logo
Blind Spots: Comparing the Vision Costs of Weight-Loss Drugs

Blind Spots: Comparing the Vision Costs of Weight-Loss Drugs

Medscape18-06-2025
While reviewing patient cases with residents one morning, Joseph F. Rizzo III, MD, mentioned he recently cared for a patient who had taken semaglutide and developed severe optic neuropathy. One resident reported that she had just seen a patient in the emergency room with a similar history, presenting with the same eye condition. A week later, Rizzo saw yet another one of these patients.
'It seemed improbable that it would just be a coincidence,' Rizzo, director of Neuro-Ophthalmology Service at Massachusetts Eye and Ear, a teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School in Boston, told Medscape Medical News .
Eventually, Rizzo and several residents published research of patients at the clinic. It was the first study to show an association between the use of semaglutide and nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), according to the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Weight-loss drugs are known to affect vision in a small subset of patients. Labeling for GLP-1 receptor agonists such as semaglutide and tirzepatide include warnings about the increased risk for diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. The label for the combination of phentermine and topiramate warns of a risk for acute myopia and secondary angle-closure glaucoma, and the label for the combination of naltrexone and bupropion lists the risk for angle-closure glaucoma.
But which drug carries the lowest risk for vision complications remains a tricky question.
'Nobody has really done any true head-to-head comparisons of' the weight-loss drugs, said Mollie Cecil, MD, a spokesperson for the Obesity Medicine Association.
All weight-loss drugs have the potential to change the shape of the eye lens, which can cause transient blurring of vision. They also can worsen diabetic retinopathy due to a dramatic drop in blood sugar and increase the risk for blindness from NAION, said Rahul N. Khurana, MD, a spokesperson for the American Academy of Ophthalmology and an ophthalmologist at Northern California Retina Vitreous Associates in Mountain View, California.
'I don't think we have enough data to say one drug is safer than the other,' he said.
A Shifting Vision of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
Rizzo and his colleagues' study published in JAMA Ophthalmology in July 2024 included nearly 2000 patients with type 2 diabetes or obesity. Those who took semaglutide had a four to seven times higher risk for NAION than those who did not take GLP-1 receptor agonists.
Rizzo said one limitation of the study was selection bias because patients were cared for at an eye hospital staffed by neuro-ophthalmologists, which was more likely to have patients with NAION. His team recently finished a nationwide study analyzing data on the same subject that has not yet been published, he said.
Numerous studies published since then have shown conflicting results, including a lower or higher risk for NAION than that reported in Rizzo's research or no increase in risk.
After Rizzo's study was published, the American Academy of Ophthalmology and other groups said further research was necessary to definitively say whether the drug causes NAION. The groups did not recommend that patients stop taking semaglutide unless they had a sudden loss of vision.
The use of GLP-1 receptor agonists has also been associated with other vision problems.
A recent study found patients with diabetes taking these drugs had a twofold higher risk for neovascular age-related macular degeneration than a matched cohort of patients who did not take a GLP-1 receptor agonist.
But the newer class of drugs may be safer for other patients, such as those who have obesity and do not have diabetes. A retrospective cohort study published earlier this year in Ophthalmology found the risk for primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension was significantly lower in this population of patients taking GLP-1 receptor agonists than in those taking other weight-loss medications, such as the combination of phentermine and topiramate.
'I don't really think any of these are better for vision, although there is evidence that GLP-1 agents may be protective against glaucoma,' said Angelo Tanna, MD, vice chair of the Department of Ophthalmology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago.
Older Drug, New Insights
Approved by the FDA in 1959 for the treatment of obesity, phentermine is the most commonly prescribed weight-loss drug in the US, according to a study published in January in JAMA Open Network .
Katherine Talcott, MD, a vitreoretinal surgeon at the Cole Eye Institute at the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, said some data suggest GLP-1 receptor agonists can worsen diabetic retinopathy. She and her colleagues had not seen a study on the effect of phentermine having the same effect, so they set out to do so in patients with overweight and obesity. Their study found phentermine was associated with a decreased future risk for a new diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy or the need for intravitreal anti-VEGF injections.
'It's great that there's an additive protective effect by being on the medicine,' she said.
However, phentermine is also associated with blurred vision and serious ocular side effects, with case reports of branch retinal artery occlusion, acute myopia and acute angle closure, and NAION.
Topiramate and Angle Closure
Tanna at Northwestern University said ocular adverse events associated with weight-loss drugs are rare but can have devastating consequences. Tanna co-authored a 2015 case report in the Journal of Glaucoma of bilateral angle closure in a woman who took the combination of phentermine and topiramate. He said he has seen a handful of cases of this rare reaction in patients taking topiramate, but this was the only case in which the drug was being used for weight loss.
A study analyzing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database found that topiramate was 30% more likely to be associated with reports of vision impairment than semaglutide.
Vision impairment included optic ischemic neuropathy, blindness, and reduced visual acuity.
Another study, published last year in Ophthalmology Glaucoma , identified topiramate with the most reports of angle-closure glaucoma in the FAERS database over a 20-years period.
A case report in 2014 also documented bilateral angle-closure glaucoma induced by topiramate several days after initiation of the drug. The combination of naltrexone and bupropion for weight loss also has been associated with this adverse event, along with bupropion alone for depression.
Choosing a Drug
Cecil said she considers several factors when deciding which weight-loss drug to prescribe, including a patient's preexisting eye health.
'If you have somebody who has not yet developed peripheral vascular disease or diabetes, without compelling evidence I think that all weight-loss drugs would have about the same safety,' she said.
But insurance coverage and affordability are often the biggest drivers of her decisions.
'If I didn't have to worry about insurance, I really would lean on the GLP-1s for most patients because they are safe, they are effective, and we are discovering more and more secondary benefits to them all the time, including decrease in cardiovascular disease,' Cecil said.
Rizzo said he does not discourage patients from taking semaglutide. But he urges caution for patients who have already lost vision for any reason.
'They have to make their own informed decision about whether they might be willing to accept what we believe is an increased risk,' he said.
Cecil noted that for patients with complicated chronic diseases, clinicians must be careful not to blame a drug when a patient develops an eye condition that may be related to their disease state.
'That's one of the reasons why in obesity medicine, we talk so much about how important it is to really, truly have an individualized treatment plan,' she said.
Rizzo reported being a consultant for Life Biosciences, machineMD, and Viridian Therapeutics. Tanna reported being a consultant for Alcon, Ivantis, and Zeiss. Other sources reported having no relevant financial conflicts of interest.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Students are unsung heroes of university research, and federal research funding cuts hurt them most
Students are unsung heroes of university research, and federal research funding cuts hurt them most

