Trump wields tariffs to sway Putin on Ukraine. Here's how they might work, or not
Now President Donald Trump is betting that his go-to economic weapon — tariffs — can succeed where Ukrainian drones and rockets haven't, and finally persuade Putin to end his war.
Tariffs, which the U.S. president has called ' the most beautiful word in the dictionary,'' are taxes on imports. They are Trump's all-purpose fix — a tool he deploys to protect American industry, lure factories to the United States, tackle drug trafficking and illegal immigration, and raise money to pay for his massive tax cuts.
On the campaign trail last year, Trump promised he'd negotiate an end to the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 24 hours. But months have passed without a peace deal, and the president has recently expressed frustration with the Russians. 'We're very, very unhappy with them ... I thought we would have had a deal two months ago, but it doesn't seem to get there,' Trump told reporters Monday.
So in addition to agreeing to send more weapons to Ukraine, he's once again unsheathing tariffs.
He said Monday the U.S. would impose 100% tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil, natural gas and other products if there isn't a peace deal in 50 days. The levies are meant to cause Russia financial pain by making its trading partners think twice before buying Russian energy.
'I use trade for a lot of things,'' Trump said, "but it's great for settling wars.'
Trump did not spell out exactly how these "secondary'' tariffs would work, and trade analysts are skeptical.
'Unilateral tariffs are likely to be ineffective in influencing Putin's actions,' said Douglas Irwin, a Dartmouth College economist who studies American trade policy. "Financial sanctions in cooperation with European and other allies are much more likely to damage Russian economy, but whether they soften Russia's approach is also uncertain.''
The secondary tariffs idea isn't new. Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut earlier this year introduced legislation that would impose a 500% tariff on countries that buy Russian oil, petroleum products and uranium.
If Trump goes through with his threat, his 100% tariffs have the potential to disrupt global commerce and push oil prices higher. They might also complicate Trump's efforts to strike separate trade deals with countries like China and India.
The 100% tariffs would likely target China and India
Since December 2022, when the European Union banned Russian oil, China and India have bought 85% of Russia's crude oil exports and 63% of its coal, according to the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, a Finnish nonprofit. So they would likely be the two countries most affected by Trump's 100% import taxes.
Trump has already tangled with China this year, and things did not go well.
In April, Trump plastered a 145% levy on Chinese imports, and Beijing counterpunched with 125% tariffs of its own. The triple-digit tariffs threatened to end trade between the world's two biggest economies and briefly sent financial markets reeling. China also withheld shipments of rare earth minerals used in products such as electric vehicles and wind turbines, crippling U.S. businesses.
After showing how much pain they could inflict on each other, the United States and China agreed to a ceasefire. A new 100% secondary tariff 'would blow up that deal,' said Gary Hufbauer, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.
'China is particularly well-placed to hold out,' said Nicholas Mulder, a Cornell University historian. "All this would get us back to a position of full confrontation that would be uncomfortable for all sides.''
Hufbauer also noted that the secondary tariffs would also likely end 'any rapprochement with India'' — the world's fifth-biggest economy and one with which Trump is pursuing a trade deal.
Energy prices could climb
If Trump goes ahead with the tariffs, 'it would invariably lead to higher global energy prices,'' especially for natural gas, economists Kieran Tompkins and Liam Peach of Capital Economics wrote in a commentary Monday.
Other oil-exporting countries have enough spare capacity to ramp up production and offset any loss of Russian oil exports in global market. But if they did, the world would have no buffer to rely on if there were an oil shock caused by, say, conflict in the Middle East — and prices could skyrocket.
'Removing that spare capacity would be akin to riding a bike with no shock absorbers,'' Tompkins and Peach wrote.
The Russian economy has been resilient
After Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the United States and its allies slammed Russia with sanctions.
Among other things, the U.S. froze the assets of Russia's central bank and barred some Russian banks from using a key international payments system run by Belgium. With its allies from the Group of Seven rich nations, it also capped the price that importers could pay for Russian oil.
