Supreme Court Issues Notice To Assam Chief Secretary Over Goalpara Demolition Drive
The Supreme Court on Thursday issued notice on a plea seeking contempt action against the Assam Chief Secretary and other officials for allegedly conducting a mass eviction and demolition drive in Goalpara's Hasila Beel in violation of the apex court guidelines.
A bench, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai, sought responses of Chief Secretary Ravi Kota, Principal Secretary, Revenue & Disaster Management Department, Gyanendra Dev Tripathi, Goalpara's District Commissioner Khanindra Choudhury, Goalpara's Superintendent of Police Nabaneet Mahanta, and other officials in the matter.
"Issue notice, returnable in two weeks. [P]ersonal presence of the alleged contemnnor(s) is dispensed with, until further orders," ordered the Bench, also comprising Justice K. Vinod Chandran.
As per the plea, filed through advocate Adeel Ahmed, no sufficient time or any opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners and in an "arbitrary and high-handed manner" a notice was issued to remove their houses, structures, shops, buildings and crops within two days.
"The houses, crops, properties, belongings, etc. of the petitioners and other similarly situated persons have all been demolished in the eviction and demolition exercise."
The petitioners, claiming to be landless, said that their forefathers had to settle in the Hasila Beel revenue village of Balijana Revenue Circle about 50 to 60 years ago after losing their houses and land due to the riverbank erosion of the river Brahmaputra.
The plea said that the eviction and demolition exercise was carried out without granting a personal hearing and without providing adequate time for appeal or judicial review, in blatant violation of the guidelines issued in the case titled "In Re: Directions in the matter of demolition of structures".
In November last year, a bench of then Justice Gavai and Justice K.V. Viswanathan laid down pan-India directives governing demolitions of unauthorised structures.
The top court had cautioned that flouting its directions by state authorities will result in criminal contempt and prosecution.
Issuing a slew of directions under Article 142 of the Constitution, the apex court said that no demolition will be carried out without a prior show-cause notice. It added that the demolition order will not be implemented for a period of 15 days and will be displayed on a designated digital portal to be maintained by every municipal and local authority. The Supreme Court had clarified that its directions will not be applicable if there is an unauthorised structure in any public place, such as a road, street, footpath, abutting railway line or any river body or water bodies and also to cases where there is an order for demolition made by a court of law.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Civil rights body to host meet on religious freedom on Aug. 9
Civil Rights Initiative Internationale (CRII) is organising a national conference on 'Religious Freedom in India: Is It Still a Far Cry from Reality?' at the Centenary Baptist Church, Secunderabad, on August 9. Addressing a press conference here on Tuesday, CRII national president K. Babu Rao said the meet would respond to the deepening crisis of religious freedom and rising attacks on Christian communities across the country. He said the conference would examine the legal and constitutional framework guaranteeing religious freedom and also review Supreme Court judgments relevant to the rights of religious minorities. Mr. Babu Rao, a former IPS officer of Madhya Pradesh cadre, noted that the meet would highlight recent case studies of persecution and legal harassment and discuss strategic responses to growing religious extremism and discrimination. He also announced plans to launch a national advocacy network to defend constitutional rights and pluralism. By bringing together senior advocates, constitutional experts, church leaders, journalists and civil society voices, CRII seeks to forge a collective strategy to defend faith, restore rights and uphold the dignity of every Indian citizen, especially those facing targeted discrimination, he added. The key speakers at the conference include Director of Advocacy (Asia) for ADF International Tehmina Arora, Supreme Court advocate Franklin Caesar Thomas, and Hyderabad Institute of Theology and Apologetics director Rev. Sudhakar Mondithoka, apart from Rao.
India Today
43 minutes ago
- India Today
Language used by Trump unfortunate: Ex-diplomat on ‘dead economy' jibe at India
Former top American diplomat Richard Haass analyses the state of US-India relations, noting that Donald Trump's unilateralist foreign policy is causing friction. Haass points to American frustration with India's economic protectionism and its purchase of Russian oil. Conversely, he acknowledges India's right to be frustrated by the American president's rhetoric and infringements on its strategic autonomy. Haass observes a concerning trend: "...what seems to be happening now over the last six months is some of the old mutual questioning or scepticism, a lack of confidence, a lack of trust has re-entered this relationship."
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
SC judges' observation on Rahul Gandhi unwarranted: Opposition floor leaders' meet
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The INDIA bloc floor leaders on Tuesday termed as "extraordinary" and "unwarranted" the observations of two Supreme Court judges about leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, including the comments that "if you were a true Indian, you would not have said this".On her part, Gandhi's sister and Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra said the SC judges "do not decide" who a true Indian is."All the (floor) leaders of the INDIA parties agreed that the sitting judge has made an extraordinary observation, which is unwarranted, on the democratic rights of political parties. It is the responsibility of political parties, especially the leader of Opposition, to comment on issues of national interest. When a government fails so spectacularly to defend our borders, it is every citizen's moral duty to hold it accountable," said a Congress press release after the floor leaders' to media queries later, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra said, "With due respect to the honourable judges, they do not decide who a true Indian is. It is the duty of the Opposition leader to question the government. My brother would never speak against the Army, he holds them in the highest respect. This is a misinterpretation."When media persons asked about the observations about Gandhi made by the judges on Monday, SP leader Akhilesh Yadav said, "BJP should tell the (border) area of India then and the area of India now. The day they give an answer, we will take out a Tiranga Yatra."
