Memorial University calling for input on new Indigenous verification policy
Memorial University is looking for public input on an upcoming policy that will see Indigenous students and faculty asked to verify their Indigenous identity before accessing grants, scholarships and jobs set aside for Indigenous-only applicants.
The university announced Monday it had completed a draft policy and would accept public input for the next four weeks.
Verification policies are "something that Indigenous people, here and across the country, really are calling for," said Catharyn Andersen, MUN's vice-president of Indigenous affairs.
"There's a reason why we have those opportunities ... we should be sure that they're going to Indigenous students and Indigenous people."
Memorial University would join eight other post-secondary schools in Canada that have implemented a similar policy in recent years, she said. Those schools include Waterloo, McGill and Saskatchewan.
A final policy will ideally go into effect in the fall, Andersen said.
Students and faculty can still self-identify as Indigenous, but any funding or employment for Indigenous applicants would require them to adhere to the verification process and provide proof of membership in a recognized Indigenous group.
The verification committee will look at whether an Indigenous group has recognition under Section 35 of the Canadian Constitution Act, she said, or whether the group is recognized as Indigenous by their federally recognized Indigenous neighbours.
"It incorporates Indigenous ways of recognizing one another as well," Andersen said.
The policy follows the high-profile firing of former president Vianne Timmons, who for years claimed to be a member of an unrecognized Mi'kmaw band. After a CBC report in 2023 on the veracity of her ancestry, Timmons returned her Indspire Award.
Andersen says Timmons's case didn't prompt the university to draft a verification policy, but it did speed up the timeline.
"It's hard to argue that it didn't have an impact," Andersen said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
2 hours ago
- National Observer
Prime Minister Mark Carney will visit birthplace in N.W.T.
Prime Minister Mark Carney is set to stop today in the town where he was born as he travels across the Northwest Territories. Carney also spent his early childhood in Fort Smith, located south of Yellowknife along the Alberta boundary, before he moved with his family to Edmonton. He is scheduled to talk to locals in Fort Smith about affordability and food insecurity, and discuss wildfires with community leaders, before heading to Inuvik in the territory's northwest corner. He is set to co-host the Inuit-Crown Partnership Committee on Thursday with Natan Obed, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, a national organization representing Inuit. It will be Carney's second meeting with Indigenous groups on Ottawa's major projects bill. The legislation would give Ottawa the ability to fast-track projects deemed to be in the national interest by sidestepping some review requirements. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 23, 2025.
Calgary Herald
3 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
We need less politicking and more approvals for major energy projects
Article content Canadians increasingly agree that our country's full economic potential and energy independence will be unleashed only if more nation-building projects are approved — and quickly. Article content This includes pipelines, which a majority of Canadians in every province — including Quebec — now support. A February SOM-La Presse poll showed support for Energy East in Quebec at 59 per cent (with 22 per cent against). MEI polling done before the trade conflict with the U.S. showed 49 per cent support in Quebec (with 28 per cent against) for building new pipelines to tidewater on either coast. Article content Article content Article content Canada is long overdue for a project approval process that is swift by default. Importantly, Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act, stipulates that major projects in the national interest will be approved in less than two years. The 20 projects currently languishing in the federal environmental approvals process have, on average, taken much longer than that. Article content Article content Bill C-5 can potentially override or limit the application of the federal Impact Assessment Act, formerly Bill C-69 (the 'no more pipelines bill'), and for good reason: it was ruled unconstitutional in 2023 by the Supreme Court of Canada, which agreed with the Alberta Court of Appeal that the act took a 'wrecking ball' to exclusive provincial jurisdiction over natural resources, guaranteed under the Constitution. However, it's important to note that the IAA — which ironically was also once promoted as a 'one-stop shop' to 'speed up the approval of major projects' — has not been repealed, along with other harmful, anti-investment federal regulations, including the Clean Electricity regulations and the oil and gas emissions cap. Article content Adding to the uncertainty, provinces (and Indigenous rights holders) appear to have a veto under Bill C-5. Initially, Prime Minister Mark Carney suggested that he and certain ministers have the 'authority' to unilaterally designate major project approvals and set development conditions. Energy Minister Tim Hodgson said cabinet will not discuss what projects are being fast-tracked until they are 'finalized.' Article content However, when a reporter recently asked Carney, 'If there's a pipeline project you believe is in the national interest, but Quebec or British Columbia don't want it, are you going to push it through?' Carney answered, 'No, we need to have consensus from all provinces and Indigenous peoples.' Article content Last week, Carney said it was 'highly likely' that a pipeline would make its way onto his government's to-do list of nation-building projects. However, he added that he couldn't guarantee it, given that proposals must come from the private sector.
