Two more Welsh politicians defect to Nigel Farage's Reform UK
Two more Welsh politicians defect to Nigel Farage's Reform UK
The announcement was made as Nigel Farage delivered a keynote speech in Port Talbot
Leader of Reform UK Nigel Farage speaks at the Plaza on June 9, 2025 in Port Talbot
(Image: Getty Images )
Reform leader Nigel Farage has used a keynote speech in Wales to announced that two more Welsh councillors have defected. Speaking in Port Talbot, he announced independent councillors Andrew Barry and David Hughes, both members of Merthyr Tydfil council, have joined Reform UK.
They were welcomed to the stage during a speech that has given his first glimpses of policies ahead of the election. Mr Farage said the party would allow coal mining again in Wales and says its long term plan is to "reopen the Port Talbot steelworks".
Cllr Barry, who has had the cabinet brief for finance, says he has seen "waste" in the system during his time. He said: "The people making the decisions on those hundreds of thousands of pounds are unelected members of the council.
"I see Reform as the only opposition in Wales." You can follow live updates from the speech here.
Meanwhile David Hughes, who had previously had the housing and social services brief, spoke of "waste" within councils. "I've come over to Reform because there's so much waste where money is being spent, we need to get into procurement to make sure money is being spent correctly".
"It sounds like every Welsh council needs a DOGE," Mr Farage joked. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here
Article continues below
The most recent poll for Wales suggests Reform is in line to take its first seats in the Senedd at the election in May 2026. Its only representation in Wales at the moment is with councillors, but a YouGov/Barn Cymru poll which asked people their voting intention for the Welsh Parliament in May put Reform UK in second with 25% of the vote.
Nigel Farage speaks at the Plaza
(Image: Getty Images )
They were only behind Plaid Cymru who were projected to get 30% of the vote and ahead of Labour's 18%. You can read that here.
In an opinion piece for WalesOnline, the party leader has given his first glimpses of policies ahead of the election. Mr Farage has said the party would allow coal mining again in Wales and says its long term plan is to "reopen the Port Talbot steelworks".
The steelworks, owned by Tata, have not closed but its remaining blast furnaces were closed in 2024, with work now ongoing to build an electric arc furnace which will recycle previously-used steel. Thousands of jobs are being lost as part of the change.
The Indian-owned company said the blast furnaces were at the end of their operational lives and too expensive to replace. The Port Talbot steelworks were, the company said, losing £1m a day before the blast furnaces were turned off.
Reform UK say it would "use Welsh Development Grants to support real industry. We'll redirect economic funding from consultants and NGOs to actual factory floors, machinery, and industrial jobs in places like Llanelli, Shotton, and Ebbw Vale".
Nigel Farage speaks at the Plaza
(Image: Getty Images )
Nigel Farage has also said the party would also set up "regional technical colleges" for people to have a "path into proper trade".
The party would also, it says, stop any building being used for asylum seeker accommodation, end funding to the Welsh Refugee Council and scrap the Welsh Government's "Nation of Sanctuary".
It also vowed to set up an Elon Musk style department to cut costs. "A Reform UK Senedd will also save hundreds of millions each year by cutting bureaucracy, waste and bad management."
"The establishment of Welsh DOGE will help us uncover where there is woke and wasteful spending and we will make sure those funds are redirected to frontline services," Mr Farage pledges.
Article continues below
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
34 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Speed limits to be removed on parts of A4042 in Torfaen
The Welsh Government has issued a public notice of its intention to reinstate the national speed limit on five stretches of the A4042 between Cwmbran and Mamhilad. The decision will revoke the existing restrictions imposed by The A4042 Trunk Road (Llantarnam Bypass, Cwmbran, Gwent) De-restriction Order 1996. The affected sections are: - From 238 metres southeast of the Croes-y-Mwyalch Roundabout to 150 metres north of the same roundabout, including the roundabout itself. - On the northbound carriageway, from 155 metres south of the Crown Roundabout to 36 metres south of the Pontypool Roundabout, including all roundabouts in between. - On the southbound carriageway, from 40 metres south of the Pontypool Roundabout to 155 metres south of the Crown Roundabout, including all roundabouts in between. - On the northbound carriageway, from 213 metres northeast of the Pontypool Roundabout to 18 metres northeast of the Mamhilad Park Estate Roundabout, including all roundabouts in between. - On the southbound carriageway, from 18 metres northeast of the Mamhilad Park Estate Roundabout to 45 metres south of the Court Farm Roundabout, including all roundabouts in between. The notice, published on June 24, invites members of the public to inspect the full details of the proposed changes. The documents are available at Cwmbran Library during normal opening hours and can also be viewed online at the Welsh Government's website. The consultation period runs until July 15. Objections must be submitted in writing, either by email to TransportOrdersBranch@ or by post to Orders Branch, Transport, Welsh Government, Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NQ. All objections must specify the grounds on which they are made. The Welsh Government has stated that, as part of the consultation process, it may be necessary to share information, including personal data, with third parties to address issues raised. Anyone submitting objections who does not wish for their personal data to be shared should make this clear in their correspondence. In such cases, the Welsh Ministers will remove names and addresses before forwarding representations to third parties. However, the government has warned that representations may be given less weight if personal data is withheld, particularly if there is a local public inquiry. The full notice can be viewed on the Welsh Government's website. The proposed changes are part of ongoing efforts to review and update traffic regulations across Wales. The A4042 is a key route in south-east Wales, connecting Newport to Abergavenny and serving as a major link for commuters and businesses in the region. The public consultation is open until July 15. All representations must be submitted by this date.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
How does Rupert Lowe's Restore Britain differ from Reform UK?
