Venezuela's El Dorado, Where Gold Is Currency Of The Poor
They live in a town named after the mythical City of Gold and untold riches -- but most of them are poor.
Merchants use scales to carefully weigh the flecks people guard in plastic pill bottles or wrapped in pieces of paper, and market goods are priced in weight of gold.
For 0.02 grams, you can get a small packet of maize meal, for one gram a pre-packaged bag of groceries that includes flour, pasta, oil, margarine, ketchup and milk powder.
A gram of gold can purchase between $85 and $100 worth of goods, but takes hours of back-breaking work to amass. If you're in luck.
"Gold is a blessing given to us so we can buy what we want, but you have to work hard," 48-year-old Jose Tobias Tranquini told AFP in the town of 5,000 residents mostly employed in mining -- legal and illegal.
"One day at the mine you might find nothing; there are lucky people who have gotten up to a kilo (2.2 pounds), but... I haven't had that kind of blessing. I've only gotten a little bit," said Tranquini.
El Dorado's residents have limited access to banking services.
They could sell their gold at one of the dozens of dealers that dot the streets, but most prefer not to. Gold -- unlike the battered Venezuelan currency that has lost 50 percent of its value this year -- does not depreciate.
El Dorado arose as a military fort as Britain and Venezuela squared off in 1895 over the mineral- and oil-rich region of Essequibo now at the center of an increasingly heated territorial dispute with Guyana, which has administered it for decades.
The oldest inhabitants of the town remember that when it rained, particles of gold emerged from the town's clay streets.
Nowadays, the streets are tarred, though potholed, and the population rely for transport mainly on motorcycles that zoom noisily to and fro.
Hilda Carrero, a 73-year-old merchant, arrived in Eldorado 50 years go in the midst of a gold rush. The town, she recalls, was just "jungle and snakes... It was ugly."
Carrero sells cans of water for 0.03 grams of gold apiece -- about $1.50 -- but business, like mining hauls, is erratic. Some days she sells nothing.
"If I don't have gold I have no life," Carrero sighed.
It can be hard to make a living in a place where abundant reserves of gold, diamonds, iron, bauxite, quartz and coltan have attracted organized crime and guerrilla groups that mine illegally, and sow violence.
Extortion of small business owners is rife, and 217 people were killed in the four years to 2020 in clashes between rival criminal gangs.
Environmentalists also denounce an "ecocide" in the heavily-exploited area, and mine collapses have claimed dozens of lives.
Around El Dorado, there are numerous camps processing the gold-laden sand that miners dig up daily.
In tall sheds with zinc roofs, mountains of sand are milled in machines that work with modified car engines, then washed in water and toxic mercury to separate the gold from other metals.
Tiny particles almost imperceptible to the naked eye are trapped in a green mat which is shaken out to collect them.
The granules are finally heated with a blowtorch to remove impurities before the gold can be traded or sold.
It is hard work, and hazardous.
"The danger of this is the smoke" produced by the mercury burning off, a mill owner explained while smoking a cigarette.
A family of five working at a mine visited by AFP spent four hours that day processing a ton of sand.
For their efforts: one gram of gold.
"We'll use it to buy food and whatever is needed at the mill," a worker who asked not to be named told AFP as he cupped a tiny grain of gold in coarse hands.
