White House responds to outrage over Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle ad
President Trump's communications director Steven Cheung called the backlash 'moronic,' arguing that liberal critics wrongly labeled the campaign tone‑deaf and accusing cancel culture of fueling the controversy.
Cancel culture run amok. This warped, moronic, and dense liberal thinking is a big reason why Americans voted the way they did in 2024. They're tired of this bullshit. pic.twitter.com/He7Ji6O3VF — Steven Cheung (@StevenCheung47) July 29, 2025
Meanwhile, US Senator Ted Cruz publicly defended Sydney Sweeney, mocking the critics in a post on X (formerly Twitter), saying, 'Now the crazy Left has come out against beautiful women. I'm sure that will poll well.'
Cruz dismissed claims of eugenics undertones and reposted a New York Post article describing the backlash.
American Eagle has not issued a public response. After the campaign launched, the company disabled comments on key posts and quietly substituted alternate visuals, including imagery featuring a woman of color to soften the message.
The campaign itself, including its tagline and key scripts, remains unchanged.
Despite the clamor, the limited-edition 'Sydney Jean' line sold out quickly, and American Eagle's stock rose by 7–10% in the days following the rollout.
Proceeds are being donated to Crisis Text Line, a nonprofit focused on mental health and domestic violence support.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Missed signals, lost deal: How India-US trade talks collapsed
NEW DELHI/WASHINGTON: After five rounds of trade negotiations, Indian officials were so confident of securing a favourable deal with the United States that they even signalled to the media that tariffs could be capped at 15%. Indian officials expected US President Donald Trump to announce the deal himself weeks before the August 1 deadline. The announcement never came. New Delhi is now left with the surprise imposition of a 25% tariff on Indian goods from Friday, along with unspecified penalties over oil imports from Russia, while Trump has closed larger deals with Japan and the EU, and even offered better terms to arch-rival Pakistan. Interviews with four Indian government officials and two U.S. government officials revealed previously undisclosed details of the proposed deal and an exclusive account of how negotiations collapsed despite technical agreements on most issues. The officials on both sides said a mix of political misjudgment, missed signals and bitterness broke down the deal between the world's biggest and fifth-largest economies, whose bilateral trade is worth over $190 billion. The White House, the U.S. Trade Representative office, and India's Prime Minister's Office, along with the External Affairs and Commerce ministries, did not respond to emailed requests for comment. India believed that after visits by Indian Trade Minister Piyush Goyal to Washington and U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance to Delhi, it had made a series of deal-clinching concessions. New Delhi was offering zero tariffs on industrial goods that formed about 40% of U.S. exports to India, two Indian government officials told Reuters. Despite domestic pressure, India would also gradually lower tariffs on U.S. cars and alcohol with quotas and accede to Washington's main demand of higher energy and defence imports from the U.S., the officials said. 'Most differences were resolved after the fifth round in Washington, raising hopes of a breakthrough,' one of the officials said, adding negotiators believed the U.S. would accommodate India's reluctance on duty-free farm imports and dairy products from the U.S. India accuses EU, US of double standard over Russian trade It was a miscalculation. Trump saw the issue differently and wanted more concessions. 'A lot of progress was made on many fronts in India talks, but there was never a deal that we felt good about,' said one White House official. 'We never got to what amounted to a full deal - a deal that we were looking for.' Over-confidence and miscalculation Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who visited Washington in February, agreed to target a deal by fall 2025, and more than double bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030. To bridge the $47 billion goods trade gap, India pledged to buy up to $25 billion in U.S. energy and boost defence imports. But officials now admit India grew overconfident after Trump talked up a 'big' imminent deal, taking it as a signal that a favourable agreement was in hand. New Delhi then hardened its stance, especially on agriculture and dairy, two highly sensitive areas for the Indian government. 'We are one of the fastest growing economies, and the U.S. can't ignore a market of 1.4 billion,' one Indian official involved in the negotiations said in mid-July. Negotiators even pushed for relief from the 10% average U.S. tariff announced in April, plus a rollback of steel, aluminium and auto duties. Later, India scaled back expectations after the U.S. signed trade deals with key partners, including Japan and the European Union, hoping it could secure a similar 15% tariff rate with fewer concessions. That was unacceptable to the White House. 'Trump wanted a headline-grabbing announcement with broader market access, investments and large purchases,' said a Washington-based source familiar with the talks. An Indian official acknowledged New Delhi wasn't ready to match what others offered. South Korea, for example, struck a deal just before Trump's August 1 deadline, securing a 15% rate instead of 25% by offering $350 billion in investments, higher energy imports, and concessions on rice and beef. Communication breakdown 'At one point, both sides were very close to signing the deal,' said Mark Linscott, a former US Trade Representative who now works for a lobby group that is close to the discussions between the two nations. 'The missing component was a direct line of communication between President Trump and Prime Minister Modi.' India braces for higher US tariffs, eyes broader trade deal A White House official strongly disputed this, noting other deals had been resolved without such intervention. An Indian government official involved in the talks said Modi could not have called, fearing a one-sided conversation with Trump that could put him on the spot. However, the other three Indian officials said Trump's repeated remarks about mediating the India-Pakistan conflict further strained negotiations and contributed to Modi not making a final call. 'Trump's remarks on Pakistan didn't go down well,' one of them said. 'Ideally, India should have acknowledged the U.S. role while making it clear the final call was ours.' A senior Indian government official blamed the collapse on poor judgment, saying top Indian advisers mishandled the process. 'We lacked the diplomatic support needed after the U.S. struck better deals with Vietnam, Indonesia, Japan and the EU,' the official said. 'We're now in a crisis that could have been avoided.' Trump said on Tuesday he would increase the tariff on imports from India from the current rate of 25% 'very substantially' over the next 24 hours and alleged that New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil were 'fuelling the war' in Ukraine. Way forward Talks are ongoing, with a U.S. delegation expected in Delhi later this month and Indian government officials still believe the deal can be salvaged from here. 'It's still possible,' one White House official said. The Indian government is re-examining areas within the farm and dairy sectors where concessions can be made, the fourth official said. On Russian oil, India could reduce some purchases in favour of U.S. supplies if pricing is matched. 'It likely will require direct communication between the prime minister and the president,' said Linscott. 'Pick up the phone. Right now, we are in a lose-lose. But there is real potential for a win-win trade deal.'
