The pantry staple that the longest-living people on earth EVERY day
Dan Buettner, a National Geographic fellow who has spent decades studying the diets of the world's longest-living people, says beans are the 'true longevity food'.
In fact, he claims you should be eating them every day if you want to stay healthy and active into old age.
'The longest-living people on Earth eat beans every single day,' Buettner said in an Instagram video.
'Forget the fear-mongering around lectins and the carnivore craze - those diets aren't producing 90-year-olds still playing pickleball.'
Buettner - who has researched so-called Blue Zones, regions where people live significantly longer than average - dismissed online health trends that demonise beans, saying they're not only safe but essential.
'People say, "I don't want to eat beans because I'll fart or get bloated",' he said.
'But the reality is, if you soak beans, rinse them, cook them thoroughly - no lectins, by the way - you can avoid those problems.'
His tip for beginners was to take it one step at a time.
'Start with just a teaspoon a day if it upsets your stomach. Then the second week, two teaspoons, and the third week, three teaspoons,' he said.
'Your microbiome will grow the bacteria necessary to metabolise them. That way, everyone can work up to a cup of beans a day without any internal tumult.'
Easy ways to incorporate more beans into your diet include adding some chickpeas to your salads for extra protein and texture.
You can also blend cannellini beans into soups or dips for creaminess, or stir black beans through scrambled omelettes.
Another simple way is to toss kidney beans into chillis, tacos, or pasta sauces.
Buettner says this gradual approach allows your gut to adapt - making beans not just tolerable, but an easy daily staple.
Calling out what he dubbed 'this whole plant paradox nonsense', Buettner said it had confused people and done the 'biggest disservice' to eating.
He also challenged the notion that high-meat, zero-carb diets could match the health and longevity benefits seen in bean-rich diets.
'The New York Times interviewed me, and I challenged them to find any population on the planet that eats a carnivore diet and lives a long time,' he said.
'People say the Maasai and Inuit are healthy and on carnivore diets - but their life expectancy is 63.'
His conclusion is simple.
'If you want to be healthy in your 80s, 90s, and 100s and still playing pickleball, you don't want to be eating a carnivore diet,' he said.
Looks like the secret to a long life might just be sitting in your pantry.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'I'm a personal trainer and there's 3 signs your body is storing fat'
Shedding body fat is a popular fitness goal for many people but it's not always a simple task. A personal trainer has shared three signs that your body might be holding on to excess fat. A common fitness aim for many people is to lose weight or trim down the fat. The two main methods of doing this are through diet and exercise, which means maintaining eating less by sticking to a calorie deficit, choosing nutrient-rich foods, and taking part in regular workouts. But, some people find their fat loss journey challenging even when focusing on these aspects, so an expert has shared some indicators that your body might be hoarding fat. Helen Laverick, a women's online fitness coach from the UK with a large Instagram following, regularly posts fitness and nutrition tips, along with exercise guides. In one of her posts, the personal trainer gave some information to help those struggling to reduce body fat. The fitness instructo r shared her insights in the post's caption, stating: "I used to think that cutting back on food would automatically lead to fat loss, but I eventually learned that sometimes eating less doesn't mean you're burning fat. "In fact, I noticed a few key signs that my body wasn't allowing me to see the desired change and preventing me from losing fat..." She then listed three signs that your body "might be preventing you from losing fat." 1. Persistent energy slumps and sluggishness after meals Helen observed that despite lowering her calorie intake she would "always feel sluggish after meals." She found herself experiencing energy dips post-meal and also had bouts of low energy that didn't align with her levels of activity or sleep patterns. The fitness coach explained: "This post-meal lethargy can sometimes be related to how your body handles insulin and holds onto fat, particularly if your diet is high in simple carbs or isn't balanced with enough protein and healthy fats." 2. Increased waist circumference and tighter-fitting clothes Helen remarked: "Even though I was cutting calories, my jeans began to feel tighter around the midsection. It was confusing at first...l was eating less, yet my waistline was expanding. "This change in measurements is a clear indicator that I wasn't losing fat, especially around the abdomen, even if the scale doesn't show a dramatic shift!". Harvard Health Publishing has suggested a reason for an increasing waistline without weight gain. It notes that as we age, our muscle mass typically decreases, meaning our core muscles aren't as firm as they once were. Also, a reduction in elastin and collagen in the skin makes it more susceptible to gravity's effects, causing sagging. These changes can lead to a broader waistline. 3. Loss of muscle definition despite consistent training Helen added: "I noticed that despite my regular workouts and lifting heavy, my muscles weren't as defined as they used to be. "This lack of definition can occur when fat accumulates over the muscle, masking the hard work l was putting in at the gym." She concluded her post by reminding that tracking body fat "isn't always obvious on the scale." The personal trainer suggests checking how your clothes fit, your energy levels, and the definition of your muscles.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