It was a good day. Gold dust is a common method of payment in El Dorado and other Venezuelan mining towns AFP Gold dealers dot the streets of El Dorado AFP A gram of gold that took a family of five four hours to extract AFP In El Dorado, groceries are priced in gold weight AFP A gram of gold can fetch between $85 and $100 AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
a day ago
- Int'l Business Times
New Cryptocurrency May Be Aiding Russia To Dodge Sanctions
Russia could be turning to a new cryptocurrency called A7A5 to allow money to flow in and out of the country and avoid Western sanctions, experts have told AFP. Multiple rounds of international sanctions have been imposed on Moscow since its February 2022 invasion of Ukraine seeking to ramp up economic pressure to halt the war. But the launch of A7A5 in February this year opened up an alternative payment method for Russian businesses and individuals to sidestep sanctions when trading with foreign partners, the UK-based non-profit Centre for Information Resilience (CIR) said in a report. A7A5 is a stablecoin -- a form of cryptocurrency backed by traditional assets -- in this case pegged to the ruble, making it harder for Western authorities to monitor than dollar-based alternatives. It was launched by a pro-Russian Moldovan oligarch and a Russian state-owned bank as "the first ever ruble-pegged stablecoin," George Voloshin from anti-money laundering group ACAMS told AFP. While it is not widely used yet, experts say its creation marks a significant step in Russia's efforts to reduce its dependence on major crypto companies -- many of which cooperate with Western governments. Since Russia was kicked out of the international banking system SWIFT and hit with asset freezes and investment bans, Moscow has already turned to crypto to sidestep financial restrictions imposed by the United States and its allies. Stablecoins are especially attractive because they are less volatile than other cryptocurrencies. People have also used cryptocurrency to donate directly to both the Ukrainian army and Russian militias, according to several analytics firms such as Elliptic. But Russia has faced a problem: USDT, the most popular stablecoin, is tied to the US dollar and controlled by a company called Tether, which cooperates with US and European authorities. Earlier this year, Tether blocked $28 million in USDT held in wallets on Garantex, Russia's largest crypto exchange, which was shut down following a global crackdown on illegal transactions. "That was a real wake-up call" for Russia, said Elise Thomas, senior investigator at CIR. "It made them think that they need their own stablecoin, they need something that they control," she added. Just before Garantex was shut down, tens of millions of dollars were moved from USDT into A7A5, according to data from crypto tracking firm Global Ledger. A7A5 is backed by deposits in Promsvyazbank, a Russian bank under sanctions for its ties to the government and the military. The coin is traded on Grinex, a crypto exchange based in Kyrgyzstan -- a country seen as friendlier to Russian interests and less vulnerable to Western pressure. A7A5 is also registered in Kyrgyzstan rather than Russia because the country offers a crypto-friendly legal environment and is less exposed to "sanctions and other economic pressures," project director Leonid Shumakov said in an interview posted online. Less than six months after its launch, around $150 million is now held in A7A5. These transactions are not necessarily illegal, but they could become problematic if used by sanctioned individuals or entities to reconnect with the global financial system, warned ACAMS's Voloshin. The man behind the A7 group, which developed A7A5, is Ilan Shor, a Moldovan businessman and politician now living in Russia. Investigators found links between A7A5 and Shor's political activities in Moldova, including websites related to both sharing the same IP address. These findings have suggested that the cryptocurrency could be used as a tool for political influence. Shor and his company have already been sanctioned by the UK, and more recently by the European Union, which accused them of trying to meddle in Moldova's 2024 presidential election and its referendum on joining the EU -- all while keeping close ties with Moscow.
Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
EU Turns Up Pressure With Trump Trade Deal 'In Reach'
With the contours of a hard-fought EU-US trade deal taking shape, the European Union is flexing its muscles in a bid to squeeze concessions from US President Donald Trump in the run-up to his deadline of August 1. Brussels and Washington appear to be inching towards a deal with a baseline 15-percent US levy on EU goods, and potential carve-outs for critical sectors, multiple diplomats told AFP. The EU's 27 countries have largely let the European Commission focus on seeking a deal to avoid hefty US tariffs -- as Trump repeatedly upped the stakes, finally threatening them with 30-percent levies without an accord by month's end. But since the US leader's latest ultimatum, the tone has hardened from key EU capitals Paris and Berlin: they say it is time for Brussels to show its mettle and willingness to respond forcefully if needed. Reflecting the toughened stance, EU states Thursday backed a package of retaliation on 93 billion euros ($109 billion) of US goods -- to kick in from August 7 if talks fall short. The counter-tariffs are "intended to support negotiations, not escalate tensions", an EU diplomat emphasised. Economist Eric Dor said the EU would be "capitulating" by accepting a 15-percent baseline. He warned it would harm businesses with profit margins too small to absorb the tariff