The sanctions were expected to crush the Russian economy, but they didn't. Putin put Russia on a wartime budget, and high defense spending kept unemployment low.
Military recruits were given big sign-up bonuses and the families of the fallen received death benefits, pumping income into some of Russia's poorer regions. To keep its oil sales going, Russia deployed "shadow fleets,'' hundreds of aging tankers of uncertain ownership and dodgy safety practices that delivered oil priced above the G7 price cap.
'The experience of the G7 oil price cap against Russia showed how challenging the enforcement of measures against the Russian oil trade can be,' Mulder said.
Last year, the Russian economy grew 4.1%, according to the International Monetary Fund.
But strains are showing, partly because Putin's war has made Russia a pariah to foreign investors. The IMF forecasts growth will decelerate to 1.5% this year, and last month the Russian economy minister warned the country is "on the brink of going into a recession.''
Trump's tariffs could increase the pressure, in part by driving down Russia's energy exports — and the revenue the Russian government collects from an energy tax.
Tariffs are mostly untried as a diplomatic lever
'To my knowledge, tariffs have never been applied as an explicit anti-aggression measure,' said Mulder, author of a 2022 history of economic sanctions. "I am skeptical that the secondary tariffs threat will be effective.''
For one thing, he said, it's unclear whether Trump will actually impose them after 50 days. The president has repeatedly announced tariffs against other countries, and then sometimes suspended or tweaked them.
For another, the secondary tariffs would target countries — namely China and India — that might have some sway in Moscow. 'The United States needs cooperation and collaboration to bring Russia to the negotiating table,' said Cullen Hendrix, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute. "Threatening to harm the actors who actually have leverage over Moscow may backfire.''
____
AP writers Katie Davies in Manchester, England, and Chris Megerian in Washington, contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP Rep's Response To Donald Trump's Slam Of ‘Weaklings' Base Is Just… Wow
Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) brushed off President Donald Trump's harsh words for his own supporters on Wednesday with a comment that's been mocked online as sycophantic and surreal. Trump lashed out at those of his MAGA base who are furious with the Justice Department's refusal to release any more documents related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, calling them 'stupid.' Asked for his response to Trump's slamming of his own supporters, Burchett spun: 'President Trump has his own opinions, but honestly, man, he wins.' CNN: What's your response to President Trump calling his own supporters weaklings? Burchett: He has a strategy in all this and I suspect it will play out because he wins every time. — Acyn (@Acyn) July 17, 2025 Trump 'has a strategy in all this and I suspect that's gonna play out because, dad-gummit, he wins every dad-gum time,' the Republican added, playing into the MAGA notion that Trump always knows exactly what he's doing at any given time because he's playing 4D chess. 'It's uncanny that he ends up on top,' Burchett added. 'And I suspect on this case he will do as well.' The Tennessee lawmaker's defense sparked swift backlash on social media: Are we back to the 4D chess trope? — The Dr. - ❤️'s Educated Women (@gatesisthedevil) July 17, 2025 Such a weaklings' answer! — Evaristus Odinikaeze (@odinikaeze) July 17, 2025 Sycophant's gotta sycophant. — Bill Schmidt (@BaByBoY12216) July 17, 2025 Panic and rant is a strategy? — Chimes of Freedom (@throbbingvicar) July 17, 2025 Narrator: in fact, the convicted felon fails most of the time and then declares victory anyway. Because liar. — Guy Cole (@guycole) July 17, 2025 Related... Fox News Star Stuns With Unreal Take On 'Nazis' And 'The Blacks' OOPS! Trump Taunts AOC And Crockett, Then Undermines Himself In Next Breath Paul Krugman Exposes The Flaw At The Heart Of Trump's Cruelest Policy


Boston Globe
27 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Going to therapy while the world is on fire