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Students are unsung heroes of university research, and federal research funding cuts hurt them most

Old Main building in the main campus of Penn State University, State College. (Getty Images) One of my doctoral students recently graduated, and with his experience as a student researcher, he secured a job in a research lab at a large information technology company. That's part of how federal research funding makes an impact: it provides crucial support to train the next generation of scientists, engineers, inventors, and entrepreneurs. Sharp reductions in funding to the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health are in the news, and much more depends on their funding than the creation of knowledge. We risk not only lost research, but also lost training for highly skilled labor, with repercussions that may never be fully remedied. I'm an associate professor in the College of Information Sciences and Technology at Penn State, and I frequently encounter misconceptions when I talk about what it's like to perform research as a professor. Many people think that professors do all of the work of research, with students having minimal or no involvement. Within STEM (science technology, engineering, and mathematics), that's far from the truth. Modern research is labor-intensive and requires the involvement of many people, especially students. It's common for a research-active professor to have several students working with them on projects. Professors know the landscape of their subject area and they use that knowledge to identify productive research topics, to guide students through developing them, and to help them create impactful results. Students run experiments, collect samples and data, and analyze results, among other tasks. Professors sometimes say that their students run individual projects, while the professor provides strategic leadership and runs the lab. Research grants pay for the expenses of research, and student salaries and tuition are two of the largest expenses. In the grants I receive, they're the largest direct costs by far. Many STEM graduate students, especially doctoral students, are employed as research assistants. These positions pay a small salary to perform research and typically cover tuition and benefits too. Without that financial support, these students wouldn't be able to devote five or six years to the research activities and training necessary for a doctoral degree. Toward workforce development, research is one of the most effective — and personally rewarding –ways that we can train students for future STEM careers. Student researchers learn how to tackle difficult problems for which there are no answer keys, because research is the process of creating the answers. They learn to work in collaborative teams, give presentations, write well, and integrate feedback on their work. All of this happens in a hands-on, open-ended setting that course-based learning does not provide. The benefits to students exceed those, even. Graduate student researchers build professional networks by collaborating and attending conferences. Undergraduate researchers get intellectual enrichment beyond what coursework can provide, as well as a preview of what graduate school is like. Anecdotally, regardless of their career paths, many student researchers also report high satisfaction with their work. The knowledge that one researcher creates might be modest, but the aggregation of that knowledge –across many researchers, over time — improves our understanding of the natural world and produces new technologies to benefit humanity. Replacing academic research with corporate research is sometimes floated as an option, but this is infeasible for multiple reasons. One is the distinction between applied research and basic research. Applied research is focused on creating knowledge specifically to enable new products and services. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE In contrast, basic research expands what humanity knows or what we can do, both in a broad sense. Applied research relies upon people trained in an environment of basic research, where they have the freedom to think creatively and study fundamental problems. Research universities provide that environment. Beyond that distinction, the costs of training researchers make it unlikely for companies to provide the same experience universities are built to offer. Doctoral students spend several years learning how to perform research, and during that equivalent time in a company, they would contribute little—if anything—to the company's bottom line. Except at a few very large companies, creating a robust learning environment doesn't fit into industry structure or goals, while universities are designed around education. I already see the repercussions of uncertainty in the funding landscape: one of my master's students lost a research assistantship that he expected to receive this fall. This is one example among many of a growing disruption in our universities' abilities to produce skilled researchers. This production can withstand small disruptions, but a large one like we're witnessing puts it in serious peril. We depend on student researchers for many advancements in science and technology, and they depend on us to support their work. Pennsylvania's legislators and our representatives in Congress can play their role by standing up for NSF and NIH funding. Shomir Wilson is an associate professor in the College of Information Sciences and Technology at the Pennsylvania State University, where he leads the Human Language Technologies Lab. He received a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Maryland in 2011, and has worked or studied at nine universities across four continents. He writes from State College. Readers may email him at shomir@ and follow him on Bluesky at ‪@ Solve the daily Crossword