CBC
6 hours ago
- CBC
Region's plan to clear Kitchener encampment raises concerns for federal housing advocate
Federal housing advocate Marie-Josée Houle has written an open letter to Region of Waterloo Chair Karen Redman and councillors with her concerns over plans to remove people from a long-standing encampment in Kitchener. The encampment is located at 100 Victoria Street N., near the Kitchener train station and where Victoria Street intersects with Weber Street. People have been living on the site since early 2022. In April, regional council passed a bylaw to clear the encampment by Dec. 1 so the empty lot can be used by Metrolinx and construction crews as work to build a new transit hub gets underway. The bylaw would make it illegal for anyone to live on or occupy the site at 100 Victoria St. N., after Dec. 1. In her letter, Houle explains it's her mandate to review systemic housing issues across the country, as established by the National Housing Strategy Act. "I appreciate that municipalities like Region of Waterloo are on the frontlines of the homelessness crisis and responses to encampments but do not necessarily have the powers and financial resources to address all the systemic factors contributing to homelessness," Houle wrote in her open letter, which is posted on the Canadian Human Rights Commission's website. "Nevertheless, municipal governments — just like all other orders of government — have obligations to respect, protect, and fulfill human rights and to adopt a human rights based approach to encampments." She said in her review of the region's plans, she "heard repeatedly" that giving people a spot at a temporary emergency shelter was not good enough. "Spaces in emergency shelters do not offer security of tenure and may be inaccessible or unsafe for many people. They do not always consider the cultural needs of Indigenous people, the needs of people with disabilities and can be unsafe for women and members of the 2SLGBTQQIA+ community," Houle wrote. Building trust 'essential,' advocate says She urged the region to use a human rights-based approach to their next steps, and that includes "meaningfully engaging" with people who live at the encampment and finding solutions that offer adequate housing and supports for people. "It is not enough to claim to adopt a human rights-based approach; it is essential to take actions that lead to rights being protected and a real improvement in the lives of people living in encampments," Houle wrote. "Building and maintaining the trust of people living in encampments is an essential component of a human rights based approach. These relationships must demonstrate transparency, accountability and integrity," Houle added. "Although the region on the one hand has a team of support workers to assist encampment residents in accessing housing, on the other hand, the region is bringing harmful litigation against the residents of the encampment. It is impossible to build trust in this context." Houle says she would also welcome the chance to speak with council to offer advice on how her office could help the region move forward. Region continues to support people at encampment Homelessness has been a growing issue in Waterloo region. A point-in-time count in the fall of 2021 showed more than 1,000 people didn't have a place to live. That rose to more than 2,300 people during an October 2024 point-in-time count. The region previously tried to clear people from living on the site in 2022. In January 2023, a Kitchener judge ruled the region couldn't evict people from the site unless they gave them another place to live. The region tried to argue the encampment went against a bylaw on public conduct on regionally owned properties. Justice M.J. Valente cited the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and said the region's plans to move people off the site at the time went against the person's rights to life, liberty and security of the person. That's because, Valente said in his ruling, the region lacked enough shelter space for everyone who was homeless. In a statement to CBC News on Tuesday, the region said "staff and partners continue to support residents at the encampment." Those supports include outreach staff, connecting people with Ontario Works caseworkers, regularly cleaning the site, hiring pest control, installing portable washrooms and lights as well as addressing "other health and safety interventions." The region says that between April 16 and July 2, they helped 13 people who had been living at the encampment prior to April 16 to move off the site "with an approach consistent with the region's plan to end chronic homelessness." As well, the region says it is seeking direction from the Superior Court of Justice on the bylaw passed in April. That case is scheduled to go before the court in November.
