Don't let politics rule UF president decision. Just look at New College.
While the UF board was unanimous in supporting Ono, vocal opposition to his candidacy has come from a trustee of another institution overseen by the State University System – New College of Florida. And that New College trustee is Christopher Rufo, the provocative commentator best known for his social media and blog posts.
The Board of Governors should take this opportunity to look past the headlines and benchmark how New College has actually fared under the watch of leaders like Rufo.
It should do so by using standard state metrics over the past two-plus years – because these metrics show New College has been a debacle under Richard Corcoran, the president Rufo helped to install at the school's leader.
It's a warning for the Board of Governors as it decides the fate of UF.
Every June, all Florida state universities send their annual statistics – known as "the metrics" – to the Board of Governors in a standardized format as part of their annual planning.
The latest annual release of metrics for New College is grim, and particularly so when it comes to incoming first-year students who enter the college directly from high school.
For example, from fall 2022 to fall 2024, there has been:
A decrease in the percentage of incoming students with a 4.0 grade point average (from 55% to 42%).
A decrease in the percentage of incoming students who finished in the top 10% of their high school graduating classes (from 29% to 14%).
A decrease in the average SAT score of incoming first-year New College students (from 1233 to 1153).
And while New College continues to tout increased total enrollment, from fall 2022 to fall 2024 the number of freshmen – those going directly from high school to New College – only increased by 28.
The other 150 new students were transfer students
Indeed, the number of "first time in college" students at New College actually declined from fall 2023 to 2024.
Many of these transfer students aren't from Florida, and many aren't even coming to New College from the United States. Just look at the lengthy roster of New College's 2024-25 men's soccer team: Based on their "home country" listings, the overwhelming majority of team members are from countries outside the United States – and some have come from distant nations like France, Ghana, Brazil and Australia.
All of this is taking place at an incredible cost – literally.
According to annual Florida CFO Reports on Component Units, expenses at New College have exploded. During the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022, New College's expenses were $60 million; they were $94 million during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024.
But after spending all of these additional millions, New College has only added around 180 students.
The New College debacle isn't a result of a change in policy.
For example. the school's elimination of its Diversity, Equity and Inclusion office was largely a non-issue: In February 2023 I personally spoke in favor of eliminating the DEI office at New College, both because of my own negative experiences with it and to make the point that it wasn't actually important to the school.
More: New College of Florida 2025 graduation marks achievement and endurance
However, the New College debacle is a result of a change in management: Corcoran had no background as a higher education leader when he was hired by Rufo and other trustees, and his lack of experience continues to negatively impact the school.
For example, the New College board didn't tell Corcoran to boost enrollment through a shambolic athletics program. Corcoran did that on his own initiative, and even recruiting large numbers of student-athletes hasn't worked out the way he'd hoped.
That's because student-athletes don't simply want spots on team rosters; they want actual playing time, and that's much more difficult to attain when so many other athletes have been recruited to those teams.
It's the kind of thing someone with higher educational experience might have known.
Mistakes like these could be seen as growing pains for the "new" New College; indeed, during a 2023 interview, Rufo compared the approach at New College to remodeling a kitchen.
'You do the demo," Rufo said, "then you do the build."
More: New College picked wrong guy for commencement speaker. Here are 5 better options. | Opinion
But it was an astonishing analogy, and it displayed Rufo's lack of understanding that for generations New College students – most of them from Florida – had been attracted to the school precisely because of the unique academic system that previously existed. And in terms of course offerings, very little has truly changed at New College.
The horrible statistics, embarrassments and anecdotes coming from New College should serve as blinking red warning lights for the Board of Governors as it weighs the fate of UF.
The first warning: A university needs a university administrator, or it will fall apart.
The second warning: It is Florida's families who lose when Florida's public universities are mismanaged because out-of-state trustees are prioritizing scoring points on social media over examining data – and over doing the hard work of accountability and governing.
It's not too late to put New College under real leadership or even to fold its unique academic program into another institution.
And this is certainly no time to replicate Rufo's destructive failure of oversight at New College at the University of Florida.
Mike Sanderson is a New College of Florida alum. He is the former editor of The Catalyst, New College of Florida's student newspaper.