SpaceX launch today: Everything to know about SES O3b mPOWER launch from Cape Canaveral, Florida
SpaceX launch today: Everything to know about SES O3b mPOWER launch from Cape Canaveral, Florida

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

SpaceX launch today: Everything to know about SES O3b mPOWER launch from Cape Canaveral, Florida

SpaceX is targeting an afternoon-rush-hour Falcon 9 rocket launch today from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station — but the stormy forecast only projects 50-50 odds of favorable launch weather. SpaceX's two-hour launch window opens at 5:12 p.m. The Falcon 9 will ascend due east, then deploy two SES O3b mPOWER satellites in medium-Earth orbit. However, the Space Force's 45th Weather Squadron forecast only calls for 50% odds of "go for launch" weather, citing potential development of showers and thunderstorms near the Cape powerful enough to pack wind gusts of 40 mph to 50 mph. Primary meteorological concerns: anvil clouds, cumulus clouds and surface electric fields. No Brevard County sonic booms should occur during today's mission. Rather, the rocket's first-stage booster will target landing aboard a SpaceX drone ship out at sea 8½ minutes after liftoff. Check back for live FLORIDA TODAY Space Team launch coverage updates on this page, starting about 90 minutes before the launch window opens. When SpaceX's live webcast begins about 15 minutes before liftoff, we'll post it below next to our countdown clock. Cape Canaveral: Is there a launch today? Upcoming SpaceX, NASA, ULA rocket launch schedule at Cape Canaveral Countdown Timer For the latest news and launch schedule from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and NASA's Kennedy Space Center, visit Another easy way: Click here to sign up for our weekly Space newsletter. Rick Neale is a Space Reporter at FLORIDA TODAY. Contact Neale at Rneale@ Twitter/X: @RickNeale1 Space is important to us and that's why we're working to bring you top coverage of the industry and Florida launches. Journalism like this takes time and resources. Please support it with a subscription here. This article originally appeared on Florida Today: SpaceX rocket launch today: What to know before liftoff from Florida Solve the daily Crossword

Common antimicrobial chemical associated with skin problems in kids
Common antimicrobial chemical associated with skin problems in kids

Washington Post

time8 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Common antimicrobial chemical associated with skin problems in kids

Children with twice the level of the antimicrobial chemical triclosan in their urine were 23 percent more likely to report eczema symptoms than those with lower concentrations, according to research published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives. Triclosan was commonly found in antibacterial soaps and body washes before 2016, when the Food and Drug Administration restricted its use in consumer wash products after finding that it was no more effective than standard soap and water. However, according to the Cleveland Clinic, triclosan can still be found in some toothpastes, deodorants, cosmetics and detergents.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store