Just when you thought politics couldn't fragment any further, along come two new political movements on the far right, both spawned from Reform UK like replicating amoebae. The very newest is 'Restore Britain', which proclaims it is not a party but a 'movement'. That one is led by former Reform UK MP Rupert Lowe. The other is the creation of former Reform UK deputy leader Ben Habib, and is a party, albeit a slightly peculiar one. Habib was sacked from his Reform role by Nigel Farage after the general election last year, and left what he called 'the cult' soon afterwards. Although Reform UK is still arguably the main force on the right of British politics, with a comfortable polling lead over the Conservatives, it has many smaller competitors, and has itself – including in its previous incarnations (Ukip, Brexit Party) – shown a distinct tendency to splinter at the first sign of success. After all, its chair, Zia Yusuf, recently resigned and un-resigned in one day. They're a volatile lot. Hasn't Habib got a party already? Well, he did have. 'Integrity' was its name. It actually never registered with the Electoral Commission, and as a corporate entity it has now been renamed Advance UK Party Limited, according to the records at Companies House. Integrity Party Limited was originally incorporated on 19 November 2024. Its directors were Habib himself; Christian Russell (resigned 11 April 2025); Richard Shaw (also resigned on 11 April); and Mohammad Sohail (resigned 13 December 2024). So Habib is apparently now its sole director, and he is the only 'person with significant control', holding, directly or indirectly, 75 per cent or more of the shares in the company. So is it democratic? That remains to be seen. It's curious, because one of the reasons Habib gave for leaving Reform UK was the personal control Farage exerted on Reform UK Limited – but this has now altered significantly (albeit Farage would still be practically impossible for the membership to depose). For what it's worth, Advance UK seems to have an extremely complex, opaque and unworkable system of governance, as part private company and part conventional political party. So: the board of directors (currently just Habib) approves policy and 'oversees' what is referred to as 'the leadership', while party members elect 'the college', which elects the leader and can remove him or her. (Habib is officially 'leader in waiting'.) The college is overseen by its chair, who is also the chair of the board of directors (Habib, presumably). It's almost as if Habib deliberately created a structure guaranteed to create internal friction and splits because he enjoys a ruckus, and likes things done his way or not at all. Not unlike Farage, Yusuf, Lee Anderson, and Lowe, in fact. Is it extremist? Quite possibly. Habib got into some bother last year when, as a Reform UK spokesperson, he advocated leaving migrants to drown in the sea if they refused the offer of a boat that would return them to France: 'We could, as an idea, provide them with another dinghy into which to climb and then go back to France. If they choose to scupper that dinghy, then yes, they have to suffer the consequences of their actions.' Challenged by the Talk TV host Julia Hartley-Brewer on whether he would leave them to die, he added: 'Absolutely: they cannot be infantalised to the point that we become hostage to fortune.' Sadly, some agree with him. It's a crowded field, though? Indeed, as the far-right fringe tends to be (mirroring the far left, as it happens). There's also the remains of Ukip, now run militantly by street politician Nick Tenconi (after the previous leader defected to Reform); Reclaim, led by Laurence Fox, though it's electorally inactive; and the 'SDP', which it's fair to say is unrecognisable to those who recall the 1981 Roy Jenkins version. There's also the Heritage Party, English Democrats, BNP and Britain First. Plus others. Could it work? Maybe if it got massive financial support from Elon Musk – he's no fan of Farage, and favours Rupert Lowe, but Lowe is not leading Advance UK. What of Rupert Lowe and Restore Britain? Aside from the Farage factor, an even more extreme 'mass deportation' stance, and an obsession with grooming gangs, it is hard to see how Restore Britain really differs that much from Reform UK, Advance UK, or various of the other organisations. In fact, eccentric as ever – or maybe cunningly – Lowe has thrown his movement open to people in any party 'if they share our values and want to be part of a bottom-up movement that has the potential to transform Britain'. Indeed, Habib, on the day he launched his own party, also joined Restore Britain; Lowe, however, shows no sign of joining Advance UK. Habib claims to be in constant touch with the maverick anti-burqa MP. Will they split the right-wing vote? Not to any noticeable degree. Advance, Ukip, Reclaim and the others will probably continue to have negligible electoral impact, generally lacking resources, mass membership, well-known personalities, local organisations, sympathetic coverage in the right-wing press, or their own television station – all advantages enjoyed by Reform UK, which of course also now has a significant body of elected representatives (though these are inexperienced at best). The scrap between the Conservatives and Reform remains the more significant one, bearing in mind that closer links between those two would also alienate moderate pro-Europe Tories who would then back the Lib Dems or Labour instead, basically out of fear and loathing of Farage. 'Unite the right' sounds appealing, but it would mean the end of the Tories, so it won't happen at national level. Under first-past-the-post, the next election could be quite chaotic. Anyone else on the extreme-right populist bandwagon? The cynically minded might add Keir Starmer and the Labour Party, who, at least in their 'island of strangers' moments, seem to have the attitude that 'if you can't beat 'em, join 'em'. Joking aside, some centre-left and centre-right parties in Europe have become increasingly hardline on immigration, albeit none want to leave the EU. They're not that mad.