This article originally appeared on Sarasota Herald-Tribune: Don't let UF repeat New College of Florida's bad lessons | Opinion
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
a day ago
- Miami Herald
Florida spends $4 million on new ‘ideology-free' college accreditor
Florida's higher education leaders are fast-tracking an ambitious, multi-state plan to form a new college accreditor — an effort which Gov. Ron DeSantis is touting as a way to subvert the grip of 'woke accreditation cartels' on academia. The State University System's Board of Governors on Friday approved a roadmap for establishing the Commission for Public Higher Education, a new accrediting agency backed by university systems from five neighboring red states: North Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, South Carolina and Texas. Florida plans on launching a six-month test run of the new accreditation process with six universities this December, according to the agency's business plan approved unanimously by the Board of Governors in the Friday meeting. The organization aims to secure the U.S. Department of Education's stamp of approval for the accreditation by June 2028. The agency must have at least two years of experience operating as an accreditor before it can seek recognition from the U.S. Department of Education. Florida's GOP-dominated Legislature is backing the venture with a $4 million start-up injection. The agency is anticipating that participating university systems will dedicate similar contributions, per the business plan. Accreditation, which colleges must obtain in order to receive federal student financial aid funding, is meant to act as a quality-control measure for institutions. But critics of the current system say the process is cumbersome and lacks mechanisms for universities to provide input on evaluation criteria. Once a niche subject rarely discussed outside of academic policy wonk circles, accreditation is an increasingly hot topic among conservatives. Some Republicans say accreditors stifle innovation and force left-wing ideology upon institutions. A 'secret weapon' Prominent GOP officials seeking to shake up accreditation are deploying wartime rhetoric. President Donald Trump has threatened to wield the accreditation system as a 'secret weapon' to force schools to adopt policies favored by conservatives. When DeSantis announced Florida's new accrediting agency last month, he said the accreditation establishment had colluded to form 'juntas.' For the governor, seizing control of accreditation is one of the final frontiers in his quest to reshape Florida's higher education landscape, aiming to root out what he sees as rampant left-wing orthodoxy on college campuses. Republican state lawmakers under DeSantis have pushed for laws banning diversity, equity and inclusion spending at state universities and scrubbing 'identity politics' from general education courses. DeSantis' has said one of his biggest gripes with accreditors is that they threaten to yank accreditation from schools without DEI initiatives. But the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges — the longtime accreditor of Florida's 40 public universities and colleges — is the only one of the seven southern accreditation agencies that mandate DEI criteria. Discussions between Florida and the University of North Carolina system began last year, Florida university system chancellor Ray Rodrigues told the Miami Herald in an interview, because of shared concerns over SACSCOC's supposed political overreach. In 2023, the accreditor began investigating UNC-Chapel Hill to determine whether it violated accreditation criteria when it established the School of Civic Life and Leadership — an academic unit meant to promote civil discourse — without faculty input. Florida's beef with SACSCOC goes back farther. In 2021, the agency raised concerns after the University of Florida initially barred professors from offering expert testimony in a voting rights lawsuit against the state. (The university later reversed course.) That same year, SACSCOC dinged the Board of Governors for considering then-Education Commissioner Richard Corcoran — a sitting board member at the time — for the Florida State University presidency. (Corcoran has served as president of New College of Florida since 2023.) For administrators, the accreditation process can be cumbersome. It involves hosting campus visits and filling out lengthy spreadsheets. Robert Shireman, a former Obama-era Education Department official, described the process as the higher-ed equivalent of filing taxes. 'If you feel like you're a good college, it can be annoying,' said Shireman, who currently serves on the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity, which advises the U.S. Secretary of Education on accreditation. According to Shireman, accreditation critics across the political spectrum have raised concerns that accrediting agencies are sluggish and lack mechanisms for universities and colleges to have a say in how they are evaluated. SACSCOC, for instance, is overseen by a 77-member board that meets twice a year. The CPHE's board is far leaner, initially consisting of six members selected directly by participating university systems, according to the agency's business plan — a composition that Shireman said may allow the agency to more nimbly make decisions. Unusual structure In terms of organizational structure, the agency will operate as a nonprofit with the Florida Board of Governors acting as its sole member. That's unusual for an accrediting agency, Shireman said. Accreditors typically operate as nonprofits, but are rarely managed by state agencies and act independent of the institutions it holds accountable. Whether or not the agency could maintain the independence necessary to be seen as legitimate emerged as a key concern during Friday's board meeting. Kimberly Dunn, the board's faculty representative, suggested barring the agency from accrediting Florida's public universities until it had established independence. Not everybody is on board with the accreditation overhaul. Robin Goodman, an English professor at Florida State University, told state board members on Friday they were pushing for 'a solution in search of a problem.' Florida's current accreditation setup, Goodman said, was working perfectly fine and was helping universities climb national rankings. She called the DeSantis' DEI concerns a 'non-evidence based claim' and raised concerns about whether the governor would use CPHE as a Trojan Horse for injecting conservative ideas into curricula. 'That just seems like a bad decision and will make our universities not as great as they are now,' Goodman told board members. Dunn, the faculty representative, said it was important to ensure the agency's accreditation criteria didn't impose or restrict certain content in curriculum. Rodrigues, the university system chancellor, responded that Florida can't establish an accreditor that 'removes left wing ideology and replaces it with right wing ideology.' 'The point of this is to have an accreditor that's not involved in ideology at all,' Rodrigues said. 'It's completely focused on academic excellence [and] quality education.'
