The crimes Trump doesn't care about
When the topic is immigrants or Democratic cities, President Donald Trump loves to talk about crime. But when it comes to Wall Street bankers and C-suite executives, he tends to keep his mouth shut.
Within the first 100 days of his second term, Trump pardoned a slew of financial fraudsters. And in February, he signed an executive order announcing that his administration would pause enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a law passed in 1977 that was designed to prevent American citizens and companies from bribing foreign officials to serve their own business interests.
Now, it's becoming clear how Trump's Department of Justice likely intends to handle financial crimes. If these crimes involve drug cartels or political opponents — anything that fits his narratives that immigration is dangerous and that Democrats are corrupt — then they merit the DOJ's attention.
Related Trump has set up a perfect avenue for potential corruption
This month, for example, Trump accused California Sen. Adam Schiff of committing mortgage fraud. Similarly, the DOJ opened an investigation into New York Attorney General Letitia James's real-estate transactions — the same Letitia James who filed a lawsuit against the Trump Organization that resulted in a judge ordering Trump to pay over $450 million.
But if Trump's allies or major corporations engage in some corruption to get ahead, then the DOJ might be inclined to just look the other way.
How the DOJ's white-collar crime priorities are shifting
On paper, the Trump administration's words have not necessarily indicated a more dramatic shift in priorities than the routine modifications you might see from one administration to the next. 'What I see in the actual policies and the details that are emerging is sort of more of the fine-tuning you would expect with a change in administration, consistent with not only the first Trump administration but also prior Republican administrations,' said Joseph Facciponti, a former federal prosecutor who now serves as the executive director of NYU School of Law's Program on Corporate Compliance and Enforcement.
Still, there are signs that the Trump administration might continue to deprioritize enforcing white-collar crimes. Since Trump returned to power, the DOJ has retreated from lawsuits involving money laundering, crypto markets, and foreign corruption. In fact, as of March 31, federal prosecutions of white-collar crime have declined by more than 10 percent compared to last year, when Democrats still controlled the White House. That's made defense lawyers representing clients with ongoing investigations feel more optimistic about their pending cases, according to the Wall Street Journal. It's also left them concerned that they'll have less work and fewer lucrative clients during the Trump years.
To say that this approach is business-friendly is an understatement. Trump's February executive order pausing enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act states that upholding anti-bribery laws essentially punishes American companies for 'routine business practices in other nations' and 'actively harms American economic competitiveness and, therefore, national security.' The executive order is not merely willing to ignore corporate corruption — the language practically encourages it as a necessary means to stay competitive.
This line of thinking was continued in a memo issued by the DOJ in May, which announced new investigative and policy priorities for white-collar crime enforcement. While the memo stated that 'white-collar crime also poses a significant threat to U.S. interests,' it also stated that rigorous enforcement of corporate law is a burden on businesses. 'The vast majority of American businesses are legitimate enterprises working to deliver value for their shareholders and quality products and services for customers. Prosecutors must avoid overreach that punishes risk-taking and hinders innovation,' the memo says, adding that the department has to strike the right balance between investigating criminal wrongdoing and minimizing burdens on businesses.
To be sure, effective law enforcement does require prosecutors to be prudent and not take on every single case that comes their way. But the DOJ seems to be implying that prosecutors have been too aggressive in pursuing cases involving financial crime, despite the fact that white-collar prosecutions have been trending down since 2011.
The May memo does outline some areas of white-collar crime that it plans to focus on, including health care and elder fraud, Ponzi schemes that defraud investors, and money laundering or tax evasion schemes that compromise US national security interests. But the question is whether the DOJ will have the capacity for robust corporate enforcement in those areas. 'I think the real issue is how [the administration's priorities] all get implemented because we know that there's been a number of resignations within the criminal division, and specifically the fraud section. We know that they have shifted personnel around and reassigned staff to do other things,' Facciponti said. 'And so what kind of resources do they have at this point to do the kinds of investigations that they say that they're interested in doing?'
Indeed, changes in the administration's staffing have also slowed investigations or brought them to a halt. In April, the Wall Street Journal reported that Attorney General Pam Bondi is 'swapping out and sidelining career supervisors who were responsible for charging crimes such as corruption, price fixing and securities fraud.'
Trump has also signaled to convicted white-collar criminals that they might have an out. Since retaking the White House, he has commuted the 14-year sentence of Jason Galanis, who defrauded investors, including a Native American tribe and a teachers' pension fund, of tens of millions of dollars; he has pardoned Julie and Todd Chrisley, the reality TV stars convicted of bank fraud and tax evasion; and he granted clemency to Lawrence Duran, a health care executive who was convicted of leading a Medicare fraud and money laundering scheme. These are just a few of the fraudsters Trump has granted clemency to, which House Democrats say has cost victims and taxpayers some $1.3 billion in fines and restitution.