I've been a personal trainer for 25 years - I avoid this 'healthy' food because it makes you look old
Demand for plant-based meat alternatives, gluten-free snacks and other 'healthy' options has undeniably taken the world by storm. Fuelled by a deluge of alarming reports into the dangers of eating too much processed meat, gluten and refined carbohydrates, supermarket shelves are now packed with 'plant based meat' and grain and nut-packed granolas. But, Tracy Campoli, a certified holistic health coach, warned these so-called "healthy" products could be ageing the body from the inside out, causing chronic inflammation and visible signs of ageing. According to Ms Campoli, some of the most popular plant-based meat-alternatives are seriously lacking in vital nutrients like protein, and are instead packed full of additives, seed oils and salt. In a video posted to YouTube, the fitness coach analysed five different "healthy foods" that are by their very nature highly processed, and concluded that fake meat is one of the worst offenders when it comes to health. 'Just because it's plant-based, it doesn't mean it's healthy—you've got to read your labels,' she warned her 347,000 subscribers. Around 12 per cent of people in the UK eat a meat-free diet, with many choosing to give up red meat in particular because of its supposed link with heart disease and even cancer. But, Ms Campoli warned: 'Some of these so-called "good for you" choices may secretly be sabotaging your skin and even speeding up visible signs of ageing like wrinkles. 'But more plant-based alternatives might actually be causing some fine wrinkles on your face. Ms Campoli continued: 'So many of those mass-marketed plant-based meat alternatives—such as Beyond Meat and Impossible Burger—all use inflammatory oils which can speed up your cellular ageing.' Seed oils such a canola oil, sunflower and rapeseed oils are high in polyunsaturated fats which, it has long been claimed, are a 'heart healthy' substitute for traditional animal fats. But in recent years, they've also found themselves at the centre of a raging health debate. Detractors refer to seed oils as 'The Hateful Eight' – which also include corn, soybean, cottonseed, grapeseed, safflower and rice bran oil. Critics say these oils—which today make up more than 25 per cent of the calories in our diets—are causing obesity and leading to a host of health problems from type 2 diabetes to depression and even migraines. It's a claim that goes against medical advice of the past few decades: butter, dripping and lard are high in 'bad' saturated fats which raise cholesterol and heart disease risk, while seed oils contain unsaturated fats that can decrease cholesterol levels and protect the heart. But according to Ms Campoli seed oils aren't always the healthier option. 'They may sound healthy, but they are actually really not great for our body, causing more oxidative stress,' she warned in the clip. The main concern us that they are high in omega-6 fatty acids, she explained. 'When we have an excess of omega-6 in our body it creates more oxidative stress, damages your skin cells and it can cause wrinkles.' She added that these alternative products are often packed with higher levels of salt than their animal-derived counterparts, as manufacturers try to mimic the taste and texture of real meat. This, she says, can cause people to bloat and make the skin look more puffy. Eating too much salt can also lead to high blood pressure, increasing the risk of heart attack and stroke. 'It's also not good for your skin because sodium can also lead to dehydration,' Ms Campoli added. 'But it's hydration from the inside out gives us that glowy more youthful-looking skin. 'If you're eating a lot of excess salt, you're going to look dry and dehydrated. She concluded: 'All of these ingredients together can cause inflammation in the body. 'Inflammation is the root cause of so many diseases and health problems so we want to do our best to keep inflammation at bay. 'You're better off eating more whole foods than looking for substitutes.' Wholegrain breads that are full of hidden sugars and emulsifiers, granola, rice cakes and gluten-free snack products also made her blacklist. 'Many of these products breads contain hidden sugars which contribute to glycation—meaning it stiffens and weakens your collagen, making your skin saggy and contributing to the visible signs of ageing.' It comes as new research suggests consuming a diet low in ultra-processed foods could help supercharge weight loss. Additive-laden foods have been vilified for decades over their supposed health risks, with dozens of studies linking them to type 2 diabetes, heart disease and even cancer. Now, British scientists who tracked dozens of adults have discovered those who ate a diet rich in minimally processed foods and avoided UPFs, lost twice as much weight as those who often consumed UPFs. Sticking to meals cooked from scratch could also help curb food cravings, they also found. However, diets high in UPFs had little impact on blood pressure, heart rate, liver function and cholesterol. Researchers argued their findings echoed calls to limit certain types of UPFs but cautioned it also showed that not all UPFs are 'inherently unhealthy'.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour's decision to close the Fleming Fund is a false economy that puts our national security at risk