Metro
2 hours ago
- Metro
Rod Stewart, Bobby Vylan and Kneecap - Readers discuss politics at Glastonbury
Do you agree with our readers? Have your say on these MetroTalk topics and more in the comments. Rod Stewart says we should 'give [Nigel] Farage a chance', saying the Reform leader is 'coming across well' (Metro, Mon). By all means listen to Sir Rod's music but don't listen to the 80-year-old rocker for advice on politics, how to vote or even what's good for younger UK artists. Rebranding his Brexit Party as Reform UK isn't enough to obscure what a disaster Farage has already been for Britain, including its music industry. Brexit has been awful for musicians wanting to tour Europe, hence the campaign to get the damage undone, which is at Peter Brown, Cleckheaton Rapper Bobby Vylan led chants of 'death, death to the IDF' (the Israel Defence Forces) during his Glastonbury performance. Irish hip-hop band Kneecap were allowed to play despite member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh being charged with displaying a Hezbollah flag at a previous gig. If Lucy Connolly, the wife of a Tory councillor, can be jailed for saying on the day of the Southport riots that hotels housing asylum seekers should be set on fire, then Vylan and Kneecap should be immediately brought before a judge for hate speak and inciting violence. Facial recognition technology should be used to identify the worst offenders in the Glastonbury crowd who joined in the death chants and make an example of them. Barry Stanton, Folkestone It's a shame Glastonbury appears to be descending in to a political commentary event rather than a musical one. There was a time when an artist would make a subtle comment in a lyric or song title and the fans would get their point and that would be it. Now it's in your face. I'd have thought most fans go to Glastonbury for a release from the often depressing news rather than be subjected to another political broadcast. Even Rod is at it. He should stick to talking about Maggie. Dec, Essex I am increasingly critical of Israel's military actions, which have had a huge civilian cost, and I think it is legitimate to call attention to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. But I have far more respect for aid agencies in Gaza than any musician. Free speech is not and never has been a green light to incite violence. I wonder what supporters of Kneecap or Bobby Vylan would make of a British nationalist trio promoting far-right groups? At Glastonbury, Kneecap 'joked' about starting a riot outside the upcoming court case. But this has real-world consequences for police officers who may be injured if trouble breaks out. None of this helps the struggling Palestinian people. These artists are not being 'persecuted' for their views – they are being held to account for crossing a line. Nathan Hazlett, Sunderland From now on, only Christmas carols are allowed at Glastonbury! Samuel, Tooting You might not like Palestine Action, the protest group proscribed as a terrorist group by home secretary Yvette Cooper. Indeed, you might hate them but you have to admit they aren't terrorists. They don't have weapons or bombs. They've never hurt, never mind killed, anyone. What they've done is smash up a few assembly lines and broken some planes. Criminals they may be but terrorists they are not. This isn't about protecting people, it's about clamping down on dissent because the government knows it has lost the argument over Israel and Gaza. What these authoritarian politicians don't understand is that as soon as a new government comes in, it will use these laws to silence the people currently in charge. As for everyone else, we'll have long since lost any say in anything important by then. Rob Slater, Norfolk In reply to S Coyne (MetroTalk, Wed), who says Reform UK has nothing to offer working people. More Trending Reform says it will raise the threshold from where you start paying income tax to £20,000. So it is very much helping working people. Regarding the plan to offer non-doms a £250,000 'Britannia Card' to exempt them from paying tax on foreign assets, millionaires pay a lot in other taxes but they are leaving in droves. It's a good idea to do anything to stop that exodus. Timothy Triggs, Oxford Bob Jones (MetroTalk, Fri) says he's willing to show Brad Pitt around London after the superstar said he 'missed out on having a gay experience'. Well, Bob, I'm new in town and I may not be Brad Pitt but I could be the perfect fit. Or should this be in Rush Hour Crush..? Johno, Camden MORE: Ickle Bubba's top-rated stroller is now on sale – and promises to 'see you through the ages' MORE: The Metro daily cartoon by Guy Venables MORE: The surprising drink nutritionist recommends for speedy festival recovery
