This Stock Is Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence (AI), but Is It a Buy Right Now?
Google Cloud is Alphabet's fastest-growing segment, increasing revenue 28% year over year in the first quarter.
Alphabet is currently trading at a lower valuation than every other "Magnificent Seven" stock and the S&P 500.
10 stocks we like better than Alphabet ›
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been one of the most discussed subjects over the past few years. It's far from a new technology, but with the explosion in popularity of generative AI tools like OpenAI's ChatGPT, it has soared into the mainstream.
The AI landscape is layered and evolving daily. Some companies are laying the groundwork and foundation for developing the technology, others are using this foundation to build their own tools, and some are perfectly content with simply using tools, like the average user.
When it comes to companies shaping the future of AI, one of the first to come to mind is Google's parent company, Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG)(NASDAQ: GOOGL), which has been one of the key players in the development of AI as we know it today.
What makes Alphabet so important to AI development starts with its research. Through its companies DeepMind and Google Research, Alphabet has been responsible for some of AI's biggest breakthroughs.
It developed the transformer architecture that powers large language models (LLMs); it developed an AI program called AlphaFold that predicts protein structures, allowing for faster drug and vaccine developments; and its AlphaGo program was one of the first examples of how good AI could be at solving complex issues that many thought required human reasoning.
Alphabet operates in all three phases of the AI pipeline: research and development, training and deployment, and real-world applications (Gemini, Google Search, etc.). This helps keep operations streamlined, which may not be the case with companies that rely on other companies for infrastructure or AI models. For example, OpenAI relies on Microsoft for cloud infrastructure.
Some people have voiced concerns that AI tools could harm Alphabet's core business, Google Search, by reducing the need to click on search ads when users can type the same question into a tool like ChatGPT and receive a more conversational answer.
In theory, it's a fair concern, but there haven't been any signs of this tangibly harming Alphabet's business.
Alphabet continues to be a money machine, bringing in $90.2 billion in revenue in the first quarter, up 12% year over year. This growth was led by Google Cloud, which increased its revenue by 28% year over year to $12.3 billion. It probably won't ever catch up to Google Search (56% of its Q1 revenue), but it's a high-growth area that's beginning to carry more of its own weight.
Arguably the best thing about Alphabet's stock right now is how undervalued it seems. It's trading at 18.5 times its forward earnings, which is below the 21.7 times the S&P 500 is trading at, and well below what the other "Magnificent Seven" companies are trading at today.
For a company that has consistently grown through the years, the pessimism toward Alphabet's stock seems a bit overblown. It has top-tier in-house AI capabilities, a fast-growing cloud business (third in market share behind Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure), and a portfolio full of industry-leading companies like Google, YouTube, and Waymo.
I wouldn't invest in the stock expecting to double your money in a couple of years, but if you're a long-term investor, you likely won't regret investing at Alphabet's current prices. If you're concerned about current volatility and market conditions, consider dollar-cost averaging your way into a stake. The stock is a bargain.