This has given convicted white-collar criminals some hope that they can get pardoned if they get on Trump's good side. Former Sen. Bob Menendez, a Democrat from New Jersey who was convicted of bribery and corruption under President Joe Biden's DOJ, has been gunning for a presidential pardon by accusing Democrats of weaponizing the Justice Department — a familiar line lifted from Trump's presidential campaign. Sam Bankman-Fried — the cryptocurrency mogul who was convicted of fraud and conspiracy and sentenced to 25 years in prison — and his allies have also been trying to secure a pardon from Trump, according to the New York Times.
How Trump thinks about crime
The president likes to tout a tough-on-crime persona, having successfully run law-and-order campaigns that relied on racist and anti-immigrant tropes to whip up anger among his base supporters. His administration has also made crime a focus, largely to serve its interest in curbing immigration and its mass deportation agenda — so much so that the White House's official channels have turned arrests of immigrants into memes.
But Trump clearly doesn't view some crimes — specifically white-collar crimes — as worthy of scrutiny. That's in part because Trump has long ingratiated himself with the business world, not to mention the fact that he and his businesses have also been found guilty of fraud.
More than six months into the second Trump administration, a pattern is emerging in which Trump's political opponents are scrutinized in ways his allies never would be, as is the case with Schiff and James. And people who try to get on Trump's good side, like New York City Mayor Eric Adams, who was indicted on bribery charges during the Biden administration, have seen Trump's DOJ drop its charges against them.
By being soft on white-collar crime, the lesson from Trump's Justice Department might be that if you're a businessperson looking to dabble in some light fraud, now might be the best time to do so. And if you want extra insurance, it probably wouldn't hurt to get on Trump's good side.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
7 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump's tariff deadline is near. Here's a look at countries that have a deal — and those that don't
Come Friday, the world will have to contend with higher tariff rates from the Trump administration, raising the specter of even more economic uncertainty. For most countries, that can of worms has been kicked twice down the road, from 'Liberation Day' on April 2, to July 9, and now to Aug. 1. Back in April, President Donald Trump had claimed to have done 'over 200 deals' in an interview with Time Magazine, and trade adviser Peter Navarro had said that '90 deals in 90 days' was possible. The country has fallen far short of that, with only eight deals in 120 days, including one with the 27-member European Union. Here are where things stand in global trade. U.K. first to a deal The U.K. led the charge on trade agreements with the U.S., striking one as early as May. The framework includes a 10% baseline tariffs on U.K. goods, as well as various quotas and exemptions for products such as autos and aerospace goods. But even after Trump met with Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland recently, some points in their trade agreement remain uncertain. That includes tariffs on U.K. steel and aluminum, which the U.S. agreed to slash. Talks about the U.K.'s digital services tax, which Trump wants scrapped, also seem to be continuing. Vietnam: tariffs more than halved Vietnam was the second to cross the line with the Trump administration, with Trump announcing a trade agreement on July 2 that saw the tariff imposed on Vietnam slashed from 46% to 20%. One point with Vietnam was a 40% 'transshipping' tariff on goods originating in another country and transferred to Vietnam for final shipment to the U.S., although it is not clear how this will be applied. Trump also claimed that there would be full market access to the country for U.S. goods. Chinese manufacturers have used transshipping to sidestep the hefty tariffs on their direct shipments to the United States, using Vietnam as a major transshipment hub. However, it seems that Vietnam was blindsided by the 20% rate imposed, according to a report by Politico. Politico said negotiators had expected a 11% levy, but Trump unilaterally announced the 20% rate. Indonesia: bringing down barriers Indonesia's tariff rate was cut to 19% from 32% in its agreement with Trump, announced on July 15. The White House said Indonesia will eliminate tariff barriers on over 99% of U.S. products exported to Indonesia across all sectors, including agricultural products and energy. The framework says the countries will also address various 'non-tariff barriers' and other obstacles that the U.S. faces in Indonesian markets. Philippines: marginal decrease Unlike its ASEAN counterparts above, which had sizable reductions in their tariff duties, the Philippines saw a decrease of a single percentage point, to 19% from 20%, on July 22. Manila will not impose tariffs on U.S. goods as part of the agreement, according to Trump, who praised the country for what he described as 'going OPEN MARKET with the United States.' In addition, Trump also said that the Philippines will work together 'Militarily,' without specifying any details. The two countries are already treaty allies, with Manila hosting U.S. troops and having a mutual defense treaty going back to 1951. Japan: rice and autos Japan was the second major Asian economy to come to an agreement with the U.S. after China, seeing its tariff rate cut to 15% from 25% on July 23, and being the first economy to see a lower preferential tariff rate for its key automobile sector. Trump called the agreement 'perhaps the largest Deal ever made,' while adding that Japan would invest $550 