UN, Netherlands cancel LGBTQ event in Senegal after government warning
Anti-gay laws are in place in many conservative West African countries, including Senegal, where anyone who commits an 'act against nature' with someone of the same sex can be punished by up to five years in prison.
In a statement published on X, Senegal's foreign ministry on Friday said it had been informed of a film screening to be hosted by the UN and the Dutch embassy that would have been followed by 'discussions on LGBTI issues'.
The statement did not specify when the event was scheduled to occur.
'Accordingly, the government reserves the right to take any appropriate action against any organisers of such activities, and even against participants, whatever their origins, status or rank,' the foreign ministry statement said.
The activities of diplomatic missions and international organizations must comply with the country's regulations, it said.
Later on Friday, Seif Magango, spokesperson for the UN human rights office, told Reuters the event 'has been cancelled, and we continue to engage with the authorities'.
The Dutch foreign ministry said in a statement that, while the Netherlands 'stands for human rights and equal treatment' it had decided to cancel the event 'considering various factors'.
In 2022, Senegalese lawmakers rejected a bid to toughen anti-LGBTQ provisions in the penal code, saying the existing legislation was sufficiently clear.
Earlier this year, Ghana reintroduced a bill that could become one of Africa's most restrictive pieces of anti-LGBTQ legislation after an earlier attempt to enact it fell short because of legal challenges.
The fate of that legislation, which would need to be signed into law by the president, is unclear.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
15 minutes ago
- First Post
'Free speech will suffer': Musk's X locks horns with UK over online safety laws
While X has taken steps to comply, such as introducing age verification systems, it expressed concerns about the law's broader implications. read more A 3D-printed miniature model of Elon Musk and the X logo are seen in this illustration taken January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration The social media platform X, owned by US billionaire Elon Musk, has publicly criticised the UK's newly implemented Online Safety Act, warning that its broad regulations could pose a risk to free speech. The company issued a stark statement: 'Free speech will suffer. The Act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer.' New provisions of Online Safety Act The criticism follows the rollout of new provisions under the Online Safety Act, which took effect recently. A key requirement mandates that websites, including social media and adult content platforms, verify the age of users to shield children from explicit or violent material. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While X has taken steps to comply, such as introducing age verification systems, it expressed concerns about the law's broader implications. The platform cautioned that the threat of hefty financial penalties could push companies to over-censor content, stating, 'Many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression.' UK govt stands strong by legislation The UK government has stood by the legislation, stressing that non-compliant companies could face fines of up to £18 million or 10 per cent of their global turnover—a penalty that could reach £200 million for X. The UK's media regulator, Ofcom, has already launched investigations into dozens of websites failing to implement required safeguards and has reached out to US-based companies, including X, to remind them of their legal obligations. X also took issue with provisions allowing police to monitor social media for content deemed anti-immigrant, arguing that this 'oversteps the intended mission' of protecting children. The platform's concerns align with remarks from Elon Musk, who previously labelled the Online Safety Act as a 'suppression of the people.' Musk has also thrown his support behind a public petition calling for the law's repeal, which has garnered over 450,000 signatures. In response, Ofcom defended the regulations, clarifying that they do not mandate restricting legal content for adults. A spokesperson stated, 'They must carefully consider how they protect users' rights to freedom of expression while keeping people safe.'