Before you buy stock in Alphabet, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Alphabet wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $697,627!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $939,655!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,045% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025
Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Stefon Walters has positions in Microsoft. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
This Stock Is Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence (AI), but Is It a Buy Right Now? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Google hit with antitrust complaint in EU over AI summaries harming web traffic to news sites: report
Google's controversial AI-generated summaries — which have been blamed for crushing the traffic of US news sites — have drawn an antitrust complaint in the European Union from a group of independent publishers. The complaint, dated June 30 and submitted by the Independent Publishers Alliance, accuses Google of abusing its dominant position in online search by promoting its own AI-generated summaries over links to original content. The filing by the Independent Publishers Alliance, seen by Reuters, requests that the European Commission impose interim measures to prevent what it describes as 'irreparable harm' to publishers. 3 Google's artificial intelligence tools are being blamed for harming publishers' businesses. Koshiro K – 'Google's core search engine service is misusing web content for Google's AI Overviews in Google Search, which have caused, and continue to cause, significant harm to publishers, including news publishers in the form of traffic, readership and revenue loss,' the complaint alleges. The court action comes as damning data revealed that the AI Overviews have resulted in 37 of the top 50 US news domains suffering year-over-year traffic declines since its launch in May 2024, according to digital intelligence firm SimilarWeb. A report by SimilarWeb also found that the AI summaries have led to a significant increase in the frequency of 'zero clicks' to search queries. The percentage of web searches related to news that end without a click to a news site jumped to 69% in May 2025 from 56% for the same month last year, SimilarWeb found. A spokesperson for the Competition and Markets Authority, the EU's antitrust agency, confirmed to The Post that it received the complaint. 'Last week, we proposed to designate Google with strategic market status in search and search advertising. If designated, this would allow us to introduce targeted measured to address specific aspects of how Google operates search services in the UK,' the rep said. AI Overviews are summaries generated using Google's artificial intelligence models and are displayed at the top of general search results. The feature is available in more than 100 countries. Google began incorporating advertisements into AI Overviews this past May. The publishers allege that Google's practice of displaying its own summaries above hyperlinks disadvantages original content and is made worse by the lack of control publishers have over how their material is used. 3 A group of independent publishers in the European Union filed an antitrust complaint against Google over its AI Overviews technology. dts News Agency Germany/Shutterstock 'Publishers using Google Search do not have the option to opt out from their material being ingested for Google's AI large language model training and/or from being crawled for summaries, without losing their ability to appear in Google's general search results page,' the complaint alleges. The Movement for an Open Web, whose members include digital advertisers and publishers, and British nonprofit Foxglove Legal Community Interest Company are also signatories to the complaint. The three organizations are seeking regulatory intervention to address what they say is an urgent threat to competition and access to news. Foxglove co-executive director Rosa Curling said the consequences of AI Overviews for news publishers are severe. 'Independent news faces an existential threat: Google's AI Overviews,' Foxglove co-executive director Rosa Curling said. 'That's why with this complaint, Foxglove and our partners are urging the European Commission, along with other regulators around the world, to take a stand and allow independent journalism to opt out.' A Google spokesperson defended the AI Overviews feature and disputed the characterization of its impact on publishers. 3 The complaint submitted by the Independent Publishers Alliance accuses Google of abusing its dominant position in online search by promoting its own AI-generated summaries over links to original content. Google 'New AI experiences in Search enable people to ask even more questions, which creates new opportunities for content and businesses to be discovered,' the spokesperson told Reuters. Google added that the company sends billions of clicks to websites each day and that traffic fluctuations can be influenced by many factors. 'The reality is that sites can gain and lose traffic for a variety of reasons, including seasonal demand, interests of users, and regular algorithmic updates to Search,' the spokesperson said. The claims in the EU complaint echo a similar argument made in a lawsuit filed in the United States by an education technology company, which alleges that Google's AI Overviews are eroding demand for original content and damaging the competitive ability of publishers, resulting in declines in both traffic and subscriptions. Google has faced several antitrust investigations on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean in recent years. The tech giant is appealing a $4.7 billion fine imposed by the European Commission for allegedly abusing its dominance with the Android operating system. Last month, an advisor to the EU's top court recommended the fine be upheld. The European Commission is also continuing investigations into Google's conduct in digital advertising and search, with potential for further regulatory action. In the United States, a federal judge ruled in August 2024 that Google violated antitrust law by maintaining monopolies in general search and search advertising, citing exclusive deals such as those with Apple. A verdict after a trial on the remedy phase — which could include breaking up Google — is expected next month. In a separate ruling in April 2025, another judge found Google had illegally monopolized online advertising markets by controlling both the buy and sell sides of the ad exchange. With Post Wires
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Schools turn to handwritten exams as AI cheating surges