billion in the United States and the U.S. would 'receive 90% of the Profits.' The path to this agreement was fraught with uncertainty, with Trump saying days before the agreement that he did not expect the two countries to reach a deal. He described Japan on separate occasions as 'very tough' in trade talks and suggested the country was 'spoiled' for not accepting U.S. rice despite facing a domestic rice shortage. E.U.: some discontent remains The European Union's agreement with the U.S. was struck just days ago, after long negotiations. E.U. goods are now facing a 15% baseline tariff rate, half the 30% Trump had previously threatened the bloc with. Existing duties on autos will be reduced to 15%, and levies on some products like aircraft and certain drug generics will go back to pre-January levels. But the deal has been met with criticism, including from some European leaders. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou went as far as saying it was an act of 'submission' and a 'dark day.' E.U. Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic, however, called it 'the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances.' South Korea: also at 15% South Korea is the latest country to reach an agreement, on Thursday, with the terms being somewhat similar to the ones Japan received. The country will see a blanket 15% tariff on its exports, while duties on its auto sector are also lowered to 15%. South Korea 'will give to the United States $350 Billion Dollars for Investments owned and controlled by the United States, and selected by myself, as President,' Trump said. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said '90% of the profits' from that $350 billion investment will be 'going to the American people.' However, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung said the $350 billion fund will play a role in facilitating the 'active entry' of Korean companies into the U.S. market into industries such as shipbuilding and semiconductors. China: talks still ongoing The Trump administration's trade talks with China have taken a different tack than those with the rest of the world. The world's second-largest economy was firmly in Trump's trade crosshairs from the moment he took office. Rather than a deal, China has reached a series of suspensions over its 'reciprocal' tariff rate. It was initially hit with a 34% tariff from 'Liberation Day,' before a series of back-and-forth measures between the two sides saw the duties skyrocket to 145% for Chinese imports to the U.S. and 125% for U.S. imports to China. However, both sides agreed to reduced tariffs in May, after their first trade meeting in Geneva, Switzerland. The truce was agreed to last until Aug. 12. China currently faces a 30% combined tariff rate, while the U.S. is looking at 10% duties. The countries' most recent meeting in Stockholm ended without a truce extension, but U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that any truce extension will not be agreed to until Trump signs off on the plan. For countries without a deal, it appears that a higher global baseline tariff of about 15%-20% will be slapped on them, according to Trump, higher than the 10% baseline announced on 'Liberation Day.' Countries with a trade surplus with the U.S. will most likely see a higher 'reciprocal' tariff rate. Here are some key trading partners that have not agreed to a deal with the U.S. India: tariffs and a penalty On Wednesday, Trump announced a 25% tariff on India, with an additional unspecified 'penalty' for what he views as unfair trade policies and for India's purchase of military equipment and energy from Russia. 'While India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. The 25% tariff rate is modestly lower than what Trump imposed on India on ' Liberation Day,' when he announced a 26% rate on the key trading partner, but at the high end of the 20%-25% range that the U.S. president said he was considering. Canada: an 'intense phase' There has been frequent back-and-forth between Canada and the U.S. over tariffs in recent months, with the country being hit by duties even before Trump announced his so-called 'reciprocal' tariffs. Canada is now facing 35% tariffs on various goods starting Aug. 1, with Trump threatening to increase that rate in case of retaliation. The rate is separate from any sectoral tariffs. Trump has repeatedly cited drugs flowing from Canada to the U.S. as a reason for his move to impose tariffs. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said earlier this week that the partners were in an 'intense phase' of talks, noting that it would be unlikely for an agreement not to include any tariffs, Reuters reported. Mexico: no sign of progress Like Canada, Mexico has also long been a U.S. tariff target, with Trump citing drugs and illegal migration as factors in his decision to announce levies on the U.S.' southern neighbor. The president has said that Mexico has not done enough to secure the border. Mexico is set to be hit with a 30% tariff, with any retaliation set to be met with an even higher rate from the U.S. The Mexican government has stressed that it is important for the trading partners to resolve their issues ahead of Aug. 1, but there have not been many signs of progress toward an agreement in recent weeks. Australia: sticking to the baseline Australia currently faces the baseline 10% as it runs a trade deficit with the United States. However, the country could be facing a higher tariff rate if Trump decides to raise his baseline rate to 15%-20%. Canberra has not been publicly known to be in trade talks with Washington, with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese reportedly arguing that Australia's deficit with the U.S. and its free trade agreement mean there should be no tariff on Australian imports. reportedly said was not prompted by Trump.