'I'm doing well,' I answer in a semireflexive way. The kids are thriving, summer is here, vacation is coming soon. Yet my answer does not capture the full picture. 'Well, I mean apart from the fact that terrible things are happening all around and that the world feels on the brink of collapse.' Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up A car ablaze in Sweida, Syria, following clashes between Bedouin and Druze factions on July 14. Getty Images/Getty Advertisement One of my patients doesn't wait for me to ask how he is doing as we start an early morning session. 'I can't do therapy today,' he says. I listen, curious. 'There's just too much dissonance. Not sure I can really go into the details of what's happening in my life when the world seems to be crumbling all around.' I've heard many versions of this expressed in therapy over the past several months, a hesitation about feeling entitled to a 50-minute therapy session. (I received consent from my patients to reference their stories anonymously.) 'Your life matters,' I say. 'Yes, big things are happening, but this doesn't mean your life doesn't have significance.' My words feel flimsy, perhaps because I'm only partially convinced of them myself. My patient knocks them down in the next three seconds. 'Yeah, well, you're a therapist, so of course you are going to say that.' Advertisement Sometimes I need a good little kick of radical honesty in a session to sharpen my focus. 'Many people are talking about this very question in therapy,' I say. I tell him that I'm thinking about this question, too. He tells me about hypernormalization, a term introduced by the Russian-born American anthropologist Alexei Yurchak to describe the way in which people carried on with life pretending everything was normal in the 1970s Soviet Union despite the systemic failure of government and institutions. I listen in silent agreement. My patient tells me he is grateful for having just gotten a good job offer, but his happiness is tempered by his awareness of what is happening in the country and the world. Some of his friends want to leave the country. 'What do I do?' he asks. 'Should I escape to Europe? Focus on my job? Amass wealth and buy a house? Fight? How do I fight?' A Ukrainian firefighter worked to extinguish a fire following Russian drone strikes on houses in Odesa, on July 11. OLEKSANDR GIMANOV/AFP via Getty Images We end the session without having gotten into the dynamics of the romantic relationship he had wanted to talk about. I remember learning in grad school about the late American psychologist Urie Bronfenbrenner's biopsychosocial model, which holds that human development is influenced by multiple interconnected systems in a person's environment. An illustration showing a stick-figure individual at the center of several concentric circles: family and close friends first, with community and school one ring out, and politics, government, religion, and culture circling the whole. I imagine the stick figure — my patient or me — becoming uncentered, floating across the lines that are themselves wobbly. Advertisement Therapy feels like this: destabilized. Can we truly shut out the outside world and carry on with day-to-day therapy work when the world keeps smashing into us? What weight do our individual lives carry? Some patients wonder at the self-indulgence of paying good money to talk about relationships, health, families, careers, kids, pets. These perennial questions for the practice of therapy have resurfaced with a new urgency over the past several months. For other patients, the political world has become of immediate relevance to their day-to-day lives. Depression, anxiety, anger, dissociation, and fear are heightened for many. Scientist and doctor patients whose research funding has been cut question their life's direction. Other patients talk about deportation; yet others are fearful of losing food stamps and housing benefits. A woman with a severe trauma history, whose government-subsidized housing has provided her with a sense of safety she had never felt, tells me she has a suicide plan if her benefits get taken away. She is not joking. A colleague mentions a patient with a history of delusions who is terrified when he sees black SUVs pull up in front of his building. The presence of Immigration and Customs Enforcement in his neighborhood now gives his delusions a grounding in reality. The line that separates anxiety from paranoia has shifted. Smoke and fire rose to the sky following an Israeli army bombardment in the northern Gaza Strip, as seen from southern Israel on July 10. Leo Correa/Associated Press And then there are many patients who, like me, feel enraged and powerless, consumed and wanting to escape. Meanwhile, life on the street in my neighborhood looks eerily normal: People get coffee, kids play while parents chat at the playground, runners run, and, of course, people go to their weekly therapy appointments. Advertisement I ask my own therapist, 'Is it strange for me to talk to you about my own little life in the context of the world? What are you telling your patients? What should I be telling mine?' I see in her eyes that she knows what I'm