hike, and drive relocations to the United States. Most states prefer a deal to no deal -- even with undesirable levies of 15 percent -- but exemptions are key, with aircraft, steel, lumber, pharmaceutical products and agricultural goods under discussion, diplomats said. The approaching deadline comes with a sense of deja-vu: before Trump's 30-percent threat on July 12, EU officials also believed they were on the cusp of a deal following months of difficult talks. "The final decision is in the hands of President Trump," stressed another EU diplomat -- even if Japan securing an agreement with 15-percent flat levies has boosted expectations of a European deal. The mood music seems different this time, however. Trump Wednesday said Washington and Brussels were in "serious negotiations". "If they agree to open up the union to American businesses, then we will let them pay a lower tariff," the US leader added. EU trade spokesman Olof Gill Thursday reiterated the "twin tracks" approach: "Negotiation, and preparation for the event that the negotiations don't lead to the outcome we want." The thought now in many European capitals is that if the EU does not get a deal, "retaliation must be significant", Alberto Rizzi of the European Council on Foreign Relations think tank told AFP. Trump takes umbrage at the EU's surplus in goods trade, but in fact, for services, the bloc had a trade deficit of 109 billion euros with the United States in 2023. Brussels is already drawing up a list of services to potentially target. Beyond that, France has been most vocal in calling for the EU to bring out the "bazooka" known as the anti-coercion instrument. Paris says it has Berlin's support, following talks this week between President Emmanuel Macron and Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Under the instrument, the EU can curb imports and exports of US goods and services as well as intellectual property rights, and impose restrictions on access to the EU market, including public procurement. But it's an open question whether the bloc would have the stomach to escalate the fight by deploying the potent tool, described by Gill as the EU's "most powerful deterrent". And even if it did, retaliation would not be swift. Under the rules, the commission would usually have four months to investigate the third country it accuses of detrimental trade policies -- then EU states would have eight to 10 weeks to back any action. Only then would the commission have a green light to prepare measures within six months. Experts seem unconvinced the EU would opt for this "nuclear" option, especially when Europe wants to keep Trump's support for Ukraine and the US security umbrella intact. "It is questionable whether all EU members would ever agree to such drastic action against their principal security provider," wrote Daniel S Hamilton of Brookings Institution in a paper published this week.
Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
Tariff Negotiations With US 'Not Finished', Says Philippines
Negotiations over the Philippines' new 19 percent US tariff rate are "not finished", a key government economic adviser said Thursday, tamping down fears over the deal's potential impact on the agriculture sector. President Ferdinand Marcos flew back to the country late Wednesday after a three-day trip to Washington that saw him emerge from a meeting with Donald Trump having shaved a single point off a 20 percent levy on Filipino goods. What might "seem like a very small concession" was in fact a "significant achievement", Marcos told reporters who questioned if the Philippines -- a longtime US treaty ally -- was getting the short end of the stick. The US president, meanwhile, touted "zero tariffs" on American goods headed to the archipelago nation of 115 million. But Marcos economic adviser Frederick Go said Thursday that tariffs would not be dropped in every category. "The negotiations are not yet finished. Our technical working groups will continue to work with their counterparts from America to finalize the details of this arrangement," he told reporters in Manila. "There are still many things to be discussed." Since the Trump meeting, the Marcos administration has downplayed the potential effects of the tariffs, noting just 16 percent of the country's exports go to the United States, with about two-thirds being electronic components not subject to levies. On Thursday, Go said that while tariffs would disappear for certain agricultural products like soy and wheat, key areas such as sugar, corn, rice, fish and pork would remain protected for Filipino farmers. "I can guarantee to you we studied our biggest industries in the country where we are a significant market producer. We didn't include those in our arrangements with the United States," he said. Go also touted the benefit to Filipino consumers of dropping some tariffs, particularly on pharmaceuticals. "Medicines are expensive in the Philippines. If they are tariff-free, then that can lower the price of medicine in our country," he said. Jesus Felipe, an economics professor at Manila's De La Salle University, told AFP the actual number of Philippine exports hit by the full tariff would likely be low. "That's the number (19 percent) that has been flagged, but our feeling is that many products -- a substantial share of Philippine exports to the US -- will have to be exempted." While predicting the effect on Philippine GDP would effectively be "nothing", Felipe said the "imperialist attitude" with which the United States was treating smaller countries remained worrying. Countries with far larger US trade deficits like China, Mexico and Canada had "much more power and leverage" to fight back, he said. "The Philippines cannot retaliate."