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Gold inches lower as dollar gains, markets await Fed appointments
Gold prices edged lower on Wednesday due to a slightly firmer dollar, while investors held back from making big bets ahead of U.S. President Donald Trump's decision on appointments to the Federal Reserve. Spot gold was down 0.2% at $3,374.72 per ounce, as of 0442 GMT, after hitting a near two-week high on Tuesday. U.S. gold futures fell 0.1% to $3,429.80. The dollar rebounded from a one-week low hit in the previous session, reducing gold's appeal to holders of other currencies. 'Gold has been caught between conflicting forces. The drop in yields has helped, but the U.S. dollar has managed to hold up well despite Friday's selloff. That has produced the range we're now seeing, as prices wait for conviction across the catalysts,' said Ilya Spivak, head of global macro at Tastylive. Trump on Tuesday said he would soon announce a short-term replacement for Fed Governor Adriana Kugler, who announced her resignation on Friday, as well as his pick for the next Fed chair. The CME FedWatch tool now puts the odds of a September cut at nearly 87%, after Friday's weaker-than-expected employment growth data, following which Trump fired the commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). On the trade front, Trump again threatened to raise tariffs on goods from India over its Russian oil purchases, while New Delhi called his attack 'unjustified' and vowed to protect its economic interests, deepening the trade rift between the two countries. Elsewhere, Perth Mint's gold product sales fell 33% in July from the previous month, while silver sales slipped to a six-month low, the refiner said on Wednesday. Spot silver was steady at $37.82 per ounce, platinum slipped 0.5% to $1,314.76 and palladium fell 0.6% to $1,168.42.
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Intra-day update: rupee maintains positive trend against US dollar
The Pakistani rupee maintained its upward trajectory against the US dollar, appreciating 0.05% during the opening hours of trading in the inter-bank market on Wednesday. At 10:15am, the currency was hovering at 282.43, a gain of Re0.14. On Tuesday, the currency settled at 282.57. Internationally, the US dollar was rangebound on Wednesday, with investors choosing to stay on the sidelines ahead of US President Donald Trump's pick to fill a coming vacancy on the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors. Trump said on Tuesday he will decide on a nominee by the end of the week and had separately narrowed the possible replacements for Fed Chair Jerome Powell to a short list of four. Data out the same day also showed the US services sector activity unexpectedly flatlined in July even as input costs climbed by the most in nearly three years, underscoring the hit from Trump's tariffs on the economy, which has also begun to bite corporate earnings. Still, those did little to sway the dollar, as traders were hesitant to take on fresh positions ahead of news on who would fill the Fed board vacancy. Concerns are mounting that partisan loyalty would invade the staid world of central bank policy. The dollar was last little changed at 147.54 yen, while the euro ticked up 0.02% to $1.5760. Sterling last bought $1.3304. Against a basket of currencies, the dollar was last at 98.76, still some distance away from its peak of 100.25 hit on Friday before the nonfarm payrolls figures. Traders continue to price in an over 90% chance of a Fed cut in September, with about 58 basis points worth of easing expected by the year-end. Oil prices, a key indicator of currency parity, climbed on Wednesday, rebounding from a five-week low in the previous day, on concerns of supply disruptions after US President Donald Trump's threats of tariffs on India over its Russian crude purchases. Brent crude futures rose 29 cents, or 0.4%, to $67.93 a barrel by 0119 GMT while US West Texas Intermediate crude was at $65.44 a barrel, up 28 cents, or 0.4%. Both contracts fell by more than $1 on Tuesday to settle at their lowest in five weeks, marking a fourth session of losses, on oversupply concerns from OPEC+'s planned September output hike. This is an intra-day update