NBC News
7 minutes ago
- NBC News
China probes Nvidia over AI chip 'tracking' security risks
While Nvidia has been given assurances by Washington that it will be allowed to resume exports of its made-for-China H20 general processing units, the AI chips may be met with increased scrutiny from Beijing. According to the Cyberspace Administration of China, Nvidia met with Beijing officials on Thursday regarding potential national security concerns posed by its H20 chips, which recently saw restrictions on their export lifted following an effective ban in April. Nvidia was requested 'to clarify and submit relevant supporting documentation regarding security risks, including potential vulnerabilities and backdoors, associated with its H20 computing chips sold to China,' according to a CNBC translation of a statement from CAC. In a post, the regulator said that Nvidia's computing chips were reported to have serious security vulnerabilities, also noting calls from U.S. lawmakers for mandatory tracking features to be placed on advanced chips exported from the country. In its statement, CAC added that American AI experts had already revealed that Nvidia's computing chips pose mature 'tracking and positioning' and 'remote shutdown' technologies. The statement appears to be referencing a report from Reuters in May that said Bill Foster, a Democrat lawmaker from Illinois, was planning to introduce legislation that would require advanced AI chipmakers like Nvidia to include a built-in location reporting system. Forester, who once worked as a particle physicist, and independent technical experts reportedly agreed that the technology to track chips was readily available, with much of it already built into Nvidia's chips. Forester's bill would also seek to give U.S. authorities the power to remotely shut down chips being used without proper licenses, in a measure to fight chip smuggling and export loopholes. Nvidia did not immediately respond to a request for comment from CNBC. In recent weeks, many American lawmakers have also taken issue with the reported rollback of restrictions on Nvidia's H20 chips, warning they will advance Beijing's AI capability. This week, Nvidia reportedly placed orders for 300,000 H20 chipsets with contract manufacturer TSMC as it seeks to meet Chinese demand.
CNBC
7 minutes ago
- CNBC
CNBC Daily Open: Is India is the first to face Trump's 'secondary' tariff on Russia?
In the frenzied run-up to Friday, Aug. 1 — the day when U.S. President Donald Trump's new tariffs come into effect (no more delays!) — America's major trading partners such as Japan, the European Union and now, South Korea, have come to an agreement with the country. All of them will be subject to 15% tariffs on U.S. imports of their goods. But India? Not only has there not been a deal yet, Trump unilaterally imposed a 25% tariff on the South Asian country — a higher-than-expected number, as analysts had widely expected India to secure a favorable deal with America. Worse, the tariff will exist alongside an additional "penalty," which Trump said is the price India has to pay for its military and energy transactions with Russia. That essentially sounds like the "secondary tariff" Trump had previously threatened to slap on Moscow. In doing so, Trump's actions seem to be suggesting that the White House's trade policies is not based simply on the balance of trade, as Trump is fond of bringing up, or even how much he likes you — see his admiration of the U.K.'s King Charles and the country's 10% tariff rate. It's also about who your friends are. Essentially, Trump appears to be implying that, even if you are an up-and-coming influential figure, if you hang out with the uncool kids (who buy Russian arms), you can't sit with us. Perhaps Trump can afford to alienate allies because the U.S. economy is still unexpectedly strong. It expanded 3% in the second quarter, much higher than the 2.3% Dow Jones estimate, and Magnificent Seven earnings are handily topping estimates. Much has been discussed about the decline of American exceptionalism, but, for now, the U.S. is still the queen bee. The Federal Reserve holds interest rates. The Federal Open Market Committee voted 9-2 on the decision — the first time since late 1993 that multiple governors cast "no" votes. Chair Jerome Powell said the Fed still needs to see the effects of tariffs on inflation. India to pay 25% tariffs on exports to the U.S. On top of that, Trump said Wednesday that the South Asian country will also face a "penalty" for dealing with Russia. Separately, South Korea has reached a deal with the U.S. that will see it subject to a 15% tariff rate, Trump announced. Meta Platforms and Microsoft beat earnings expectations. Year on year, Meta's revenue grew 22%, while that of Microsoft increased 18%. During extended trading, Microsoft shares jumped more than 8% to put the company's market cap above $4 trillion. U.S. stocks are weighed by Fed conference. The S&P 500 fell Wednesday. Asia-Pacific markets mostly declined Thursday. Shares of Samsung Electronics retreated after the firm reported a 93.8% year-over-year plunge in profit. Chinese markets fell on disappointing data on the country's manufacturing activity in July. [PRO] Investors are aggressively borrowing money to buy stocks. It's a sign of market exuberance, according to Jim Reid, head of macro and thematic research at Deutsche Bank, who added that this pace was last seen during market bubbles. Trump's tariff deadline is near. Here's a look at countries that have a deal — and those that don't Come Friday, the world will have to contend with higher tariff rates from the Trump administration, raising the specter of even more economic uncertainty. For most countries, that can of worms has been kicked twice down the road, from "Liberation Day" on April 2, to July 9, and now to Aug. 1. Here are where things stand in global trade. —
