raised concerns over potential security risks in the firm's H20 artificial intelligence chip. The Cyberspace Administration of China, the country's internet regulator, said it was concerned by a U.S. proposal for advanced chips sold abroad to be equipped with tracking and positioning functions. The CAC's move cast uncertainty over the U.S. company's sales prospects in China weeks after a U.S. export ban was reversed. The regulator said it had summoned Nvidia to a meeting on Thursday to explain whether its H20 AI chip had any backdoor security risks, as it was worried that Chinese user data and privacy rights could be affected. A backdoor risk refers to a hidden method of bypassing normal authentication or security controls. In a statement, an Nvidia spokesperson said, "Cybersecurity is critically important to us. Nvidia does not have 'backdoors' in our chips that would give anyone a remote way to access or control them." The White House and both houses of U.S. Congress have proposed the idea of requiring U.S. chip firms to include location verification technology with their chips to prevent them from being diverted to countries where U.S. export laws ban sales. The separate bills and White House recommendation have not become a formal rule, and no technical requirements have been established. Nvidia has been a focus of U.S.-China relations, and China's move comes shortly after the U.S. this month reversed an April ban on Nvidia selling the H20 chip to China. The company developed the H20 chip for the Chinese market after the U.S. imposed export restrictions on advanced AI chips in late 2023. "Nvidia chips are now dispensable for China. They can be easily put on the negotiating table," said Tilly Zhang, an analyst with Gavekal Dragonomics. "China obviously has more courage and domestic substitution capabilities compared to previous years to not rely on overseas technology." This month, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang embarked on a public and effusive visit to China, where he sought to demonstrate his commitment to the Chinese market, met with government officials, and praised the country's AI advances. The CAC statement did not elaborate on what backdoor security risks there could be or say what the Chinese government was considering doing as a result. Charlie Chai, an analyst with tech- and consumer-focused 86Research, said Beijing's warning was likely a symbolic stance against similar objections made by U.S. authorities. "However, we do not believe Beijing will make excessively harsh demands or introduce regulatory hurdles that will effectively drive Nvidia out of China, for the lack of alternatives. China still needs Nvidia chips for domestic research and applications," Chai said. Nvidia's products are highly sought after not just by Chinese tech companies but also by Chinese military bodies, state-run AI research institutes, and universities. The company last week placed an order with contract manufacturer TSMC for 300,000 H20 chipsets due to strong demand, Reuters reported. Chinese authorities and industry associations have in the past accused U.S. tech companies of posing security risks, with varying consequences. In early 2023, China barred key operators of the country's infrastructure from purchasing from Micron (MU.O), opens new tab, saying that a review it conducted had found the U.S. memory chipmaker's products posed serious security risks. Last year, the Cybersecurity Association of China, an industry group, called for Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab products sold in China to be subject to a security review, but Chinese regulators have not publicly responded. Nvidia is also facing an antitrust investigation in China. The State Administration for Market Regulation announced late last year it was investigating the chipmaker over suspected violations of the country's anti-monopoly law. The regulator said Nvidia was also suspected of violating commitments it made during its acquisition of Israeli chip designer Mellanox Technologies, under terms outlined in the regulator's 2020 conditional approval of that deal.