Health emergencies rarely respect borders or budgets. As I write, the world is facing an antibiotic emergency, with bacteria rapidly evolving resistance to the treatments we depend on to counter infectious diseases. Without effective antibiotic treatments, global health and the global economy are defenceless against the likes of pneumonia and sepsis. Antibiotics are the infrastructure of modern medicine, making chemotherapy, caesarean sections and hip replacements possible. More than 1.1million people die across the world every year because of antibiotic resistance, including 35,000 in the UK alone. These trends are increasing and inter-generational, with deaths in children tripling in the last three years. For the last decade, the UK has been at the forefront of global efforts to tackle the wider threat posed by antimicrobial resistance (AMR). While antibiotic resistance poses the single biggest threat to modern medicine, AMR points to a serious problem for all types of antimicrobial agents – antifungals, antivirals, and antiparasitics – threatening to reverse all the significant gains we've made against HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis. The UK's Fleming Fund has been a bulwark against such threats: building laboratory capacity in 25 low- and-middle-countries to detect emerging AMR outbreaks, allowing for proactive, data-driven responses before they escalate into global crises. Among many other things, the Fleming Fund has tripled the genomic sequencing capacity across the entire African continent – which even pivoted to detect Covid-19 variants. The UK government's decision to shut down the Fleming Fund is a false economy and directly puts our national security at risk. It will cost lives, as well as precious GDP that could be spent on frontline NHS services. If we are to learn any lessons at all from Covid-19, it should be that we cannot afford to cut corners when it comes to preventing and preparing for inevitable pathogenic threats. Bold investment to protect against AMR Decisions made today will directly impact our ability to counter and contain AMR pandemics in the very near future. When I was Chancellor in 2023, the Treasury recognised the economic health ramifications of AMR, and the UK government commissioned economic studies to better understand the risks and opportunities. The Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation found that if AMR resistance accelerates in line with poorer-performing countries, the world faces an additional seven million deaths globally by 2050. The Center for Global Development then estimated that economically, this would wipe $1.7 trillion annually off global GDP by 2050 and it will cost $175 billion extra a year for health systems to treat people. Country-level estimates released recently estimate that the British economy would be $59 billion smaller in this scenario and the UK would spend an additional $2.8 billion a year treating superbugs. $296 billion and $188 billion would be wiped off the US and EU economies respectively. In contrast, this research shows that there would be large economic benefits to the UK and elsewhere if we invest in improving the treatment of infections. With the UK economy facing significant challenges and the NHS workforce facing rising pressures, now is the time to act boldly and invest proactively to protect against AMR. Whilst the UK alone cannot solve AMR, the UK can and should leverage its world-leading technical expertise and diplomatic leadership through the Fleming Fund, its Special Envoy on AMR, Dame Sally Davies, and other global investments in AMR. Even in a world where only 0.3 per cent of gross national income (GNI) is earmarked for international aid funding, there must be a budget line for AMR. If we are to drive economic growth and build resilience against health threats at home and abroad, we need decisive action with investments that put health security first. With an evolved Fleming Fund, we can mitigate against the worst effects of AMR by supporting research and development of new antibiotics, increasing access to treatments in countries where lack of access accelerates resistance, embedding large-scale education and training programmes to ensure the sustainable and responsible use of existing antibiotics, and harnessing AI for diagnostic tests and surveillance for the UK and the countries most severely impacted by AMR. A world without the Fleming Fund puts even greater pressure on UK government and the life sciences sector to find new ways to prepare for the pandemics we already detect and those we are yet to detect, to safeguard UK health and economic security. Now is the time for the government to step up.