talking about. She is asking similar questions. She tells me about a book she is reading about the power of defiance. Sounds good, I tell her, as I put it in my online cart. Not a typical therapist move. We are out of mainstream therapy water. Both as therapist and patient, I wonder how much my individual story has weight and consequence in the context of a breaking social order. Is there a risk that I am becoming complicit with this break if I carry on talking about relationships and family and summer plans in my therapy as if nothing else were going on? And what if I don't feel like talking about politics in therapy? Or what if I need to shut out the world so I can focus on what's happening in my smaller sphere? I reflect on what I had said to my patient, about his life continuing to matter. It hits me on my bike ride home along the river after my therapy appointment, alongside the people sitting by the water taking in the afternoon sun. Our lives matter. The fact of an administration that seeks to crush individual voices, and in particular dissenting ones, urges us to stay aware of ourselves. Many skills developed in therapy are important not just to individual well-being and personal growth; they are tools to support coping and, if we want them to be, can be vehicles for political change and resistance. These tools and vehicles include self-exploration, curiosity, reflection, questioning of previously held assumptions and what we thought were given truths, taking risks, tolerating distress, managing uncomfortable emotional states, appreciating one's unique identity, questioning fear, building on one's strengths, and exploring possibilities for change. At a time when difference and diversity in being and critical thought are in peril, now more than ever is the time to bolster those very qualities. Advertisement

28 minutes ago
Pro-Russia cybercrime network targeted by European law enforcement
LONDON -- Law enforcement officials in Europe said they had coordinated the dismantling of an international pro-Russian cybercrime network, arresting two members, issuing warrants for others in Russia and disrupting the group's main infrastructure. The network, known as NoName057(16), was alleged to have targeted Ukraine and countries that supported Kyiv in its fight against the Russian invasion, Europol said in a statement Wednesday. The group was alleged to have recruited volunteers via "pro-Russian channels, forums, and even niche chat groups on social media and messaging apps." "Individuals acting for NoName057(16) are mainly Russian-speaking sympathisers who use automated tools to carry out distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks," Europol said in a statement. Two people were arrested, one in France and one in Spain, officials said of the 3-day operation. Seven other arrest warrants were issued, including six by Germany for alleged hackers living in Russia, Europol said. "The group, which professed support for the Russian Federation since the start of the war of aggression against Ukraine, executed multiple DDoS attacks during high-level political events in Europe," the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation, or Eurojust, said in a statement posted to social media. The FBI in the United States was among the law enforcement agencies who took action against the group, Europol said. Europol and Eurojust, the European Union's top law-enforcement agencies, coordinated the operation, which they called "Eastwood." They were joined by authorities from Czechia, France, Finland, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the Netherlands. The hacking group was estimated to have mobilized some 4,000 users to support their operations, Eurojust said. Europol and other law enforcement agencies sent some 1,000 alleged supporters messages notifying them of "their legal liability," Europol said. Investigators said they disrupted more than 100 servers used by the group, along with a "major part" of the group's main infrastructure. Law enforcement officers searched two dozen houses throughout Europe and questioned people in Germany, France, Italy, Poland and Spain, according to Europol. The pro-Russian group was accused of a series of hacks, including attacking banks and government offices in Sweden, along with perpetrating waves of cyber attacks in Germany and elsewhere. The attacks in Germany targeted some 230 organizations and businesses, including 'arms factories, power suppliers and government organizations,' according to Eurojust. "In Switzerland, multiple attacks were also carried out in June 2023, during a Ukrainian video-message addressed to the Joint Parliament, and in June 2024, during the Peace Summit for Ukraine at Bürgenstock," Europol said.