
Why the AI Future Is Unfolding Faster Than Anyone Expected
By Brad Stone
May 20, 2025 at 8:30 AM EDT
Share this article
When OpenAI introduced ChatGPT in 2022, people could instantly see that the field of artificial intelligence had dramatically advanced. We all speak a language, after all, and could appreciate how the chatbot answered questions in a fluid, close-to-human style. AI has made immense strides since then, but many of us are—and let me put this delicately—too unsophisticated to notice.
Max Tegmark, a professor of physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, says our limited ability to gather specialized knowledge makes it much harder for us to recognize the disconcerting pace of improvements in technology. Most people aren't high-level mathematicians and may not know that, just in the past few years, AI's mastery has progressed from high-school-level algebra to ninja-level calculus. Similarly, there are relatively few musical virtuosos in the world, but AI has recently become adept at reading sheet music, understanding musical theory, even creating new music in major genres. 'What a lot of people are underestimating is just how much has happened in a very short amount of time,' Tegmark says. 'Things are going very fast now.'
In San Francisco, still for now the center of the AI action, one can track these advances in the waves of new computer learning methods, chatbot features and podcast-propagated buzzwords. In February, OpenAI unveiled a tool called Deep Research that functions like a resourceful colleague, responding to in-depth queries by digging up facts on the web, synthesizing information and generating chart-filled reports. In another major development, both OpenAI and Anthropic—co-founded by Chief Executive Officer Dario Amodei and a breakaway group of former OpenAI engineers—developed tools that let users control whether a chatbot engages in 'reasoning': They can direct it to deliberate over a query for an extended period to arrive at more accurate or thorough answers.
Another fashionable trend is called agentic AI —autonomous programs that can (theoretically) perform tasks for a user without supervision, such as sending emails or booking restaurant reservations. Techies are also buzzing about 'vibe coding'—not a new West Coast meditation practice but the art of positing general ideas and letting popular coding assistants like Microsoft Corp.'s GitHub Copilot or Cursor, made by the startup Anysphere Inc., take it from there.
As developers blissfully vibe code, there's also been an unmistakable vibe shift in Silicon Valley. Just a year ago, breakthroughs in AI were usually accompanied by furrowed brows and wringing hands, as tech and political leaders fretted about the safety implications. That changed sometime around February, when US Vice President JD Vance, speaking at a global summit in Paris focused on mitigating harms from AI, inveighed against any regulation that might impede progress. 'I'm not here this morning to talk about AI safety,' he said. 'I'm here to talk about AI opportunity.'
When Vance and President Donald Trump took office, they dashed any hope of new government rules that might slow the AI juggernauts. On his third day in office, Trump rescinded an executive order from his predecessor, Joe Biden, that set AI safety standards and asked tech companies to submit safety reports for new products. At the same time, AI startups have softened their calls for regulation. In 2023, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman told Congress that the possibility AI could run amok and hurt humans was among his ' areas of greatest concern ' and that companies should have to get licenses from the government to operate new models. At the TED Conference in Vancouver this April, he said he no longer favored that approach, because he'd ' learned more about how the government works.'
It's not unusual in Silicon Valley to see tech companies and their leaders contort their ideologies to fit the shifting political winds. Still, the intensity over the past few months has been startling to watch. Many tech companies have stopped highlighting existential AI safety concerns, shed employees focused on the issue (along with diversity, sustainability and other Biden-era priorities) and become less apologetic about doing business with militaries at home and abroad, bypassing concerns from staff about placing deadly weapons in the hands of AI. Rob Reich, a professor of political science and senior fellow at the Institute for Human-Centered AI at Stanford University, says 'there's a shift to explicitly talking about American advantage. AI security and sovereignty are the watchwords of the day, and the geopolitical implications of building powerful AI systems are stronger than ever.'