Scroll.in
15 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Trump says he has ‘heard' India may stop buying Russian oil
United States President Donald Trump on Friday said that he has heard that India 'is no longer going to be buying oil' from Russia, ANI reported. 'I don't know if that's right or not, but that's a good step,' the news agency quoted Trump as saying. 'We will see what happens.' The comment came a day after Reuters reported on Thursday that Indian state-owned refiners had halted oil purchases from Russia over the past week. However, on Saturday, ANI quoted unidentified Indian officials as saying that the state-owned refiners are continuing to source oil from Russian suppliers. #WATCH | "I understand that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard, I don't know if that's right or not. That is a good step. We will see what happens..." says, US President Donald Trump on a question by ANI, if he had a number in mind for the… — ANI (@ANI) August 1, 2025 Trump's remarks on Friday also came just hours after India's Ministry of External Affairs responded to the Reuters report, stating that decisions on sourcing fuel are guided by market dynamics. 'We take decisions based on the price at which oil is available in the international market and depending on the global situation at that time,' ministry Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said at a press briefing. 'As for the specifics of your particular question, I am not aware of it. I don't have details of these specifics.' India and Russia share a 'steady, time-tested partnership ', he added. 'Our ties with any country stand on their merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country,' Jaiswal said. India's clarification on Friday came two days after Trump threatened to impose a ' penalty ' on New Delhi for buying a large portion of its military equipment and fuel from Russia amid the war on Ukraine. The penalty would be in addition to the 25% levy Washington announced on goods imported from India, as part of the so-called reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries that have not negotiated separate trade agreements with it. While the tariffs will take effect on August 7, the executive order signed by Trump on Thursday made no mention of the 'penalty'. On Thursday, Trump said that he does not care about 'what India does with Russia' and that 'they can take their dead economies down together, for all I care'. 'We have done very little business with India, their tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world,' Trump said on social media. 'Likewise, Russia and the USA do almost no business together.' On Wednesday evening, India's commerce ministry said that New Delhi was studying the implications of the US' decision, and that it would take all steps necessary to secure national interests.
NDTV
44 minutes ago
- NDTV
US Nuclear Submarine Programme: Facts, Impact And All You Need To Know
US President Donald Trump announced on August 1 that he had instructed two nuclear submarines to be repositioned to what he termed 'the appropriate regions,' in response to recent comments from former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. The statement, made through social media, has sparked concerns over the escalating rhetoric between the two nuclear powers. Trump's directive follows Medvedev's reminder that Russia retains Cold War-era nuclear strike capabilities, a statement made after Trump warned him to "watch his words". "Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev ... I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that," Trump said in his post. What is the move all about Trump's move is seen largely as a symbolic flex of military muscle rather than a shift in defence posture. Security experts, cited by Reuters, said that the US already maintains a continuous underwater presence with its fleet of nuclear submarines. The Ohio-class submarines, which form the backbone of the US sea-based nuclear deterrent, are capable of launching Trident II D5 ballistic missiles, each with multiple thermonuclear warheads that can reach targets over 4,600 miles away. Of the 14 Ohio-class subs in the fleet, between eight and 10 are usually deployed at any given time, according to the Nuclear Threat Initiative. Despite Trump's tone, current US officials reportedly do not view Medvedev's remarks as a credible threat. According to Reuters, his comments have not prompted any tangible shifts in military readiness. But experts warn that such rhetoric carries weight, especially in the context of strained relations between Washington and Moscow. Russian officials, while not escalating the situation further, have responded with assertions of their own. Viktor Vodolatsky, a senior member of the Russian State Duma, dismissed Trump's announcement, claiming that Russian submarines already have control over the regions where the American subs were said to be headed. America's Nuclear Submarine Fleet The US maintains a powerful and persistent underwater presence through its nuclear-powered submarine fleet, which plays a major role in national defence and global deterrence. The broader US submarine force comprises four nuclear-powered classes: Ohio, Virginia, Seawolf, and Los Angeles. According to Reuters, security experts note that this underwater force is constantly active, with the Ohio-class submarines forming the core of America's sea-based nuclear capability. Each of the 14 Ohio-class ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) is capable of launching Trident II D5 missiles, equipped with multiple thermonuclear warheads that can strike targets over 4,600 miles away. Usually, between eight and 10 of these subs are deployed at any given time, as per the Nuclear Threat Initiative, reported Reuters. The Virginia, Seawolf and Los Angeles-class vessels, all designated as attack submarines (SSNs), are built for offensive operations. They can track enemy submarines, support aircraft carriers and land forces, and conduct surveillance missions. Tensions between the US and Russia remain high, exacerbated by the ongoing war in Ukraine and what Trump perceives as President Vladimir Putin's unwillingness to negotiate an end to the conflict.