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Dr. Scott Morrison Named Interim President at St. Mary's University
President Vanderpool Accepts New Opportunity in Texas St. Mary's University Announces Incoming Interim President CALGARY, Alberta, July 08, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- St. Mary's University (St. Mary's) accepted the resignation of Dr. Sinda K. Vanderpool, President and Vice-Chancellor since July 2022, to support her appointment as the next president of the University of St. Thomas – Houston. 'We are deeply grateful for Dr. Vanderpool's leadership and collaborative community building over the past three years. Together with faculty, staff, students, and supporters, she has led our university to accomplish national awards, academic program expansions, and record-breaking investments from supporters.' said Gary Strother, Chair of St. Mary's University Board of Governors. 'On behalf of St. Mary's, and the communities we serve, I wish Sinda and her family all the best.' The University's board has begun acting on its authority to search for a new president. One of Alberta's leading education executives, Dr. Scott Morrison, has agreed to serve as Interim President and Vice-Chancellor from August 5, 2025 until that search is complete. Through his extensive career in education, Dr. Morrison has held a variety of influential leadership roles in Alberta, including as Executive Director of the Catholic School Superintendents of Alberta, which granted him a leave from his current position to support St. Mary's University during its transition. 'Scott is not only an expert in leading educational organizations, but he is also a committed member of St. Mary's community,' said Strother. For the past 17 years, Dr. Morrison contributed as a sessional instructor, teaching an undergraduate course in the Faculty of Education and leadership certification courses. He also helped shape the university's Bachelor of Education program for secondary students and its soon-to-be launched Master of Education program. A former member of St. Mary's Board of Governors, he chaired its Governance and Nominating Committee for three years. Morrison was honoured to accept the role. 'To serve St. Mary's as its Interim President will be a labour of love. I have long been an advocate for St. Mary's and the transformative power of the Catholic Intellectual Tradition it blends through their degrees in education, arts and science.' Vanderpool has mixed feelings as she transitions the role with Morrison August 5 – 8, her last week here. 'I have felt so very honoured to serve St. Mary's and the community that uplifts it. While I am excited to live closer to my family, I know the future is bright for a place that will always hold a special home in my heart.' Lisa Laskowski, Vice President, External RelationsSt. Mary's UniversityPhone: 403.554.6225Email: About St. Mary's University St. Mary's University is a dynamic and inclusive institution located in Calgary, Alberta, offering undergraduate degrees in Education, Arts, and Science, along with diploma programs in Business that emphasize entrepreneurship, innovation, and social responsibility. For students aspiring to careers in health care, mental health, or medicine, St. Mary's provides essential foundational courses to support their academic journey. Situated on a picturesque 35-acre campus adjacent to Fish Creek Provincial Park, St. Mary's blends natural beauty with academic tradition. The campus is home to nationally ranked athletics teams, a vibrant community choir, and heritage buildings that reflect the university's rich history and enduring values. Guided by the Catholic intellectual tradition and open to all, St. Mary's fosters a culture of academic excellence, ethical leadership, and a deep respect for the dignity of every person. Graduates emerge as thoughtful, compassionate leaders— committed to service, inspired by faith, and prepared to shape a better world. A photo accompanying this announcement is available at in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Forget a ‘shadow' Fed chair, here's how the central bank could have two different leaders at once
President Donald Trump's continued pressure on Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and his stated desire to appoint a replacement who will lower rates have raised concerns about potential clashes at the typically consensus-driven central bank. The way the Fed is organized also leaves open the possibility of a split chairmanship. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell actually wears two hats: He is chair of the Fed's board of governors and chair of the Federal Open Market Committee. Historically, the board chair has also been FOMC chair, but it doesn't have to be that way. In fact, the Fed even alludes to it in its own explainer on how the central bank works. 