If Trump's policies are one reason for the change, another is the emergence of DeepSeek and its talented, enigmatic CEO, Liang Wenfeng. When the Chinese AI startup released its R1 model in the US in January, analysts marveled at the quality of a product from a company that had raised far less capital than its US rivals and was supposedly using data centers with less powerful Nvidia Corp. chips. DeepSeek's chatbot shot to the top of the charts on app stores, and US tech stocks promptly cratered on the possibility that the upstart had figured out a more efficient way to reap AI's gains.
The uproar has quieted since then, but Trump has further restricted the sale of powerful American AI chips to China, and Silicon Valley now watches DeepSeek and its Chinese peers with a sense of urgency. 'Everyone has to think very carefully about what is at stake if we cede leadership,' says Alex Kotran, CEO of the AI Education Project.
Losing to China isn't the only potential downside, though. AI-generated content is becoming so pervasive online that it could soon sap the web of any practical utility, and the Pentagon is using machine learning to hasten humanity's possible contact with alien life. Let's hope they like us. Nor has this geopolitical footrace calmed the widespread fear of economic damage and job losses. Take just one field: computer programming. Sundar Pichai, CEO of Alphabet Inc., said on an earnings call in April that AI now generates 'well over 30%' of all new code for the company's products. Garry Tan, CEO of startup program Y Combinator, said on a podcast that for a quarter of the startups in his winter program, 95% of their lines of code were AI-generated.
MIT's Tegmark, who's also president of an AI safety advocacy organization called the Future of Life Institute, finds solace in his belief that a human instinct for self-preservation will ultimately kick in: Pro-AI business leaders and politicians 'don't want someone to build an AI that will overthrow the government any more than they want plutonium to be legalized.' He remains concerned, though, that the inexorable acceleration of AI development is occurring just outside the visible spectrum of most people on Earth, and that it could have economic and societal consequences beyond our current imagination. 'It sounds like sci-fi,' Tegmark says, 'but I remind you that ChatGPT also sounded like sci-fi as recently as a few years ago.'
More from the AI Issue
DeepSeek's 'Tech Madman' Founder Is Threatening US Dominance in AI Race
The company's sudden emergence illustrates how China's industry is thriving despite Washington's efforts to slow it down.
Microsoft's CEO on How AI Will Remake Every Company, Including His
Nervous customers and a volatile partnership with OpenAI are complicating things for Satya Nadella and the world's most valuable company.
America's Leading Alien Hunters Depend on AI to Speed Their Search
Harvard's Galileo Project has brought high-end academic research to a once-fringe pursuit, and the Pentagon is watching.
How AI Has Already Changed My Job
Workers from different industries talk about the ways they're adapting.
Maybe AI Slop Is Killing the Internet, After All
The assertion that bots are choking off human life online has never seemed more true.
Anthropic Is Trying to Win the AI Race Without Losing Its Soul
Dario Amodei has transformed himself from an academic into the CEO of a $61 billion startup.
Why Apple Still Hasn't Cracked AI
Insiders say continued failure to get artificial intelligence right threatens everything from the iPhone's dominance to plans for robots and other futuristic products.
10 People to Watch in Tech: From AI Startups to Venture Capital
A guide to the people you'll be hearing more about in the near future.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
28 minutes ago
- Business Insider
A programmer beat an OpenAI tool at coding. He says the AI made him push himself to win.