The rise of artificial intelligence in education is forcing schools and universities to rethink everything from homework policies to how final exams are administered. With tools like ChatGPT now widespread, students can generate essays, solve complex math problems or draft lab reports in seconds, raising urgent questions about what authentic learning looks like in 2025. To fight back, some schools are turning to an unlikely solution: pen and paper. The old-school "blue book," a lined booklet used for handwritten test answers, is staging a comeback, according to reporting from The Wall Street Journal. And while it might seem like a relic of a pre-digital era, educators say it's one of the most effective tools they have to ensure students are actually doing their own work. Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you'll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my While it's difficult to measure precisely, recent surveys suggest up to 89% of students have used AI tools like ChatGPT to help with coursework. Some admit to using it only for brainstorming or grammar fixes, but others rely on it to write entire papers or take-home tests. As reported, the spike in academic dishonesty has left faculty scrambling to preserve academic standards. Universities have reported a sharp rise in disciplinary cases tied to AI, but many incidents likely go undetected. Detection software like Turnitin's AI writing checker is being used more widely, but even those tools admit their systems aren't foolproof. One reason this trend is so hard to police is that generative AI has become surprisingly good at mimicking human writing. Tools can tailor tone and style and even match a student's previous work, making plagiarism nearly impossible to identify without sophisticated forensics or human intuition. In blind tests, teachers have often been unable to distinguish between human and AI-written responses. Making matters worse, some schools that initially tried detection software have started abandoning it due to accuracy concerns and privacy issues. In response, a growing number of professors are bringing exams back into the classroom, with pen and paper. Schools like Texas A&M, University of Florida and UC Berkeley have all reported surging demand for blue books over the last two years. The logic is simple: If students have to write their essays by hand during class time, there's no opportunity to copy from ChatGPT or another AI assistant. It's not just nostalgia; it's a strategic shift. In-person, handwritten exams are harder to game, and some instructors say the quality of student thinking actually improves without digital shortcuts. Still, not everyone is convinced this is the answer. Critics argue that relying on in-class, timed writing may shortchange students on deeper research skills and analytical thinking, especially for complex topics that benefit from time, revision and outside sources. Plus, blue books do little to prevent AI misuse on homework, group projects or take-home essays. Some educators are pushing for a more balanced response: Instead of banning AI tools, teach students how to use them responsibly. That means integrating AI literacy into the curriculum, so students learn where the line is between inspiration and plagiarism and understand when it's appropriate to use tools like ChatGPT or Grammarly. "AI is part of the professional world students will enter," said one university dean quoted in The Wall Street Journal. "Our job is to teach them how to think critically, even with new tools in hand." As AI tools evolve, so will the strategies schools use to ensure honest learning. Some are shifting toward oral exams, where students must explain their reasoning out loud. Others are assigning more process-based work, such as annotated drafts, recorded brainstorming sessions or group projects that make cheating harder. There's no silver bullet, but one thing is clear: the AI genie isn't going back in the bottle, and the education system must adapt quickly or risk losing credibility. AI cheating in education has forced schools to take a hard look at how they assess student learning. The return of the blue book is a sign of just how serious the problem has become and how far educators are willing to go to protect academic integrity. But the real solution will probably involve a mix of old and new, using analog tools like blue books, embracing digital detection methods and teaching students why honest work matters. As AI continues to evolve, education will have to evolve with it. The goal isn't just to stop cheating, it's to make sure students leave school with the skills, knowledge and values they need to succeed in the real world. If AI can do your homework and write your essays, what does it really mean to earn a diploma in the age of artificial intelligence? Let us know by writing to us at Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you'll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my Copyright 2025 All rights reserved.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Google in Danger of Paying $314 Million to Smartphone Users in One Major US State
In 2019, nearly 14 million citizens of California filed a class action lawsuit in the state against Google. The reason for the class action suit was that "Google collected information from idle phones running its Android operating system for company uses like targeted advertising, consuming Android users' cellular data at their expense." Now, a jury has decided on the outcome of this lawsuit, saying that Google has to pay $314 million to the users, per The Guardian. "A jury in San Jose, California, said on Tuesday that Google misused customers' cellphone data and must pay more than $314.6m to Android smartphone users in the state, according to an attorney for the plaintiffs." The lawsuit states that Alphabet Google performed "mandatory and unavoidable burdens shouldered by Android device users for Google's benefit" while also "sending and receiving information" while being idle. Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda did say the company plans to appeal the lawsuit verdict while the company also said no users were harmed through this incident. On the contrary, this isn't the only such case for Google. Another case was brought to the court on behalf of the remainder of the states, although that specific case has a trial date in April 2026. Google also claims that users consented to such rules in the privacy policies regarding this case, and with the company planning to appeal, it could be time before this gets some in Danger of Paying $314 Million to Smartphone Users in One Major US State first appeared on Men's Journal on Jul 2, 2025