'By law, the FOMC determines its own internal organization and, by tradition, the FOMC elects the Chair of the Board of Governors as its chair and the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as its vice chair,' it says. Fed governors, including the chair, are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. But members of the FOMC decide who is chair of the rate-setting committee, which is comprised of the seven governors, the New York Fed president, and four other regional Fed presidents who serve on a rotating basis. Fed policymakers carefully guard the Fed's reputation for being independent from political pressure. And this is where tradition and the law could diverge, resulting in one person serving as FOMC chair and another as board chair. Here's how a hypothetical split could come about: The FOMC picks its chair at its first meeting of the year. In 2026, that's scheduled for Jan. 27-28. Only a current member of the FOMC is eligible to be chair. Powell's term as board chair expires on May 15, 2026, but his term as a governor extends to January 2028. In theory, he could stay on the FOMC and be eligible to serve as its chair until then—if he doesn't resign and instead chooses to stick around longer. A vacancy on the Fed board will open up as Governor Adriana Kugler's term expires on Jan. 31, 2026. Trump could nominate someone to fill that spot and replace Powell as board chair. But that person would not be in place in the time for the FOMC's first meeting when the FOMC chair is selected. The FOMC could hold another vote later in the year after a new board chair takes over. But no one can force a revote, according to Robert Eisenbeis, who previously served as director of research at the Atlanta Fed. It's customary for the New York Fed president to nominate the board chair as FOMC chair. But again, that's not a requirement, he told Fortune. Unless the FOMC decides to hold another vote, the next time they pick a chair would be at the following year's first meeting in January 2027. And because Powell's term as governor expires in January 2028, a similar situation could happen in 2027. 'So we end up with a year where somebody's chairman, who's not chairman of the FOMC, and there's a split of monetary responsibility among the participants,' Eisenbeis explained. Adding more complication to this scenario is that the board of governors and the FOMC pull different levers. The FOMC sets the federal funds rate, which is what Trump has been saying should come down. Meanwhile, the board sets the rate paid to banks on reserves they keep at the Fed and oversees the 'discount window,' which can provide liquidity to banks. To his knowledge, Eisenbeis said there hasn't been a case in the Fed's history where different people chaired the FOMC and the board. It's also not clear if one chair would outrank the other. 'So you can have this disagreement and conflict between the FOMC potentially and the board of governors because of the split responsibilities,' he said. 'And nobody knows who's in charge.' The Fed didn't provide a comment. A split like this could be disruptive to markets as investors would struggle to figure out which chair to follow the most, Eisenbeis warned. But the prospect of conflicting voices on monetary policy has already been raised by talk of a 'shadow' Fed chair, who would be nominated well before Powell's term expires next May. The idea is that the shadow chair could jawbone markets into easing financial conditions, such as lowering bond yields, before taking office and undermine Powell's messaging in his final months. Trump said last month his pick to replace Powell is coming 'very soon,' and even vowed to tap someone who will do what he has been pressuring the Fed to do for months. 'If I think somebody's going to keep the rates where they are or whatever, I'm not going to put them in,' Trump said. 'I'm going to put somebody that wants to cut rates.' The notion of a shadow chair has already raised alarms as a recipe for market chaos. Princeton professor Alan Blinder, who served as the Fed's vice chair in the 1990s, told CNN recently that it could also set up a big showdown in the FOMC. 'If he or she contradicts what Powell is saying, that will aggravate the FOMC, almost all of whose members will still be there when the new chair takes over,' he explained to CNN. 'It opens the door to an open or silent revolt against the chair, which is a rare thing in Fed history.' Market veteran Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research, said in a note on Monday that whoever the next Fed chair is, a Trump loyalist or not, must still work with the rest of the consensus-driven FOMC, where it's rare to have even a few dissenters on a policy decision. If a loyalist takes over and is too much of an outlier on monetary policy compared to the rest of the FOMC, then the chair could even be outvoted. 'That would seriously weaken the power of the Fed chair and raise concerns about the internal conflict with the Fed,' Yardeni warned. Eisenbeis pointed out that the FOMC chair can't order around other members, and recalled a previous chair from the late 1970s, G. William Miller, who tried to ban smoking at the Fed but faced pushback and failed. Like Blinder, the former vice chair, he sees Fed officials forcefully guarding their independence and tradition of consensus—where persuading, rather than commanding—is how members make decisions. 'If someone comes in who says 'I'm in charge, and you're going to do whatever I say,' the system will rise up against that,' Eisenbeis predicted. This story was originally featured on