AI hasn't yet killed the coding star. On Wednesday, a programmer from Poland, Przemysław Dębiak, beat an OpenAI tool at the AtCoder World Tour Finals 2025 Heuristic Contest in Tokyo, which is sponsored by the company. "I was so tired. I actually felt at some point that I should take a break," Dębiak, who competed under the name "Psyho," told Business Insider over a video call on Friday. "But at the same time, I was very close to getting a score comparable to the model," he added. That pushed him to dig deep, using "all the remaining energy" to beat the AI. "I'm trying to give 100% of what I have and try to stay alive," he said, adding that without OpenAI's model, his score "would be much, much lower." Dębiak's victory drew the attention of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. In a post on X on Wednesday, Altman wrote, "good job psyho." When reached for comment, OpenAI directed BI to a post on X, where it had written, "Our model took 2nd place at the AtCoder Heuristics World Finals! Congrats to the champion for holding us off this time." The contest is held annually and run by AtCoder, a Japan-based competitive programming site. Yoichi Iwata, the competition's administrator, told BI that OpenAI's model outperformed those who used similar approaches, but Dębiak "arrived at a completely different solution." "We expected a human to win, and were rather surprised that the AI was able to secure second place," Iwata added. "While the AI surpassed humans in terms of optimization ability, we believe it still fell short of human creativity." The competition's results page shows Dębiak prevailing over competitors from Japan, Georgia, and France. On Friday, Dębiak shared a results page on X that showed him as the competition's victor and OpenAI in second place. "The results are official now and my lead over AI increased from 5.5% to 9.5%," he wrote. Update: I'm alive and well The results are official now and my lead over AI increased from 5.5% to 9.5%😎 Honestly, the hype feels kind of bizarre. Never expected so many people would be interested in programming contests. Guess this means I should drop in here more often👀 — Psyho (@FakePsyho) July 17, 2025 After winning the competition on Wednesday, Dębiak celebrated his win online, writing, "Humanity has prevailed (for now!)", adding that he was "completely exhausted" after just 10 hours of sleep in three days. He told BI he flew from Warsaw to Tokyo for the competition. The programmer wrote on X that he did not use AI tools, just "regular" Visual Studio Code, a software development platform, with "some basic autocomplete to speed up repetitive stuff." Dębiak, 41, told BI he only found out about OpenAI's entry a week before the contest. "No one knew that this would be, to some extent, an exhibition match between humans and AI," he said. The stars aligned for the human AI will win in cases that require straightforward engineering — implementing algorithms, solving the problem, and optimizing code — because it's simply faster, Dębiak told BI. But in longer contests where programmers "do everything from scratch," he said, AI has a harder time keeping up. "The longer the contest is, the more chances for humans and less chances for AI," he said, adding that he overtook OpenAI's tool near the end of the 10-hour competition. Dębiak said he competed in "algorithmic optimization," where the goal was to write the most efficient solution to a complex problem. In this competition, he had to code a program that guided robots across a 30x30 grid using the fewest moves possible. Reflecting on the competition, Dębiak said the variables lined up in his favor. "It's easy to imagine a different problem where AI would win and all the humans would be like far, far away," he added. AI has famously beaten humans in other high-profile competitions. In 1997, IBM's Deep Blue AI machine beat chess grandmaster Gary Kasparov, and in 2016, Google DeepMind's AlphaGo beat Go world champion Lee Sedol. In February, Altman said that by the end of the year, OpenAI could surpass humans in coding competitions. AI is already writing big chunks of code at Microsoft, Google, and Meta, the companies' CEOs have all said in recent months. Altman has said that demand for software engineers could eventually dip. "My basic assumption is that each software engineer will just do much, much more for a while. And then at some point, yeah, maybe we do need less software engineers," he said in March, referring to OpenAI's hiring strategy.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Robinhood CEO says the majority of the company's new code is written by AI, with 'close to 100%' adoption from engineers
Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev estimates that "a minority" of the company's new code is written by humans. On the 20VC podcast, Tenev said that it's become difficult to distinguish human-written from AI-generated code. He said the company has used tools like GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Windsurf, and nearly 100% of his engineers use an AI editor. At Robinhood, nearly all of the engineers are vibe coders. That's according to Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev, who said on the 20VC podcast that the company's human-written code was hard to distinguish from AI-generated code. Among the company's engineers, "close to 100%" are using AI code editors, he said. When asked what percentage of Robinhood's new code is AI-generated, Tenev said that it was around 50%. That's a higher percentage than what Microsoft and Google have previously said, with CEOs Satya Nadella and Sundar Pichai estimating around 30%. Tenev acknowledged that the 50% metric was imprecise, thanks to the upgrowth of "agentic" code editors. "We've moved from GitHub Copilot, which is an autocomplete system, to Cursor, and now things like Windsurf, where nearly all of the code is written by AI," Tenev said. "It's hard to even determine what the human-generated code is." Taking a guess, Tenev estimated the "minority" of new code at Robinhood was written by humans. Robinhood's stock price has been on a tear, trading up over 177% since the start of the year, with multiple factors driving its recent rally. Robinhood expanded its crypto venture by launching US private-stock tokens. Retail investors on Robinhood remain active, and the company continues to roll out new products like a predictions-market hub. On 20VC, Tenev said AI had contributed to the company's cost and efficiency stabilization, he said. "We have been pretty mum on how much we've been using it internally," Tenev said. "The impact that it's had on internal teams, ranging from software engineering to customer support, the really big internal teams, has been huge." Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-OpenAI to release web browser in challenge to Google Chrome
By Kenrick Cai, Krystal Hu and Anna Tong SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -OpenAI is close to releasing an AI-powered web browser that will challenge Alphabet's market-dominating Google Chrome, three people familiar with the matter told Reuters. The browser is slated to launch in the coming weeks, three of the people said, and aims to use artificial intelligence to fundamentally change how consumers browse the web. It will give OpenAI more direct access to a cornerstone of Google's success: user data. If adopted by the 500 million weekly active users of ChatGPT, OpenAI's browser could put pressure on a key component of rival Google's ad-money spigot. Chrome is an important pillar of Alphabet's ad business, which makes up nearly three-quarters of its revenue, as Chrome provides user information to help Alphabet target ads more effectively and profitably, and also gives Google a way to route search traffic to its own engine by default. OpenAI's browser is designed to keep some user interactions within a ChatGPT-like native chat interface instead of clicking through to websites, two of the sources said. The browser is part of a broader strategy by OpenAI to weave its services across the personal and work lives of consumers, one of the sources said. OpenAI declined to comment. The sources declined to be identified because they are not authorized to speak publicly on the matter. Led by entrepreneur Sam Altman, OpenAI upended the tech industry with the launch of its AI chatbot ChatGPT in late 2022. After its initial success, OpenAI has faced stiff competition from rivals including Google and startup Anthropic, and is looking for new areas of growth. In May, OpenAI said it would enter the hardware domain, paying $6.5 billion to buy io, an AI devices startup from Apple's former design chief, Jony Ive. A web browser would allow OpenAI to directly integrate its AI agent products such as Operator into the browsing experience, enabling the browser to carry out tasks on behalf of the user, the people said. The browser's access to a user's web activity would make it the ideal platform for AI "agents" that can take actions on their behalf, like booking reservations or filling out forms, directly within the websites they use. TOUGH COMPETITION OpenAI has its work cut out - Google Chrome, which is used by more than 3 billion people, currently holds more than two-thirds of the worldwide browser market, according to web analytics firm StatCounter. Apple's second-place Safari lags far behind with a 16% share. Last month, OpenAI said it had 3 million paying business users for ChatGPT. Perplexity, which has a popular AI search engine, launched an AI browser, Comet, on Wednesday, capable of performing actions on a user's behalf. Two other AI startups, The Browser Company and Brave, have released AI-powered browsers capable of browsing and summarizing the internet. Chrome's role in providing user information to help Alphabet target ads more effectively and profitably has proven so successful that the Department of Justice has demanded its divestiture after a U.S. judge last year ruled that the Google parent holds an unlawful monopoly in online search. OpenAI's browser is built atop Chromium, Google's own open-source browser code, two of the sources said. Chromium is the source code for Google Chrome, as well as many competing browsers including Microsoft's Edge and Opera. Last year, OpenAI hired two longtime Google vice presidents who were part of the original team that developed Google Chrome. The Information was first to report their hires and that OpenAI previously considered building a browser. An OpenAI executive testified in April that the company would be interested in buying Chrome if antitrust enforcers succeeded in forcing the sale. Google has not offered Chrome for sale. The company has said it plans to appeal the ruling that it holds a monopoly. OpenAI decided to build its own browser, rather than simply a "plug-in" on top of another company's browser, in order to have more control over the data it can collect, one source said. Sign in to access your portfolio